"Cucked" societies create more attractive people

Height has increased but frames and craniofacial structures have worsened due to modern lifestyles. Some old high school. clips show the huge difference in males back then on average. Talking 50s to 70s when most nutritional big deficiencies were over.
I doubt that frames and craniofacial structures have suffered much over the past century. Again, I think that perception is mostly due to fatter males with less muscle mass due to overeating and lethargy.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MoggerChad
because chad can focus on reproduction
while cuck can focus on betabuxxing
specialization on genetic production mean society are more efficient to create beautiful people
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22126 and Deleted member 23359
Height has a strong, positive correlation with fighting success and reproductive success (which includes female sexual selection). Genes for taller males obvious result in taller males regardless of castration.
That's bogus, if you have the genes but lack the hormonal profile or the building blocks for those structures, you simply won't. Nature don't create structures out of nowhere and definitely prioritize certain things over others in an unbalanced environment.

That's the whole reason why the whole point on how nutrition hinders growth comes from.
 



Early boomers in the 60s put modern males to shame. The very top atletes today are dominant but average young males were much better physically than weak modern young males.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Preoximerianas, Deleted member 17676 and ChristianChad
Why are are you guys talking about whites when Asian women mog white women to hell and back?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
Giga cope
Tinder experiments aren’t real life
Go outside and see what type of guys all the girls are with

Each generation is getting uglier
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Baldingman1998 and Beetlejuice
Certain positive traits are being selected for like tall height, but there's also negative traits being selected for too like sociopathy and depression. I remember reading about Twitter thread about dysgenics in the UK that went over all the traits being selected first and against. Western populations will be taller, lower inhib and more prone to mental illnesses in the future.
 
Societies that enable and promote cuckoldry create more attractive people because females can more strictly select based on physical attractiveness (good genes) without compromising security and causing social unrest (ugly males are more likely to be forced to betacuck rather than receiving a mandated virgin).



The result:
View attachment 1787501View attachment 1787502View attachment 1787504View attachment 1787509View attachment 1787511View attachment 1787514

Compared to societies that harshly limit female sexual selection:
View attachment 1787517View attachment 1787518View attachment 1787520

jfl right yeah cherrypick the top 99.9th% percentile French celebs and models with perfect lighting, touchups and compare them to pics of common brown folks out in the sun with bad angles and lighting that are obviously not the top 99th percentile celebs and are not taken in studios or whatnot :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Preoximerianas, Xangsane, Deleted member 17676 and 1 other person
France literally banned paternity test to protect women and their infidelity. Imagen living as a man in france. 0 human rights
Basically they said the government decides who is a father not biology. they said keeping family peace, which is aka we don't want men finding out their children are not theirs because those families would most likely break up and that would put stress on the system as the women will go to the government for saftey net programs. France is the cuck captial of the world.:lul: These fuckn french folks literally said the french government decides who is the father not BIOLOGY.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Baldingman1998
Societies that enable and promote cuckoldry create more attractive people because females can more strictly select based on physical attractiveness (good genes) without compromising security and causing social unrest (ugly males are more likely to be forced to betacuck rather than receiving a mandated virgin).



The result:
View attachment 1787501View attachment 1787502View attachment 1787504View attachment 1787509View attachment 1787511View attachment 1787514

Compared to societies that harshly limit female sexual selection:
View attachment 1787517View attachment 1787518View attachment 1787520

Almost as bad here in the usa, they have these little common law marriage , laws were the government can force you to give resources , wages, cars and homes to a women, if her children see you as a father figure. Their basically just creating a another saftey net by forcing men who have sexual access with women with children into paying, because they know most men will not invest long-term or seriously to single mothers because their not bound by law as the biological father. If you let a women move into a home or apartment you own, she can file with family court to take it from you, and the courts will say its in the best interest of the children, even if said children are not yours.
 
No they dont you dumb fucking retard, BECAUSE Subhuman women still REPRODUCE! Fucking faggot
 
  • +1
Reactions: k99 and Aladin
if you have the genes but lack the hormonal profile or the building blocks for those structures, you simply won't.
Genes determine the hormonal profile. If you have the nutrition and calories but not the genes to grow taller, you will simply grow wider.
 



Early boomers in the 60s put modern males to shame. The very top atletes today are dominant but average young males were much better physically than weak modern young males.

That's obviously a cherrypicked propaganda piece. I'm a broken record here telling you that the average young male today suffers from overeating and lethargy (not because the genetic baseline is more restrictive).
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
Over centuries yes, but there won't be any substansive change over a couple of generations until gene editing comes of women start using sperm donors en mass.
A few hundred years of increasingly divergent female sexual selection can be quantified. In the late 1800s, the average Western European male was only a few centimeters taller than the average Indian male:
G Plainfct17Apr heightweb4 1555557074651
RAGw6i5.png
 
A few hundred years of increasingly divergent female sexual selection can be quantified. In the late 1800s, the average Western European male was only a few centimeters taller than the average Indian male:

G Plainfct17Apr heightweb4 1555557074651

JFL at this blatant propaganda. Tamils are taller than Chinese men in Singapore(parity) and even irl brown zoomers are at the very least equal if not a bit taller on average jfl at that graph
Singapore Average height


@Reckless Turtle
 
No they dont you dumb fucking retard, BECAUSE Subhuman women still REPRODUCE! Fucking faggot
Use your brain (if possible). Even the lower percentile females increase in attractiveness over generations with selective female breeding.
 
Last edited:
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro and Baldingman1998
JFL at this blatant propaganda. Tamils are taller than Chinese men in Singapore(parity) and even irl brown zoomers are at the very least equal if not a bit taller on average jfl at that graph
View attachment 1788669

@Reckless Turtle
I'm too lazy to read the study, but the Indian sample size is ~12k compared to the Chinese ~105k, and there's no denying that India has experienced rapidly increasing sexual selection in the past few decades as the country globalizes and arranged marriages fall out of practice.
 
I'm too lazy to read the study, but the Indian sample size is ~12k compared to the Chinese ~105k, and there's no denying that India has experienced rapidly increasing sexual selection in the past few decades as the country globalizes and arranged marriages fall out of practice.
The sample is from the Singaporean Army's soldiers lol and the numbers match the ethnic breakdown of Singapore as Tamils are 9% of SG while Chinks are 74%. It's reflective of the young male pop of Singapore lol there is no flaw in the data
 
The sample is from the Singaporean Army's soldiers lol and the numbers match the ethnic breakdown of Singapore as Tamils are 9% of SG while Chinks are 74%. It's reflective of the young male pop of Singapore lol there is no flaw in the data
It's obviously potentially flawed if you're trying to use it to represent the Indian population...
 
It's obviously potentially flawed if you're trying to use it to represent the Indian population...
? It represents Chinese and Tamils(pure Dravids) in an equal environment
 
Societies that enable and promote cuckoldry create more attractive people because females can more strictly select based on physical attractiveness (good genes) without compromising security and causing social unrest (ugly males are more likely to be forced to betacuck rather than receiving a mandated virgin).



The result:
View attachment 1787501View attachment 1787502View attachment 1787504View attachment 1787509View attachment 1787511View attachment 1787514

Compared to societies that harshly limit female sexual selection:
View attachment 1787517View attachment 1787518View attachment 1787520

Does Iceland love cuckoldry
 
Genes determine the hormonal profile. If you have the nutrition and calories but not the genes to grow taller, you will simply grow wider.
That's very simplistic. No hormonal profile if you have no "machinery" to build those hormones to begin with. Epigenetics, for instance, play a huge role in gene expression as well, even small changes like exposure to solar radiation. Your genes can and will turn on and off depending on external stimuli. Let alone literally removing whole organs.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aladin
Your genes can and will turn on and off depending on external stimuli.
Once again, certain genes are required to grow taller even in optimal environmental conditions.
 
Maybe. @disillusioned
I think it’s cucked or was, my great grand father was the sheriff of iceland and he had like 40kids with 7 different women and Christian so he was only married to one at a time when one died he’d get a new bitch to fuck leaving a incel, also incel in Iceland if your not 6ft average height of women in Iceland is 5’8 literally model height for foids also average dick size is 6.5in which makes me little above average in iceland for my height and dick
 
Seems like somebody failed in the biology class.

Sexual revolution only happened in the 60s. Women only got rights in 20s. Till then most parts of the western world had arranged marriage or similar arrangement.

100 years is not enough for sexual selection to show any effect.
 
  • +1
Reactions: k99, Aladin and Baldingman1998
If I'd be a Chad due to cuckholdness, I'd thank my cuck "dad" and mom sooo much.
 
Seems like somebody failed in the biology class.

Sexual revolution only happened in the 60s. Women only got rights in 20s. Till then most parts of the western world had arranged marriage or similar arrangement.

100 years is not enough for sexual selection to show any effect.
It does already. Gen z is tall as fuck and gl.
 
Seems like somebody failed in the biology class.
Quite the opposite.

Sexual revolution only happened in the 60s. Women only got rights in 20s. Till then most parts of the western world had arranged marriage or similar arrangement.

100 years is not enough for sexual selection to show any effect.
Seems like somebody failed in the history class.

In the 15th century, parliament was not punishing adulterous wives by enclosure but they did call for punishment for those who murdered their husbands by enclosure. If a woman had not compounded her crime of adultery with murder, prior to the 16th century, she was not enclosed. Not examples have yet been found contrary to this.

The results of sexual selection can be seen in one generation. Who's going to give Becky a more attractive child out of the examples in the OP?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
This forum should shut its trap regarding what a biology is and its trend
Everyone loves being broscientist here
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4362 and Deleted member 17872
This forum should shut its trap regarding what a biology is and its trend
Everyone loves being broscientist here
Ironic coming from the guy who isn't even making a counterargument.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129 and MoggerChad



Early boomers in the 60s put modern males to shame. The very top atletes today are dominant but average young males were much better physically than weak modern young males.

Lmao those are cherry picked dudes for a vid
 
I am not making arguments about evolution here
You want to make an argument without reading the field thats a disaster
You're just rambling at this point.
 
Subhuman women still gonna reproduce
 
  • +1
Reactions: risque_dew, Baldingman1998 and Deleted member 17872
You're just rambling at this point.
I am making a observation only
Regardless whats the practicality of your argument
We are not further only 100-200 years away from genetic engineering you can have your supermodels there

If we want this sudden push everything like nature then why give children polio vaccine,antibiotics and all this medicine to protect yourself
Why not allow me to rape any woman i see since its also in my biology

Why this argument i want benefits of 10000 year old living but not you
 
  • +1
Reactions: k99 and Deleted member 17872
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
It does already. Gen z is tall as fuck and gl.
Gen Z are same height as the millennials and uglier

Quite the opposite.


Seems like somebody failed in the history class.


Lol at frenchies. The most cucked nation on the planet @Cidre enjoyer
The results of sexual selection can be seen in one generation. Who's going to give Becky a more attractive child out of the examples in the OP?
Then why are french people manlets? Or women don’t select for height.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Baldingman1998, Cidre enjoyer and loksr
Gl couples have normie children quite a bit (for example, basically every heartthrob celeb has kids uglier than himself)
Normie couples have gl kids often enough (meeks is the first example that comes to
mind)

Tbh I’m convinced being gl is more about luck than ANYTHING else
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 22126
Use your brain (if possible). Even the lower percentile females increase in attractiveness over generations with selective female breeding.
This is the most braindead statement anyone has ever said on this site. Makes no sense.
 
If you're serious, you're a jerk but begrudgingly. First, attractiveness and dimorphism are different things, attractiveness is influenced yes or yes by society (currently we Europeans are the banner of beauty, embedded in our subconscious from a young age, all cartoons, princes and even fucking anime they have Caucasian men), that is, contrary to what you publish, second, what creates beauty and dimorphism is health, a good childhood, food and nutrition, sports, the easy secretion of GH. Literally the opposite of the countries you posted. I really hope this post is a meme because if not, damn it, go study social sciences. You are comparing the beauty of men who have the standard in their favor and from first world countries with easy health, to countries that have the standard at a disadvantage and poor health (that is, a terrible physical development as well as craniofacial).
 

Similar threads

Edgarpill
Replies
21
Views
1K
IncelJihadist
IncelJihadist
_MVP_
Replies
9
Views
689
Anth0ny
A
WhoTookVendetta
Replies
5
Views
459
Deleted member 81734
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top