Germania
Kraken
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2019
- Posts
- 5,612
- Reputation
- 8,156
Say you have a solid natty body, have been training for many years, have average genetics and you are making extremely little progress now aka you are stagnating. You don't aim to build tons of new mass, "only" 3-4 kilos (6-8 punds) in the right places, e.g. weak points, to let your physique peak aesthetically.
How could the approach to roids be here? If you have solid natural testosterone levels and are under 40, I see it as nonsensical to already continuously supply testosterone from the outside aka blast and cruise (TRT), especially if you are "just" aiming for a few pounds/kg more muscle.
In this scenario, would it make sense to run a few shorter cycles? Sure you will lose a lot of the new muscle mass, but if you already have a solid natural physique and could possibly hold on to 1-2k/2-4lbs after every cycle, that would be more than a good result.
Discuss!
How could the approach to roids be here? If you have solid natural testosterone levels and are under 40, I see it as nonsensical to already continuously supply testosterone from the outside aka blast and cruise (TRT), especially if you are "just" aiming for a few pounds/kg more muscle.
In this scenario, would it make sense to run a few shorter cycles? Sure you will lose a lot of the new muscle mass, but if you already have a solid natural physique and could possibly hold on to 1-2k/2-4lbs after every cycle, that would be more than a good result.
Discuss!