
NVM_Ignacio
Equinox
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2024
- Posts
- 2,602
- Reputation
- 1,911
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Now this is dedication
The ones you consider the most brutal ones. Where you can see a big gap between being good looking and not being good looking or something related to that yk
NZb6Air is goatedNow this is dedication
the mom ones are the most brutal imo (moms dont give a shit about their kids if their uglyThe ones you consider the most brutal ones. Where you can see a big gap between being good looking and not being good looking or something related to that yk
give me those and something else that you likethe mom ones are the most brutal imo (moms dont give a shit about their kids if their ugly
thanks bro
mark as solution niggathanks bro
i gotchumark as solution nigga
Make sense tbh.the mom ones are the most brutal imo (moms dont give a shit about their kids if their ugly
for sure my glorious kingmark as solution nigga
What about suxual behavior of physically disabled adolescences
Not gonna lie, that's actually ultrabased.
What about suxual behavior of physically disabled adolescences![]()
not all studies are industry funded, esp in stuff like this psychology etc and even if they are , it doesnt mean they're biased, yo ucan't just make a study and then post it in a journal it has to go through the peer review process (anti bias etc) and sometimes industry funded studies go against the funders interests . It's obvious anyway when the study is funded for the interest of teh funder like that chinese study saying smoking increases testosteroneAs you've prolly more experienced with that topic, how do I counter the "Studies cost money. So, someone paid the scientists to conduct it. There is no reason to pay for something unless it brings you money, and therefore the study is probably biased and made as a marketing tool for the beaty industry" argument?