Athiests are weirder than any religious person

atheists, christians and hindus are annoying as fuck
 
  • +1
Reactions: try2beme
1. geneology of morality by nietzsche
2. antichrist also by nietzsche
Aren't these just philosophical works and personal interpretation of historical events rather than a fact
Ive literally practiced religion for quite a while.
Then why make such points? Do you lack understanding?
they still have a dick and just can imagine they fuck a man while fucking a woman in reality so they get horny
How can you prove being gay is genetic when there are literally studies showing consuming certain media can alter your attraction
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Peubert
How can you prove being gay is genetic when there are literally studies showing consuming certain media can alter your attraction
if you weren't already gay in genetic you wont become gay through consuming media lol
its like thinking somebody can be a good painter if they consume media enough
 
if you weren't already gay in genetic you wont become gay through consuming media lol
its like thinking somebody can be a good painter if they consume media enough
What genes determine you being gay? Being a printer requires good cognitive skills. Which are inherited
 
  • +1
Reactions: Peubert
Aren't these just philosophical works and personal interpretation of historical events rather than a fact

Then why make such points? Do you lack understanding?

How can you prove being gay is genetic when there are literally studies showing consuming certain media can alter your attraction
it kinda is genetic tho, there was a whole study and documentary about it its called the john/joan case, look it up
1787833223822
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
it is just your personal interpretation, not fact
Historical facts are based on sources like documents or other physical proof. Your historical facts is based on the interpretation of a single individual
 
What genes determine you being gay? Being a printer requires good cognitive skills. Which are inherited
i'm not sure what concrete genes but the fact being a good painter requires good cgonitive skills doesn't debunk what i said and it was an analogy anyway
 
Historical facts are based on sources like documents or other physical proof. Your historical facts is based on the interpretation of a single individual
and how you can know if in those documents they are 100% facts rather than just personal interpretation?
 
and how you can know if in those documents they are 100% facts rather than just personal interpretation?
You don't. That's why you look at multiple sources to make sure it's right. Also Nietzsche was not a witness but a nigger spitting thoughts 🤣
 
Because when you believe in ideas of afterlife and salvation or nirvana or moksha etc then you begin to develop a hatred for life on earth. You begin to hate strength, beauty, earthly joys. Thats why all religions promote these ascetic ideals and relabel it as inner strength. Its poverty. All major religions are pessimistic and life denying. Since you cant conquer this earth you begin to dream of something beyond the earth. Heaven or nirvana or whatever floats your boat. The disease wasnt cured. Which was a lack of earthly strength.
Nigga quoting nietzsche word for word, true though religion has an obsession with relabeling any form of conquest or show of strength as immoral
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
yeah no shit they are illogical
 
  • +1
Reactions: try2beme
You don't. That's why you look at multiple sources to make sure it's right. Also Nietzsche was not a witness but a nigger spitting thoughts 🤣
in multiple sources there could also be just personal interpretations lol
 
I am reading Zarathustra rn. Ngl a good book but he uses a rediculous amount of metaphors
i've read beyond good and evil. it has less metaphors but still rly complicated and last paragraph of it is terramogger. zarathustra resembles some art work rather than philosophical one to me
 
  • +1
Reactions: AbandonShip
it kinda is genetic tho, there was a whole study and documentary about it its called the john/joan case, look it up
View attachment 5571358
The study shows that it is not 100% genetic. So it can be manipulated whether you turn gay or not if you really want to fight against this disgusting thing.
 
I am reading Zarathustra rn. Ngl a good book but he uses a rediculous amount of metaphors
i've read beyond good and evil. it has less metaphors but still rly complicated and last paragraph of it is terramogger. zarathustra resembles some art work rather than philosophical one to me
Thoughts on Schopenhauer and Kant? already finished with Nietzsche and have been trying to get into more German continental philosophy
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist and AbandonShip
Nigga quoting nietzsche word for word, true though religion has an obsession with relabeling any form of conquest or show of strength as immoral
I am quoting him because my experience agrees with him 100% . I used to be quite pessimistic and hated life. Thats why religion appealed to me. Especislly buddhism. But i realised it was all a cope as i didnt have the strength to face life head on. I wanted a way out and religion offered it. Its for those who are too pussy to kill themselves. If one is really a pessimist then the only logical option is suicide. But these religions prevent suicide by introducing karma and afterlife and all that nonsense so that one doesnt kill himself after consuming their pessimistic rhetoric. They produce a neutered human being. Buddhism is literally the middle path i.e a neutered human. Devoid of passion. Devoid of creativity
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hess
Again not a witness. You can't compare his work to a historical document. Please use reasoning
seems like you don't use reasoning enough to comprehend that all historical documents are also personal interpretations
 
Thoughts on Schopenhauer and Kant? already finished with Nietzsche and have been trying to get into more German continental philosophy
Used to like schopenhauer when i was a depressedcel. Now i have done a complete 180. Worty reading tho. Especially his essays
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hess and JewishNationalist
I know Athiesm is the weird side because whenever religious people get into discussions with athiests it always ends up with the athiest nitpicking every minor sin the religious person does . Basically their rebuttal is constantly shoving in their faces that the religious person isn’t as perfect as God. Totally owned moment in their eyes worthy of a fedora tip.
Lots of midwit atheists clearly have some kind of complex against authority. Lots of the times its daddy issues.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wasted time
Thoughts on Schopenhauer and Kant? already finished with Nietzsche and have been trying to get into more German continental philosophy
bro to comprehend nietzsche you need shopenhauer, and to comprehend shopenhauer you need kant because their philosophies are interconnected. and on german philosophy start studying it with david hume (you wont comprehend kant without him) tbh although he isn't a german. then start reading kant and then shopenhauer
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hess
I am quoting him because my experience agrees with him 100% . I used to be quite pessimistic and hated life. Thats why religion appealed to me. Especislly buddhism. But i realised it was all a cope as i didnt have the strength to face life head on. I wanted a way out and religion offered it. Its for those who are too pussy to kill themselves. If one is really a pessimist then the only logical option is suicide. But these religions prevent suicide by introducing karma and afterlife and all that nonsense so that one doesnt kill himself after consuming their pessimistic rhetoric. They produce a neutered human being. Buddhism is literally the middle path i.e a neutered human. Devoid of passion. Devoid of creativity
Nice, buddhism
 
  • JFL
Reactions: AbandonShip
I am quoting him because my experience agrees with him 100% . I used to be quite pessimistic and hated life. Thats why religion appealed to me. Especislly buddhism. But i realised it was all a cope as i didnt have the strength to face life head on. I wanted a way out and religion offered it. Its for those who are too pussy to kill themselves. If one is really a pessimist then the only logical option is suicide. But these religions prevent suicide by introducing karma and afterlife and all that nonsense so that one doesnt kill himself after consuming their pessimistic rhetoric. They produce a neutered human being. Buddhism is literally the middle path i.e a neutered human. Devoid of passion. Devoid of creativity
IMO I have always differed in belief in regards to this with Nietzsche, i think this sort of religiousness is only appealing to an already weak person and for majority of its history Christianity was shaped by europeans and influenced heavily despite going against their original teachings which is why medieval and early moden europe despite being so christian were incredibly martial and militaristic and were heavily alligned with a more noble morality despite operating under a christian veneer
 
  • +1
Reactions: AbandonShip
bro to comprehend nietzsche you need shopenhauer, and to comprehend shopenhauer you need kant because their philosophies are interconnected. and on german philosophy start studying it with david hume (you wont comprehend kant without him) tbh although he isn't a german. then start reading kant and then shopenhauer
I mean I understood most of genelogy, twilight of the idols and anti christ perfectly without them, but im not completely devoid of any knowledge on the philosophies, I mostly just read what appeals to me and then google and look up what confuses me
 
  • +1
Reactions: AbandonShip and JewishNationalist
I know Athiesm is the weird side because whenever religious people get into discussions with athiests it always ends up with the athiest nitpicking every minor sin the religious person does . Basically their rebuttal is constantly shoving in their faces that the religious person isn’t as perfect as God. Totally owned moment in their eyes worthy of a fedora tip.
Dude why do you care so much about what others believe. Fuck discussions
 
I mean I understood most of genelogy, twilight of the idols and anti christ perfectly without them, but im not completely devoid of any knowledge on the philosophies, I mostly just read what appeals to me and then google and look up what confuses me
You dont need to read the previous works of philosophers entirely. Just read some basics about them to get an idea.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hess and JewishNationalist
I mean I understood most of genelogy, twilight of the idols and anti christ perfectly without them, but im not completely devoid of any knowledge on the philosophies, I mostly just read what appeals to me and then google and look up what confuses me
ohhh ok but main nietzsche's concept is will to power though. you are in his philosophy without context if you didn't read shopenhauer (or at least summary on his philosophy)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hess
Used to like schopenhauer when i was a depressedcel. Now i have done a complete 180. Worty reading tho. Especially his essays
I really like his ideas on will being an irrational essence that runs/powers our world , just need to get my lazy ass reading again
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist and AbandonShip
ohhh ok but main nietzsche's concept is will to power though. you are in his philosophy without context if you didn't read shopenhauer (or at least summary on his philosophy)
Ive read abt the idea from secondary sources but ya I need to expand my knowledge on it
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
both are retarded and wrong

one side are egotistical faggots
the other side are retarded faggots
 
Atheists always think they have the moral high ground lol but in reality without God there is no such thing as objective morality.
 
  • +1
Reactions: try2beme
I know Athiesm is the weird side because whenever religious people get into discussions with athiests it always ends up with the athiest nitpicking every minor sin the religious person does . Basically their rebuttal is constantly shoving in their faces that the religious person isn’t as perfect as God. Totally owned moment in their eyes worthy of a fedora tip.
About what would you argue with a Gay Person?
 
  • +1
Reactions: try2beme
I know Athiesm is the weird side because whenever religious people get into discussions with athiests it always ends up with the athiest nitpicking every minor sin the religious person does . Basically their rebuttal is constantly shoving in their faces that the religious person isn’t as perfect as God. Totally owned moment in their eyes worthy of a fedora tip.
the only reason you think atheists are a monolithic conglomerate of retards is because you arent intelligent enough to be naturally placed in the vicinity of intelligent atheists.

High IQ "atheists" (many of them are more like deists) are generally very respectful; good example would be Alex O'Connor.
 
True degen talkin no brainer
I am not one of atheist alr
 
Atheist unironically are brainwashed

Trying have a civil respectful conversation with them

It’s either going to be slurs and insults or like you mentioned Ad hominem

They act like crying children when you confront them on being an atheist
they don't bring up new arguments, i just use them to study more about religion to know what response is best lol
 

Similar threads

Niqz16
Replies
3
Views
47
Morgan
Morgan
Sage
Replies
10
Views
96
ICXCLuvr
ICXCLuvr
truC3L
Replies
7
Views
42
ShamelessClubSlut
ShamelessClubSlut
ICXCLuvr
Replies
40
Views
230
PSL Les
P
Nectar
Replies
50
Views
239
jbgdudeeee
jbgdudeeee

Users who are viewing this thread

  • amvi0rr
  • Vodxi
Back
Top