You're a Homosexual If You Think This Asian Girl Isn't a Stacy

[exo]

Autism through the roof. Nobody give a shit about your retarded measurements

said the sperg who shits out the same 3 retarded sudies everytime to prove that azn wymin are "desired"

 

[Deleted member 13787]

said the sperg who shits out the same 3 retarded sudies everytime to prove that azn wymin are "desired"

Nothing sperg about that.

 

[Orc]

I waist mog her.

 

[Deleted member 21044]

Autism through the roof. Nobody give a shit about your retarded measurements

Look at how recessed her jaw is jfl. And the horseface. Tranny tier stuff.

 

[Deleted member 27219]

Autism through the roof. Nobody give a shit about your retarded measurements

This nigga is saying women are meant to have 90° gonial angles

 

[Deleted member 13787]

Look at how recessed her jaw is jfl. And the horseface. Tranny tier stuff.

Nothing on her face is masculine you moron. I can easily eyeball her features, if they dont strike me as masculine, then theyre not. Recessed jaw is ideal on females, forward grown is tranny tier stuff.

 

[Deleted member 27219]

Nothing on her face is masculine you moron. I can easily eyeball her features, if they dont strike me as masculine, then theyre not. Recessed jaw is ideal on females, forward grown is tranny tier stuff.

He doesn't even know how anything about the traits he's talking about. He said this is a recessed downward grown maxilla, completely clueless

 

[Deleted member 13787]

He doesn't even know how anything about the traits he's talking about. He said this is a recessed downward grown maxilla, completely clueless

That's what happens when someone with 0 visual intelligence tries to discuss ortho facial traits.

 

[Deleted member 21735]

this forum is gay, they only like tomboish white girls and chads

 

[Deleted member 21044]

This nigga is saying women are meant to have 90° gonial angles

 

[Deleted member 21044]

He doesn't even know how anything about the traits he's talking about. He said this is a recessed downward grown maxilla, completely clueless

Put the pic in frankfurt plane dumb bluecel retard.

 

[Deleted member 27219]

View attachment 2153431

They are chemically malformed prepubescent boys, it's useless showing this as an example. It just supports that men are the only one who can have naturally low gonial angles

 

[Deleted member 21044]

They are chemically malformed prepubescent boys, it's useless showing this as an example. It just support that men are the only one who can have naturally low gonial angles

What?

 

[Deleted member 27219]

What?

No female skull ever had jaws like that. These things are the result of modern faggotry stop acting like udk

 

[Deleted member 21044]

No female skull ever had jaws like that. These things are the result of modern faggotry stop acting like udk

You are so retarded it's scary if you mean this unironically. (Reputation checks out).

There is not a single prehistoric female skull without a 90° gonial angle. It only developed due to degenerate modern habits like mouthbreathing and bad posture.

Coping mothbreather spotted @Grel Hellscream @5'7 zoomer @PURE ARYAN GENETICS.

 

[BrendioEEE]

Im not asian you white monkey

Vietnamese Asian Man (so-called Kinh)

 

[Deleted member 27219]

You are so retarded it's scary if you mean this unironically. (Reputation checks out).

View attachment 2153439

There is not a single prehistoric female skull without a 90° gonial angle. It only developed due to degenerate modern habits like mouthbreathing and bad posture.

Coping mothbreather spotted @Grel Hellscream @5'7 zoomer @PURE ARYAN GENETICS.

Except this is some ugly masculinized skull and probably forged. You can even tell that the chin + the whole jawbone is rounded and the forehead is flat. The skull doesn't match the ugly trannies you showed. Little zygo projection as well

 

[BrendioEEE]

On a side note, there's a phenomenon of some SEA females who actually (passably) looksmax to Korean, Chinese, Japanese stacies, but have much lower standars than the East Asians because they're third world.

If you genuinely want a good looking asian wife, I'd recommend start looking into that if you don't think you can pull a native high quality one. The bootleg third worlders are starting to maxx out and I'm sure their standards wont stay low forever.

 

[Deleted member 27219]

You are so retarded it's scary if you mean this unironically. (Reputation checks out).

View attachment 2153439

There is not a single prehistoric female skull without a 90° gonial angle. It only developed due to degenerate modern habits like mouthbreathing and bad posture.

Coping mothbreather spotted @Grel Hellscream @5'7 zoomer @PURE ARYAN GENETICS.

With most historic female skulls looking like this you can go carry this cope somewhere else. You love tranny looking women

 

[Deleted member 21044]

Except this is some ugly masculinized skull and probably forged. You can even tell that the chin + the whole jawbone is rounded and the forehead is flat. The skull doesn't match the ugly trannies you showed. Little zygo projection as well

You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Masculinised? What? Of course the "jaw bone" is rounded because females have inward gonions. Flat forehead is not sexually dimorphic it's related to cranial capacity. And it doesn't have little zygo projection what are you talking about.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

On a side note, there's a phenomenon of some SEA females who actually (passably) looksmax to Korean, Chinese, Japanese stacies, but have much lower standars than the East Asians because they're third world.

If you genuinely want a good looking asian wife, I'd recommend start looking into that if you don't think you can pull a native high quality one. The bootleg third worlders are starting to maxx out and I'm sure their standards wont stay low forever.

A ton of SEA zoomer girls look just as good as NEA ones.

 

[Deleted member 21044]

With most historic female skulls looking like this you can go carry this cope somewhere else. You love tranny looking women

View attachment 2153453

That's not a real skull bro.

 

[Deleted member 27219]

Put the pic in frankfurt plane dumb bluecel retard.
View attachment 2153433

He literally has alveolar prognatism you fucking retard

 

[Deleted member 27219]

That's not a real skull bro.

Human Female Asian Skull​

BC-211 $262.00​

This human female Asian skull was cast from an original specimen in a North American medical school forensic osteology teaching collection. Osteologic features supportive of Asian ancestry include moderate alveolar prognathism, flat nasal region, round/square anterior nasal aperture, lack of a nasal sill, no nasal gutter, round maxillary arcade, and short nasal spine. Osteologic features suggestive of female sex include the relative gracility of bony prominences, single frontal boss, smooth nasion and a round anteroinferior mandible. An osteological evaluation report is available for print and download here: BC-211-Report. 2-part skull (separate cranium & jaw).

 

[Deleted member 26116]

The amount of times I would fuck this woman...

 

[Deleted member 21044]

Human Female Asian Skull​

BC-211 $262.00​

This human female Asian skull was cast from an original specimen in a North American medical school forensic osteology teaching collection. Osteologic features supportive of Asian ancestry include moderate alveolar prognathism, flat nasal region, round/square anterior nasal aperture, lack of a nasal sill, no nasal gutter, round maxillary arcade, and short nasal spine. Osteologic features suggestive of female sex include the relative gracility of bony prominences, single frontal boss, smooth nasion and a round anteroinferior mandible. An osteological evaluation report is available for print and download here: BC-211-Report. 2-part skull (separate cranium & jaw).

The site is literally called Bone Clones.

Also jfl at 200 bc. Do you know when the agricultural revolition happened?

 

[Deleted member 13787]

You are so retarded it's scary if you mean this unironically. (Reputation checks out).

View attachment 2153439

There is not a single prehistoric female skull without a 90° gonial angle. It only developed due to degenerate modern habits like mouthbreathing and bad posture.

Coping mothbreather spotted @Grel Hellscream @5'7 zoomer @PURE ARYAN GENETICS.

Cope. Ancient iranian female skull, clearly way more than 90 degree tranny angle.

Virtual Museum

Free Html5 Templates and Free Responsive Themes Designed by Kimmy | zerotheme.com

arts.cuhk.edu.hk

 

[BrendioEEE]

 

[Deleted member 27219]

The site is literally called Bone Clones.

Also jfl at 200 bc. Do you know when the agricultural revolition happened?

This is the oldest, most masculine looking female skull I found on there. Even the anthropologist calls it "Masculinized female skull" and in the report it's literally listed as male. Stop the cope

 

[Deleted member 21044]

Cope. Ancient iranian female skull, clearly way more than 90 degree tranny angle.

Virtual Museum

Free Html5 Templates and Free Responsive Themes Designed by Kimmy | zerotheme.com

arts.cuhk.edu.hk

Clearly? You can't even see it.

 

[Deleted member 21044]

View attachment 2153461
This is the oldest, most masculine looking female skull I found on there. Even the anthropologist calls it "Masculinized female skull" and in the report it's literally listed as male. Stop the cope

The skull is from 197 bc and it's literally malfored. What are you trying to prove with this? Your retardation?

 

[Deleted member 13787]

Clearly? You can't even see it.

you can easily see it lmao.

 

[Deleted member 21044]

you can easily see it lmao.

Measure it then.

 

[Deleted member 27219]

The skull is from 197 bc and it's literally malfored. What are you trying to prove with this? Your retardation?

Those are codenames, not dates. And it's malformed because the woman was around the age of 70 when dead and missing teeth. I don't know what age these are from as it's not listed. The anthropologist calling it masculinized should be enough evidence that these traits aren't normal on a woman, you're retarded otherwise if not

 

[Deleted member 27219]

The skull is from 197 bc and it's literally malfored. What are you trying to prove with this? Your retardation?

A skull dated 31k years ago from the czech republic btw

See the striking facial reconstruction of a Paleolithic woman who lived 31,000 years ago

The remains were previously thought to be male.

www.livescience.com

Tranny cope disproven

 

[Deleted member 21044]

Those are codenames, not dates. And it's malformed because the woman was around the age of 70 when dead and missing teeth. I don't know what age these are from as it's not listed. The anthropologist calling it masculinized should be enough evidence that these traits aren't normal on a woman, you're retarded otherwise if not

They're calling it "masculin" because of forehead, mastoids, gonions and nuchal line. Not the gonial angle.

You're posting random bullshit from a totally different time period and you haven't proven anytnhing so far so keep coping.

You rn:

 

[Deleted member 27219]

They're calling it "masculin" because of forehead, mastoids, gonions and nuchal line. Not the gonial angle.

You're posting random bullshit from a totally different time period and you haven't proven anytnhing so far so keep coping.

You rn:
View attachment 2153493

They are calling it masculine because of the brow bone, occiputal spur, zygo growth and jaw.
Homosexual coper. Above article disproves your desperate bullshit

 

[Deleted member 21044]

A skull dated 31k years ago from the czech republic btw

See the striking facial reconstruction of a Paleolithic woman who lived 31,000 years ago

The remains were previously thought to be male.

www.livescience.com

Tranny cope disproven

We had to reconstruct the skull and for that we used statistical data of average and projections extracted from about 200 CT scans of modern humans

You didn't even read the article you dumb cockroach. Stop bothering me with nonsesne and if you have any actual evidence for your braindead theory (you don't) then post it.

 

[Deleted member 21044]

They are calling it masculine because of the brow bone, occiputal spur, zygo growth and jaw.
Homosexual coper. Above article disproves your desperate bullshit

What parameters of the jaw tho? Gonial angle isn't one of them. If you actually read it you wouldn't embarrass yourself.

 

[Deleted member 27219]

You didn't even read the article you dumb cockroach. Stop bothering me with nonsesne and if you have any actual evidence for your braindead theory (you don't) then post it.

 

[Deleted member 21044]

Are you fucking retarded? The data from people is to DRAW THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE SOFT TISSUES. That's the actual 3d model of the skull.
View attachment 2153498

You 80 iq ape, read the stuff before you post it. Embarrassing.

Because the mandible (lower jaw) was missing, Moraes looked to existing data of modern-day human jaws to help fill in the blanks of what this individual might have looked like.

 

[Deleted member 27219]

You 80 iq ape, read the stuff before you post it. Embarrassing.

I don't bother that much with tranny copes, I post here for entertainment which is why I don't care for the cope. Anyways, I attached a skull from an ancient female found in a cave. Again, disproves your bs.

View attachment 2153498

 

[Deleted member 27219]

View attachment 2153498

In comparison to that, this is a male skull found around the same location

Actual 90 degree gonial angle and it's because this is a male.
@Dr. Bruh

 

[Deleted member 21044]

I don't bother that much with tranny copes, I post here for entertainment which is why I don't care for the cope. Anyways, I attached a skull from an ancient female found in a cave. Again, disproves your bs.

The předmostí skulls are literally malformed. Look at the prognathism, look at the occupit. Even the wikipedia page admits there was variance - meaning epigenetic disturbance of development. It's been suggested that the tribe was cannibalistic. This is a worthless example.

 

[190cm90kg]

looks plastic especially her nose when smiling

 

[Deleted member 27219]

The předmostí skulls are literally malformed. Look at the prognathism, look at the occupit. Even the wikipedia page admits there was variance - meaning epigenetic disturbance of development. It's been suggested that the tribe was cannibalistic. This is a worthless example.

What a fucking cope. These skulls have perfect development. I will make a careful thread debunking all your skull bullshit soon.
The male is the one with a 90 degree gonial angle and you didn't address that because it'd destroy your cope. Classic modern day faggot, feel free to rest with your tranny copes if that is what fulfills you but please don't spread your utterly autistic takes any further.

Prognatism is found in all skulls around the world and it's literally one of the traits of european heritage, muh epigenetics.

 

[Deleted member 21044]

What a fucking cope. These skulls have perfect development. I will make a careful thread debunking all your skull bullshit soon.
The male is the one with a 90 degree gonial angle and you didn't address that because it'd destroy your cope. Classic modern day faggot, feel free to rest with your tranny copes if that is what fulfills you but please don't spread your utterly autistic takes any further.

The "male" one desn't even have a 90° gonial angle. It's 105 or more.

The předmostí skulls are literally studied because of how weird they are. Jfl. Far from perfect development.

Also explain why an angle higher that 90° would be "ideal" from a biomechanical perspective.

Do some research for your post and in the process you will find out i'm right.

 

[Deleted member 27219]

The "male" one desn't even have a 90° gonial angle. It's 105 or more.

View attachment 2153523

The předmostí skulls are literally studied because of how weird they are. Jfl. Far from perfect development.

Also explain why an angle higher that 90° would be "ideal" from a biomechanical perspective.

Do some research for your post and in the process you will find out i'm right.

Proof you don't even know how to measure skull angles. Utter embarrassment. The "muh epigenetic disturbance" is because he was comparing them through 26 different measurement to ancient Cro-Magnon, Skhul, Herto and Negro skulls to "determine the authenticity of the Out of Africa model"

Also explain why an angle higher that 90° would be "ideal" from a biomechanical perspective.

It's not about what is ideal, it's human dimorphism. It's like asking "in what way would smaller cheekbones or a shorter skull be ideal? "

Do some research for your post and in the process you will find out i'm right.

Yeah about time someone talks about how utterly wrong you are, you claim shit about angles yet you don't know how to measure them.

 

[Deleted member 21044]

Proof you don't even know how to measure skull angles. Utter embarrassment. The "muh epigenetic disturbance" is because he was comparing them through 26 different measurement to ancient Cro-Magnon, Skhul, Herto and Negro skulls to "determine the authenticity of the Out of Africa model

Measure the angle then.

It's not about what is ideal, it's human dimorphism. It's like asking "in what way would smaller cheekbones or a shorter skull be ideal? "

Do you even know what sexual dimorphism is? Can you explain it to me?

Also jfl at you calling me a faggot for liking proprely developed girls while you yourself are actually homosexual.

 

[Deleted member 27219]

Measure the angle then.

You don't measure an exact angle with the camera pointed down and sideways from it, the fact that you did just shows how you aren't credible. I did look through some of the skulls and to your credit some of them do look deformed, however the two I used as an example clearly weren't. Very clearly the angle is low and you are blind if you do not see this.

Do you even know what sexual dimorphism is? Can you explain it to me?

The difference between two sexes? What are you trying to achieve with this question?

Also jfl at you calling me a faggot for liking proprely developed girls while you yourself are actually homosexual.

You don't like properly developed "girls". You are into prepubescent boys. Lol at you for trying to use that joke post as some sort of a blow.

You can see that these two female skulls are properly developed. You have a modern female overlayed on top (cranium size and upper/lower jaw length proves superior development). The gonial angles are lower than that of modern females however the mandible is still higher in angle than a male and the entire mandible body has a round slope to it (among other female dimorphic traits).