muhajudin21
im pseudo-perfect
- Joined
- May 13, 2026
- Posts
- 961
- Reputation
- 685
normies have latched on to a new opinion and it makes me angry as its simply just an assumption with no data this retarded trend is promoting people to go ER and that karma doesn't exist 
.
www.theguardian.com
fortune.com
study basically asserts aggressive behaviour in children tend to have higher earnings
note- not necessarily bullying simply aggression like anger issues
Children with higher conduct-problem scores at age 10 โ higher earnings and better labor-market outcomes in their 40s.โ
I believe this is because of a child with low inhibition paired with low logical thinking will naturally act out
later in life this lower inhibition paired with logical reasoning translate to higher rates of success
this is the misconception that "bullies have better lives" stems from a very misunderstood study
now on the other hand bullies after 10-12(conscious bullying) who have logical thinking actually stem from abuse, neglect, and dysfunctional households
Farrington defining it as a โrepeated oppression, psychological or physical, of a less powerful person by a more powerful oneโ (Farrington, 1993)
overall conscious bullying from children over the age of 10-12 are more likely to end up so because of desensitisation towards violence within there home which can contribute to the development of low interpersonal skills, which in turn increase the likelihood of involvement in bullying behaviour's at school opposite applies to higher socioeconomic backgrounds
Table 1 (Table 1). Table 2 (Table 2).
SES = socio-economic status
โpoor children become victims while wealthy children become bullies.โ is a misconception overall higher SES equates to a more stable home and since bullying stems from dysfunctionality among other factors. Higher SES children overall are less likely to be bullies but when high SES children are within a dysfunctional home they tend to be a bully/victim instead of bully-victim
low SES equates to higher chance of dysfunctionality which means more bullies, bully-victims, and victims overall
Conscious bullying perpetration โ higher risk of later antisocial behaviour/Higher rates of delinquency not success
"bullies are more attractive/taller". Zero evidence or data for this a baseless assumption in fact a attractive/tall person is usually within positive social environments making it more likely for them to reciprocate and have a more positive outlook on life. on the other hand a bully-victim is more likely to be have "weaker" or "timid" traits like being short or scrawny.
So in conclusion YES your highschool bullies will peak in highschool and there are indicators they will have a worse life
a much higher risk of delinquency, antisocial behaviour, and criminal offending.
aggression toward others during adolescence was associated with poorer later job functioning and greater illegal-drug use (pubmed)
Victims - suffer more from internalizing/mental-health difficulties.
Bully-victims(bullied who then bullies others): elevated risks in both areas and often the most overall difficulties.
overall Uninvolved people proved to have the best lives so if your getting bullied get rid of them

.
Playground bullies do prosper โ and go on to earn more in middle age
Five-decade UK study finds that aggression at school leads to better-paying jobs, while those with emotional instability went on to earn less
A 40-year behavioral study confirms itโkids who bully go on to make the most money | Fortune
Academics at the University of Exeter found bullying and temper tantrums were early traits of highly successful people.
study basically asserts aggressive behaviour in children tend to have higher earnings
note- not necessarily bullying simply aggression like anger issues
Children with higher conduct-problem scores at age 10 โ higher earnings and better labor-market outcomes in their 40s.โ
I believe this is because of a child with low inhibition paired with low logical thinking will naturally act out
later in life this lower inhibition paired with logical reasoning translate to higher rates of success
this is the misconception that "bullies have better lives" stems from a very misunderstood study
now on the other hand bullies after 10-12(conscious bullying) who have logical thinking actually stem from abuse, neglect, and dysfunctional households
Farrington defining it as a โrepeated oppression, psychological or physical, of a less powerful person by a more powerful oneโ (Farrington, 1993)
overall conscious bullying from children over the age of 10-12 are more likely to end up so because of desensitisation towards violence within there home which can contribute to the development of low interpersonal skills, which in turn increase the likelihood of involvement in bullying behaviour's at school opposite applies to higher socioeconomic backgrounds
Table 1 (Table 1). Table 2 (Table 2).
SES = socio-economic status
โpoor children become victims while wealthy children become bullies.โ is a misconception overall higher SES equates to a more stable home and since bullying stems from dysfunctionality among other factors. Higher SES children overall are less likely to be bullies but when high SES children are within a dysfunctional home they tend to be a bully/victim instead of bully-victim
low SES equates to higher chance of dysfunctionality which means more bullies, bully-victims, and victims overall
Conscious bullying perpetration โ higher risk of later antisocial behaviour/Higher rates of delinquency not success
"bullies are more attractive/taller". Zero evidence or data for this a baseless assumption in fact a attractive/tall person is usually within positive social environments making it more likely for them to reciprocate and have a more positive outlook on life. on the other hand a bully-victim is more likely to be have "weaker" or "timid" traits like being short or scrawny.
So in conclusion YES your highschool bullies will peak in highschool and there are indicators they will have a worse life
a much higher risk of delinquency, antisocial behaviour, and criminal offending.
aggression toward others during adolescence was associated with poorer later job functioning and greater illegal-drug use (pubmed)
Victims - suffer more from internalizing/mental-health difficulties.
Bully-victims(bullied who then bullies others): elevated risks in both areas and often the most overall difficulties.
overall Uninvolved people proved to have the best lives so if your getting bullied get rid of them
