Current list of high IQ threads & rebuttals.

As if you not some curry larping on .org planning to "eviscerate" other curries just because you disagree with them:feelshaha:
My face Is in my profile btw. Do not humiliate yourself even more than you already did… admit your defeat to your superior white counterparts… might help you in the future blyat
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ZenithZXV
a fact is something you can sense
e.g the sky is blue (even that is not a fact in this context because i'm telling you, if you go outside and look at it then it is indeed a fact)

noun​

  1. Knowledge or information based on real occurrences.
    an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy.
  2. Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed.
    Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact.
  3. A real occurrence; an event.
    had to prove the facts of the case.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV

noun​

  1. Knowledge or information based on real occurrences.
    an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy.
  2. Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed.
    Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact.
  3. A real occurrence; an event.
    had to prove the facts of the case.
exactly what i said
 
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon
oldcel v new

Michael Jackson Popcorn GIF
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Algernon and ZenithZXV
a fact is something you can sense
e.g the sky is blue (even that is not a fact in this context because i'm telling you, if you go outside and look at it then it is indeed a fact)

dont know just like how nobody knows what is actually being injected or what is produced in the body
It’s a fact that the earth has a specific atmospheric composition and gravity because these can all be proven and tested even if it’s not as simple as the grass is green.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon
It’s a fact that the earth has a specific atmospheric composition and gravity because these can all be proven and tested even if it’s not as simple as the grass is green.
Nice job conceding upon our argument and jumping to the easy fish.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Algernon, ZenithZXV and EmperorVon
And people plan when typing too..? What is exactly your point? The average person doesn't think before they speak or type.
the average person thinks when speaking due to social reprimand

users on here are usually non-NT so they are socially stunted and worry, planning their xonversations

while over here i'd say most of the people you argue with feel comfortable to not think and just write what they want
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
High IQ threads:


Many more where I spoke and commented about general things but I cannot find them.

Logical molestations:

@iblamexyz being educated on the blackpill when I was a greycel: https://looksmax.org/threads/ideal-blonde.1700785/page-3#post-24196394
@EmperorVon being educated on formal argument theory & dishonesty when he called me a pseudo intellectual: https://looksmax.org/threads/is-there-a-more-true-quote.1979410/page-3#post-27545195
@User28823 generally just being educated on everything & me exposing the girl he larps dating: https://looksmax.org/threads/i-told-her-its-time-for-me-to-move-on.1979135/#post-27540269


Too many to count.. Those are some of the high post users who I have embarrassed. No one here is even on the same level as me. You people are below me in every metric. Stay. In. Your. Lane.
hop off your own dick many better threads out there
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
It’s a fact that the earth has a specific atmospheric composition and gravity because these can all be proven and tested even if it’s not as simple as the grass is green.
yeah and jesus walking on water is a fact too
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: EmperorVon and ZenithZXV
Nice job conceding upon our argument and jumping to the easy fish.
You didn’t respond you want me to keep going? I don’t respond if I get nothing back.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
the average person thinks when speaking due to social reprimand
Not much really..? The amount they think also translates..? The person at 130iq should think about the same or more as a prerequisite of his intelligence which as a result would cause this correlation to occur regardless. If anything, this shows that online correlations are even stronger and more obvious once again reinforcing my point.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
yeah and jesus walking on water is a fact too
Not remotely the same thing. One has no evidence and we can do a test right now on gravity and how things can move differently on earth and in space.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
It wouldn’t be an assumption if I also possess knowledge on the topics discussed and not just assuming based on no information.
You knew information on 1 of the debates. You commented on every debate other than ours. You're speaking nonsense.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
Not remotely the same thing. One has no evidence and we can do a test right now on gravity and how things can move differently on earth and in space.
gravity yeah sure, molecules absolutely not tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
2k6 posts and still cant use the website
You contradicted yourself, if I cannot use the website according to you, then why did you told me I have 2k posts then:feelskek:
If I cannot use the website then I wont even register on this forum, what a fucking moron:feelskek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon and topology
You knew information on 1 of the debates. You commented on every debate other than ours. You're speaking nonsense.
I could also posses knowledge on what was discussed in each debate, I don’t need to be part of an argument between a flat earther and scientist to know who’s correct based on my own knowledge.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
Темы с высоким IQ:


Есть еще много других мест, где я говорил и комментировал общие вещи, но я не могу их найти.

Логические домогательства:

@iblamexyz получила образование по теме «черной таблетки», когда была «грейцелом»: https://looksmax.org/threads/ideal-blonde.1700785/page-3#post-24196394
@EmperorVon был образован в области теории формальных аргументов и нечестности, когда назвал меня псевдоинтеллектуалом: https://looksmax.org/threads/is-there-a-more-true-quote.1979410/page-3#post-27545195
@User28823 в целом просто получает информацию обо всем, а я разоблачаю девушку, с которой он притворяется, что встречается: https://looksmax.org/threads/i-told-her-its-time-for-me-to-move-on.1979135/#post-27540269


Их слишком много, чтобы сосчитать... Это лишь некоторые из пользователей, которые часто публикуют подобные сообщения, и которых я опозорил. Здесь нет никого, кто был бы на одном уровне со мной. Вы, люди, ниже меня по всем показателям. Оставайтесь. В. Своём. Порядке.
Can you rate my topics about genes? Can I tag you in them?
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
Instagram Job GIF
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: mirinnnasal and ZenithZXV
This is the most obvious GPT argument EVER. I've seen it make this exact argument across MULTIPLE fields.

Regardless, it can give an accurate number within standard deviations. Off that, you're nowhere near average IQ.


You can....? You can observe the habit within 2 deviations and go off that....?


AI spotted, you're a moron. AI specifically makes these types of sentences. It makes a declaration like this at the end of every paragraph. You're not smart or slick.



Your IQ would be measured upon a lot of users here.. You're acting as if I'm only putting you against 1 user. Yikes..
i said these things myself but i made sure that gpt makes the sentence so you’d have a better understanding. Since you dont like that ill stop. and im sorry but this is the most funny shit ive ever read. 2 deviations is 70 iq to 130 iq. Thats almost everyone on the fucking planet meaning you mean to tell me you can base my iq off of 2 deviations which spans from borderly impaired to gifted. Even if i did use gpt to finalize my sentences (did not use them for arguments just so you could have a better understanding) you answered with the most retarded reply ive ever seen. You dont need to prove anything to me you just said the most retarded thing and tried to make an argument out of it
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
I could also posses knowledge on what was discussed in each debate, I don’t need to be part of an argument between a flat earther and scientist to know who’s correct based on my own knowledge.
Doesn't matter as you've demonstrated you did not read the threads to know the nuances. You cannot have a useful opinion on something until all the facts are known.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
gravity yeah sure, molecules absolutely not tho
How are they not real? We’ve observed their components such as atoms and as small as electrons. Molecules have different structures which can be observed.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
Not much really..? The amount they think also translates..? The person at 130iq should think about the same or more as a prerequisite of his intelligence which as a result would cause this correlation to occur regardless. If anything, this shows that online correlations are even stronger and more obvious once again reinforcing my point.
?
my point was irl people think from this forum, online people don't think as much due to comfort

this would strongly weaken correlation since i'd say 90% of people go into this forum js to have fun not to think

they may be smarter then the text shows due to relaxation breaking the discomfort

i js thought more about it, a better point overall though beyond mine would be that due to the fact we don't really have good evidence as to how it affects people's correlation, we can't really say too much on it even if you think it's logical and i think it's illogical
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
We’ve observed their components such as atoms and as small as electrons. Molecules have different structures which can be observed.
 
Thats almost everyone on the fucking planet meaning you mean to tell me you can base my iq off of 2 deviations which spans from borderly impaired to gifted
I can span it from average - impaired / gifted. 2 deviations off the mean implies I mean 100IQ having issues can imply 70IQ or 130IQ. You also fail to realize it gives a pretty close number, it's not like when someone fits into the criteria of having issues speaking with someone at 100IQ and it's due to being stupid that they're estimated to be 100IQ - 70 IQ, they're estimated to be very low.
 
Doesn't matter as you've demonstrated you did not read the threads to know the nuances. You cannot have a useful opinion on something until all the facts are known.
That’s true it was just a scan I would need a more in-depth reading for a thorough opinion but a casual opinion is fine.
 
religious freak, just go pray to jesus it makes more sense
I’m the exact opposite I believe based on observable fact you just spout the same rhetoric as goatis without question
 
  • JFL
Reactions: IAMNOTANINCEL
my point was irl people think from this forum, online people don't think as much due to comfort
Which would cause the intellect gap to get even bigger :lul::lul::lul::lul: Notice the link..?

this would strongly weaken correlation since i'd say 90% of people go into this forum js to have fun not to think
Not really as someone at 130iq is incapable of holding a conversation with someone at 85iq most of the times. The trend is very obvious.

i js thought more about it, a better point overall though beyond mine would be that due to the fact we don't really have good evidence as to how it affects people's correlation, we can't really say too much on it even if you think it's logical and i think it's illogical
We do have evidence...? No clue what you're saying.
 
You contradicted yourself, if I cannot use the website according to you, then why did you told me I have 2k posts then:feelskek:
If I cannot use the website then I wont even register on this forum, what a fucking moron:feelskek:
Your ignorance baffles me. I can’t communicate with subhumans ethnics like you, your comprehension skills are as low as your monkey sentience levels. It’s over g. Pack it up. Your only achievement in life is having 2k6 posts on an incel forum. Still you don’t know how to use the website despite rotting on it 10 hours a day waiting for the next dopamine hit of your subhuman « friend » @topology sucking you off (closest thing you’ll ever have to an intimate relationship btw). Gg
 
That’s true it was just a scan I would need a more in-depth reading for a thorough opinion but a casual opinion is fine.
Conceded. Yikes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon and ZenithZXV
Your ignorance baffles me. I can’t communicate with subhumans ethnics like you, your comprehension skills are as low as your monkey sentience levels. It’s over g. Pack it up. Your only achievement in life is having 2k6 posts on an incel forum. Still you don’t know how to use the website despite rotting on it 10 hours a day waiting for the next dopamine hit of your subhuman « friend » @topology sucking you off (closest thing you’ll ever have to an intimate relationship btw). Gg
Am I still on your mind..?
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
Conceded. Yikes.
On that alone sure, I would need to spend more time reading each but I’m correct on everything else and the scoreboards in my favour.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
On that alone sure, I would need to spend more time reading each but I’m correct on everything else and the scoreboards in my favour.
You're 0-2, losing everything so far.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
I can’t communicate with subhumans ethnics like you
So you said you cannot communicate with me, then why did you reply back then if you have an inability to communicate with "subhuman ethnics" such as myself?:feelshaha: contradicted itself one again, go back to looksmaxxing.org
 
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon and topology
So you said you cannot communicate with me, then why did you reply back then if you have an inability to communicate with "subhuman ethnics" such as myself?:feelshaha: contradicted itself one again, go back to looksmaxxing.org
Focusing on semantics like a cuck low T leftist and missing the whole point… niggers man, niggers…
 
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon and ZenithZXV
Which would cause the intellect gap to get even bigger :lul::lul::lul::lul: Notice the link..?
No? If people don't think then you aren't measuring their iq, their iq is a conscious test on it, there is a reason it's called iq test and you are aware of being tested, because thats when your actually trying to use your intellect
Not really as someone at 130iq is incapable of holding a conversation with someone at 85iq most of the times. The trend is very obvious.
true, but when being more informal they can hold conversation
you could talk to some random who failed high school and you can talk about basic things unless you argue, in which you either convince him or iq mog him so hard he doesn't understand tour argument even when dumbed down
We do have evidence...? No clue what you're saying.
What evidence? We haven't tested anyones iq and found anything, I'm not saying we actually need good sampling, but maybe 3 people at max on this forum.

probably will sleep soon since its 1-2 am now
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
I can span it from average - impaired / gifted. 2 deviations off the mean implies I mean 100IQ having issues can imply 70IQ or 130IQ. You also fail to realize it gives a pretty close number, it's not like when someone fits into the criteria of having issues speaking with someone at 100IQ and it's due to being stupid that they're estimated to be 100IQ - 70 IQ, they're estimated to be very low.
Yeah mate thats just not true at all. If someone has communication issues with a person of 100 iq thats not iq at fault it can be several factors like:

Different communication styles

Emotional tone (like arguing vs explaining)

Lack of effort / rushed typing (which is most likely the reason you think you “beat everyone” in an argument on this forum while they are just too lazy to give a shit about your effort on an org thread no one will remember)

Ego clashes

And no you cant get a close number because you know what that would mean?

Being able to distinguish iq 85 vs 100 vs 115 just from text alone

Its not possible. Stop the cope and accept facts

Not even psychologists are able to do this what makes you think you can?:lul:

Like i said you are a self proclaimed intellect
 
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon and ZenithZXV
semantics like a cuck low
As if you did not spam dumb semantics without a substance, you disagree with topology and all you do is to call someone a cuck and low t:feelshaha:
Dude you better adjust your brain layout.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon and sub5_poopcel
Only your dreams I guess you sleep the same hours and position
Nope.

What evidence? We haven't tested anyones iq and found anything, I'm not saying we actually need good sampling, but maybe 3 people at max on this forum.
Do you think I haven't thought of that? I've gauged the iq of 50+ users via the free IQ test in the looksmax.org Discord.

true, but when being more informal they can hold conversation
The study was on informal conversations...

you could talk to some random who failed high school and you can talk about basic things unless you argue, in which you either convince him or iq mog him so hard he doesn't understand tour argument even when dumbed down
You only believe this due to the fact that your IQ isn't high enough. Past 45 points it's practically impossible.

No? If people don't think then you aren't measuring their iq, their iq is a conscious test on it, there is a reason it's called iq test and you are aware of being tested, because thats when your actually trying to use your intellect
IQ is also largely subconscious.. See how it works..? The studies done were on people having normal conversations and not aware. They thought of all possible issues.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Algernon and ZenithZXV
Yeah mate thats just not true at all. If someone has communication issues with a person of 100 iq thats not iq at fault it can be several factors like:
Not when the sample size is large enough, where mine is...

And no you cant get a close number because you know what that would mean?

Being able to distinguish iq 85 vs 100 vs 115 just from text alone

Its not possible. Stop the cope and accept facts
70 iq struggles with 100, it also struggles with 105, 110, 115, etc. This proves it's low and a general bound can be formed. Off this, I was able to tell you have low IQ.

Its not possible. Stop the cope and accept facts

Not even psychologists are able to do this what makes you think you can?:lul:
People trained for this can assuming they have my data set..?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon and ZenithZXV
As if you did not spam dumb semantics without a substance, you disagree with topology and all you do is to call someone a cuck and low t:feelshaha:
Dude you better adjust your brain layout.
Spit Take Lol GIF by Justin
. I mean yes, yes I Will take advice from an ethnic for intellectual and behavioral improvements. Works everytime. Anyways you are brown, enough said. I mog you to death and it’s over for you… I mean the usual blabla after mogging the coping subhuman low IQ ethnic
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: topology
@topology keep giving me the ugh reaction you utter subhuman… projecting the reaction that people get from seeing you IRL
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

eyes33
Discussion HIGH IQ THREAD
Replies
24
Views
165
kdt45
kdt45
ImSomeone
Replies
9
Views
44
ImSomeone
ImSomeone
thekidd8
Replies
8
Views
59
inceliusndius
inceliusndius
brotato78
Replies
29
Views
148
WilhelmThyWizard
WilhelmThyWizard
180
Replies
33
Views
252
kranerman23123
kranerman23123

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top