Do more attractive men have more sex?

Staceymaxxing

Staceymaxxing

Iron
Joined
Nov 22, 2022
Posts
232
Reputation
320



High iq statistical psych guy, therefore be decent iq before you watch and contest the studies/forest plots

Few points in video:

Chad doesn't slay all the women, guys with resources do most often.

Women for LTR prefer low body count men than high. (Go pick up a high quality chick who wants a LTR and tell her you fuck around every week)

Variables aside looks(after passing the threshold) that are better predictors of how much you slay is social dominance, athletic participation, personality/dark traid etc

Married men are seen as more attractive by women even after controlling for looks, for LTR not STR

Men are fooled by intrasexual status signalling than women, e.g Roids in male gaze

Also addresses arguments some of you autists would make towards the end of the video
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 47332, poopoohead, cloudburst and 3 others
I actually think that a chad on tinder cleans the whole app in a while

it remains to be seen how many chads are on old compared to the overall chad population
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 47332



High iq statistical psych guy, therefore be decent iq before you watch and contest the studies/forest plots

Few points in video:

Chad doesn't slay all the women, guys with resources do most often.

Women for LTR prefer low body count men than high. (Go pick up a high quality chick who wants a LTR and tell her you fuck around every week)

Variables aside looks(after passing the threshold) that are better predictors of how much you slay is social dominance, athletic participation, personality/dark traid etc

Married men are seen as more attractive by women even after controlling for looks, for LTR not STR

Men are fooled by intrasexual status signalling than women, e.g Roids in male gaze

Also addresses arguments some of you autists would make towards the end of the video

i agree with the summary, will watch video when i get time maybe. honestly most of the blackpill beliefs read like they're straight out of an autistic 16 year olds diary.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6128, fogdart, poopoohead and 4 others
uglier men have more sex


prettier men have more everything else
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6128, Deleted member 47332 and BongMog
Chad doesn't slay all the women, guys with resources do most often.

Women for LTR prefer low body count men than high. (Go pick up a high quality chick who wants a LTR and tell her you fuck around every week)

Variables aside looks(after passing the threshold) that are better predictors of how much you slay is social dominance, athletic participation, personality/dark traid etc

Married men are seen as more attractive by women even after controlling for looks, for LTR not STR

Men are fooled by intrasexual status signalling than women, e.g Roids in male gaze
Haven't watched the video but all the points you are talking about are already known and acknowledged by most of the normal people in this community (don't show me a few outliers)

Theses points were slowly debunked since 2019/2020 on looksmax till this day

- Moneymaxxed guy and statutmaxxed guy slay but you legit have to be millionaire tier buy a yacht type money to do that shit with hot girls, + risks of false sexual assault accusation like many footballers and businessman got hit with, and with the BP you know she fucking you cause of your money not your looks, so it feels shit

- Yes, a woman for LTR or anything will always prefer a low body coutn men, the "muh you need to be high body count alpha redpill" shit was made up by some autistic bald black/white middle aged red pillers telling you women get turned on if they know you got a huge body count, women only get turned on by you directly if you look good, if you're super GL and tell them you're a virgin they might think you got a small dick but they will get more mad if they know you got a high body count as they want you for themself

- This is basic knowledge lol

- Attractive men are seen as more attractive by women, yeah your bald headed 5ft6 guy who settled with a roastie ran thru college whore is defintely seen as more attractive

- This is true, but only the retarded normoids think like that, nobody in this website thinks like this, we all know it's about face first then height/body etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6128, Deleted member 47332, poopoohead and 7 others
This discussion once again confuses LTR with ONS.

You can't get a long term relationship with a rich good looking woman most of the time using looks alone (Jeremy Meeks is an extreme outlier).

9F032260 A8E9 4F1F AF74 BA47242A0B62

You can't get one night stands off Tinder with an ugly face and body no matter how many rental Ferraris you show off in your profile.

They are two completely different markets!

Looks matter far less in relationships if you can compensate with money.
There are all sorts of old goblins who look worse than Harvey Weinstein married to hot 28 year olds because they have a net worth in the tens of millions or more.

21CAF8BF F870 455B BC9D 89803BD69144


Those same goblins would be invisible on Bumble, Tinder, etc. to hot women looking for casual sex.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, Deleted member 6128, Deleted member 47332 and 5 others



High iq statistical psych guy, therefore be decent iq before you watch and contest the studies/forest plots

Few points in video:

Chad doesn't slay all the women, guys with resources do most often.

Women for LTR prefer low body count men than high. (Go pick up a high quality chick who wants a LTR and tell her you fuck around every week)

Variables aside looks(after passing the threshold) that are better predictors of how much you slay is social dominance, athletic participation, personality/dark traid etc

Married men are seen as more attractive by women even after controlling for looks, for LTR not STR

Men are fooled by intrasexual status signalling than women, e.g Roids in male gaze

Also addresses arguments some of you autists would make towards the end of the video

It seems NT men with status and height have the most sex. Regardless of looks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6128, Prince88, Staceymaxxing and 1 other person
Looks matter far less in relationships if you can compensate with money.
There are all sorts of old goblins who look worse than Harvey Weinstein married to hot 28 year olds because they have a net worth in the tens of millions or more.
Yeah this. Sex lasts only 5 min so for women is very overrated
 
This discussion once again confuses LTR with ONS.

You can't get a long term relationship with a rich good looking woman most of the time using looks alone (Jeremy Meeks is an extreme outlier).

View attachment 2358915
You can't get one night stands off Tinder with an ugly face and body no matter how many rental Ferraris you show off in your profile.

They are two completely different markets!

Looks matter far less in relationships if you can compensate with money.
There are all sorts of old goblins who look worse than Harvey Weinstein married to hot 28 year olds because they have a net worth in the tens of millions or more.

View attachment 2358913

Those same goblins would be invisible on Bumble, Tinder, etc. to hot women looking for casual sex.
explain how a poor student mtn can ltr a mtb/htb in daily life, I see it all the time putting my two feet outside
 
  • +1
Reactions: BongMog
Ironically, HTN generally slay more than Chadlites/Chads.
That's because HTN are often insecure and try to make up for it by seeking validation and make picking up women their #1 concern.

Chadlites and Chads are generally secure in their attractiveness; they could outslay HTNs, but they don't feel the need to. Their lives don't revolve around women; for them, women are just a taken-for-granted constant in their day to day life.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, autistic_tendencies, schizo echochamber and 2 others
Ironically, HTN generally slay more than Chadlites/Chads.
That's because HTN are often insecure and try to make up for it by seeking validation and make picking up women their #1 concern.

Chadlites and Chads are generally secure in their attractiveness; they could outslay HTNs, but they don't feel the need to. Their lives don't revolve around women, they're just a taken-for-granted constant in their day to day life.
I second this. What do you think is the average body count per looks level, assuming early-mid 20s?
 
I second this. What do you think is the average body count per looks level, assuming early-mid 20s?
Heavily depends on your home country, plus everyone fucking lies about body counts so this conversation is generally pointless.
One thing is for certain though, most men are not having regular sex.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, p0lishsubhuman, autistic_tendencies and 6 others
Heavily depends on your home country, plus everyone fucking lies about body counts so this conversation is generally pointless.
One thing is for certain though, most men are not having regular sex.
I'm from the UK. Let's assume UK/USA/Western Europe/AU
 
  • JFL
Reactions: datboijj
This discussion once again confuses LTR with ONS.

You can't get a long term relationship with a rich good looking woman most of the time using looks alone (Jeremy Meeks is an extreme outlier).

View attachment 2358915
You can't get one night stands off Tinder with an ugly face and body no matter how many rental Ferraris you show off in your profile.

They are two completely different markets!

Looks matter far less in relationships if you can compensate with money.
There are all sorts of old goblins who look worse than Harvey Weinstein married to hot 28 year olds because they have a net worth in the tens of millions or more.

View attachment 2358913

Those same goblins would be invisible on Bumble, Tinder, etc. to hot women looking for casual sex.
Nothing was confused. Everything was marked clearly.

All depends on your priorities, and ironically on your end not to mix them together.

Also, the studies is clearly not referring to millionaires, your average slayer in your neighborhood isn't a millionaire but I get what you're saying.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24789
explain how a poor student mtn can ltr a mtb/htb in daily life, I see it all the time putting my two feet outside
Exactly

Its talking about daily normal relationships than millionaires (not that I want to be part of this mini thread though)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24789
Ironically, HTN generally slay more than Chadlites/Chads.
That's because HTN are often insecure and try to make up for it by seeking validation and make picking up women their #1 concern.

Chadlites and Chads are generally secure in their attractiveness; they could outslay HTNs, but they don't feel the need to. Their lives don't revolve around women; for them, women are just a taken-for-granted constant in their day to day life.
Yes

Men and women at the very extreme ends of attractiveness are also more picker and generally in LTRs for whatever reasons.

HTNs with especially personality disorders/dark triad(cant bond with one girl long term or attachment issues) or athleticism prowess or NT local status or a combo of them would be the ones feasting the most not chads
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24789 and Xangsane
Nothing was confused. Everything was marked clearly.

All depends on your priorities, and ironically on your end not to mix them together.

Also, the studies is clearly not referring to millionaires, your average slayer in your neighborhood isn't a millionaire but I get what you're saying.
Nevermind, you were talking about hot girls not slaying girls the most in general
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
Attractive men certainly have more opportunity for sex.

 
Of course. More testosterone.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top