Colonialism saved Africa.

[infidel hunter]

All the talk of imperialism and colonialism ruing Africa... before Europe got involved Africa had no electricity no technology and was essentially living In a Stone Age level of advancement(they are Bronze Age now in many communities, going backwards...). The gooks have now started colonialism in Africa because without it the continent would devolve further into madness. God damn white Europeans! Cursing us with roads and electricity and central government! Now South Africa is a shithole and the rest of the continent is essentially a warzone. The Arabs and Europeans are needed in Africa now more than ever. But whites and arabs will be blamed for all of africa’s problems even though they saved it.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Give me any source of Africans being in the Stone Age

 

[infidel hunter]

Give me any source of Africans being in the Stone Age

they still live in mud huts to this day. No electricity, no cement roads. They are going backwards.

 

[infidel hunter]

Give me any source of Africans being in the Stone Age

Jfl every article on google talks about Egypt, which doesn’t even count, so much med and Arab influence they didn’t even look African their people were essentially med. it’s insane how pc google is they don’t talk about how shit Africa was before colonialism.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

View attachment 1243999
View attachment 1244000
View attachment 1244001
they still live in mud huts to this day. No electricity, no cement roads. They are going backwards.

View attachment 1243999
View attachment 1244000
View attachment 1244001
they still live in mud huts to this day. No electricity, no cement roads. They are going backwards.

This is in sub Saharan Africa bro I just had to type in African cities

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Jfl every article on google talks about Egypt, which doesn’t even count, so much med and Arab influence they didn’t even look African their people were essentially med. it’s insane how pc google is they don’t talk about how shit Africa was before colonialism.

Egypt was an African civilization ancient Egypt was an African nation and genetics wise Egyptians are Africans

 

[infidel hunter]

View attachment 1244004
View attachment 1244005View attachment 1244006
This is in sub Saharan Africa bro I just had to type in African cities

How many countries in Africa have cities like this? A handful? 99% of the country is pre Bronze Age technology.

 

[infidel hunter]

Egypt was an African civilization ancient Egypt was an African nation and genetics wise Egyptians are Africans

Biologically the Egyptians were nowhere near other sub Saharan blacks, they were much more fairer skinned and had a culture separate from all other African tribes surrounding them.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

How many countries in Africa have cities like this? A handful? 99% of the country is pre Bronze Age technology.

You can find them in Nigeria, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Ethiopia, Kenya South Africa etc

 

[Kekee]

Should've never colonized. Now they are in white countries. Just lol @ colonization. Africans are fine with living in mud huts, so just let them be.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Biologically the Egyptians were nowhere near other sub Saharan blacks, they were much more fairer skinned and had a culture separate from all other African tribes surrounding them.

Yeah they did but genetically they were afro asatic which relates to other black Africans. Egyptians were North African in genetics not arab in mediterranean

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Should've never colonized. Now they are in white countries. Just lol @ colonization. Africans are fine with living in mud huts, so just let them be.

Are these mud huts?

 

[infidel hunter]

Yeah they did but genetically they were afro asatic which relates to other black Africans. Egyptians were North African in genetics not arab in mediterranean

I like how Eurocentric has been used by liberals to mask reality. It’s not a Eurocentric view, the ancient Egyptians who built the pyramids were more similar to Macedonians than other black sub Saharan Africans. It’s evident in their art, skeletal remains and culture. It’s insane how people won’t admit that.

 

[infidel hunter]

Are these mud huts?
View attachment 1244008
View attachment 1244009
View attachment 1244011

Not as impressive as Ancient Greek or Roman architecture, not even close, and this doesn’t disprove my point, go to a village in any African country and you will most likely see people living in a Bronze Age state or worse.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Not as impressive as Ancient Greek or Roman architecture, not even close, and this doesn’t disprove my point, go to a village in any African country and you will most likely see people living in a Bronze Age state or worse.

So this isn’t impressive

 

[infidel hunter]

Yeah they did but genetically they were afro asatic which relates to other black Africans. Egyptians were North African in genetics not arab in mediterranean

the best case scenario is that Egyptians were mixed Africans with med admixture, even the liberal studies have to admit it because it’s scientific fact. They are described often as having yellow or olive skin tones, much unlike the Nubians to their south. Somehow it’s Become political as Egypt is Africa’s one bastion of technological pride, a country that is now majority Arab and not even considered part of Africa...

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Not as impressive as Ancient Greek or Roman architecture, not even close, and this doesn’t disprove my point, go to a village in any African country and you will most likely see people living in a Bronze Age state or worse.

Btw the Africans were the first people to get into the Iron Age and Mullery energy this is what they made

This was all before the enlightenment age in Europe

 

[Deleted member 5802]

View attachment 1244015
View attachment 1244017
View attachment 1244020
View attachment 1244022
the best case scenario is that Egyptians were mixed Africans with med admixture, even the liberal studies have to admit it because it’s scientific fact. They are described often as having yellow or olive skin tones, much unlike the Nubians to their south. Somehow it’s Become political as Egypt is Africa’s one bastion of technological pride, a country that is now majority Arab and not even considered part of Africa...

North Africa is a colder place so the people there will develop light skin and Caucasianiod traits I’m not saying the Egyptians are black, just sit down and stop being racist for a minute

 

[infidel hunter]

Btw the Africans were the first people to get into the Iron Age and Mullery energy this is what they made View attachment 1244029
View attachment 1244030
View attachment 1244032
This was all before the enlightenment age in Europe

And they stagnated for centuries after reaching their peak. Chinese and European technology after the Bronze Age and into the Industrial Age was centuries ahead of Africa. That’s not even debatable.

 

[infidel hunter]

North Africa is a colder place so the people there will develop light skin and Caucasianiod traits I’m not saying the Egyptians are black, just sit down and stop being racist for a minute

It’s not even being racist, are you really saying that colonialism did not advance the African continent technologically? Even people who use the term ‘Eurocentrism’ acknowledge that Africa was far behind the European powers.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

And they stagnated for centuries after reaching their peak. Chinese and European technology after the Bronze Age and into the Industrial Age was centuries ahead of Africa. That’s not even debatable.

No not really the Africans in ancient times were equal to that of Eurasians the slave trade stopped development thanks to European contact some Africans were making and developing their own guns. Africans were falling behind but they were not centuries behind

 

[infidel hunter]

So this isn’t impressive
View attachment 1244013
View attachment 1244014
View attachment 1244016
View attachment 1244018

The ancients Greeks and romans were unmoggable, even the best African architecture at the time paled in comparison. Not saying it was horrible but to create a false equivalency would be unwise.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

It’s not even being racist, are you really saying that colonialism did not advance the African continent technologically? Even people who use the term ‘Eurocentrism’ acknowledge that Africa was far behind the European powers.

There was some advancement and new technologies did come into Africa but the slave trade and colonism set africa but hundreds of years. With disregarding ethnic borders in Africa it will be like putting everyone in Europe and Asia together at one stop and force them to learn Korean

 

[infidel hunter]

No not really the Africans in ancient times were equal to that of Eurasians the slave trade stopped development thanks to European contact some Africans were making and developing their own guns. Africans were falling behind but they were not centuries behind

They did have some firearms but were beaten by a massively outnumbered European army every time, maybe they were decades behind but still that’s a massive difference.

 

[infidel hunter]

Th

There was some advancement and new technologies did come into Africa but the slave trade and colonism set africa but hundreds of years. With disregarding ethnic borders in Africa it will be like putting everyone in Europe and Asia together at one stop and force them to learn Korean

The slave trade was just that, a trade. The Africans captured their own people and sold them to Arabs and Europeans, a practice which legally was terminated by all European powers long before the age of imperialism. And again if Africa was advanced enough they should have been able to repel the Europeans and Arabs easily with their massive numbers advantage.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

View attachment 1244035View attachment 1244036View attachment 1244037
View attachment 1244038The ancients Greeks and romans were unmoggable, even the best African architecture at the time paled in comparison. Not saying it was horrible but to create a false equivalency would be unwise.

Your not mogging these

 

[sandcelmuttcel]

Egypt was an African civilization ancient Egypt was an African nation and genetics wise Egyptians are Africans

egyptians had levantine genes

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Th

The slave trade was just that, a trade. The Africans captured their own people and sold them to Arabs and Europeans, a practice which legally was terminated by all European powers long before the age of imperialism. And again if Africa was advanced enough they should have been able to repel the Europeans and Arabs easily with their massive numbers advantage.

The problem is the slave trade depleted the men in Africa so industrialization was impossible. Arabs never conquered west Africa but it took 500 years for Europeans to conquer Africa. Africans were not selling their own people enemy kingdoms

 

[infidel hunter]

Your not mogging these View attachment 1244039View attachment 1244040View attachment 1244042View attachment 1244043View attachment 1244044

Lol, again Egypt card is pulled. As I explained Egypt was unique from every other African group at this time, not because it was colder in Northern Africa jfl, the Nubians weren’t even that much further down and were completely different biologically and culturally. The Egyptians at best were African- med hybrids. They don’t apply to the continent they are an exception to the rule.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

egyptians had levantine genes

Egypt was a multi racial society you could find black Egyptians and you could also find Egyptian would could had pass as Eastern European

 

[infidel hunter]

egyptians had levantine genes

Yes they are clearly biologically separate from other African groups but that doesn’t fit the narrative.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Lol, again Egypt card is pulled. As I explained Egypt was unique from every other African group at this time, not because it was colder in Northern Africa jfl, the Nubians weren’t even that much further down and were completely different biologically and culturally. The Egyptians at best were African- med hybrids. They don’t apply to the continent they are an exception to the rule.

Nubians and Egyptians were the same people genetics wise multiple dna studies prove this the goddamn Egyptians were Africans

 

[infidel hunter]

Egypt was a multi racial society you could find black Egyptians and you could also find Egyptian would could had pass as Eastern European
Is it coincidence that the African culture with levant admixture was the most advanced, unlikely.

 

[sandcelmuttcel]

Egypt was a multi racial society you could find black Egyptians and you could also find Egyptian would could had pass as Eastern European

only the nubians were black and they were enslaved by the egyptians i think

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Yes they are clearly biologically separate from other African groups but that doesn’t fit the narrative.

Cope harder

 

[infidel hunter]

only the nubians were black and they were enslaved by the egyptians i think

Yes they were vastly different from Egyptians culturally racially etc.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Egypt was a multi racial society you could find black Egyptians and you could also find Egyptian would could had pass as Eastern European
Is it coincidence that the African culture with levant admixture was the most advanced, unlikely.

Nubia was just as advanced they were not conquered nearly the amount of times Egypt was conquered

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Yes they were vastly different from Egyptians culturally racially etc.

Both groups shared similar culture and both groups are afro asiatc

 

[infidel hunter]

Cope harder

Your the one Coping, all credible scientific evidence leans towards Egyptians being clearly a mixed admixture vastly different from the Nubians to the south and other neighboring tribes. But again Egypt is the most advanced and must be pure Africans right???? Well no they are clearly described as fair skinned compared to the darker Nubians. The contrast couldn’t be more obvious based on all historical accounts, artwork, culture, technological differences....

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Yes they were vastly different from Egyptians culturally racially etc.

Yes they were vastly different from Egyptians culturally racially etc.

seeth

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Your the one Coping, all credible scientific evidence leans towards Egyptians being clearly a mixed admixture vastly different from the Nubians to the south and other neighboring tribes. But again Egypt is the most advanced and must be pure Africans right???? Well no they are clearly described as fair skinned compared to the darker Nubians. The contrast couldn’t be more obvious based on all historical accounts, artwork, culture, technological differences....

Skin color doesn’t matter here biologically there’s no such thing as the black race are these people black

they are genetically Asian phenotype is developed due to environmental pressures

 

[sandcelmuttcel]

seeth

Mummy DNA unravels ancient Egyptians’ ancestry - Nature

Genetic analysis reveals a close relationship with Middle Easterners, not central Africans.

www.nature.com

Genetic analysis reveals a close relationship with Middle Easterners, not central Africans.

The tombs of ancient Egypt have yielded golden collars and ivory bracelets, but another treasure — human DNA — has proved elusive. Now, scientists have captured sweeping genomic information from Egyptian mummies. It reveals that mummies were closely related to ancient Middle Easterners, hinting that northern Africans might have different genetic roots from people south of the Sahara desert.

 

[infidel hunter]

Skin color doesn’t matter here biologically there’s no such thing as the black race are these people blackView attachment 1244048

they are genetically Asian phenotype is developed due to environmental pressures

the environmental pressures for Nubians and northern Egyptians would be almost identical the region they occupied along the Nile was very similar, this means that environmental pressures don’t explain the differences as you go from south to north. The Nubians didn’t build the pyramids or the Sphinx, the Egyptians did, yes they had a varied racial makeup but it is clearly explained that the further south you went the darker and more Nubian /sub Saharan African the admixture. The norther most had massive amounts of levant, med and Asian dna. I think it’s obvious why Egypt was more advanced than the surrounding kingdoms including the Nubians.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Mummy DNA unravels ancient Egyptians’ ancestry - Nature

Genetic analysis reveals a close relationship with Middle Easterners, not central Africans.

www.nature.com

Congrats you proved my point yet again


Those ancient levent people were genetically also African keep coping

 

[Deleted member 5802]

View attachment 1244050View attachment 1244052View attachment 1244053
the environmental pressures for Nubians and northern Egyptians would be almost identical the region they occupied along the Nile was very similar, this means that environmental pressures don’t explain the differences as you go from south to north. The Nubians didn’t build the pyramids or the Sphinx, the Egyptians did, yes they had a varied racial makeup but it is clearly explained that the further south you went the darker and more Nubian /sub Saharan African the admixture. The norther most had massive amounts of levant, med and Asian dna. I think it’s obvious why Egypt was more advanced than the surrounding kingdoms including the Nubians.

The Egyptians came from North Africa while the Nubians came from the Sudan and Eastern Africa. Genetically Nubians are nilo Saharan and Cushitic

 

[infidel hunter]

Mummy DNA unravels ancient Egyptians’ ancestry - Nature

Genetic analysis reveals a close relationship with Middle Easterners, not central Africans.

www.nature.com

Genetic analysis reveals a close relationship with Middle Easterners, not central Africans.

The tombs of ancient Egypt have yielded golden collars and ivory bracelets, but another treasure — human DNA — has proved elusive. Now, scientists have captured sweeping genomic information from Egyptian mummies. It reveals that mummies were closely related to ancient Middle Easterners, hinting that northern Africans might have different genetic roots from people south of the Sahara desert.

The science is not debatable. It’s obvious that even compared to the asiatic African mixture of the Nubians the Egyptians were much more genetically similar to levant or med people’s, this explains the artwork, and other anecdotal evidence. They were so far away from sub Saharan Africans. Essentially med/asiatic hybrids.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Mummy DNA unravels ancient Egyptians’ ancestry - Nature

Genetic analysis reveals a close relationship with Middle Easterners, not central Africans.

www.nature.com

Genetic analysis reveals a close relationship with Middle Easterners, not central Africans.

The tombs of ancient Egypt have yielded golden collars and ivory bracelets, but another treasure — human DNA — has proved elusive. Now, scientists have captured sweeping genomic information from Egyptian mummies. It reveals that mummies were closely related to ancient Middle Easterners, hinting that northern Africans might have different genetic roots from people south of the Sahara desert.

Like I keep saying for the thousand time Egypt was a multi racial society you’ll find people as black as a Ethiopian and as lightskin as an Eastern European

 

[infidel hunter]

Congrats you proved my point yet again


Those ancient levent people were genetically also African keep coping

Nowhere near the sub Saharan tribes or other African peoples, levant people are vastly different biologically, culturally etc.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

The science is not debatable. It’s obvious that even compared to the asiatic African mixture of the Nubians the Egyptians were much more genetically similar to levant or med people’s, this explains the artwork, and other anecdotal evidence. They were so far away from sub Saharan Africans. Essentially med/asiatic hybrids.

You can’t debunk this video bro

 

[infidel hunter]

Like I keep saying for the thousand time Egypt was a multi racial society you’ll find people as black as a Ethiopian and as lightskin as an Eastern European
Your proving my point inadvertently, the reason for Egypt being so advanced was because of the med/levant influence, not because of their African admixture. This explains why they were more advanced than the nubians(which they were don’t even try to claim otherwise)