ethnic migrants have a higher birth rate than whites. so not only immigration
The average height in France is roughly the same as the average height in the US, and it's been increasing due to sexual selection. Also, keep in mind that the average height is constantly being skewed down due to immigration.
It makes no sense because you're braindead?
Ugly humans will always exist because of genetic recombination. And women don't go for looks alone in ltr. Chad only is a meme if you actually go out to the real world you basement dweller
America is way more ethnic than France and still is taller than France plus due to the early puritan culture of America it never had the same female sexual selection. Ur theory is easily disproven.
Netherlands is even more ethnic than France but still way taller. So much for women preferring height.
If you're serious, you're coping, but begrudgingly. Beauty "standards" are the result of genetic preferences.
All of these have a genetic basis. You're suggesting that these factors aren't prominent in France...?
They outbreed with less attractive people, on average.
Cope.
Nowhere did my "braindead" comment deny this. You're going off on tangents due to your own stupidity.
The U.S. had a higher, relative, average height to begin with. So did the Netherlands. Like France, those countries were also exposed to increased female sexual selection. Thus, their average heights increased.
It has absolutely nothing to do with better nutrition and healthcare. Lol
India had massive infrastructural advancements in the past century, but its height growth still stagnated due to arranged marriages (limited female sexual selection).
That statistic shows for those born up to 1980, if it went afterwards, the trend would probably be stagnating (like it slows down for 1960+).The average height in France is roughly the same as the average height in the US, and it's been increasing due to sexual selection. Also, keep in mind that the average height is constantly being skewed down due to immigration.
You're just speculating. Find a source that controls for immigration before continuing.
Correct, as are indications of heterozygosity, athleticism, fighting success, intelligence, etc.
The pertinence of those features is arguably much less than the aforementioned ones.
It happens that sexual dimorphism is universal and depends on environmental factors, not "caucasian genetics" wtf. The Caucasian is beautiful by today's standards, to think that they are of superior genetics and that is why they are more "desired" has no real argument. Caucasians are "beautiful" because the current beauty standard says so, not because of natural preselection.
Start explaining how the "current beauty standard" came to exist.
You can't go deeper than this? What does the "expansion of Eastern Europe" mean?
You're just rambling at this point. Where and how are Latinas so inflated?
All over the fucking world since 2020 Latinas have become fashionable except in Asia, I don't give them more than 10 years in any case.
But if society is against my wishes, then do you think I care what they want? No. I'll do what's best for me
But White Chad -> other Chads
I agree, it will stay that way for a lot of years.
true
that graph compares indian with chinese men not indian with western menA few hundred years of increasingly divergent female sexual selection can be quantified. In the late 1800s, the average Western European male was only a few centimeters taller than the average Indian male:
Massive cope. Increasing maternal age is the result of birth control, not innate female sexual selection.
You can very easily compare the Indian growth rate in one graph to the growth rates in the other graph...
Source?
More coping, especially past the advent of efficient agriculture and assuming minimal malnutrition.
I'm assuming that medieval France and Germany were similar in terms of cuckoldry.
Adultery in Late-Medieval Northern France - Medievalists.net
This paper focused on adultery and canon law in later medieval northern France.
www.medievalists.net
1. They were getting taller, as per the graph I linked.
they weren't getting much taller from the 1960s and onwards. but according to your theory that's the point when height should have increased rapidly because then women were actually liberated and could choose their partners
as if women in the 16th century all were adulterous when marital rape was literally still legal
men still grew up malnourished in europe till a decade after world war 2 -> https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c7434/c7434.pdf
Why ar u escaping my question about US and France?India had massive infrastructural advancements in the past century, but its height growth still stagnated due to arranged marriages (limited female sexual selection).
They could have a secret affair, exacerbated by a lack of paternity testing. Not to mention, you're ignoring all of the prostitutes that got pregnant.
...yet the average height was increasing in Europe prior to the end of WW2.
What was your argument for mentioning this? The genes for height are a product of a particular environment (as are all genes). My argument is that sexual selection increases the average height over time, assuming that nutritional thresholds are reached.
Your puritan argument is weak because there was notable female sexual selection by the late 19th century in America, which is evident by the growth rate not increasing prior to that.
India went from dirt poor and poverty-stricken to having an obesity epidemic in that time period. Not to mention that basic healthcare exploded in availability.
incorrect -> https://www.nature.com/articles/pr2012189
yeah no, women weren't all sneaking out of their house to get fucked & impregnated by chad
post sources for that claimbecause the food situation was getting better
What I said is correct and that link does not claim otherwise.
I'm arguing that infidelity was a small but significant component. Realistically, increased female sexual mobility (lesser or lacking arranged marriage) simply results in females being more selective with their long-term partners (who they will end up breeding with).yeah no, women weren't all sneaking out of their house to get fucked & impregnated by chad
adultery was still a crime for most of european history
And then after the war, it continued on an upward trajectory.
which supports the theory that height mostly correlates with food situation
why would it plateau? generally speaking a 6'3 man has a higher SMV than a 6' man, therefor if female choice had an "eugenic" effect, height should still increase
maybe valuable but not necessary to know that even before immigration hit europe height plateaued
If that were the case then the average height would have returned to its state prior to the war and then flatlined. Also:
India had massive infrastructural advancements in the past century, but its height growth still stagnated due to arranged marriages (limited female sexual selection).
Selectiveness for particularly tall men would be less likely to outweigh the following due to diminishing returns:
You're suggesting that immigration only "hit Europe" around the late 90s?
shit comparison
