L
lilhorizontal32
Equinox
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2021
- Posts
- 2,532
- Reputation
- 3,028
1. Alfaro prefers a lefort 1 cut around the ANS point and this produces a different effect to doing CCW rotation like Arnett & Gunson, to avoid any unnecessary ANS advancement.
does anyone know the difference in the final aesthetic result with these 2 approaches and in which case would either be preferred?
Alfaro's lefort 1 cut for reference:
Normal lefort 1 cut:
Arnett and Gunson's CCW approach:
looksmax.org
2. if excess advancement of the ANS point is what causes the so called "chimp lips" or "monkey face", why not just do as much lefort 1 advancement as needed for a mogger side profile and just shave the ANS point down as some surgeons do? what are the downsides of this?
does anyone know the difference in the final aesthetic result with these 2 approaches and in which case would either be preferred?
Alfaro's lefort 1 cut for reference:
Normal lefort 1 cut:
Arnett and Gunson's CCW approach:
![looksmax.org](https://looksmax.org/img/twitter.png)
BIMAX - Monkey course
For people who are afraid to became Monkey with DJS i advise you this course of Dr.Arnett: At 11mn: -He compare straight BIMAX vs BIMAX CCW, and say that straight Bimax destroy ur face. He evend said the treatement plane (without CCW) is horrible At 35mn: -If you do straight advacenemt he...
2. if excess advancement of the ANS point is what causes the so called "chimp lips" or "monkey face", why not just do as much lefort 1 advancement as needed for a mogger side profile and just shave the ANS point down as some surgeons do? what are the downsides of this?