2 Bimax questions

L

lilhorizontal32

Equinox
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Posts
2,532
Reputation
3,028
1. Alfaro prefers a lefort 1 cut around the ANS point and this produces a different effect to doing CCW rotation like Arnett & Gunson, to avoid any unnecessary ANS advancement.

does anyone know the difference in the final aesthetic result with these 2 approaches and in which case would either be preferred?

Alfaro's lefort 1 cut for reference:

1639204634245
1639204649991


Normal lefort 1 cut:

1639204707528


Arnett and Gunson's CCW approach:


2. if excess advancement of the ANS point is what causes the so called "chimp lips" or "monkey face", why not just do as much lefort 1 advancement as needed for a mogger side profile and just shave the ANS point down as some surgeons do? what are the downsides of this?
 
  • +1
Reactions: subhuman incel, Lorsss and one job away
The point of cutting around the ANS is to avoid the nose upturning in cases where the nose is normal/upturned despite having a retruded maxilla. You're limited in movement since you're not moving your nose or paranasal area at all, so expanding past the orthognathic point will make you look even worse.

This is the first time I've seen this so I may be wrong and the effect on paranasal fullness is still present.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Acromegaly_Chad and one job away
The point of cutting around the ANS is to avoid the nose upturning in cases where the nose is normal/upturned despite having a retruded maxilla. You're limited in movement since you're not moving your nose or paranasal area at all, so expanding past the orthognathic point will make you look even worse.

This is the first time I've seen this so I may be wrong and the effect on paranasal fullness is still present.
So for me cutting around the ans is a negative since I want an upturn
 
can you do CCW along with cutting around the ANS
 
So for me cutting around the ans is a negative since I want an upturn
Yeah, I think you could benefit from a bit more fullness at the paranasal area and upturning of the nose.

Obviously I don't know the outcomes of this, but I'd assume the entire nasal structure is completely preserved, which isn't ideal for a lot of cases where the nose appears bigger/is downturned as a result of a recessed maxilla.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Duke of cumskins and one job away
The point of cutting around the ANS is to avoid the nose upturning in cases where the nose is normal/upturned despite having a retruded maxilla. You're limited in movement since you're not moving your nose or paranasal area at all, so expanding past the orthognathic point will make you look even worse.

This is the first time I've seen this so I may be wrong and the effect on paranasal fullness is still present.
so those with a nose "buried" in their face with nasolabial folds should have the ANS moved with the lefort cut?
 
so those with a nose "buried" in their face with nasolabial folds should have the ANS moved with the lefort cut?
Yes, I'd assume so. I have a droopy "buried" nose with folds so hopefully I'm right.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, subhuman incel and lilhorizontal32

Similar threads

Yahya
Replies
34
Views
2K
lestoa
lestoa
C
Replies
63
Views
3K
9898
9
Tabula Rasa
Replies
20
Views
878
champagnepapi
champagnepapi
A
Replies
27
Views
3K
panfacemogger
panfacemogger

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top