Deep canine fossa vs shallow canine fossa

O

oscar0819

Iron
Joined
Jan 16, 2025
Posts
91
Reputation
43
I think it is not talked about enough. Thoughts? Pros and cons with each one?
Personally i think an ltn-htn+ or even cl with shallow canine fossa looks better than an ltn-cl deep canine fossa, but a true slayer with deep (Alan for example) looks better than a true slayer with shallow canine fossa.
Tell me what u think, dumb thread ik but im just curios ig.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Amphisbaena, Dathomirian Zabrak and Jonasㅤㅤ⠀
jester patel on org
 
  • +1
Reactions: 7arely.eroz
you can't change it so discussing it is utterly pointless.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 40105, ThraxxGlo, Amphisbaena and 3 others
they are same just angle and lightning issue
 
Deep fossa holds fat so much worse than shallow. Deep only looks good at 10-12% otherwise it’s shit. Shallow can get away with higher bf.
 
  • +1
Reactions: oscar0819 and Jonasㅤㅤ⠀
I think it is not talked about enough. Thoughts? Pros and cons with each one?
Personally i think an ltn-htn+ or even cl with shallow canine fossa looks better than an ltn-cl deep canine fossa, but a true slayer with deep (Alan for example) looks better than a true slayer with shallow canine fossa.
Tell me what u think, dumb thread ik but im just curios ig.
It doesn’t matter both are good
 
  • +1
Reactions: darktriadcel, jeff1234 and oscar0819

Similar threads

darktriadcel
Replies
25
Views
3K
iblamefwhr
I
O
Replies
0
Views
304
oscar0819
O
Zeekie
Replies
73
Views
900
tegene
T
hax
Replies
14
Views
165
hax
hax
I
Replies
19
Views
804
Restitutor Orbis
Restitutor Orbis

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top