Deleted member 2205
- Jul 1, 2019
The way you are talking though is as if everything you say is objective when it isn't. No, having brown skin isn't bad. Having brown eyes isn't bad. Having black hair isn't bad. You basically form your opinions based on what some chicks prefer and misguidedly think they are facts. Sure Indians may be less attractive to some women in a certain part of the world. But that doesn't make Indians objectively less attractive than Europeans. Even if the entire world thinks that Indians are uglier than Europeans, that is still subjectivity because it's an opinion. No group of people can be classified objectively on the basis of looks, barring deformed people. You are mixing subjectivity with objectivity. Looks can never be described objectively when it comes to attraction. That's my point. If you say brown skin is bad, sure you can think that. But that doesn't make it true. Objectively speaking anyways.
Basically what this dude thinks is that Indians are at no disadvantage in the dating market. And when any proof that Indians get less matches than white people is invalid because "it's an opinion".
Just stop this shitskin hindu cope man. Accept the fact that you are disadvantaged, so you don't have to deal with it later.
Jfl at this shitskin gigacope. Coping levels are double of @Titbot tier. This might be the most delusional curry yet
I never said that their opinion shouldn't be taken seriously. That should be considered. I just said that it's just not true objectively to claim Indians are less attractive to Europeans because attractiveness is subjective and never objective. For example, hooded eyes are only ideal in this community. But the guys I see slaying irl or have the potential to slay don't even have hooded eyes. Or a giga chin for that matter. Or any other praised feature in this community.
And women's opinions about race shouldn't be taken seriously?
So hooded eyes are only attractive to this forum, not to women irl?