Deep canine fossa vs shallow canine fossa

oscar0819

oscar0819

Bronze
Joined
Jan 16, 2025
Posts
291
Reputation
142
I think it is not talked about enough. Thoughts? Pros and cons with each one?
Personally i think an ltn-htn+ or even cl with shallow canine fossa looks better than an ltn-cl deep canine fossa, but a true slayer with deep (Alan for example) looks better than a true slayer with shallow canine fossa.
Tell me what u think, dumb thread ik but im just curios ig.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 250823, Amphisbaena, Dathomirian Zabrak and 1 other person
jester patel on org
 
  • +1
Reactions: 7arely.eroz
you can't change it so discussing it is utterly pointless.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 40105, ThraxxGlo, Amphisbaena and 3 others
they are same just angle and lightning issue
 
Deep fossa holds fat so much worse than shallow. Deep only looks good at 10-12% otherwise it’s shit. Shallow can get away with higher bf.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 250823, It'snotover, oscar0819 and 1 other person
I think it is not talked about enough. Thoughts? Pros and cons with each one?
Personally i think an ltn-htn+ or even cl with shallow canine fossa looks better than an ltn-cl deep canine fossa, but a true slayer with deep (Alan for example) looks better than a true slayer with shallow canine fossa.
Tell me what u think, dumb thread ik but im just curios ig.
It doesn’t matter both are good
 
  • +1
Reactions: darktriadcel, Deleted member 138051 and oscar0819

Similar threads

negativ_canthalshit
Replies
3
Views
113
LTNUser
LTNUser
pheenon
Replies
8
Views
185
pheenon
pheenon
DownwardGrowthCel
Replies
39
Views
815
user20266741
user20266741
iblamecarter
Replies
19
Views
998
iblamecarter
iblamecarter

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top