Deep canine fossa vs shallow canine fossa

oscar0819

oscar0819

Iron
Joined
Jan 16, 2025
Posts
224
Reputation
104
I think it is not talked about enough. Thoughts? Pros and cons with each one?
Personally i think an ltn-htn+ or even cl with shallow canine fossa looks better than an ltn-cl deep canine fossa, but a true slayer with deep (Alan for example) looks better than a true slayer with shallow canine fossa.
Tell me what u think, dumb thread ik but im just curios ig.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: johnny Depp, Amphisbaena, Dathomirian Zabrak and 1 other person
jester patel on org
 
  • +1
Reactions: 7arely.eroz
you can't change it so discussing it is utterly pointless.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 40105, ThraxxGlo, Amphisbaena and 3 others
they are same just angle and lightning issue
 
Deep fossa holds fat so much worse than shallow. Deep only looks good at 10-12% otherwise it’s shit. Shallow can get away with higher bf.
 
  • +1
Reactions: johnny Depp, It'snotover, oscar0819 and 1 other person
I think it is not talked about enough. Thoughts? Pros and cons with each one?
Personally i think an ltn-htn+ or even cl with shallow canine fossa looks better than an ltn-cl deep canine fossa, but a true slayer with deep (Alan for example) looks better than a true slayer with shallow canine fossa.
Tell me what u think, dumb thread ik but im just curios ig.
It doesn’t matter both are good
 
  • +1
Reactions: darktriadcel, Deleted member 138051 and oscar0819

Similar threads

androgenic
Replies
103
Views
4K
TiktokUser
TiktokUser
Nodesbitch
Replies
30
Views
2K
aabb123
aabb123
Jason Voorhees
Replies
30
Views
858
Jason Voorhees
Jason Voorhees
carbonprynt
Replies
100
Views
3K
Wexilarious
Wexilarious

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top