Bad Surgical Before and Afters

koops

koops

Bronze
Joined
May 7, 2026
Posts
401
Reputation
1,016
Before and afters are an extremely important source of information. Cosmetic surgery and even non-surgical treatment like fillers are much less popular among men, meaning before and afters for men are harder to come by than those for women (except for certain procedures that are done most by men, like custom implants - you find more male b&a's but still not many).

That being said there is a serious issue with that in that the spread of information is being muddled by shitty before and afters. I'll go over the 3 types of shitty before and afters so you know what I mean, then I'll go over the type of before and after we really should be trying to do.

Type 1: The Normie B&A
Bssogenio


This is a result from a local jaw surgeon of mine. LJS + Genio. She just snapped two different pics at completely different angles. The before and after is shitty because she didn't really care, which is fine because she's a normie. This is the most forgivable imo because these people aren't doing it intentionally


Type 2: The Looksmaxxer B&A
6448957 1781577084242

Probably the most annoying one. Just take the before pic in the most horrible of conditions to make yourself look as subhuman as possible, then do the entire frauding 101 combo in the after. I chose this result because someone made a thread about it a while back, but you can also see it expressed for other types of surgery too.

Another good example would be the type of people who make videos of themselves after doing like 12 things where they are just squinting, going at random frauding angles 24/7 etc - the point is not to actually give an accurate representation of what the surgery changed, but instead to gain the admiration of random dudes on the internet

In my opinion these results in bimax patients are 50% of what has led bimax to being an overrated surgery.

Type 3: The Marketing B&A
Igoralves

Most common in filler clinics. Not all surgeons or clinics do it, but many do. The most reprehensible imo because these are actually businesses we are talking about. Notice how they will use more subtle tricks: for example here you can see how the one taking the photo is using lens distortion especially to their advantage.
Sailer

A good non-filler example is Dr. Sailer, who just says fuck it and takes two completely different pictures. of a dude

How to actually take a good before and after:

It's simple. Choose a location in your home where your camera is roughly eye level. Put the camera there. Stand 2 meters away. Take the photo.

After you're done what you wanna do, just put the camera in the same spot and do it again, trying to replicate the same posture and expression. It doesn't even have to be perfect. By doing just that you are already being more accurate than like 90% of before and afters posted on here, reddit etc.

"But Koops, that sounds autistic. This thread is autistic."

Yeah and this fucking forum is autistic bro. It is also one of the few places on the internet where there is a notable focus on male cosmetic surgery. I think that the information we can provide by actually posting genuine before and afters is worth the 3-5 minutes of trouble it takes to snap an accurate before and after picture. The information you actually provide by taking a good before and after is very valuable, especially when there are so many procedures where we have close to jack shit in terms of results to browse through
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Jgns, compost_, grav and 9 others
Mug shot tier pics for genuine advice or brutal DNR should be law
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Jgns, compost_ and koops
Should I get bimax bros???
IMG 8261
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Jgns, compost_, Saint. and 4 others
I don't know if it's just me, but I feel that I can infer correctly the facial attractiveness of even foreshortened faces.

For example...
Should I get bimax bros???
View attachment 5404971
chad who's 16 and here for banter.


A good non-filler example is Dr. no no, who just says fuck it and takes two completely different pictures. of a dude
Proof? With a name you're skirting the line of defamation and lawsuit. You need to be able to prove in a court of law that the before-and-after is of two different people. Make sure you have proof when you publish something that might cause damages. Better yet is to just be vague and avoid names to avoid the risk.

If they knew your real name, their legal teams could crush you. Not worth it for forum posts. Regardless of ethics, that is what will happen if you're hurting their bottom line. They're so much richer than you that they can just threaten you will lawsuit and you'll fold.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jgns, compost_, Acquiescence and 1 other person
Proof? With a name you're skirting the line of defamation and lawsuit. You need to be able to prove in a court of law that the before-and-after is of two different people. Make sure you have proof when you publish something that might cause damages. Better yet is to just be vague and avoid names to avoid the risk.

If they knew your real name, their legal teams could crush you. Not worth it for forum posts. Regardless of ethics, that is what will happen if you're hurting their bottom line. They're so much richer than you that they can just threaten you will lawsuit and you'll fold.
Damn you make a good point. Thanks. Easy to talk your head off online without realizing that kind of thing
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jgns, compost_, Lookologist003 and 1 other person
Proof? With a name you're skirting the line of defamation and lawsuit. You need to be able to prove in a court of law that the before-and-after is of two different people
Pretty sure kooperino here was just implying that Dr REDACTED wasn’t even trying to give the impression that both pictures (of the same dude) were taken in a similar manner, no? Like in pic 2 he’s just straight up angled differently, better lighting, smiling, and trimmed up beard
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jgns, compost_, koops and 1 other person
Well, if I was stupid enough to have believed the claim that it was two different people and choose to do my bimax elsewhere, those are damages as far as the law is concerned. I was stupid enough. Just, phrase it in such a way to not insinuate such a thing if you are going to criticize to a name. Remember that libel laws are taken very seriously.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jgns, koops, compost_ and 1 other person
Before and afters are an extremely important source of information. Cosmetic surgery and even non-surgical treatment like fillers are much less popular among men, meaning before and afters for men are harder to come by than those for women (except for certain procedures that are done most by men, like custom implants - you find more male b&a's but still not many).

That being said there is a serious issue with that in that the spread of information is being muddled by shitty before and afters. I'll go over the 3 types of shitty before and afters so you know what I mean, then I'll go over the type of before and after we really should be trying to do.

Type 1: The Normie B&A
View attachment 5403246

This is a result from a local jaw surgeon of mine. LJS + Genio. She just snapped two different pics at completely different angles. The before and after is shitty because she didn't really care, which is fine because she's a normie. This is the most forgivable imo because these people aren't doing it intentionally


Type 2: The Looksmaxxer B&A
View attachment 5403256

Probably the most annoying one. Just take the before pic in the most horrible of conditions to make yourself look as subhuman as possible, then do the entire frauding 101 combo in the after. I chose this result because someone made a thread about it a while back, but you can also see it expressed for other types of surgery too.

Another good example would be the type of people who make videos of themselves after doing like 12 things where they are just squinting, going at random frauding angles 24/7 etc - the point is not to actually give an accurate representation of what the surgery changed, but instead to gain the admiration of random dudes on the internet

In my opinion these results in bimax patients are 50% of what has led bimax to being an overrated surgery.

Type 3: The Marketing B&A
View attachment 5403278
Most common in filler clinics. Not all surgeons or clinics do it, but many do. The most reprehensible imo because these are actually businesses we are talking about. Notice how they will use more subtle tricks: for example here you can see how the one taking the photo is using lens distortion especially to their advantage.
View attachment 5403286
A good non-filler example is Dr. Sailer, who just says fuck it and takes two completely different pictures. of a dude

How to actually take a good before and after:

It's simple. Choose a location in your home where your camera is roughly eye level. Put the camera there. Stand 2 meters away. Take the photo.

After you're done what you wanna do, just put the camera in the same spot and do it again, trying to replicate the same posture and expression. It doesn't even have to be perfect. By doing just that you are already being more accurate than like 90% of before and afters posted on here, reddit etc.

"But Koops, that sounds autistic. This thread is autistic."

Yeah and this fucking forum is autistic bro. It is also one of the few places on the internet where there is a notable focus on male cosmetic surgery. I think that the information we can provide by actually posting genuine before and afters is worth the 3-5 minutes of trouble it takes to snap an accurate before and after picture. The information you actually provide by taking a good before and after is very valuable, especially when there are so many procedures where we have close to jack shit in terms of results to browse through
Lens distortion tactic is undefeated.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jgns, koops, compost_ and 1 other person
Well, if I was stupid enough to have believed the claim that it was two different people and choose to do my bimax elsewhere, those are damages as far as the law is concerned. I was stupid enough. Just, phrase it in such a way to not insinuate such a thing if you are going to criticize to a name. Remember that libel laws are taken very seriously.
A certain someone certainly agrees!
IMG 8270
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jgns, koops, compost_ and 1 other person
A certain someone certainly agrees!
View attachment 5407331
When he invoked the sad story of Tufano and that he tried to represent himself in court, I'm just like:feelsrope: Because I see now that it is true and the discussion of plastic surgery is more messy and amended than I had previously thought.

You know when you read something and you didn't understand the message, but you read it on a later date and it suddenly makes sense. I had that. When so much money and something as intimate as our face is at stake, then how could the state of things be any different?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jgns, koops, compost_ and 1 other person

Similar threads

P
Replies
13
Views
190
vermicel
V
Nightcoreg0d
Replies
1
Views
180
Nightcoreg0d
Nightcoreg0d
B
Replies
17
Views
650
ScientiaAeterna
ScientiaAeterna
based akamelovr
Replies
3
Views
177
throwawayofshame
throwawayofshame
chris182
Replies
13
Views
218
Mr.Breb
Mr.Breb

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →