"Cucked" societies create more attractive people

Reckless Turtle

Reckless Turtle

Kraken
Joined
Jul 29, 2021
Posts
17,322
Reputation
24,004
Societies that enable and promote cuckoldry create more attractive people because females can more strictly select based on physical attractiveness (good genes) without compromising security and causing social unrest (ugly males are more likely to be forced to betacuck rather than receiving a mandated virgin).



The result:
Tumblr 8dc63a076c164e7c44f3e0e3349e017e 1b7faf0e 640
1469027088 EtamSpring20191l4K3nYbhEYxe6b05ea9f468a619f4c870dc4cd1aa9b
Gettyimages 535665528 2048x2048
4f3e748395adab531eaa638e4a005ea5
Camille lacourt 5
3333


Compared to societies that harshly limit female sexual selection:
Main qimg 8ba03cdb10b5eff33047b7347a88232d pjlq
Blurred background colorful colors 2477374 1
3081026 115182247
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon, Despicable, RAMU KAKA and 45 others
As a man would rather be subhuman than be a cuckold
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: futuregigamogger, klip11, RAMU KAKA and 56 others
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Erik-Hexum, LampPostPrime, czwarty and 10 others
@averagejoe will impregnate a lot of French foids . He's gigachad 😻😻😻🤙🤙🤙
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Pikabro, Roquefort, Skywalker and 3 others
France literally banned paternity test to protect women and their infidelity. Imagen living as a man in france. 0 human rights
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: futuregigamogger, arabcelxxx, RAMU KAKA and 61 others
@averagejoe will impregnate a lot of French foids . He's gigachad 😻😻😻🤙🤙🤙
Thanks to cuckoldry in his Francolineage, he can now bully ethnics on Looksmax.org with his Full Package.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Pikabro, LampPostPrime, Roquefort and 6 others
France literally banned paternity test to protect women and their infidelity. Imagen living as a man in france. 0 human rights
Native French people will be more attractive and taller than ever before.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: LampPostPrime, Primalsplit, Debetro and 9 others
Societies that enable and promote cuckoldry create more attractive people because females can more strictly select based on physical attractiveness (good genes) without compromising security and causing social unrest (ugly males are more likely to be forced to be a betacuck rather than receiving a mandated virgin).



The result:
View attachment 1787501View attachment 1787502View attachment 1787504View attachment 1787509View attachment 1787511View attachment 1787514

Compared to societies that harshly limit female sexual selection:
View attachment 1787517View attachment 1787518View attachment 1787520

What retardation is this
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Ryan, DelonLover1999 and STAMPEDE
Comparing white French people with curry subhumans?
Compare France with 1960s USA or something man wtf

Even Most white societies has harsh punishments for cucking
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: klip11, LampPostPrime, reptiles and 9 others
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime, Baldingman1998, GuyFromSingapore and 6 others
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: LampPostPrime, Sub0, Roquefort and 10 others
Societies that enable and promote cuckoldry create more attractive people because females can more strictly select based on physical attractiveness (good genes) without compromising security and causing social unrest (ugly males are more likely to be forced to betacuck rather than receiving a mandated virgin).



The result:
View attachment 1787501View attachment 1787502View attachment 1787504View attachment 1787509View attachment 1787511View attachment 1787514

Compared to societies that harshly limit female sexual selection:
View attachment 1787517View attachment 1787518View attachment 1787520

Just plagiarize from a tails video theory
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
Only due to immigration. The declining white population will become increasing more attractive though
Look I get it
You want average and ugly men to raise babies of tall Chad's and pretty boys

But it should not be done in such a Gynocentric manner
 
  • +1
Reactions: Pikabro
this thread is extremely low iq
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: k99, LampPostPrime, ReadBooksEveryday and 11 others
Look I get it
You want average and ugly men to raise babies of tall Chad's and pretty boys

But it should not be done in such a Gynocentric manner
I don't "want" anything. I'm simply explaining to you how the world works.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MoggerChad and thereallegend
you are comparing a completely subhuman race to whites
Ironic that you call the thread low IQ when you clearly lack reading comprehension and critical thinking skills.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Pikabro, LampPostPrime, Deleted member 15468 and 2 others
Ironic that you call the thread low IQ when you clearly lack reading comprehension and critical thinking skills.

i dont. indians are not even a race, they are a genetic cluster and this pass down on immutable inferior traits, even worse, whites are unironically generically isolated compared to indians, which proves your thread completely retarded

whites being gl has nothing to do with anything you are spouting, it got refuted by the fact that genetically inferior women themselves are not breed out

it's obvious you are a parrot without minimal understanding of anything you're spewing
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: k99, Sub0, Marsiere214 and 5 others
indians are not even a race, they are a genetic cluster
Are you arguing with yourself? You were the only person to bring up "subhuman races"... once again, revealing your disastrously poor reading comprehension.

this pass down on immutable inferior traits, even worse, whites are unironically generically isolated compared to indians, which proves your thread completely retarded
You ought to look up the definition of sexual selection.

whites being gl has nothing to do with anything you are spouting, it got refuted by the fact that genetically inferior women themselves are not breed out
Genetically suboptimal females manage to breed because males are much less sexually selective. Once again, I would suggest looking up the definition of sexual selection.

it's obvious you are a parrot without minimal understanding of anything you're spewing
Ironic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17676
Are you arguing with yourself? You were the only person to bring up "subhuman races"... once again, revealing your disastrously poor reading comprehension.

no, retard. your thread is disingenuous in trying to prove your theory by comparing two unrelated races, one that is subhuman.

it's obvious you're an autistic midwit who couldn't understand what i said, btw. which is flat on the nose that the parts that compose the whole 'indians' are each completely subhuman ending up in a disaster of a 'race'

You ought to look up the definition of sexual selection.

it works for some traits, but not even close to what you're trying to sell here. whites 'in their default' are inherently superior. even if you go back million of years, it would only prove you wrong because the women 'selection' and cucked societies you refer to are a relatively recent phenomena and if you had any idea of what you're saying you would know that women have no idea of what they're doing, their muh 'selection' is a disaster and extremely dysgenic

Genetically suboptimal females manage to breed because males are much less sexually selective.

lol you didn't even understand what i said, sad tbh


:feelsuhh: damn bro you truly caught me here with your meme
 
  • +1
Reactions: k99, Sub0, Marsiere214 and 3 others
it works for some traits, but not even close to what you're trying to sell here. whites 'in their default' are inherently superior. even if you go back million of years, it would only prove you wrong because the women 'selection' and cucked societies you refer to are a relatively recent phenomena and if you had any idea of what you're saying you would know that women have no idea of what they're doing, their muh 'selection' is a disaster and extremely dysgenic
Exactly this. Women have no idea what they are doing.

It's funny how people in this forum are worse than normies. They literally believe women can do no wrong, they are perfect beings, illuminated creatures :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

We should make a shrine to women on this forum...since they are so perfect. Right @Reckless Turtle ????
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: k99, Pikabro, LampPostPrime and 6 others
Average french people are fucking ugly. Idk why you think showing some supermodel show is representative lol at you
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: k99, Sub0, ReadBooksEveryday and 6 others
your thread is disingenuous in trying to prove your theory by comparing two unrelated races, one that is subhuman.
The thread was comparing societies with more permissive female sexual selection to those with restricted female sexual selection. With better reading comprehension, you may have picked that up.

it works for some traits, but not even close to what you're trying to sell here. whites 'in their default' are inherently superior. even if you go back million of years, it would only prove you wrong because the women 'selection' and cucked societies you refer to are a relatively recent phenomena
A few hundred years of increasingly divergent female sexual selection can be quantified. In the late 1800s, the average Western European male was only a few centimeters taller than the average Indian male:
G Plainfct17Apr heightweb4 1555557074651
RAGw6i5.png


and if you had any idea of what you're saying you would know that women have no idea of what they're doing, their muh 'selection' is a disaster and extremely dysgenic
Cope. Women have very objective sexual attraction metrics. It's hilarious to see this written on a blackpill forum, of all places.

lol you didn't even understand what i said, sad tbh
Consider better articulating your point.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro, RecessedChinCel and Deleted member 17676
Nah its cuz whites are just genetically superior. The harsh cold climate had something to do with it
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: LampPostPrime, Marsiere214, Deleted member 17791 and 2 others
Average french people are fucking ugly.
Uglier than the average individual in a society with strict arranged marriage?

Idk why you think showing some supermodel show is representative
I was taking extreme liberty to piss people off. Feel free to link supermodels from societies with heavily restricted female sexual selection (Afghanistan and rural India, for example).
 
@Reckless Turtle

Muslim European countries like Albania are just as attractive as Europeans and are patriarchal

If you let female selection happen you’ll have a race of 7 feet 50IQ androgynous faggot retards
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: LampPostPrime, Sub0, ReadBooksEveryday and 7 others
Muslim European countries like Albania are just as attractive as Europeans and are patriarchal
Lol. Albania is arguably the least attractive Balkan country. If you don't believe me, search for "Albanian supermodel" and then "Montenegrin supermodel," "Macedonian supermodel," and "Serbian supermodel." Muslim Albanian models are practically nonexistent in competitive modeling agencies.

No, because intelligence is an important component of hypergamy.

androgynous
Male or female offspring? Because females select for masculine dimorphism while fertile.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro and Lmao
I was taking extreme liberty to piss people off. Feel free to link supermodels from societies with heavily restricted female sexual selection (Afghanistan and rural India, for example).
You would have to compare them with supermodels from countries of similar ethnicity but without restricted female sexual selection then.

So comparing afghan people to thai people. indians to the phillipines, etc. Or something like that. Idk what a good comparison would be.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lmao
You would have to compare them with supermodels from countries of similar ethnicity but without restricted female sexual selection then.

So comparing afghan people to thai people. indians to the phillipines, etc. Or something like that. Idk what a good comparison would be.
Lol. Albania is arguably the least attractive Balkan country. If you don't believe me, search for "Albanian supermodel" and then "Montenegrin supermodel," "Macedonian supermodel," and "Serbian supermodel." Muslim Albanian models are practically nonexistent in competitive modeling agencies.
 
Western countries had many more masculine guys that were attractive to females back when society was male dominated. Females were kind of forced to find a mate back then though so you didn't have inceldom at crazy rates like you do now though.
 
Western countries had many more masculine guys that were attractive to females back when society was male dominated. Females were kind of forced to find a mate back then though so you didn't have inceldom at crazy rates like you do now though.
People were less fat, giving the illusion of a more masculine gene pool. In reality, the average male height has significantly increased over the past few hundred years in Western countries. The average zoomer heightmogs the supposedly more masculine men of the past.
 
People were less fat, giving the illusion of a more masculine gene pool. In reality, the average male height has significantly increased over the past few hundred years in Western countries. The average zoomer heightmogs the supposedly more masculine men of the past.
I hate the height cope. European hunter gatherers were 5’10-5’11 on average thousands of years ago

Then farming happened and now we eat enough that it doesn’t matter and we’ve returned to normal heights
 
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime, Preoximerianas, 6ft4 and 1 other person
People were less fat, giving the illusion of a more masculine gene pool. In reality, the average male height has significantly increased over the past few hundred years in Western countries. The average zoomer heightmogs the supposedly more masculine men of the past.
yeah but height isn't exactly correlated with "masculinity"

in fact is a well known fact that castrated boys usually tend to grow very tall.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Schizoidcel
Pre-glacial maximum Upper Palaeolithic males (before 16,000 BC) were tall and slim (mean height 179 cm, estimated average body weight 67 kg),
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime and Deleted member 18603
Pre-glacial maximum Upper Palaeolithic males (before 16,000 BC) were tall and slim (mean height 179 cm, estimated average body weight 67 kg),
Source? As you said yourself, farming made reaching caloric sufficiency even more efficient.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ballskin
yeah but height isn't exactly correlated with "masculinity"

in fact is a well known fact that castrated boys usually tend to grow very tall.
Height has a strong, positive correlation with fighting success and reproductive success (which includes female sexual selection). Genes for taller males obvious result in taller males regardless of castration.
 
Well yes, but you can ask a a court and they will usually let you have a test, most French men say they don't even know it's illegal to do it in private. But private DNA tests are in general illegal in France, for example you can't take tests on 23andme in France.

However you can do DNA tests abroad and it's okay as long as you don't receive the results on French soil, weird laws.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15468 and Lmao
Source? As you said yourself, farming made reaching caloric sufficiency even more efficient.

Farming until recently stunted the growth of people because I’m guessing not enough nutrients
Now we can eat everything so we reach our original heights
 
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime, Preoximerianas and Deleted member 18603
People were less fat, giving the illusion of a more masculine gene pool. In reality, the average male height has significantly increased over the past few hundred years in Western countries. The average zoomer heightmogs the supposedly more masculine men of the past.

Height has increased but frames and craniofacial structures have worsened due to modern lifestyles. Some old high school. clips show the huge difference in males back then on average. Talking 50s to 70s when most nutritional big deficiencies were over.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Preoximerianas and Schizoidcel

Farming until recently stunted the growth of people because I’m guessing not enough nutrients
Now we can eat everything so we reach our original heights
I wonder how large the sample of fossils was for those statistics. I'm not going to look up more sources, but I was under the impression that the average human height was significantly less during hunter-gatherer times (based on fossil records).

Regardless, Indian male height only increased by roughly 3 centimeters over the 20th century, despite significant agricultural advancement (to the point that India has an obesity epidemic). Clearly, the Indian gene pool has a restrictive height ceiling, which is arguably substantially affected by restricted female sexual selection.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lmao
Agree. Hypergamy is good for mankind.
 
Well yes, but you can ask a a court and they will usually let you have a test, most French men say they don't even know it's illegal to do it in private. But private DNA tests are in general illegal in France, for example you can't take tests on 23andme in France.

However you can do DNA tests abroad and it's okay as long as you don't receive the results on French soil, weird laws.
The semantics of testing aren't important. The implication of France being progressively more "cucked" than most countries is what's relevant.
 
water thread
 
just cherry pick pictures theory, the avg france male is ugly as shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: STAMPEDE, Aladin, Preoximerianas and 4 others
Comparing white French people with curry subhumans?
Compare France with 1960s USA or something man wtf

Even Most white societies has harsh punishments for cucking
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aladin, try2beme and JBcollector

Similar threads

Edgarpill
Replies
21
Views
1K
IncelJihadist
IncelJihadist
_MVP_
Replies
9
Views
684
Anth0ny
A
WhoTookVendetta
Replies
5
Views
459
Deleted member 81734
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top