Deep canine fossa vs shallow canine fossa

oscar0819

oscar0819

Bronze
Joined
Jan 16, 2025
Posts
295
Reputation
146
I think it is not talked about enough. Thoughts? Pros and cons with each one?
Personally i think an ltn-htn+ or even cl with shallow canine fossa looks better than an ltn-cl deep canine fossa, but a true slayer with deep (Alan for example) looks better than a true slayer with shallow canine fossa.
Tell me what u think, dumb thread ik but im just curios ig.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 250823, Amphisbaena, Dathomirian Zabrak and 1 other person
jester patel on org
 
  • +1
Reactions: 7arely.eroz
you can't change it so discussing it is utterly pointless.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 40105, ThraxxGlo, Amphisbaena and 3 others
they are same just angle and lightning issue
 
Deep fossa holds fat so much worse than shallow. Deep only looks good at 10-12% otherwise it’s shit. Shallow can get away with higher bf but you should be lean regardless so it shouldn’t really matter. You can’t change what you have anyway so discussing the “pros” and “cons” is a waste to damn time.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 250823, It'snotover, oscar0819 and 1 other person
I think it is not talked about enough. Thoughts? Pros and cons with each one?
Personally i think an ltn-htn+ or even cl with shallow canine fossa looks better than an ltn-cl deep canine fossa, but a true slayer with deep (Alan for example) looks better than a true slayer with shallow canine fossa.
Tell me what u think, dumb thread ik but im just curios ig.
It doesn’t matter both are good
 
  • +1
Reactions: darktriadcel, Deleted member 138051 and oscar0819

Similar threads

v8sandweights
Replies
0
Views
32
v8sandweights
v8sandweights
doubleR
Replies
5
Views
53
WonkyChin186
WonkyChin186
nature
Replies
17
Views
85
nature
nature
dester
Replies
7
Views
58
OldSpice
OldSpice
lumizz
Replies
5
Views
55
rsj
rsj

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top