?
Cintia Dickerwho is the ginger one with the white dress
Where is she
That was her during her prime years.
Her hair is in a ponytail.
Is that how you treat your Swedish queens?
Chubby 404
All you do is complain with no counterexamples.
Show them front-facing, standing, and in candid.
Blue Brazil dress single handedly mogs the fuck out of all other women, insane facial aesthetics + tits genetics with low body fat
All white Brazilians
Nevermind I see Lima
Yeah sorry I just skimmed through. I love mixed phenotypes on foids and I find them very attractive.Average white Brazilian:
@Beetlejuice
You got more pics for brazil+ half the Swedish girls aren’t even Swedish looking
I think she's hot, but is she objectively very attractive? If she's added then these two need to be as well:
Exactly what I though
Are you gonna balance it out with better ones?
@MakinItHappenReturn thoughts?
Nevermind; he said it's not even worth his time communicating with you.
Okay. Now vote in the poll.
All brazilian models are rather white or mixt
Then pick a better picture of her.
And? She doesn't deserve to be in the list. Bad pick.
This is also another terrible pick. A girl picked for her unique look
Her cheeks are chubby indeed.
Because your choices were terrible, same for Russia in the other one.
That's a candid unlike all these highly professional runway shoots
Whats the point of these mogbattles when OP doesnt even do his research. It all relies on his choice of picking
Such as...?
You managed to post 15 pictures that do not meet the obvious criteria of:Because your choices were terrible, same for Russia in the other one.
These are better examples than the previous provided uggos
On a runway, the models don't even have a singular camera to angle and pose for. It's more candid than somebody taking a picture and saying "say cheese." You're still ignoring what else I said.
So?
Any, preferable a candid and not a bad runaway photo of her with ridiculously pale makeup.
Those are your own criterias and I I disagree with the last point
You're willing to write paragraphs and look up 15 examples that do not fit the theme of the OP, yet you're unwilling to find a single, better example?
By "candid" I'm referring to a photo taken by a third party that isn't going to be edited and wasn't necessarily taken with explicit consent from the subject (runway photographers aren't going around asking every single model for picture consent). At least half of the 15 pictures you linked are far from the definition of candid (focused modeling shoots/portfolios, digitally edited, selfies, etc.).Those are your own criterias and I I disagree with the last point
Most of them are candids and polaroids unlike you who didn't provide a SINGLE candid except for this one it's unbelievable how you can call that out when you provided fraud deluxe. And you can perfectly see their frontals in my examples except for like two.
Runways photos are worse than red carpet pictures/polaroids in natural lightning and light makeup
Runways photos are as far away as it gets from reality as possible second to professionally touched up editorials. Literally every single aspect of it is made to make them as good looking as possible. Unnatural lightning to accentuate their features and bone contours, using tricks to stay debloated temporary, professional makeup done by makeup stylists, their hair done by professional hairdressers and professionals capturing their faces with the highest quality of cameras. Makes anyone look better than what they do in candid here you have some familiar examples, do they look like this good IRL?
@looksmaxxer234 looking mogger mate
I provided one in my posts
Don't see how its relevant whether its taken or a third party or not, at the end of the day it's made to look as good as possible and they take several pictures and the best one is chosen. Now combined with all the previously mentioned frauding techniques it is a very unrealistic representation of what they would look like IRL if you ever met them in broad daylight. Only editorials or touched up photos I sent may be 1, 2, 7 and 15. The others are red carpets, selfies and half are modelling polaroids which is a far more realistic representation than runways
The issue with modeling polaroids/digitals is that the model is specifically posing at the camera with the most optimal angle (and with ideal lighting and focal length, sometimes) and the picture is taken over and over again until the best result is produced. Also, the notion that polaroids/digitals are "natural"-looking is ridiculous, especially nowadays.
It’s because he’s a worthless ethnic who has nothing better to do but put the aryan race down
Yeah sure that is one aspect but arguably just a drop in the ocean compared to all the artificial methods used on the runways, photographers there also take several photos so there will be flattering angles aswell and the models are trained to look as good as possible during their walks. If you compare a modelling polaroid to IRL its a much closer representation to what they look like than on the runway
Also isn’t this supposed to be comparison of pheno type over half these foids aren’t even aryan
Tbh 10 mil population vs 212mil its quite unfair, you could include all the Nordic countries 8 times over and it would be equal
bro also there like 50 millions young brazillian girls vs under 1 millions young swedish girls lol
Guess what iceland also has more beauty pageant wins then Brazil at 300k to 212 million
I'm arguably the exact opposite of ethnic.
Sweden has 1 Victoria's Secret angel; Brazil has 5. Also, Sweden has 6 models (IIRC) to have walked in their shows (4 of which are included in the OP), and Brazil has so many that I don't even know the number.
Dumbass how about you do some mathI'm arguably the exact opposite of ethnic.
Sweden has 1 Victoria's Secret angel; Brazil has 5. Also, Sweden has 6 models (IIRC) to have walked in their shows (4 of which are included in the OP), and Brazil has so many that I don't even know the number.
List of Victoria's Secret models - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
