Blackpill Research Survey | Minimum ES Ratio for Non-Shit Male-to-Female Transition Result

What's the minimum ESR for MtF gender transition to not turn out shit (aesthetics-wise)?

  • 0.36

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 0.38

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 0.4

    Votes: 1 16.7%
  • 0.42

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 0.44

    Votes: 2 33.3%
  • 0.46

    Votes: 1 16.7%
  • 0.48

    Votes: 1 16.7%
  • 0.5

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 0.52

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 0.54

    Votes: 1 16.7%

  • Total voters
    6
thecel

thecel

morph king
Joined
May 16, 2020
Posts
26,086
Reputation
56,782
Most blackpillers are aware of the brutal fact that close-set eyes are utterly disgusting traits, especially in females. We don't all agree on exactly how close-set is an aesthetic death sentence. Share your opinion on this matter by voting in the poll.
 
Last edited:
Just grow bangs tbh
 
cope harder . bones are everything
It only fully applies if you only have close set eyes without other abnormalities in the eye area. Like short PFL, IPD, intercanthal distance, ect.
So for someone like Barrett or with specifically overgrown zygomatic structures.

It’s interesting for your case, I remember you made a thread abt how transitioning is easier than hardmaxxing. But it seems like you could use some hard osteotomies on the face either gender.

Could prob pull Alex Brown without tho tbh
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
the avg is 46 right
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
the avg is 46 right

anyone know the website that has a collection of facial measurement percentile charts like this?

1695384681117
 

Similar threads

Sloppyseconds
Replies
145
Views
15K
Matthew24
Matthew24
got.daim
Replies
30
Views
3K
ochinchin
O
asdvek
Replies
91
Views
6K
Wexilarious
Wexilarious
134applesauce456
2 3
Replies
115
Views
15K
bloatedltnfreak
bloatedltnfreak
D
Replies
57
Views
19K
surronz
surronz

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top