Clavicular is not the reason Org blew up.

D

Deleted member 306147

The white petal blossoms.
Joined
Dec 30, 2025
Posts
211
Reputation
291
Looking at Google Trends search data, @Clavicular going mainstream in early 2025 did not produce a spike in search interest. Instead, the existing upward trend continued at a similar rate, indicating that his mainstream exposure reinforced ongoing growth rather than initiating a new wave of discovery.

The only clear inflection point occurs in mid-2023, when Dillion Latham leaked the forum. During July 30 – August 5, search interest registered at 32, followed by 64 in the subsequent period (August 6 – August 12), showing a 100% increase.

Org was always destined to blow up as looks will always being something someone wants to maximize.


Screenshot 15 2 2026 22418 trendsgooglecom







@acm @Jason Voorhees
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Ergogenic, WayneBraaaah, quan1 and 3 others
Did you even read my fucking thread? that's legit what i was saying

edit: and before you reply, me talking about LM & BP blowing up should also imply org blowing up as a result of that shit too though i didn't explicity say it
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: ltnbrownacnecel, Yani, Wuzzdio and 2 others
I think he did take looksmaxing mainstream tho. Ive been reading the new york times for 8 years now and this is the first time in my life I've seen an article talking about him and this forum
 
  • +1
Reactions: ltnbrownacnecel, Yani, 888mastermind and 1 other person
he's with andrew tate now, now he can ride his dick for clout now.
 
  • +1
Reactions: dawooddX
Did you even read my fucking thread? that's legit what i was saying
Im sorry bhai:trepidation: I was just trying to put your point out better since you couldn't say anything legible.
 
Im sorry bhai:trepidation: I was just trying to put your point out better since you couldn't say anything legible.
since when was legibility = proper punctuation
it's a few sentences nigga, you're trying to throw backhanded bullshit at me since you didn't read my shit
 
I think he did take looksmaxing mainstream tho. Ive been reading the new york times for 8 years now and this is the first time in my life I've seen an article talking about him and this forum
I completely agree on the aspect of him making Looksmaxing as a topic popular but i find it odd that people blame him for orgs popularity when org has always been growing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
He's going to get assassinated this year.
 
Did you even read my fucking thread? that's legit what i was saying

edit: and before you reply, me talking about LM & BP blowing up should also imply org blowing up as a result of that shit too though i didn't explicity say it
Org never blew up.
 
Org never blew up.
Looksmax.org today:
1771147613112

Members: 132,839

Looksmax.org OTD a year ago
1771147705947

1771147724648

Members: 60,520


A more than double increase in total members over the span of one year.
From 2019-2025, to 2025-2026.
Whatever you say bro :forcedsmile:
 
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: lnceIs and Ergogenic
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 306147 and acm
Looksmax.org today:
View attachment 4657674
Members: 132,839

Looksmax.org OTD a year ago
View attachment 4657680
View attachment 4657681
Members: 60,520


A more than double increase in total members over the span of one year.
From 2019-2025, to 2025-2026.
Whatever you say bro :forcedsmile:
Theres no exponential acceleration in members rather. Relevant gains also matter. Going from 60000 to 120000 is a 100% gain. So the year prior was most likely 30000 members am i wrong?
 
and don't contradict yourself at the start of the post.
120000 members is like a shitty app no one wants. No one is on this forum. This forum isn't popular, it will continue to become more and more popular because that's how this works. I never stated this forum is popular rather that it will inevitably be popular.
 
  • +1
Reactions: inanotherlife.
Theres no exponential acceleration in members rather. Relevant gains also matter. Going from 60000 to 120000 is a 100% gain. So the year prior was most likely 30000 members am i wrong?
from 2023 onwards lookmaxx became kinda mainstreamish with now being completely mainstream
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 306147
Theres no exponential acceleration in members rather. Relevant gains also matter. Going from 60000 to 120000 is a 100% gain. So the year prior was most likely 30000 members am i wrong?
120000 members is like a shitty app no one wants. No one is on this forum. This forum isnt popular, it will continue to become more and more popular because thats how this works.
Bro Sigh GIF

yknow what, yeah you win go do your victory lap
 
from 2023 onwards lookmaxx became kinda mainstreamish with now being completely mainstream
Youre relatively og, would you say its doubled members each year since you joined? just because its a larger figure increase doesn't mean that isnt the trend of the site.
 
  • +1
Reactions: inanotherlife.
Youre relatively og, would you say its doubled members each year since you joined? just because its a larger increase doesnt mean that isnt the trend of the site.
i didnt use it much from 2023 to now, but it was completely diffrent stratosphere in terms of exposure from 2019 to 2022.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 306147
That K Shami kid was doing Interviews on Mainstream TalkShow Networks before Clav even had traction
here as a user
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 306147
That K Shami kid was doing Interviews on Mainstream TalkShow Networks before Clav even had traction
here as a user
Holy shit I forgot about that. That's bigger than anything clavs done in terms of viewership id assume.
 
  • +1
Reactions: inanotherlife.

Similar threads

D
Replies
14
Views
1K
KeepCopingLads
KeepCopingLads
TheBlackpilledOne
Replies
6
Views
876
DirtyBlonde
DirtyBlonde
Edgarpill
Replies
52
Views
7K
yordancel
yordancel
heightmaxxing
Replies
56
Views
8K
lurking truecel
lurking truecel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top