“but muh muslim colonialism too!!” evisceration

[avenox]

Everytime you argue with a fat low iq chud on this website about Europes replacement with ethnics which is a direct cause and consequence of hundreds of years of European colonialism, 9 times out of 10, they will always bring up the Islamic conquests, and use the only narrative they have which “They enslaved longer than we did”.

The thing is, did any Caliphates slaughter, ethnically cleanse, pillage, persecute and/or oppress the people they conquered? No, defintely not as much as Europeans did, did the Ottomans persecute the arabs? No. Did the Abbasids or the Ayubidds persecute Spaniards? No.

The reality of this is the fact that while the Europeans were stealing the conquered lands resources and bringing them back to Europe, Islamic colonialism actually developed the lands they went into, the Persians, the Turks, the Arabs, they all built cities and towns in conquered lands unlike Whites who just used the stolen resources back into Europe.

This is the difference between European and Islamic Colonialism, while the Euros ethnically cleansed, persecuted, massacred, opressed and pillaged the lands they went into, the Muslims only turned the conquered lands and its people into Islam and did not look at skin color, race, or ethnicity.

TLDR: No TLDR for you, either read it all or don’t.


Case closed by Avenox, thank you for reading this high IQ thread, if you did.

 

[avenox]

Note: I am an Athiest and I do not like any religion, so this is not a biased take, I am just stating history.

 

[foidkiller42]

dnr your entire thread

Note: I am an Athiest and I do not like any religion, so this is not a biased take, I am just stating history.

you are the low iq idiot, you believe the history they present to you and you dont even question it.

 

[avenox]

dnr your entire thread

you are the low iq idiot, you believe the history they present to you and you dont even question it.

You are wrong, everything I have said here is true, keep coping faggot.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Everytime you argue with a fat low iq chud on this website about Europes replacement with ethnics which is a direct cause and consequence of hundreds of years of European colonialism, 9 times out of 10, they will always bring up the Islamic conquests, and use the only narrative they have which “They enslaved longer than we did”.

The thing is, did any Caliphates slaughter, ethnically cleanse, pillage, persecute and/or oppress the people they conquered? No, defintely not as much as Europeans did, did the Ottomans persecute the arabs? No. Did the Abbasids or the Ayubidds persecute Spaniards? No.

The reality of this is the fact that while the Europeans were stealing the conquered lands resources and bringing them back to Europe, Islamic colonialism actually developed the lands they went into, the Persians, the Turks, the Arabs, they all built cities and towns in conquered lands unlike Whites who just used the stolen resources back into Europe.

This is the difference between European and Islamic Colonialism, while the Euros ethnically cleansed, persecuted, massacred, opressed and pillaged the lands they went into, the Muslims only turned the conquered lands and its people into Islam and did not look at skin color, race, or ethnicity.

TLDR: No TLDR for you, either read it all or don’t.


Case closed by Avenox, thank you for reading this high IQ thread, if you did.

Whites are the race of master 2Quowue and deflection.

Bring up the evils of the trans Atlantic slave trade and these pink freaks will find a way to shoehorn in the Islamic/arabs


Bring up colonialism and these Cavebeasts will mention the mongols.

Bring up the Native American genitives and they’ll bring up how natives were warlike doing scalping

Bring up colonialism of Africa and India and they’ll bring ip curry rape gangs and black crime rates

White have 0 accountability and 0 reflection 0 soul and 0 mercy

 

[avenox]

Whites are the race of master 2Quowue and deflection.

When the fuck did you turn into pfl, you’re like the forums most pro ethnic users

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

When the fuck did you turn into pfl, you’re like the forums most pro ethnic users

Dude re read my comment…. I updated it


But I’m agreeing with you always have been dude

 

[foidkiller42]

You are wrong, everything I have said here is true, keep coping faggot.

i can just guess that you are talking about how the evil dumb europeans stole stuff from poor intelligent africa ((( you are a fucking moron, africa had all those resources and what did they do with them? nothing. the mali empire relied on gold fucking washing up on riverbanks, other wise they had no other way of getting gold. the africans were gifted with everything but iq and because of that they never developed shit, in nature its kill or be killed, stop crying about how people took the shit you were never even able to use

 

[Alexg_lover]

I don't care for this discussion but if you're Iranian you're still gonna be biased lol

 

[avenox]

Whites are the race of master 2Quowue and deflection.

Bring up the evils of the trans Atlantic slave trade and these pink freaks will find a way to shoehorn in the Islamic/arabs


Bring up colonialism and these caveats will mention the mongols.

Bring up the Native American genitives and they’ll bring up how natives were warlike doing scalping

Bring up colonialism of Africa and India and they’ll bring ip curry rape gangs and black crime rates

White have 0 accountability and 0 reflection 0 soul and 0 mercy

They will always use the excuse of “but we brought civilisation” in which they literally didnt other than 2 countries of that being Rhodesia and Apartheid.

It’s like me roundhouse kicking you, putting you into a 2 week coma, but you should still thank me because I drove you to the hospital and put flowers on your bed and paid for your medical bills.

That’s the logic of thr averge pro Colonialism Euro.

I will forever thank the Arabs, Turks, Mongols, Chinese and the Japanese for actually fighting against the west.

 

[avenox]

Whites are the race of master 2Quowue and deflection.

Bring up the evils of the trans Atlantic slave trade and these pink freaks will find a way to shoehorn in the Islamic/arabs


Bring up colonialism and these caveats will mention the mongols.

Bring up the Native American genitives and they’ll bring up how natives were warlike doing scalping

Bring up colonialism of Africa and India and they’ll bring ip curry rape gangs and black crime rates

White have 0 accountability and 0 reflection 0 soul and 0 mercy

They will always use the excuse of “but we brought civilisation” in which they literally didnt other than 2 countries of that being Rhodesia and Apartheid.

It’s like me roundhouse kicking you, putting you into a 2 week coma, but you should still thank me because I drove you to the hospital and put flowers on your bed and paid for your medical bills.

That’s the logic of thr averge pro Colonialism Euro.

I will forever thank the Arabs, Turks, Mongols, Chinese and the Japanese for actually fighting against the west.

 

[pflgod]

 

[foidkiller42]

"the europeans killed all the natives while the muslims built the land upp!!!!" simply not true, look at the difference between any muslim colony and rhodesia" also the jews spread a shit ton of lies about the white race, especially in belgium here is a thread talking abt belgium: https://looksmax.org/threads/king-leopold-ii-is-innocent.2208994/

 

[avenox]

I don't care for this discussion but if you're Iranian you're still gonna be biased lol

I hope 40 disgusting low IQ niggers set camp on your back garden

 

[Bipolar2Cel]

It is caused by feminism(caused by atheism) lol, any country/empire would get this shit if they had feminism. Colonialism leading to mass immigration like that after it doesn't even make sense, it is feminism and atheism and cuckism that caused most of it lol. It is basically a punishment by God for nations turning their back on him and creation. White people deserve it for being atheist losers and feminists. It is 100% self-caused, this is why I don't even bother thinking about it, pointless and it is probably over, sorry. You can be aware but still choose to ignore it and focus on ascending.

 

[Luquier]

It is caused by feminism(caused by atheism) lol, any country/empire would get this shit if they had feminism. Colonialism leading to mass immigration like that after it doesn't even make sense, it is feminism and atheism and cuckism that caused most of it lol. It is basically a punishment by God for nations turning their back on him and creation. White people deserve it for being atheist losers and feminists. It is 100% self-caused, this is why I don't even bother thinking about it, pointless and it is probably over, sorry. You can be aware but still choose to ignore it and focus on ascending.

This this this

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

They will always use the excuse of “but we brought civilisation” in which they literally didnt other than 2 countries of that being Rhodesia and Apartheid.

It’s like me roundhouse kicking you, putting you into a 2 week coma, but you should still thank me because I drove you to the hospital and put flowers on your bed and paid for your medical bills.

That’s the logic of thr averge pro Colonialism Euro.

I will forever thank the Arabs, Turks, Mongols, Chinese and the Japanese for actually fighting against the west.

lol civilisation== working 9-5 in a capitalistic hellhole being an incel

These cumskins are so deserving of extermination that’s why gods making them not breed


“But we ended slavery “

Meanwhile the Persians and Chinese were the first to end it historically and the Europeans ended it after benefitting 300 years from the most brutal form of the practice that made even the Arabs blush with how brutal it was

Like raping a woman then pulling out after you nut and then saying “Hey what’s the problem I pulled out broooo”

 

[Hess]

The reality of this is the fact that while the Europeans were stealing the conquered lands resources and bringing them back to Europe, Islamic colonialism actually developed the lands they went into, the Persians, the Turks, the Arabs, they all built cities and towns in conquered lands unlike Whites who just used the stolen resources back into Europe.

"European colonialism never benefited or developed the lands"
Blatantly false, all of africa's infrastructure was built up by europeans, every town, road and city in southern africa as well was built up purely by europeans and exists today because of them, also ethnic cleansing in africa lol? majority of the rule there was just detatched rulers bringing up infrastructure and making sure to take advantage of natural resources and occasionally maintaining law and stablility, there was rarely any attempt to demographically replace or significantly reduce their populations, the only whites to do so were established white groups in southern africa that spent 400 years in africa prior to the 19th century and wanted to expand, but even then they only managed to gain influence after ww2 for a brief period and even then were not abnormally brutal compared to the rest of people in history

The thing is, did any Caliphates slaughter, ethnically cleanse, pillage, persecute and/or oppress the people they conquered? No, defintely not as much as Europeans did, did the Ottomans persecute the arabs? No. Did the Abbasids or the Ayubidds persecute Spaniards? No.

lol so the ottomans killing off armenians, kurds, greeks and assyrians and also suppressing arab nationalist movements is now non existant? (not to mention the jannissary system and how they would kidnap the children of native populations and try to raise them into islam and use them as soldiers) and lets not pretend they didnt try to do the same in europe as well, they were just not as accomplished or successful on par with europe, also they did persecute spainards, forced conversions and heavy taxing on different religious groups while repressing christians, they deliberately made hierachies favouring non native muslims over native christians don't pretend you are all innocent or that your peoples didnt try to do the same as europe.

your entire narrative also just relies on the narrative that they just spread islam wholesomely when in reality it was not done peacefully and was just as brutal, it was conversion by the sword in a lot of cases

This is the difference between European and Islamic Colonialism, while the Euros ethnically cleansed, persecuted, massacred, opressed and pillaged the lands they went into, the Muslims only turned the conquered lands and its people into Islam and did not look at skin color, race, or ethnicity.

Not even true in the slightest

Everytime you argue with a fat low iq chud on this website about Europes replacement with ethnics which is a direct cause and consequence of hundreds of years of European colonialism,

No it isnt, these are seperate issues, if this were the case you would of seen widespread movements of peoples during these empires, the british empire at its peak was 99 percent white in britian, the fall of colonial empires and africans being funded by the soviets to revolt and then decades after that the immigration crisis is not some indicment of colonialism, it is the failure of said natives to manage their own countries and instead of fighting and making efforts to improve their land, they flee their countries and go back to being under white rule due to their own failures after decolonization, your entire narrative of mass migration being some karmic justice and inevitable reality when the simple solution to just closing up borders and to not let them in is very easy and this is a case of failure with the governments not enforcing this, without that issue these mass migrations would be non existent


Overall this entire thread is just cope to make out whitey as some super evil that ruled the entire world because OP has extreme resentment and inferiority complexes towards them not wanting to suddenly accept their migrants and tries to make them out to be evil for looking out for white interests

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

"European colonialism never benefited or developed the lands"
Blatantly false, all of africa's infrastructure was built up by europeans, every town, road and city in southern africa as well was built up purely by europeans and exists today because of them, also ethnic cleansing in africa lol? majority of the rule there was just detatched rulers bringing up infrastructure and making sure to take advantage of natural resources and occasionally maintaining law and stablility, there was rarely any attempt to demographically replace or significantly reduce their populations, the only whites to do so were established white groups in southern africa that spent 400 years in africa prior to the 19th century and wanted to expand, but even then they only managed to gain influence after ww2 for a brief period and even then were not abnormally brutal compared to the rest of people in history

lol so the ottomans killing off armenians, kurds, greeks and assyrians and also suppressing arab nationalist movements is now non existant? (not to mention the jannissary system and how they would kidnap the children of native populations and try to raise them into islam and use them as soldiers) and lets not pretend they didnt try to do the same in europe as well, they were just not as accomplished or successful on par with europe, also they did persecute spainards, forced conversions and heavy taxing on different religious groups while repressing christians, they deliberately made hierachies favouring non native muslims over native christians don't pretend you are all innocent or that your peoples didnt try to do the same as europe.

your entire narrative also just relies on the narrative that they just spread islam wholesomely when in reality it was not done peacefully and was just as brutal, it was conversion by the sword in a lot of cases

Not even true in the slightest
View attachment 5443422
View attachment 5443423



No it isnt, these are seperate issues, if this were the case you would of seen widespread movements of peoples during these empires, the british empire at its peak was 99 percent white in britian, the fall of colonial empires and africans being funded by the soviets to revolt and then decades after that the immigration crisis is not some indicment of colonialism, it is the failure of said natives to manage their own countries and instead of fighting and making efforts to improve their land, they flee their countries and go back to being under white rule due to their own failures after decolonization, your entire narrative of mass migration being some karmic justice and inevitable reality when the simple solution to just closing up borders and to not let them in is very easy and this is a case of failure with the governments not enforcing this, without that issue these mass migrations would be non existent


Overall this entire thread is just cope to make out whitey as some super evil that ruled the entire world because OP has extreme resentment and inferiority complexes towards them not wanting to suddenly accept their migrants and tries to make them out to be evil for looking out for white interests

Cumskin major copium overdose

The extent you pigoids go to justify your races evil actions is insane

This is why God is flooding your lands with Muslims and ethnics and lowering your birth rate and making your women BBC GUZZLERS and pink men like you Chink chasers

Your a cursed race

 

[Hess]

Cumskin major copium overdose

The extent you pigoids go to justify your races evil actions is insane

This is why God is flooding your lands with Muslims and ethnics and lowering your birth rate and making your women BBC GUZZLERS and pink men like you Chink chasers

Your a cursed race

Nothing wrong with conquest or anything "evil" about it, we were just the best at it compared to the rest of the world, the fact so many ethnics are willing risk life and limb to live in a white ruled country proves that the entire third world subconsciously wants white rule back and to be able to rely on their infrastructure, development and governance again

 

[AscendHQ]

Everytime you argue with a fat low iq chud on this website about Europes replacement with ethnics which is a direct cause and consequence of hundreds of years of European colonialism, 9 times out of 10, they will always bring up the Islamic conquests, and use the only narrative they have which “They enslaved longer than we did”.

The thing is, did any Caliphates slaughter, ethnically cleanse, pillage, persecute and/or oppress the people they conquered? No, defintely not as much as Europeans did, did the Ottomans persecute the arabs? No. Did the Abbasids or the Ayubidds persecute Spaniards? No.

The reality of this is the fact that while the Europeans were stealing the conquered lands resources and bringing them back to Europe, Islamic colonialism actually developed the lands they went into, the Persians, the Turks, the Arabs, they all built cities and towns in conquered lands unlike Whites who just used the stolen resources back into Europe.

This is the difference between European and Islamic Colonialism, while the Euros ethnically cleansed, persecuted, massacred, opressed and pillaged the lands they went into, the Muslims only turned the conquered lands and its people into Islam and did not look at skin color, race, or ethnicity.

TLDR: No TLDR for you, either read it all or don’t.


Case closed by Avenox, thank you for reading this high IQ thread, if you did.

Were a alike

 

[ghoulmania]

the Muslims only turned the conquered lands and its people into Islam and did not look at skin color, race, or ethnicity.

you could also see it as an ideological unification of different peoples. Caliphates/major islamic kingdoms ruled over many different populations, and for most of history (obviously history is full of contradicting events) they managed to keep everything stable.

also there were different goals for each campaigns where one was for exploitation the other was just to establish moral code to civilizations