Another hilarious W for China

A place like america has way less people than china. Every country has high rates of employee turnover. China can easily subsitute their employees because they have so many people. America cannot.
 
A place like america has way less people than china. Every country has high rates of employee turnover. China can easily subsitute their employees because they have so many people. America cannot.
Wouldn't that imply they would be less conservative with layoffs rather than more?
 
Wouldn't that imply they would be less conservative with layoffs rather than more?
Yes that's my point. They can easily be non-conservative since they have x5 the population of america and know that the worker is gonna be subsituted anyway even if they quit. This cannot be guarranteed in america however.
 
Yes that's my point. They can easily be non-conservative since they have x5 the population of america and know that the worker is gonna be subsituted anyway even if they quit. This cannot be guarranteed in america however.
But they are being conservative by making it illegal to fire employees over AI
 
But they are being conservative by making it illegal to fire employees over AI
What I meant was that they were less conservative with their workers.

They can be conservative and not use AI since they don't need to worry about employee's leaving, they'll always have another person to do the work.
the US or any other country cant be the same since they dont have a massive population to have every one of these jobs filled
 
  • +1
Reactions: hypernormie
What I meant was that they were less conservative with their workers.

They can be conservative and not use AI since they don't need to worry about employee's leaving, they'll always have another person to do the work.
the US or any other country cant be the same since they dont have a massive population to have every one of these jobs filled
Ah I see, yes I agree
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL
something like anthropic and gemini only use your data if you manually click the feedback options
ChatGPT maker OpenAI sued for sharing chatbot queries with Meta, Google
Image 34
 

Most users choose the default​

According to Aras Nazarovas, an information security researcher at Cybernews, this is why the allegations are unlikely to hold up in court.

“Using Google Analytics and Facebook’s tracking pixels is very common across most websites, no matter the industry. These are industry standard services, even though they’re definitely not very privacy-friendly,”
Aras Nazarovas.
“Seems like a pretty weak case to me. OpenAI’s privacy policy does disclose that it shares your information with a ton of third parties, including advertisement partners,” Nazarovas said.

“Using Google Analytics and Facebook’s tracking pixels is very common across most websites, no matter the industry. These are industry standard services, even though they’re definitely not very privacy-friendly.”

If you agree to any AI company’s privacy policy, you cannot reasonably expect truly private AI, in other words.
In that exact link you provided btw and thats chat gpts fault



^ a literal thiel funded company
 
What is ChatGPT's fault? You're saying it's their fault for not disclosing this obviously?
I thought most people knew that you aren't suppose to ask chatgpt personal questions if your asking it personal questions thats on you, if you haven't been using it over the years even .org threads were made about this about people killing themselves and being sued for it :feelsgood:, my point is reasonable security i don't care if its tracking my location or something but i think handling of data i listed anthropic and gemini as something reasonable. (Listed that mercor link for a reason) If you cared so much you would have invested in your own hardware for models regardless but most people that care about security are never going to do enough to be safe


i won't respond fruther because at this point your just egging on the civil liberty differences between me and you and by the title of this thread and your support for palantir we will continue to disagree on no point in debating further
 
I thought most people knew that you aren't suppose to ask chatgpt personal questions if your asking it personal questions thats on you, if you haven't been using it over the years even .org threads were made about this about people killing themselves and being sued for it :feelsgood:, my point is reasonable security i don't care if its tracking my location or something but i think handling of data i listed anthropic and gemini as something reasonable. (Listed that mercor link for a reason) If you cared so much you would have invested in your own hardware for models regardless but most people that care about security are never going to do enough to be safe


i won't respond fruther because at this point your just egging on the civil liberty differences between me and you and by the title of this thread and your support for palantir we will continue to disagree on no point in debating further
I think that's called moving the goalpost
 
  • +1
Reactions: gooner23

Similar threads

kbj
Replies
0
Views
6
kbj
kbj
polo7
Replies
38
Views
227
evexoria
evexoria
fallen442
Replies
6
Views
45
sub5withgf
sub5withgf
dxo
Replies
1
Views
67
dxo
dxo
eology
Replies
10
Views
57
blackpilljedi
blackpilljedi

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →