Bullies won't be successful(high effort)

muhajudin21

muhajudin21

im pseudo-perfect
Joined
May 13, 2026
Posts
961
Reputation
685
normies have latched on to a new opinion and it makes me angry as its simply just an assumption with no data this retarded trend is promoting people to go ER and that karma doesn't exist ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ
.













study basically asserts aggressive behaviour in children tend to have higher earnings
note- not necessarily bullying simply aggression like anger issues
Children with higher conduct-problem scores at age 10 โ†’ higher earnings and better labor-market outcomes in their 40s.โ€

I believe this is because of a child with low inhibition paired with low logical thinking will naturally act out

later in life this lower inhibition paired with logical reasoning translate to higher rates of success

this is the misconception that "bullies have better lives" stems from a very misunderstood study


now on the other hand bullies after 10-12(conscious bullying) who have logical thinking actually stem from abuse, neglect, and dysfunctional households

Farrington defining it as a โ€œrepeated oppression, psychological or physical, of a less powerful person by a more powerful oneโ€ (Farrington, 1993)

overall conscious bullying from children over the age of 10-12 are more likely to end up so because of desensitisation towards violence within there home which can contribute to the development of low interpersonal skills, which in turn increase the likelihood of involvement in bullying behaviour's at school opposite applies to higher socioeconomic backgrounds

1787756637697

Table 1 (Table 1). Table 2 (Table 2).
SES = socio-economic status

โ€œpoor children become victims while wealthy children become bullies.โ€ is a misconception overall higher SES equates to a more stable home and since bullying stems from dysfunctionality among other factors. Higher SES children overall are less likely to be bullies but when high SES children are within a dysfunctional home they tend to be a bully/victim instead of bully-victim

low SES equates to higher chance of dysfunctionality which means more bullies, bully-victims, and victims overall

Conscious bullying perpetration โ†’ higher risk of later antisocial behaviour/Higher rates of delinquency not success

"bullies are more attractive/taller". Zero evidence or data for this a baseless assumption in fact a attractive/tall person is usually within positive social environments making it more likely for them to reciprocate and have a more positive outlook on life. on the other hand a bully-victim is more likely to be have "weaker" or "timid" traits like being short or scrawny.

So in conclusion YES your highschool bullies will peak in highschool and there are indicators they will have a worse life
a much higher risk of delinquency, antisocial behaviour, and criminal offending.
aggression toward others during adolescence was associated with poorer later job functioning and greater illegal-drug use (pubmed)

Victims - suffer more from internalizing/mental-health difficulties.

Bully-victims(bullied who then bullies others): elevated risks in both areas and often the most overall difficulties.

overall Uninvolved people proved to have the best lives so if your getting bullied get rid of them
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: shedontluv-U, Latinolooksmaxxer, mrdouchebag and 6 others
yeah dude my bullies were sons of a fucking millionaire I dont think theyโ€™ll have a bad life
 
  • +1
Reactions: shedontluv-U, Latinolooksmaxxer, proxxyy11 and 2 others
normies have latched on to a new opinion and it makes me angry as its simply just an assumption with no data this retarded trend is promoting people to go ER and that karma doesn't exist ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ
.













study basically asserts aggressive behaviour in children tend to have higher earnings
note- not necessarily bullying simply aggression like anger issues
Children with higher conduct-problem scores at age 10 โ†’ higher earnings and better labor-market outcomes in their 40s.โ€

I believe this is because of a child with low inhibition paired with low logical thinking will naturally act out

later in life this lower inhibition paired with logical reasoning translate to higher rates of success

this is the misconception that "bullies have better lives" stems from a very misunderstood study


now on the other hand bullies after 10-12(conscious bullying) who have logical thinking actually stem from abuse, neglect, and dysfunctional households

Farrington defining it as a โ€œrepeated oppression, psychological or physical, of a less powerful person by a more powerful oneโ€ (Farrington, 1993)

overall conscious bullying from children over the age of 10-12 are more likely to end up so because of desensitisation towards violence within there home which can contribute to the development of low interpersonal skills, which in turn increase the likelihood of involvement in bullying behaviour's at school opposite applies to higher socioeconomic backgrounds

View attachment 5567376
Table 1 (Table 1). Table 2 (Table 2).
SES = socio-economic status

โ€œpoor children become victims while wealthy children become bullies.โ€ is a misconception overall higher SES equates to a more stable home and since bullying stems from dysfunctionality among other factors. Higher SES children overall are less likely to be bullies but when high SES children are within a dysfunctional home they tend to be a bully/victim instead of bully-victim

low SES equates to higher chance of dysfunctionality which means more bullies, bully-victims, and victims overall

Conscious bullying perpetration โ†’ higher risk of later antisocial behaviour/Higher rates of delinquency not success

"bullies are more attractive/taller". Zero evidence or data for this a baseless assumption in fact a attractive/tall person is usually within positive social environments making it more likely for them to reciprocate and have a more positive outlook on life. on the other hand a bully-victim is more likely to be have "weaker" or "timid" traits like being short or scrawny.

So in conclusion YES your highschool bullies will peak in highschool and there are indicators they will have a worse life
a much higher risk of delinquency, antisocial behaviour, and criminal offending.
aggression toward others during adolescence was associated with poorer later job functioning and greater illegal-drug use (pubmed)

Victims - suffer more from internalizing/mental-health difficulties.

Bully-victims(bullied who then bullies others): elevated risks in both areas and often the most overall difficulties.

overall Uninvolved people proved to have the best lives so if your getting bullied get rid of them

bump?
 
  • +1
Reactions: zombi3 and muhajudin21
Bros high effort is pasting links from tik tok
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: foidfondler, kbj and horseman.
Dnr
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Latinolooksmaxxer, kbj and Nyrะพ

decent explanation
Bros high effort is pasting links from tik tok
I know I spiritually raped your bloodline but jeez it gets to a point fag
 
Last edited:
  • Woah
  • Ugh..
  • JFL
Reactions: shedontluv-U, mrdouchebag and Nyrะพ
yeah dude my bullies were sons of a fucking millionaire I dont think theyโ€™ll have a bad life
if you read what I said higher socioeconomic status people are less likely to be a bullies and when they are usually grow up to be criminal/outcasts obviously outliers exist but both of you are likely to have below average lives either join the uninvolved get rid of your bully
 
  • +1
Reactions: chud10282892
Lots of bullies are socially inept and have behavioral problems, they dont understand complex social systems or do not operate in them properly, they get โ€œkarma.โ€ (Wont succeed in life)

Some are more high T, better developed, confrontational, or competitive than their peers and they will succeed in life more but might be seen as bullies for going a little over the top with the confrontation and competition, jocks often โ€œbullyโ€ each other but find that natural due to high t competition etcโ€ฆ they might also do the same thing to weaker people who find it uncomfortable due to low confrontation and physical prowess.
 
Lots of bullies are socially inept and have behavioral problems, they dont understand complex social systems or do not operate in them properly, they get โ€œkarma.โ€ (Wont succeed in life)

Some are more high T, better developed, confrontational, or competitive than their peers and they will succeed in life more but might be seen as bullies for going a little over the top with the confrontation and competition, jocks often โ€œbullyโ€ each other but find that natural due to high t competition etcโ€ฆ they might also do the same thing to weaker people who find it uncomfortable due to low confrontation and physical prowess.
agression isn't bullying
Bros high effort is pasting links from tik tok
I summarized research done on the topic in question how is that not high effort @horseman. you a bitch for ":lul:"
 
  • +1
Reactions: horseman.
agression isn't bullying

I summarized research done on the topic in question how is that not high effort @horseman. you a bitch for ":lul:"
mb
 
  • +1
Reactions: muhajudin21
normies have latched on to a new opinion and it makes me angry as its simply just an assumption with no data this retarded trend is promoting people to go ER and that karma doesn't exist ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ
.













study basically asserts aggressive behaviour in children tend to have higher earnings
note- not necessarily bullying simply aggression like anger issues
Children with higher conduct-problem scores at age 10 โ†’ higher earnings and better labor-market outcomes in their 40s.โ€

I believe this is because of a child with low inhibition paired with low logical thinking will naturally act out

later in life this lower inhibition paired with logical reasoning translate to higher rates of success

this is the misconception that "bullies have better lives" stems from a very misunderstood study


now on the other hand bullies after 10-12(conscious bullying) who have logical thinking actually stem from abuse, neglect, and dysfunctional households

Farrington defining it as a โ€œrepeated oppression, psychological or physical, of a less powerful person by a more powerful oneโ€ (Farrington, 1993)

overall conscious bullying from children over the age of 10-12 are more likely to end up so because of desensitisation towards violence within there home which can contribute to the development of low interpersonal skills, which in turn increase the likelihood of involvement in bullying behaviour's at school opposite applies to higher socioeconomic backgrounds

View attachment 5567376
Table 1 (Table 1). Table 2 (Table 2).
SES = socio-economic status

โ€œpoor children become victims while wealthy children become bullies.โ€ is a misconception overall higher SES equates to a more stable home and since bullying stems from dysfunctionality among other factors. Higher SES children overall are less likely to be bullies but when high SES children are within a dysfunctional home they tend to be a bully/victim instead of bully-victim

low SES equates to higher chance of dysfunctionality which means more bullies, bully-victims, and victims overall

Conscious bullying perpetration โ†’ higher risk of later antisocial behaviour/Higher rates of delinquency not success

"bullies are more attractive/taller". Zero evidence or data for this a baseless assumption in fact a attractive/tall person is usually within positive social environments making it more likely for them to reciprocate and have a more positive outlook on life. on the other hand a bully-victim is more likely to be have "weaker" or "timid" traits like being short or scrawny.

So in conclusion YES your highschool bullies will peak in highschool and there are indicators they will have a worse life
a much higher risk of delinquency, antisocial behaviour, and criminal offending.
aggression toward others during adolescence was associated with poorer later job functioning and greater illegal-drug use (pubmed)

Victims - suffer more from internalizing/mental-health difficulties.

Bully-victims(bullied who then bullies others): elevated risks in both areas and often the most overall difficulties.

overall Uninvolved people proved to have the best lives so if your getting bullied get rid of them

DNR some guy who stole from me is now famous and collabing with fucking ishowspeed after his mom beat his ass on stream (Yes that black guy and I have proof he stole from me, it was a game tho"

No such thing as karma, the whole dharmann homeless bullies shit is lies or just rare
 
@BWC_virgin aggression done in disparity would be bullying the thing you described I would count as positive aggression which is a good thing and does often translate to successes did any of you nigga read what I said
high effort and the first 2 clips are just TikTokโ€™s Iโ€™m dead yo ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚
you a bitch did you even read a word or watched the titkoks "normies have latched on to a new opinion and it makes me angry as its simply just an assumption with no data this retarded trend is promoting people to go ER and that karma doesn't exist ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ" I submitted two tiktoks as evidence fuck you:feelswah: btich
DNR some guy who stole from me is now famous and collabing with fucking ishowspeed after his mom beat his ass on stream (Yes that black guy and I have proof he stole from me, it was a game tho"

No such thing as karma, the whole dharmann homeless bullies shit is lies or just rare
outlier doesn't disprove my claim that is backed with actual research
:rage:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Aezac and theblueprints
@BWC_virgin aggression done in disparity would be bullying the thing you described I would count as positive aggression which is a good thing and does often translate to successes did any of you nigga read what I said

you a bitch did you even read a word or watched the titkoks "normies have latched on to a new opinion and it makes me angry as its simply just an assumption with no data this retarded trend is promoting people to go ER and that karma doesn't exist ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ" I submitted two tiktoks as evidence fuck you:feelswah: btich

outlier doesn't disprove my claim that is backed with actual research
:rage:
My bad yo ๐Ÿ˜‚
 
If you truly internalized your subhumanity you don't even think about your bullies that often because you know that no matter where you go you will always be the problem their aversion to you is a natural response
 
If you truly internalized your subhumanity you don't even think about your bullies that often because you know that no matter where you go you will always be the problem their aversion to you is a natural response
I wasn't never bullied grow up I did use to have anger issues Im simply making it known because a retarded TikTok trend is promoting people to go ER becuz there bullies are gonna have better lives then them. do you niggas even read everything I said is backed by research this is literal life fuel
 
do you niggas even read everything I said is backed by research this is literal life fuel
I'm not disagreeing with your findings I'm just saying that this obsession is worthless anyways. Since they moved on and don't even think about their victims you might as well do the same
 
I'm not disagreeing with your findings I'm just saying that this obsession is worthless anyways. Since they moved on and don't even think about their victims you might as well do the same
did you miss this part"I wasn't never bullied grow up I did use to have anger issues Im simply making it known because a retarded TikTok trend is promoting people to go ER becuz there bullies are gonna have better lives then them" come on man COME ON MAN
 
Lolz, all bullies I remember from elementary school are all relatively successful people.

If you truly internalized your subhumanity you don't even think about your bullies that often because you know that no matter where you go you will always be the problem their aversion to you is a natural response
Yeah there is some truth to this too about the aversions lol, but if you are ugly you can't really help it either. So glad I grew away from being ugly with puberty + having had braces to fix my crooked teeth(had multiple accidents as a kid lol), nobody really messed with me after that. Some jealous guy tried a bit once in HS but he was so ugly compared to me people just thought he was jealous and pathetic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: silently_said
turned out to be the opposite for me ig
 
  • +1
Reactions: shedontluv-U
Lolz, all bullies I remember from elementary school are all relatively successful people.


Yeah there is some truth to this too about the aversions lol, but if you are ugly you can't really help it either. So glad I grew away from being ugly with puberty + having had braces to fix my crooked teeth(had multiple accidents as a kid lol), nobody really messed with me after that. Some jealous guy tried a bit once in HS but he was so ugly compared to me people just thought he was jealous and pathetic.
FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU SOOOOOO MUCH YOU DUMB WHORE
THE FIRST COUPLE SENTENCANCES I SPECIFY THIS YOU DUMB NIGGER
"study basically asserts aggressive behaviour in children tend to have higher earnings
note- not necessarily bullying simply aggression like anger issues
Children with higher conduct-problem scores at age 10 โ†’ higher earnings and better labor-market outcomes in their 40s.โ€

I believe this is because of a child with low inhibition paired with low logical thinking will naturally act out

later in life this lower inhibition paired with logical reasoning translate to higher rates of success

this is the misconception that "bullies have better lives" stems from a very misunderstood study "
turned out to be the opposite for me ig
outliers exist I myself use to be an aggressive child but I wouldn't say a bully. as I SPECIFY aggression without disparity =~ bullying
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Bipolar2Cel and proxxyy11
did you miss this part"I wasn't never bullied grow up I did use to have anger issues Im simply making it known because a retarded TikTok trend is promoting people to go ER becuz there bullies are gonna have better lives then them" come on man COME ON MAN
I wasn't directing it at you I'm talking about the people that this trend is targeting
 
High IQ, High T, 6'3, good looking bullies become billionaire CEOs and marry supermodels.
Low IQ, High T, 5'10, mediocre looking bullies work at mcdonalds or an average job and marry some mediocre looking fat slob.

Also, a lot of guys are bullies because they enter puberty earlier than other guys. They have higher T and are taller/bigger, that's the advantage. Once the rest of the guys catch up, these bullies later become normies or victims themselves.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Latinolooksmaxxer, Bipolar2Cel and foidfondler
yeah thats just cope tbh

my first gf was a high T (diagnosed) high E, relatively tall big boobs and booty italian-latina

therefore she had that type A high T personality. she was very dominant especially towards other girls, almost bullish. she had a 'gym baddy' body due to her hormonal profile so most girls didnt try to fuck with her - but the fact that she never went overboard with it and mostly focused on herself - and had good social adaptative traits such as compassion, friendliness and camaraderie - is a sign of good social adjustment which prevented her from being the type of 'failed' bully

she had ADHD and BPD and shit grades, but started taking ritalin. then she became successful in almost everything she did and graduated amongst the highest grades in the entire university (not just her course)
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: mrdouchebag and muhajudin21
FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU SOOOOOO MUCH YOU DUMB WHORE
THE FIRST COUPLE SENTENCANCES I SPECIFY THIS YOU DUMB NIGGER
"study basically asserts aggressive behaviour in children tend to have higher earnings
note- not necessarily bullying simply aggression like anger issues
Children with higher conduct-problem scores at age 10 โ†’ higher earnings and better labor-market outcomes in their 40s.โ€

I believe this is because of a child with low inhibition paired with low logical thinking will naturally act out

later in life this lower inhibition paired with logical reasoning translate to higher rates of success

this is the misconception that "bullies have better lives" stems from a very misunderstood study "

outliers exist I myself use to be an aggressive child but I wouldn't say a bully. as I SPECIFY aggression without disparity =~ bullying
Okay, right, but yeah you can be aggressive without bullying, so yeah I hear you. They misintepreted the study then on purpose for the headlines + bullied persons' cope?

Also many bullies in school weren't aggressive otherwise, so yeah they are wrong equating bullying with aggression. Yeah you are correct and I agree with you.
 
  • +1
Reactions: muhajudin21
yeah thats just cope tbh

my first gf was a high T (diagnosed) high E big ass italian-latina

she was very dominant especially towards other girls, almost bullish

she had ADHD and shit grades, but started taking ritalin. then she became successful in everything she did and graduated amongst the highest grades in the entire university (not just her course)
relates to my point how?
High IQ, High T, 6'3, good looking bullies become billionaire CEOs and marry supermodels.
Low IQ, High T, 5'10, mediocre looking bullies work at mcdonalds or an average job and marry some mediocre looking fat slob.

Also, a lot of guys are bullies because they enter puberty earlier than other guys. They have higher T and are taller/bigger, that's the advantage. Once the rest of the guys catch up, these bullies later become normies or victims themselves.
you fucking stupid retard I already SPECIFICALLY POINTED OUT THE CLAIM of "bullies are attractive/tall" you come here don't even read what I said and say this AND not only man. Just fuck you your not worth my time slime ball

I give evidence and research then you just make an assumption bitch ass nigga
Okay, right, but yeah you can be aggressive without bullying, so yeah I hear you. They misintepreted the study then on purpose for the headlines + bullied persons' cope?

Also many bullies in school weren't aggressive otherwise, so yeah they are wrong equating bullying with aggression. Yeah you are correct and I agree with you.
I love to see it thank you so much
 

Attachments

  • 1787774021171.png
    1787774021171.png
    268 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: mrdouchebag, Latinolooksmaxxer and Bipolar2Cel
relates to my point how?

you fucking stupid retard I already SPECIFICALLY POINTED OUT THE CLAIM of "bullies are attractive/tall" you come here don't even read what I said and say this AND not only man. Just fuck you your not worth my time slime ball

I give evidence and research then you just make an assumption bitch ass nigga

I love to see it thank you so much
jfl the reptilia still
 
  • +1
Reactions: muhajudin21
relates to my point how?

you fucking stupid retard I already SPECIFICALLY POINTED OUT THE CLAIM of "bullies are attractive/tall" you come here don't even read what I said and say this AND not only man. Just fuck you your not worth my time slime ball

I give evidence and research then you just make an assumption bitch ass nigga

I love to see it thank you so much


High T dominant behavior helps you ascend professionally, socially and also romantically. Being timid and socially awkward will work against you.
Some bullies are just not high IQ, not big enough and look mediocre, of course they'll never make it big.
Also, I don't give a flying fuck about your time, you imbecile.
 
normies have latched on to a new opinion and it makes me angry as its simply just an assumption with no data this retarded trend is promoting people to go ER and that karma doesn't exist ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ
.













study basically asserts aggressive behaviour in children tend to have higher earnings
note- not necessarily bullying simply aggression like anger issues
Children with higher conduct-problem scores at age 10 โ†’ higher earnings and better labor-market outcomes in their 40s.โ€

I believe this is because of a child with low inhibition paired with low logical thinking will naturally act out

later in life this lower inhibition paired with logical reasoning translate to higher rates of success

this is the misconception that "bullies have better lives" stems from a very misunderstood study


now on the other hand bullies after 10-12(conscious bullying) who have logical thinking actually stem from abuse, neglect, and dysfunctional households

Farrington defining it as a โ€œrepeated oppression, psychological or physical, of a less powerful person by a more powerful oneโ€ (Farrington, 1993)

overall conscious bullying from children over the age of 10-12 are more likely to end up so because of desensitisation towards violence within there home which can contribute to the development of low interpersonal skills, which in turn increase the likelihood of involvement in bullying behaviour's at school opposite applies to higher socioeconomic backgrounds

View attachment 5567376
Table 1 (Table 1). Table 2 (Table 2).
SES = socio-economic status

โ€œpoor children become victims while wealthy children become bullies.โ€ is a misconception overall higher SES equates to a more stable home and since bullying stems from dysfunctionality among other factors. Higher SES children overall are less likely to be bullies but when high SES children are within a dysfunctional home they tend to be a bully/victim instead of bully-victim

low SES equates to higher chance of dysfunctionality which means more bullies, bully-victims, and victims overall

Conscious bullying perpetration โ†’ higher risk of later antisocial behaviour/Higher rates of delinquency not success

"bullies are more attractive/taller". Zero evidence or data for this a baseless assumption in fact a attractive/tall person is usually within positive social environments making it more likely for them to reciprocate and have a more positive outlook on life. on the other hand a bully-victim is more likely to be have "weaker" or "timid" traits like being short or scrawny.

So in conclusion YES your highschool bullies will peak in highschool and there are indicators they will have a worse life
a much higher risk of delinquency, antisocial behaviour, and criminal offending.
aggression toward others during adolescence was associated with poorer later job functioning and greater illegal-drug use (pubmed)

Victims - suffer more from internalizing/mental-health difficulties.

Bully-victims(bullied who then bullies others): elevated risks in both areas and often the most overall difficulties.

overall Uninvolved people proved to have the best lives so if your getting bullied get rid of them

Mirin but usually bully are ppl
with trait enabling this behaviour

like social halo

looks

money

statue

or physically
"bullies are more attractive/taller". Zero evidence or data for this a baseless assumption in fact a attractive/tall person is usually within positive social environments making it more likely for them to reciprocate and have a more positive outlook on life. on the other hand a bully-victim is more likely to be have "weaker" or "timid" traits like being short or scrawny.
there is so much Data for that and even experience everyone have

you are NOT getting bullied by the 5"6 poor ugly asian guy

the only time this phenomenon happen its on Internet

stereotype have a little little bit part of true bro

and data too
 
  • +1
Reactions: muhajudin21
Mirin but usually bully are ppl
with trait enabling this behaviour

like social halo

looks

money

statue

or physically

there is so much Data for that and even experience everyone have

you are NOT getting bullied by the 5"6 poor ugly asian guy

the only time this phenomenon happen its on Internet

stereotype have a little little bit part of true bro

and data too
aggression in disparity of course someone of higher status will bully you stronger, older. not looks tho there is zero correlations just because there is a disparity in looks doesn't mean there will be an abuse in power of that
 
  • JFL
Reactions: shedontluv-U
aggression in disparity of course someone of higher status will bully you stronger, older. not looks tho there is zero correlations just because there is a disparity in looks doesn't mean there will be an abuse in power of that
ok so you deny disparity of looks

but agree with statue, physic, age (don't agree )

irl it's mostlikely someone better than you in average picking on you

never saw ltn laughing at some good looking dude

a group of poor kid laughing at the rich kid

a group of weaky twinkish fragile guys harassing the 6,3 gym obsessed stereotype

all that is rare . only time it can happen
it's more about the number of bully or on Internet lol
 

Similar threads

E
Replies
2
Views
53
GZod
GZod
fallen442
Replies
15
Views
110
hitmancrewzz
hitmancrewzz
qlf
Replies
0
Views
27
qlf
qlf
๐”ป๐• ๐•จ๐•Ÿ๐•จ๐•’๐•ฃ๐••๐•˜๐•ฃ๐• ๐•จ๐•ฅ๐•™๐•”๐•–๐•
  • ๐”ป๐• ๐•จ๐•Ÿ๐•จ๐•’๐•ฃ๐••๐•˜๐•ฃ๐• ๐•จ๐•ฅ๐•™๐•”๐•–๐•
  • Offtopic
Replies
7
Views
98
T-bone123
T-bone123

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top