You don't have to have model tier looks, for decent amount of options. "Just" Being top 25% overall seems good enough also

[eduardkoopman]

This dude, has a good body and good face. But nothing model tier like. This is good enough.
I guess this is PSL5? And PSL5 seems good enough then.

 

[diggbicc]

He is in the PSL 4.5 range and you are right. Beyond 4PSL arguably even as low as 3.75 PSL it is all about sex appeal maxxing. Ofc at 3.75-4 PSL you better be above 6' as a starting base or else it's absolutely over. The higher you go up to 6PSL the more you can get away with size(height x frame x dick)

Arguably a PSL 4 guy that is 6'2" and rrt maxed, veneers, voice, and has top tier body can slay as much if not more than a PSL 6 prettyboy.

 

[Deleted member 3043]

imo he is 5.5+

 

[Chadeep]

He is in the PSL 4.5 range and you are right. Beyond 4PSL arguably even as low as 3.75 PSL it is all about sex appeal maxxing. Ofc at 3.75-4 PSL you better be above 6' as a starting base or else it's absolutely over. The higher you go up to 6PSL the more you can get away with size(height x frame x dick)

Arguably a PSL 4 guy that is 6'2" and rrt maxed, veneers, voice, and has top tier body can slay as much if not more than a PSL 6 prettyboy.

Be Chico or Rope

 

[eduardkoopman]

I guess this is PSL5?

He is in the PSL 4.5 range and you are right. Beyond 4PSL arguably even as low as 3.75 PSL it is all about sex appeal maxxing. Ofc at 3.75-4 PSL you better be above 6' as a starting base or else it's absolutely over. The higher you go up to 6PSL the more you can get away with size(height x frame x dick)

Arguably a PSL 4 guy that is 6'2" and rrt maxed, veneers, voice, and has top tier body can slay as much if not more than a PSL 6 prettyboy.

imo he is 5.5+

PSL rating, is confusing as hell to me.

I understand better: Top ..%, aka decile.
Then I at least can guestimate, well out of 100 of people I come about in real life; about 25% are equal or better looking, and 75% are worse looking

 

[Deleted member 3043]

PSL rating, is confusing as hell to me.

I understand better: Top ..%, aka decile.
Then I at least can guestimate, well out of 100 of people I come about in real life; about 25% are equal or better looking, and 75% are worse looking

i see. imo he is top 10/100

 

[eduardkoopman]

i see. imo he is top 10/100

Facially top 25%. Body also top 10%. Combined the 2 factors, You might be right it's top 10%.

 

[RAITEIII]

Where's the 5 psl and jfl at them subhuman foids.

 

[Deleted member 3043]

Facially top 25%. Body also top 10%. Combined the 2 factors, You might be right it's top 10%.

no no imo he is really gl . but now unsure

Where's the 5 psl and jfl at them subhuman foids.

how much would you rate ?

 

[diggbicc]

PSL rating, is confusing as hell to me.

I understand better: Top ..%, aka decile.
Then I at least can guestimate, well out of 100 of people I come about in real life; about 25% are equal or better looking, and 75% are worse looking

70th% overall is enough imo if you are super NT to slay
65th% overall is enough imo if to LTR
85th% overall is enough imo if you mildly NT to slay
90th% overall is enough imo if you are not NT to slay

Ofc assumption is that you are slaying LTRing 50th percentile or above females, the lower you go the more you can slash of from the requirements and the higher you go the more your requirements add up.

For example, 99th percentile overall adn very NT is required to slay ig stacies in top social circles.

 

[Moggy]

Status halo, he should be posting here with us, and not slaying 38 year old soccer moms.

 

[Xander578]

If u don't have model tier looks u should rope

 

[RAITEIII]

no no imo he is really gl . but now unsure

how much would you rate ?

Less than 5 more than 4, the rest is semantic tbh

 

[crosshold]

keep in mind thats a british show and british people are fucking subhuman so their standards are relatively lower

 

[mikeock]

Guys here overanalyse. Beauty is typically judged on the spot within a few seconds of seeing the person. This guy passes that spot test for being gl

 

[homesick]

Am i the one one who thinks pretty much all those women are hideous

wouldnt date a single one of them wtf
Btw Im realizing how that most of those women are 30 y/o+++. Ofc at that age, when they are looking for a provider, looks become less important. NOW they want someone with good income, well,- a man who can provide for her and her family.

However, if you want to date the younger women, (16)18-23 yr old, looks is more important. money and carreer not so much.

Do you want a woman who wants you for YOU or what you provide?

 

[Deleted member 5683]

You don't need model looks to be Chad they are different things

 

[PURE ARYAN GENETICS]

This dude, has a good body and good face. But nothing model tier like. This is good enough.
I guess this is PSL5? And PSL5 seems good enough then.

nice, when I finally ascend I will have a harem of 40 year old roasties to choose from

 

[homesick]

nice, when I finally ascend I will have a harem of 40 year old roasties to choose from

all these women got dicked by Chads in their 20s, and now when Chads dont want them nomore, ofc they lower their standards

bluepill post! '
stop this propoganda

looks matters ffs if u want prime women

 

[eduardkoopman]

Am i the one one who thinks pretty much all those women are hideous

wouldnt date a single one of them wtf
Btw Im realizing how that most of those women are 30 y/o+++.

I didn't even notice that before. But I looke the clip. Most are in their 20's and also a bunch in their 30's. More late 20's, then young 20's I think.

That said. I think looks keep being important always for women. They won't lower their standards that much as they age. They will lower it some, reluctantly. But will only react enthusistaicly, when a dude looks good enough. Not for some unattractive or normie looking beta-buxxer.

Ofc at that age, when they are looking for a provider, looks become less important. NOW they want someone with good income, well,- a man who can provide for her and her family
Do you want a woman who wants you for YOU or what you provide?
.

I don't think they got excited for that dude, because of his (Maybe?) Betabuxxing qualities. But for his looks. So in this case, I do think they liked him for "him", instead of likeing him for his money/betabuxxing.

However, if you want to date the younger women, (16)18-23 yr old, looks is more important. money and carreer not so much.

Why people here assume, that dude has carreer or money? He might be a brokeas hell.
This dude likely also has good enough looks to be able to score with the 18-23 year old women crowd. But he will have a more difficult time, likely,because women are at peak value from 18-23, so these aged women have more options.

all these women got dicked by Chads in their 20s, and now when Chads dont want them nomore, ofc they lower their standards

bluepill post! '
stop this propoganda

looks matters ffs if u want prime women

This dude ain't good looking enough, to score rpime women you say? I dunno if you are right about that at all. He might do just fine with the prime women as well. Thsi dude is imo overall Chadlite teritory, so he should be able to bang/get women any age group. Also prime women.

nice, when I finally ascend I will have a harem of 40 year old roasties to choose from

For scoring prime women; ALSO. A man his age, is not so relevant.
ALL (or most) that matters: How Attractive/Hot/Good Looking you are!. If you look hot/attractive/sexy as a 35 year old dude, You can score about as much prime women as a 25 year old dude that looks hot.

Source:

:"Attractive 34 year old Guy matched with 18.9% of the women under 27 years old he swiped right on. This is only slightly less than Attractive 26 year old Guy. The average age of these women was 23.7 and the average age of his matches was 24.3. Attractive 34 year old Guy didn’t pay much, if any, penalty for being 10 years older than the average female on Tinder. Apparently for males attractive is attractive at any age."

 

[homesick]

I didn't even notice that before. But I looke the clip. Most are in their 20's and also a bunch in their 30's. More late 20's, then young 20's I think.

That said. I think looks keep being important always for women. They won't lower their standards that much as they age. They will lower it some, reluctantly. But will only react enthusistaicly, when a dude looks good enough. Not for some unattractive or normie looking beta-buxxer.

I don't think they got excited for that dude, because of his (Maybe?) Betabuxxing qualities. But for his looks. So in this case, I do think they liked him for "him", instead of likeing him for his money/betabuxxing.


Why people here assume, that dude has carreer or money? He might be a brokeas hell.
This dude likely also has good enough looks to be able to score with the 18-23 year old women crowd. But he will have a more difficult time, likely,because women are at peak value from 18-23, so these aged women have more options.

This dude ain't good looking enough, to score rpime women you say? I dunno if you are right about that at all. He might do just fine with the prime women as well. Thsi dude is imo overall Chadlite teritory, so he should be able to bang/get women any age group. Also prime women.



For scoring prime women; ALSO. A man his age, is not so relevant.
ALL (or most) that matters: How Attractive/Hot/Good Looking you are!. If you look hot/attractive/sexy as a 35 year old dude, You can score about as much prime women as a 25 year old dude that looks hot.

Source:

:"Attractive 34 year old Guy matched with 18.9% of the women under 27 years old he swiped right on. This is only slightly less than Attractive 26 year old Guy. The average age of these women was 23.7 and the average age of his matches was 24.3. Attractive 34 year old Guy didn’t pay much, if any, penalty for being 10 years older than the average female on Tinder. Apparently for males attractive is attractive at any age."

I totally get your point, I was in a rush when I wrote that last post
However, remember that one of the main struggles today for the average Joe today is to even meet women in person. Many couples today meet online (tinder, happn, other dating apps) (About four in 10 heterosexual couples (39%) who got together in 2017 met online, according to a new working paper from researchers at Stanford University and the University of New Mexico.)
and like you know, on online dating women tend to raise their standards, while in the clip they see the guy in real life, which is on the rarer side in 2020. so i still think looks is extremely important if u want to slay top tier women in their prime

But the guy in the clip has no big flaws, and overall good harmony, good height, and has decent charisma so yea that is enough IRL, but not tinder

 

[Deleted member 275]

imo he is 5.5+

This. I was rated PSL5 here and he objectively mogs me tbh, not by much. He's like 5.5 so that's like top 10%. Ofcourse that's good enough lol.

Also he looksmogs most of those women in that show to oblivion. I wouldn't date at least half of them and he's better looking than me so probably has higher standards aswell.

 

[OverForMe]

In 2012 thats how woman reacted to average men
ITS OVER IN 2020