Deep canine fossa vs shallow canine fossa

O

oscar0819

Iron
Joined
Jan 16, 2025
Posts
47
Reputation
25
I think it is not talked about enough. Thoughts? Pros and cons with each one?
Personally i think an ltn-htn+ or even cl with shallow canine fossa looks better than an ltn-cl deep canine fossa, but a true slayer with deep (Alan for example) looks better than a true slayer with shallow canine fossa.
Tell me what u think, dumb thread ik but im just curios ig.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Amphisbaena, Dathomirian Zabrak and Jonas2k7
jester patel on org
 
  • +1
Reactions: 7arely.eroz
you can't change it so discussing it is utterly pointless.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • Woah
Reactions: Loruki, ThraxxGlo, Amphisbaena and 3 others
they are same just angle and lightning issue
 
Deep fossa holds fat so much worse than shallow. Deep only looks good at 10-12% otherwise it’s shit. Shallow can get away with higher bf.
 
  • +1
Reactions: oscar0819 and Jonas2k7
I think it is not talked about enough. Thoughts? Pros and cons with each one?
Personally i think an ltn-htn+ or even cl with shallow canine fossa looks better than an ltn-cl deep canine fossa, but a true slayer with deep (Alan for example) looks better than a true slayer with shallow canine fossa.
Tell me what u think, dumb thread ik but im just curios ig.
It doesn’t matter both are good
 
  • +1
Reactions: darktriadcel, jeff1234 and oscar0819

Similar threads

darktriadcel
Replies
22
Views
2K
smartstyle
smartstyle
O
Replies
0
Views
282
oscar0819
O
NVM_Ignacio
Replies
37
Views
2K
NVM_Ignacio
NVM_Ignacio
134applesauce456
2
Replies
62
Views
2K
AlphaLooksmaxxer666
AlphaLooksmaxxer666

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top