#1 rl incel trait

[Big Daddy]

unhealthy obsession with planning, quantifying and categorizing, numbers, labeling, predicting, calculating everything

remembering this is so funny when i open this site and realize people are, WITHOUT AN OUNCE OF IRONY, arguing whether some average dude who is invisible to women anyway is a "hmmmmthnmtn" or a "mhmmtnhmntn"

 

[alpomer7]

#1 having no gf

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

NT pill is brutal

 

[Big Daddy]

NT pill is brutal

i remember your username from lookism. one of the more balanced users

 

[Big Daddy]

#1 having no gf

that's closer to chad trait than to incel one

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

i remember your username from lookism. one of the more balanced users

wasnt me

 

[Aristotélēs]

Also number 1 genius trait

 

[bourgeoizyzz]

pedestrian ratio, bro

 

[Big Daddy]

Also number 1 genius trait

View attachment 4407338

he was a midwit

 

[flatcheck213]

dude who is invisible to women anyway is a "hmmmmthnmtn" or a "mhmmtnhtn"

htn is invisible in 2025

 

[Big Daddy]

htn is invisible in 2025

i get that you are joking, but i feel bad for guys who take these terms seriously

 

[Aristotélēs]

he was a midwit

Nope. Leibniz was the coping midwit who could not handle the intellectual mog. It's very evident once you actually study how both arrived at calculas. The geometrical demonstrations of Newton are pure genius at work. Leibniz on the other hand just legged it with algebraic manipulations...

 

[Doesitmatter?]

#1 having no gf

#2 being 5'6 115 pounds

 

[Big Daddy]

Nope. Leibniz was the coping midwit who could not handle the intellectual mog. It's very evident once you actually study how both arrived at calculas. The geometrical demonstrations of Newton are pure genius at work. Leibniz on the other hand just legged it with algebraic manipulations...

you cant seriously think i wasnt being ironic when i called the actual jesus a midwit

 

[Aristotélēs]

you cant seriously think i wasnt being ironic when i called the actual jesus a midwit

It's not ironic in the context of Leibniz vs Newton. The dispute to authenticity & genius was REAL

 

[Big Daddy]

It's not ironic in the context of Leibniz vs Newton. The dispute to authenticity & genius was REAL

leibniz is underappreciated, but not to the extent where there is a question who the real G is