wtf a recessed maxilla is ideal? STUDY

[homo_faber]

Looksmax - Does double jaw correct flat cheekbones and negative orbital vector?

Or would modified oblique lefort 3 be more of a surefire way to fix these issues?

lookism.net

interesting study on the relation of maxilla and cheekbones:

Background​

This study aimed to investigate dental student’s perception of facial attractiveness with regard to different combinations of anteroposterior malar-jaw positions using 3-dimensional (3-D) reconstructed images of subjects.

Methods​

Two Chinese young adults (1 male and 1 female) with straight profiles and average malar projections were selected for the study. 3-D facial images and cone-beam computed tomography images of these two subjects were superimposed using 3-D imaging software. Lateral and oblique views of nine different images were created by moving the maxillomandibular complex and/or zygomatic bone by 4 mm either forward or backward along the sagittal plane. One hundred three undergraduate dental students (n = 24, 33, and 46 students from the Year 3, 4, and 5, respectively) then scored lateral and 45° oblique view images of the newly reconstructed faces.

Results​

In the present study, images with a neutral malar and retruded jaws were found to be the most attractive in both male and female subjects. In addition, the Protruded malar (PM) group (p < 0.001), and the Retruded Jaws (RJ) group were rated more attractive (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the Relatively Prominent malar (RP) group was rated more attractive (p < 0.001) when malar-jaw relative positions were compared.

Conclusion​

This study shows that a neutral or a protruded malar favours facial attractiveness in both Chinese male and female subjects. Therefore, an appropriate relationship between malar projection and lower facial convexity should be taken into consideration while designing the orthodontic/orthognathic treatment plans for enhanced aesthetic outcomes.

https://head-face-med.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13005-020-00223-5

 

[Deleted member 6403]

Chinese

 

[homo_faber]

why are the pictures not working ffs

 

[homo_faber]

this is groundbreaking

dr. sailer on suicide watch

 

[Protégé]

Makes sense to me, the protruding convex mouths look repulsive because Asians' middle and upper thirds are not projected enough in relation to them.

 

[homo_faber]

Makes sense to me, the protruding convex mouths look repulsive because Asians' middle and upper thirds are not projected enough in relation to them.

@lilhorizontal32

 

[pizza]

i hate studies

 

[Deleted member 2729]

Don't even need to read the studie to know its bullshit

 

[betamanlet]

i hate studies

Truly science was a mistake

 

[lilhorizontal32]

@lilhorizontal32

whats the tag for?

 

[homo_faber]

whats the tag for?

the study is about relation zygos - maxilla in a broader sense aka o-curve

 

[lilhorizontal32]

the study is about relation zygos - maxilla in a broader sense aka o-curve

yeah will keep this in mind when I decide whether or not to get bimax

 

[Rabbi]

Looksmax - Does double jaw correct flat cheekbones and negative orbital vector?

Or would modified oblique lefort 3 be more of a surefire way to fix these issues?

lookism.net

interesting study on the relation of maxilla and cheekbones:

Background​

This study aimed to investigate dental student’s perception of facial attractiveness with regard to different combinations of anteroposterior malar-jaw positions using 3-dimensional (3-D) reconstructed images of subjects.

Methods​

Two Chinese young adults (1 male and 1 female) with straight profiles and average malar projections were selected for the study. 3-D facial images and cone-beam computed tomography images of these two subjects were superimposed using 3-D imaging software. Lateral and oblique views of nine different images were created by moving the maxillomandibular complex and/or zygomatic bone by 4 mm either forward or backward along the sagittal plane. One hundred three undergraduate dental students (n = 24, 33, and 46 students from the Year 3, 4, and 5, respectively) then scored lateral and 45° oblique view images of the newly reconstructed faces.

Results​

In the present study, images with a neutral malar and retruded jaws were found to be the most attractive in both male and female subjects. In addition, the Protruded malar (PM) group (p < 0.001), and the Retruded Jaws (RJ) group were rated more attractive (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the Relatively Prominent malar (RP) group was rated more attractive (p < 0.001) when malar-jaw relative positions were compared.

Conclusion​

This study shows that a neutral or a protruded malar favours facial attractiveness in both Chinese male and female subjects. Therefore, an appropriate relationship between malar projection and lower facial convexity should be taken into consideration while designing the orthodontic/orthognathic treatment plans for enhanced aesthetic outcomes.

https://head-face-med.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13005-020-00223-5

Recessed maxilla is ideal because the hair looks more forward grown in contrast and it’s the only forward growth that matters

 

[homo_faber]

over