got.daim
π―ππ― ππππβ β ββ bio.site/0w0
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2024
- Posts
- 9,888
- Reputation
- 12,065
despite research showing that lolicon reduces the chances of pedophiles to interact with kids,
agecucks want those banned, claiming its a stepping stone to actual attempts.
so lets look at it logically.
pedophilia existed before animation and before the television.
so they have the vague argument that somehow lolicon promotes it as an additional brand new cause.
but if a pedophile jacks off to cartoons, it makes more sense that he will be to exhausted to go for example to the beach.
if lolicon is banned, PDFs will go to the beach, and they can't fap there, so they just gather images, and
while doing so they are horny and thinking about how to hack the system.
it's just common sense.
if someone has decent food at home, won't he be less likely to go to a restaurant?
compare that to someone who's kitchen is out of order, maybe his fridge broke down, is he not more likely to go eat outside?
most of the agecucks online are actually post farms, for entities who benefit from seeding fear into parents of fat ugly little girls.
most technocratic laws are powered by "to protect the children" BS, to take away basic freedoms from the populace.
it's just very weird that people get triggered over cartoons or plastic.
if cartoons are really victimizable, perhaps the government should invest in animators to draw comics where the victimized toons get therapy.
agecucks want those banned, claiming its a stepping stone to actual attempts.
so lets look at it logically.
pedophilia existed before animation and before the television.
so they have the vague argument that somehow lolicon promotes it as an additional brand new cause.
but if a pedophile jacks off to cartoons, it makes more sense that he will be to exhausted to go for example to the beach.
if lolicon is banned, PDFs will go to the beach, and they can't fap there, so they just gather images, and
while doing so they are horny and thinking about how to hack the system.
it's just common sense.
if someone has decent food at home, won't he be less likely to go to a restaurant?
compare that to someone who's kitchen is out of order, maybe his fridge broke down, is he not more likely to go eat outside?
most of the agecucks online are actually post farms, for entities who benefit from seeding fear into parents of fat ugly little girls.
most technocratic laws are powered by "to protect the children" BS, to take away basic freedoms from the populace.
it's just very weird that people get triggered over cartoons or plastic.
if cartoons are really victimizable, perhaps the government should invest in animators to draw comics where the victimized toons get therapy.
"
