Deep canine fossa vs shallow canine fossa

O

oscar0819

Iron
Joined
Jan 16, 2025
Posts
212
Reputation
94
I think it is not talked about enough. Thoughts? Pros and cons with each one?
Personally i think an ltn-htn+ or even cl with shallow canine fossa looks better than an ltn-cl deep canine fossa, but a true slayer with deep (Alan for example) looks better than a true slayer with shallow canine fossa.
Tell me what u think, dumb thread ik but im just curios ig.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Amphisbaena, Dathomirian Zabrak and SlayerJonas
jester patel on org
 
  • +1
Reactions: 7arely.eroz
you can't change it so discussing it is utterly pointless.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 40105, ThraxxGlo, Amphisbaena and 3 others
they are same just angle and lightning issue
 
Deep fossa holds fat so much worse than shallow. Deep only looks good at 10-12% otherwise it’s shit. Shallow can get away with higher bf.
 
  • +1
Reactions: It'snotover, oscar0819 and SlayerJonas
I think it is not talked about enough. Thoughts? Pros and cons with each one?
Personally i think an ltn-htn+ or even cl with shallow canine fossa looks better than an ltn-cl deep canine fossa, but a true slayer with deep (Alan for example) looks better than a true slayer with shallow canine fossa.
Tell me what u think, dumb thread ik but im just curios ig.
It doesn’t matter both are good
 
  • +1
Reactions: darktriadcel, Deleted member 138051 and oscar0819

Similar threads

MogsMost
Replies
22
Views
830
kenibba
kenibba
Surfsup
Replies
119
Views
3K
StalinCel
StalinCel
itoshi rin
Replies
10
Views
1K
SQL2VD
SQL2VD
darktriadcel
Replies
25
Views
5K
iblamefwhr
I

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top