JewishNationalist
cutecel/10
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2026
- Posts
- 960
- Reputation
- 915
you can just say this about everything lolAren't these just philosophical works and personal interpretation of historical events rather than a fact?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
you can just say this about everything lolAren't these just philosophical works and personal interpretation of historical events rather than a fact?
Aren't these just philosophical works and personal interpretation of historical events rather than a fact1. geneology of morality by nietzsche
2. antichrist also by nietzsche
Then why make such points? Do you lack understanding?Ive literally practiced religion for quite a while.
How can you prove being gay is genetic when there are literally studies showing consuming certain media can alter your attractionthey still have a dick and just can imagine they fuck a man while fucking a woman in reality so they get horny
Not trueyou can just say this about everything lol
if you weren't already gay in genetic you wont become gay through consuming media lolHow can you prove being gay is genetic when there are literally studies showing consuming certain media can alter your attraction
it is just your personal interpretation, not factNot true
What genes determine you being gay? Being a printer requires good cognitive skills. Which are inheritedif you weren't already gay in genetic you wont become gay through consuming media lol
its like thinking somebody can be a good painter if they consume media enough
it kinda is genetic tho, there was a whole study and documentary about it its called the john/joan case, look it upAren't these just philosophical works and personal interpretation of historical events rather than a fact
Then why make such points? Do you lack understanding?
How can you prove being gay is genetic when there are literally studies showing consuming certain media can alter your attraction
Historical facts are based on sources like documents or other physical proof. Your historical facts is based on the interpretation of a single individualit is just your personal interpretation, not fact
i'm not sure what concrete genes but the fact being a good painter requires good cgonitive skills doesn't debunk what i said and it was an analogy anywayWhat genes determine you being gay? Being a printer requires good cognitive skills. Which are inherited
and how you can know if in those documents they are 100% facts rather than just personal interpretation?Historical facts are based on sources like documents or other physical proof. Your historical facts is based on the interpretation of a single individual
bro ur not tuff for pointing out fallacieskind of strawman ngl
Fellow Nietzsche enjoyer1. geneology of morality by nietzsche
2. antichrist also by nietzsche
my fav philosopher after aristotleFellow Nietzsche enjoyer
You don't. That's why you look at multiple sources to make sure it's right. Also Nietzsche was not a witness but a nigger spitting thoughtsand how you can know if in those documents they are 100% facts rather than just personal interpretation?

Nigga quoting nietzsche word for word, true though religion has an obsession with relabeling any form of conquest or show of strength as immoralBecause when you believe in ideas of afterlife and salvation or nirvana or moksha etc then you begin to develop a hatred for life on earth. You begin to hate strength, beauty, earthly joys. Thats why all religions promote these ascetic ideals and relabel it as inner strength. Its poverty. All major religions are pessimistic and life denying. Since you cant conquer this earth you begin to dream of something beyond the earth. Heaven or nirvana or whatever floats your boat. The disease wasnt cured. Which was a lack of earthly strength.
I am reading Zarathustra rn. Ngl a good book but he uses a rediculous amount of metaphorsmy fav philosopher after aristotle
in multiple sources there could also be just personal interpretations lolYou don't. That's why you look at multiple sources to make sure it's right. Also Nietzsche was not a witness but a nigger spitting thoughts![]()
i've read beyond good and evil. it has less metaphors but still rly complicated and last paragraph of it is terramogger. zarathustra resembles some art work rather than philosophical one to meI am reading Zarathustra rn. Ngl a good book but he uses a rediculous amount of metaphors
The study shows that it is not 100% genetic. So it can be manipulated whether you turn gay or not if you really want to fight against this disgusting thing.it kinda is genetic tho, there was a whole study and documentary about it its called the john/joan case, look it up
View attachment 5571358
Again not a witness. You can't compare his work to a historical document. Please use reasoningin multiple sources there could also be just personal interpretations lol
I am reading Zarathustra rn. Ngl a good book but he uses a rediculous amount of metaphors
Thoughts on Schopenhauer and Kant? already finished with Nietzsche and have been trying to get into more German continental philosophyi've read beyond good and evil. it has less metaphors but still rly complicated and last paragraph of it is terramogger. zarathustra resembles some art work rather than philosophical one to me
I am quoting him because my experience agrees with him 100% . I used to be quite pessimistic and hated life. Thats why religion appealed to me. Especislly buddhism. But i realised it was all a cope as i didnt have the strength to face life head on. I wanted a way out and religion offered it. Its for those who are too pussy to kill themselves. If one is really a pessimist then the only logical option is suicide. But these religions prevent suicide by introducing karma and afterlife and all that nonsense so that one doesnt kill himself after consuming their pessimistic rhetoric. They produce a neutered human being. Buddhism is literally the middle path i.e a neutered human. Devoid of passion. Devoid of creativityNigga quoting nietzsche word for word, true though religion has an obsession with relabeling any form of conquest or show of strength as immoral
seems like you don't use reasoning enough to comprehend that all historical documents are also personal interpretationsAgain not a witness. You can't compare his work to a historical document. Please use reasoning
Why ignore my reply?Fellow Nietzsche enjoyer
Used to like schopenhauer when i was a depressedcel. Now i have done a complete 180. Worty reading tho. Especially his essaysThoughts on Schopenhauer and Kant? already finished with Nietzsche and have been trying to get into more German continental philosophy
Lots of midwit atheists clearly have some kind of complex against authority. Lots of the times its daddy issues.I know Athiesm is the weird side because whenever religious people get into discussions with athiests it always ends up with the athiest nitpicking every minor sin the religious person does . Basically their rebuttal is constantly shoving in their faces that the religious person isn’t as perfect as God. Totally owned moment in their eyes worthy of a fedora tip.
bro to comprehend nietzsche you need shopenhauer, and to comprehend shopenhauer you need kant because their philosophies are interconnected. and on german philosophy start studying it with david hume (you wont comprehend kant without him) tbh although he isn't a german. then start reading kant and then shopenhauerThoughts on Schopenhauer and Kant? already finished with Nietzsche and have been trying to get into more German continental philosophy
Nice, buddhismI am quoting him because my experience agrees with him 100% . I used to be quite pessimistic and hated life. Thats why religion appealed to me. Especislly buddhism. But i realised it was all a cope as i didnt have the strength to face life head on. I wanted a way out and religion offered it. Its for those who are too pussy to kill themselves. If one is really a pessimist then the only logical option is suicide. But these religions prevent suicide by introducing karma and afterlife and all that nonsense so that one doesnt kill himself after consuming their pessimistic rhetoric. They produce a neutered human being. Buddhism is literally the middle path i.e a neutered human. Devoid of passion. Devoid of creativity
IMO I have always differed in belief in regards to this with Nietzsche, i think this sort of religiousness is only appealing to an already weak person and for majority of its history Christianity was shaped by europeans and influenced heavily despite going against their original teachings which is why medieval and early moden europe despite being so christian were incredibly martial and militaristic and were heavily alligned with a more noble morality despite operating under a christian veneerI am quoting him because my experience agrees with him 100% . I used to be quite pessimistic and hated life. Thats why religion appealed to me. Especislly buddhism. But i realised it was all a cope as i didnt have the strength to face life head on. I wanted a way out and religion offered it. Its for those who are too pussy to kill themselves. If one is really a pessimist then the only logical option is suicide. But these religions prevent suicide by introducing karma and afterlife and all that nonsense so that one doesnt kill himself after consuming their pessimistic rhetoric. They produce a neutered human being. Buddhism is literally the middle path i.e a neutered human. Devoid of passion. Devoid of creativity
I mean I understood most of genelogy, twilight of the idols and anti christ perfectly without them, but im not completely devoid of any knowledge on the philosophies, I mostly just read what appeals to me and then google and look up what confuses mebro to comprehend nietzsche you need shopenhauer, and to comprehend shopenhauer you need kant because their philosophies are interconnected. and on german philosophy start studying it with david hume (you wont comprehend kant without him) tbh although he isn't a german. then start reading kant and then shopenhauer
Dude why do you care so much about what others believe. Fuck discussionsI know Athiesm is the weird side because whenever religious people get into discussions with athiests it always ends up with the athiest nitpicking every minor sin the religious person does . Basically their rebuttal is constantly shoving in their faces that the religious person isn’t as perfect as God. Totally owned moment in their eyes worthy of a fedora tip.
You dont need to read the previous works of philosophers entirely. Just read some basics about them to get an idea.I mean I understood most of genelogy, twilight of the idols and anti christ perfectly without them, but im not completely devoid of any knowledge on the philosophies, I mostly just read what appeals to me and then google and look up what confuses me
ohhh ok but main nietzsche's concept is will to power though. you are in his philosophy without context if you didn't read shopenhauer (or at least summary on his philosophy)I mean I understood most of genelogy, twilight of the idols and anti christ perfectly without them, but im not completely devoid of any knowledge on the philosophies, I mostly just read what appeals to me and then google and look up what confuses me
I really like his ideas on will being an irrational essence that runs/powers our world , just need to get my lazy ass reading againUsed to like schopenhauer when i was a depressedcel. Now i have done a complete 180. Worty reading tho. Especially his essays
Ive read abt the idea from secondary sources but ya I need to expand my knowledge on itohhh ok but main nietzsche's concept is will to power though. you are in his philosophy without context if you didn't read shopenhauer (or at least summary on his philosophy)
Nick Fuentes fanbase is still trying to make being religious coolJfl at being religious in 2026.![]()
About what would you argue with a Gay Person?I know Athiesm is the weird side because whenever religious people get into discussions with athiests it always ends up with the athiest nitpicking every minor sin the religious person does . Basically their rebuttal is constantly shoving in their faces that the religious person isn’t as perfect as God. Totally owned moment in their eyes worthy of a fedora tip.
Jfl at being religious in 2026.![]()
Last time I checked mainstream media mocks and denies religion constantlyI dont listen to mainstream media
Fedora tip commentPeople with “morals” when held morally accountable:
there is no objective moralityAtheists always think they have the moral high ground lol but in reality without God there is no such thing as objective morality.
the only reason you think atheists are a monolithic conglomerate of retards is because you arent intelligent enough to be naturally placed in the vicinity of intelligent atheists.I know Athiesm is the weird side because whenever religious people get into discussions with athiests it always ends up with the athiest nitpicking every minor sin the religious person does . Basically their rebuttal is constantly shoving in their faces that the religious person isn’t as perfect as God. Totally owned moment in their eyes worthy of a fedora tip.
fucking realArguing with an athiest and a gay person feels exactly the same I’ve done both
they don't bring up new arguments, i just use them to study more about religion to know what response is best lolAtheist unironically are brainwashed
Trying have a civil respectful conversation with them
It’s either going to be slurs and insults or like you mentioned Ad hominem
They act like crying children when you confront them on being an atheist