๕ඞChick3ncu1ry
Gymceling everyday
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2020
- Posts
- 24,815
- Reputation
- 21,313
Good-looking people would always be actors, celebrities, company presenters, Doctors, lawyers.
Ugly people always ended up as bulgar, janitor, food trucker, employee at most, with the exception of enginner and IT ofc.
Why you may be asking yourself? Well, it's like a a lifelong sequence or positive/negative feedback loop. Let's start from bulgar life's POV he is dirt poor because he is a pathogen to society just because his genetic is inferior(both looks, and cognitive function these two go hand in hand) so why would society reward him with monetary value. Whereas, good-looking people are objectively genetically superior(looks+ability to make change) have always been rewarded since youth ofc they are going to success in society.
Ugly people always ended up as bulgar, janitor, food trucker, employee at most, with the exception of enginner and IT ofc.
Why you may be asking yourself? Well, it's like a a lifelong sequence or positive/negative feedback loop. Let's start from bulgar life's POV he is dirt poor because he is a pathogen to society just because his genetic is inferior(both looks, and cognitive function these two go hand in hand) so why would society reward him with monetary value. Whereas, good-looking people are objectively genetically superior(looks+ability to make change) have always been rewarded since youth ofc they are going to success in society.