You have a BETTER CHANCE with girls you like than you think

[s3emblance]

Humans are naturally attracted to people they percieve as within their SMV-range (within conventional hypergamous standards ie. 70th percentile male and 55th percentile female with mutual attraction). This is a evolution-mediated technique to maximize reproductive chances.

For this reason, the people you find particularly attractive (as in a crush-like attraction, not some objective analysis) are much more likely to be attracted to you than you think.

TO DEMONSTRATE THIS POINT: It's common that people develop feelings for others when they are aware that the person they are attracted to may be less objectively attractive as others around them. In high school, you probably had a crush on a girl while knowing that people you DIDN'T have some obsession with were actually more attractive. This was because you subconsciously percieved her attraction to be very slightly less or equal to your own.

 

[BeaterSupremer]

thanks for the life fuel

 

[s3emblance]

thanks for the life fuel

ofc bradar

 

[Jordan Barrett]

ofc bradar

 

[johnxz]

Humans are naturally attracted to people they percieve as within their SMV-range (within conventional hypergamous standards ie. 70th percentile male and 55th percentile female with mutual attraction). This is a evolution-mediated technique to maximize reproductive chances.

For this reason, the people you find particularly attractive (as in a crush-like attraction, not some objective analysis) are much more likely to be attracted to you than you think.

TO DEMONSTRATE THIS POINT: It's common that people develop feelings for others when they are aware that the person they are attracted to may be less objectively attractive as others around them. In high school, you probably had a crush on a girl while knowing that people you DIDN'T have some obsession with were actually more attractive. This was because you subconsciously percieved her attraction to be very slightly less or equal to your own.

actual lifefuel appreciate it brother

 

[La Vita]

 

[Vvx16]

This only happens when u get no pussy, yeah if you have 0 girls and 1 show you love, that all u got, you either have it or not, and due to our reproductive need, if she is not super ugly or weird, u may pick her, but this dont apply do the average women. By nature women have simps, its literally parental investment(meaning that women need 9months for the baby while men 1 minute, therefore they are more important in the reproduction and men are the sex/gender who needs to show and be the good guy actively) , so a out of 10 guys, a women would pick the best looking one. This apply to average guys not to average girls

 

[Dolorous]

Humans are naturally attracted to people they percieve as within their SMV-range (within conventional hypergamous standards ie. 70th percentile male and 55th percentile female with mutual attraction). This is a evolution-mediated technique to maximize reproductive chances.

For this reason, the people you find particularly attractive (as in a crush-like attraction, not some objective analysis) are much more likely to be attracted to you than you think.

TO DEMONSTRATE THIS POINT: It's common that people develop feelings for others when they are aware that the person they are attracted to may be less objectively attractive as others around them. In high school, you probably had a crush on a girl while knowing that people you DIDN'T have some obsession with were actually more attractive. This was because you subconsciously percieved her attraction to be very slightly less or equal to your own.

i'm severely retarded, can you explain this in a simpler way

 

[s3emblance]

i'm severely retarded, can you explain this in a simpler way

you are attracted to people (only in like an involuntary crush-like way) who you neither mog nor get mogged by

that gives you a much higher chance of success

 

[s3emblance]

nope, this is not mainstream dating advice

this is simply recognition of evolutionary patterns and how we're designed to maximize reproductive success by undervaluing (or ignoring) those who are significantly more attractive than us

 

[La Vita]

.

 

[La Vita]

nope, this is not mainstream dating advice

this is simply recognition of evolutionary patterns and how we're designed to maximize reproductive success by undervaluing (or ignoring) those who are significantly more attractive than us

Women want to date men who are a higher smv than them though

 

[s3emblance]

Women want to date men who are a higher smv than them though

Yes I absolutely recognized hypergamy, but hypergamy doesn’t extend to extreme differences because women know that they have significantly lower chance of success

Read my og writing carefully

 

[s3emblance]

This only happens when u get no pussy, yeah if you have 0 girls and 1 show you love, that all u got, you either have it or not, and due to our reproductive need, if she is not super ugly or weird, u may pick her, but this dont apply do the average women. By nature women have simps, its literally parental investment(meaning that women need 9months for the baby while men 1 minute, therefore they are more important in the reproduction and men are the sex/gender who needs to show and be the good guy actively) , so a out of 10 guys, a women would pick the best looking one. This apply to average guys not to average girls

The 10 guys you are talking about are all within a similar looks threshold—her assessment and comparison is simply within that like histogram range

 

[mangotimer]

Bluepilled cope

 

[s3emblance]

Bluepilled cope

Acknowledgement of human reproductive strategies?

Hypergamy obviously still exists within this model, and looks matter by far the most

 

[xanlack]

Humans are naturally attracted to people they percieve as within their SMV-range (within conventional hypergamous standards ie. 70th percentile male and 55th percentile female with mutual attraction). This is a evolution-mediated technique to maximize reproductive chances.

For this reason, the people you find particularly attractive (as in a crush-like attraction, not some objective analysis) are much more likely to be attracted to you than you think.

TO DEMONSTRATE THIS POINT: It's common that people develop feelings for others when they are aware that the person they are attracted to may be less objectively attractive as others around them. In high school, you probably had a crush on a girl while knowing that people you DIDN'T have some obsession with were actually more attractive. This was because you subconsciously percieved her attraction to be very slightly less or equal to your own.

No

 

[foid_annihilation]

Humans are naturally attracted to people they percieve as within their SMV-range (within conventional hypergamous standards ie. 70th percentile male and 55th percentile female with mutual attraction). This is a evolution-mediated technique to maximize reproductive chances.

For this reason, the people you find particularly attractive (as in a crush-like attraction, not some objective analysis) are much more likely to be attracted to you than you think.

TO DEMONSTRATE THIS POINT: It's common that people develop feelings for others when they are aware that the person they are attracted to may be less objectively attractive as others around them. In high school, you probably had a crush on a girl while knowing that people you DIDN'T have some obsession with were actually more attractive. This was because you subconsciously percieved her attraction to be very slightly less or equal to your own.

correction men are attracted to people within their smv range women want htn at least even if theyre a sub5 makeupcel