European Aesthetics and Phenotype Variation

[sensen]

No this isn't how this works the aryan component was steppe mlba and emba the aryan component for euros i think shurubnaya ancestry though the aryans were close to bronze age euros

Let me ask you a very simple question. Who invaded India from the Northwest and established Supremacy over the Subcontinent?

 

[reptiles]

Let me ask you a very simple question. Who invaded India from the Northwest and established Supremacy over the Subcontinent?

There was no invasion lmao the aryans came and fixed and intergated with india

 

[Uglybrazilian]

great rebuttal, faggot

Oldest instance of math dates back 20,000 years ago in Congo and is the Ishango bone, the earliest civilisations to pioneer maths were the Egyptians and Babylonians/Sumerians.

Oldest piece of literature, is the Epic of Gilgamesh, written by Sumerians

Astronomy was invented by sumerians

Oldest written languages are Sumerian and Egyptian

Some of the oldest pastoralists were Middle Eastern and Egyptian/Sudanese

Gunpowder invented by Chinese

Those niggas Will probably tell you that old congonese and Chinese people were aryan back then

 

[sensen]

There was no invasion lmao the aryans came and fixed and intergated with india

Okay, you just told me all you need to tell me lmaooooo. You're like one of those retarded Indian nationalists.

 

[sensen]

Those niggas Will probably tell you that old congonese and Chinese people were aryan back then

Chinese have done great things. However Maths in the Congo is obviously a troll.

 

[Uglybrazilian]

Chinese have done great things. However Maths in the Congo is obviously a troll.

But its indeed the oldest register of math that we have, he is not lying tbh

 

[hairyballscel]

@fag112 @sensen
keep crying for @hairyballscel africans even invented earth after white reptilians came from jupiter
View attachment 746334

YES, ur getting it!!

 

[Uglybrazilian]

I may be wrong but I think the oldest pastoralists were the south sudanese
They are gigatall(taller than all whites) which indicates that they have been pastoralists for a looong time

 

[sensen]

But its indeed the oldest register of math that we have, he is not lying tbh

Awesome, A man from the Congo realized two sticks combined are longer than one.

 

[hairyballscel]

Okay, and most Pharoahs, including Tutankhamen are of Indo European Y haplogroups so LOL COPE. King Tut is literally R1B, which is the most common European Y DNA that exists, which prove his dynasty was started by Aryans aka wypipo.

there isn't even public data for 5 pharoahs, so wtf are you talking about?

King Tuts dna wasn't released idiot, you don't know what ur cititing dumbass, his data was read off of a computer screen that was shown on a documentary by some guy sitting at home, the ppl that actually ran the tests haven't said a word about the data yet

Ancient Egyptians were an amalgamation of indigenous Africans and Middle Easterners and have very little to do with Europeans

 

[hairyballscel]

I may be wrong but I think the oldest pastoralists were the south sudanese
They are gigatall(taller than all whites) which indicates that they have been pastoralists for a looong time

they were the first in Africa (Nabta Playa)

 

[Uglybrazilian]

Awesome, A man from the Congo realized two sticks combined are longer than one.

Insane for that time tbh 20.000 years ago is old as hell

 

[sensen]

Insane for that time tbh 20.000 years ago is old as hell

My ancestors were too busy drawing elephants to bother doing some math shit. They left that for the Mongoloids who somehow ended up in the Congo

 

[kej3094]

Are Europeans the most aesthetic peoples and if so, why? Is it because of the greater variation and unicity in their phenotypes? Is it because of the greater variety and regularity of brilliant colours? Is their another reason? Im not talking about sexual appeal, im talking about aesthetics and beauty

I believe it’s simply because white countries are usually the most powerful/well off. Whites can impose beauty standards and have for awhile. All this means is, adapt. For ethnics.

 

[Mr.cope]

Doesnt matter what race we are we are all subhumans

 

[reptiles]

horn of africans can

didn't invent, maths, literature, astronomy, advanced architecture, pastoralism, the first written language, the wheel, gunpowder, and many many more things

Horners aren't africans there fucking sands actually that's not true the copts the egeyptians modern day ones most of the berbers the kaybal and the gaunches actually have nordic passing people i shit you not

 

[hairyballscel]

Horners aren't africans there fucking sands

source or cope

berbers the kaybal and the gaunches actually have nordic passing people i shit you no

i agree

 

[reptiles]

source or cope

i agree

Which ethnic group do you want also when i mean african i mean negroid not geographic locationing for instance indians are not east asian's even though there a part of asia.

 

[hairyballscel]

Which ethnic group do you want

what?
i asked for you to prove that horners are not africans

i mean negroid not geographic locationing for instance indians are not east asian's even though there a part of asia.

africans(ethnic perspective, not geographical) = populations that are of majority african ancestry, ancestry which originates in africa, regardless of whether its north or sub saharan

 

[Deleted member 9344]

View attachment 746027major cope bro. lol i cant even

Your ancestors literally lived in caves JFl.

Horners aren't africans there fucking sands actually that's not true the copts the egeyptians modern day ones most of the berbers the kaybal and the gaunches actually have nordic passing people i shit you not

Horn Africans are an ancient mix of North Africans & Proto-Nilotes. They are on average ~60% Proto-Nilotic Negroid & ~40% North African Caucasoid.

 

[reptiles]

what?
i asked for you to prove that horners are not africans

africans(ethnic perspective, not geographical) = populations that are of majority african ancestry, ancestry which originates in africa, regardless of whether its north or sub saharan

Alright i just found out depends on the ethnic group some are actually drifting towards the maasai people however many are still in the european cline and the really white north africans actually are closer to euro's.

View attachment 746720

Genomic Ancestry of North Africans Supports Back-to-Africa Migrations

North African populations are distinct from sub-Saharan Africans based on cultural, linguistic, and phenotypic attributes; however, the time and the extent of genetic divergence between populations north and south of the Sahara remain poorly understood. ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Also the haplogroups tbqh are african but haplogroups don't account for drift isolation and splits. Autosomal dna wise they are closer to europeans atleast most are some are clustered towards african's

As for why i said geographically there african this doesn't need to be said does it ?

 

[hairyballscel]

Horn Africans are an ancient mix of North Africans & Proto-Nilotes. They are on average ~60% Proto-Nilotic Negroid & ~40% North African Caucasoid.

more like 35% nilote and 35% north african/levant related, NOT CAUCASOID
the rest of horn african dna is 10-15% omotic related people(very small in somalis) and some neolithic yemeni ancestry, maybe some neolithic iranian aswell

 

[reptiles]

Your ancestors literally lived in caves JFl.

Horn Africans are an ancient mix of North Africans & Proto-Nilotes. They are on average ~60% Proto-Nilotic Negroid & ~40% North African Caucasoid.

Yeah somalis are part of the braoder caucasoid race but they do drift towards african as well also by african i mean northern africans northern africans even the indengious ones are more caucasoid in general anyways

 

[Deleted member 9344]

more like 35% nilote and 35% north african/levant related, NOT CAUCASOID
the rest of horn african dna is 10-15% omotic related people(very small in somalis) and some neolithic yemeni ancestry, maybe some neolithic iranian aswell

Nah, it depends on the Horn African ethnic group for Somalis it's around ~60% Proto-Nilotic & 40-45% West Eurasian/Middle Eastern, for Ethiopian/Eritreans Habeshas it's around ~50-60% West Eurasian/Middle Eastern & ~50% Proto-Nilotic, with an additional ~15% Omotic admixture. That's why Ethiopian/Eritreans Habeshas on average are lighter-skinned then Somalis, but then Somalis are taller, darker-skinned, & have a looser hair texture. Source: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004393

The additional West Eurasian/Middle Eastern admixture in Ethiopian Habeshas is due to the fact that Ethiopians intermixed with South Arabian Yemeni Sabaens during the ancient Kingdom of Aksum which was centured around Ethiopia/Eritrea 2,000 years ago.

 

[hairyballscel]

Alright i just found out depends on the ethnic group some are actually drifting towards the maasai people however many are still in the european cline and the really white north africans actually are closer to euro's.

you can cluster close to a population, it doesn't mean you have there ancestry

mankind originated in East Africa so Eurasians are a subset of East Efrican genetic diversity, if horners are pure Africans, they would still cluster somewhat close to Europeans

and europeans have African dna, especially southern Europeans, E3b, U6, M1a are all haplogroups, among others that are found in europe which originiated in Africa, so it makes sense that horn Africans cluster with Euros

i suspect horn Africans and southern Europeans carry a decent amount of common ancestry, probably north African in origin


Also, dinka people cluster closer with euros than yorubas do, these are 2 pure african populations, yet one is closer to europeans than the other is, this proves my point



i can't see your attatchment btw

 

[sensen]

there isn't even public data for 5 pharoahs, so wtf are you talking about?

King Tuts dna wasn't released idiot, you don't know what ur cititing dumbass, his data was read off of a computer screen that was shown on a documentary by some guy sitting at home, the ppl that actually ran the tests haven't said a word about the data yet

Ancient Egyptians were an amalgamation of indigenous Africans and Middle Easterners and have very little to do with Europeans

Half of European men share King Tut's DNA

Up to 70 percent of British men and half of all Western European men are related to the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun, geneticists in Switzerland said.

www.reuters.com

"Scientists at Zurich-based DNA genealogy centre, iGENEA, reconstructed the DNA profile of the boy Pharaoh, who ascended the throne at the age of nine, his father Akhenaten and grandfather Amenhotep III, based on a film that was made for the Discovery Channel.
The results showed that King Tut belonged to a genetic profile group, known as haplogroup R1b1a2, to which more than 50 percent of all men in Western Europe belong, indicating that they share a common ancestor.
Among modern-day Egyptians this haplogroup contingent is below 1 percent, according to iGENEA."

Cope harder, brown.

 

[reptiles]

you can cluster close to a population, it doesn't mean you have there ancestry

mankind originated in East Africa so Eurasians are a subset of East Efrican genetic diversity, if horners are pure Africans, they would still cluster somewhat close to Europeans

and europeans have African dna, especially southern Europeans, E3b, U6, M1a are all haplogroups, among others that are found in europe which originiated in Africa, so it makes sense that horn Africans cluster with Euros
View attachment 746754
i suspect horn Africans and southern Europeans carry a decent amount of common ancestry, probably north African in origin


Also, dinka people cluster closer with euros than yorubas do, these are 2 pure african populations, yet one is closer to europeans than the other is, this proves my point



i can't see your attatchment btw

>>you can cluster close to a population, it doesn't mean you have there ancestry>>

Genetic closeness correlates heavily with ancestry for instance you don't expect an indian person to bloody have east asian ancestry reaching over 60 percent why ? geographic distance north africa is very far from yoruba africans and other northerners so i would not expect any genetic tie at all.

As for measuring ancestry d stats and migration charts work the best there is also FST distance you can use the formula's are kinda hard to understand and the tables are just confusing but that can help track genetic distance between ethnic groups.

>>mankind originated in East Africa so Eurasians are a subset of East Efrican genetic diversity, if horners are pure Africans, they would still cluster somewhat close to Europeans<<

Were talking about Eurasian adam here right ? the haplo group for that separated from modern day Africans well over 60 thousand years ago. The chronology goes like this.

1 Humans leave africa.

2 Humans split from basal eurasian around 60 thousand years ago.

3 a bunch of drift plus wars and rape has changed the modern landscape genetically as to why africans can look so ethnically diverse it's cause africa is a very temperature diverse place.

For instance you can find somalis who look Indian but if you did a genetic closeness chart (either use d stat's or fstats or fst charts) they would be on opposite ends of the map how does despite no genetic connection's any phenotypic similarities occur ? latitude since it's closer to the equator you see phenotypic similarities don't confuse this to mean though modern day indians europeans or east asians are related to Africans closely


>>and europeans have African dna, especially southern Europeans, E3b, U6, M1a are all haplogroups, among others that are found in europe which originiated in Africa, so it makes sense that horn Africans cluster with Euros>>


I haven't seen this on any admixture charts though north african dna is found in euros.

African admixture in Europe - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

>>i suspect horn Africans and southern Europeans carry a decent amount of common ancestry, probably north African in origin<<

Probably but drift is what drives change and i think there was a split in the last halocene around 12 KYA i don't know i'll have to double check on that.

>>Also, dinka people cluster closer with euros than yorubas do, these are 2 pure african populations, yet one is closer to europeans than the other is, this proves my point>>


African is a horrible term for cases like europe can just say white race cause literally all europeans are genetically identical nearly so much so that a half european half chinese person is less close to your average euro.

For every other race I think there is a case for the term Indian or east Asian anyways the african group which is geographically closer to europe is gonna be slightly closer this also needs to be said when i say the berbers are sands i'm not saying they literally are middle eastern i'm saying there genetically more related to middle easterners.

And 1 last point connecting all this to summarize PCA'S are good for genetic closeness not for measuring ancestry and autosomoal dna is more accurate than fucking haplogroups for instance many curries are R1A haplogroup does that mean there european ? no

 

[hairyballscel]

Nah, it depends on the Horn African ethnic group for Somalis it's around ~60% Proto-Nilotic & 40-45% West Eurasian/Middle Eastern,

You are talking about Cushitic ancestry, read this, there was another study on cushitic ancestry and it concluded that its 2 components are of equal proportions

the amount of Nilotic is equal to the North African/Levantine ancestry

and it isn't West Eurasian ancestry, it is North East African, there isn't any evidence that West Eurasians/Middle Easterns migrated en masse to East Africa, the study you cited is shit and filled with holes i disproved it here

The additional West Eurasian/Middle Eastern admixture in Ethiopian Habeshas is due to the fact that Ethiopians intermixed with South Arabian Yemeni Sabaens during the ancient Kingdom of Aksum which was centured around Ethiopia/Eritrea 2,000 years ago.

This idea is based on the remains found in Ethiopia which show some evidence of Sabeans moving across the Red Sea, the idea was that they stayed, started civilisation and mixed with the locals, but times have changed, Sabaean influence is now thought to have been minor, limited to a few localities, and the Sabean sites were all abandoned after a few decades

Sabeans had little genetic impact on Horners, it was neolithic yemeni people

And this is a shit study, they used a modern population as a reference, have you read the full study?

They use Sardinians, a population with a decent amount of African DNA, so the pic is completely inaccurate, some of that West Eurasian ancestry is African

 

[hairyballscel]

Half of European men share King Tut's DNA

Up to 70 percent of British men and half of all Western European men are related to the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun, geneticists in Switzerland said.

www.reuters.com

"Scientists at Zurich-based DNA genealogy centre, iGENEA, reconstructed the DNA profile of the boy Pharaoh, who ascended the throne at the age of nine, his father Akhenaten and grandfather Amenhotep III, based on a film that was made for the Discovery Channel.
The results showed that King Tut belonged to a genetic profile group, known as haplogroup R1b1a2, to which more than 50 percent of all men in Western Europe belong, indicating that they share a common ancestor.
Among modern-day Egyptians this haplogroup contingent is below 1 percent, according to iGENEA."

Cope harder, brown.

this changes nothing, you didn't address my point, this isn't offical data idiot, do some research

 

[hairyballscel]

geographic distance north africa is very far from yoruba africans and other northerners so i would not expect any genetic tie at all.

Moreover, our model predicts that West Africans (represented by Yoruba) had 12.5±1.1% ancestry from a Taforalt related group rather than Taforalt having ancestry from an unknown Sub-Saharan African source; this may have mediated the limited Neanderthal admixture present in West Africans .

- Paleolithic DNA from the Caucasus reveals core of West Eurasian ancestry

Taforalt is in Northen Morrocco btw

1 Humans leave africa.

2 Humans split from basal eurasian around 60 thousand years ago.

Basal Eurasian is African, it didn't split off 60,000 years ago, it split off 80,000 years ago, which predates Out of Africa migration, i have lots of other evidence but i wont post rn, im gonna sleep soon

The split time of the ghost Basal Eurasian lineage from other Eurasians was inferred at 79.8 kya (95% CI of 67.4-101 kya).

Efficiently inferring the demographic history of many populations with allele count data

I haven't seen this on any admixture charts though north african dna is found in euros.

All the haplogroups i named are found in Europe

Also Early European Farmers(EEF) were 44% Basal Eurasian

These analyses allow us to infer that EEF ancestry in Europe today ranges from ~30% in the Baltic region to ~90% in the Mediterranean

- Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1312/1312.6639.pdf

Basal Eurasian is AFRICAN and is extensive in Europe, if u want i will post more evidence for how Basal Eurasian is African but not rn, im tired asf

 

[reptiles]

Moreover, our model predicts that West Africans (represented by Yoruba) had 12.5±1.1% ancestry from a Taforalt related group rather than Taforalt having ancestry from an unknown Sub-Saharan African source; this may have mediated the limited Neanderthal admixture present in West Africans .

- Paleolithic DNA from the Caucasus reveals core of West Eurasian ancestry

Taforalt is in Northen Morrocco btw


Basal Eurasian is African, it didn't split off 60,000 years ago, it split off 80,000 years ago, which predates Out of Africa migration, i have lots of other evidence but i wont post rn, im gonna sleep soon

The split time of the ghost Basal Eurasian lineage from other Eurasians was inferred at 79.8 kya (95% CI of 67.4-101 kya).

Efficiently inferring the demographic history of many populations with allele count data




All the haplogroups i named are found in Europe

Also Early European Farmers(EEF) were 44% Basal Eurasian

These analyses allow us to infer that EEF ancestry in Europe today ranges from ~30% in the Baltic region to ~90% in the Mediterranean

- Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1312/1312.6639.pdf

Basal Eurasian is AFRICAN and is extensive in Europe, if u want i will post more evidence for how Basal Eurasian is African but not rn, im tired asf

They represent yoruba like ancestry cause basal eurasian looked like proto african but genetically ancient palethic western eurasians or eastern eurasian were not african. They were proto african phenotypivally before the basal eurasian split. Here is a pca below of the genomes of the paleothic era.

2 the basal eurasian split that is reponsible to modern day easterb western southern eurasian split from basal eurasian around 40 to 48 thkusand years ago. Basal eurasian itself had significant genetic drift from very ancient mbuti.

Know ultimately all of basal eurasia descends from africans but they still had siginificant genetic drift.


3 basal eurasian is not genetically african or atleast modern day black and they had significant genetic drift between mbuti like all non africans descend from haplogroup ce but that was well over 40 thousand years ago before the split that being said modern day populations are not realted to the ancient ones.

 

[hairyballscel]

No they don't. That's a cope. And even if they did, why would I believe the very scientists trying to cover for the model?

NEANDERTHALZ WUZ KANGZ fuck outta here. Matrilineal lines are traced back to Africa, but not all Y haplos.

holy shit ur so dumb

 

[sensen]

holy shit ur so dumb

I mean, prove me wrong. Please. Show me definitive proof that all Y haplogroups trace back to Africa.

Spoiler: You can't, because it hasn't been proven.

 

[Alexanderr]

Because I don't have to. I'm not gonna sit here and go through videos and data that I seen 6 months ago for some African that I don't give a fuck about. I just want to tell you how fucking stupid you are. I don't care about enlightening you.

That’s how it works. You make a positive statement and then provide evidence supporting it.
It‘s ironic you call the other dude stupid not knowing this.

 

[hairyballscel]

I mean, prove me wrong. Please. Show me definitive proof that all Y haplogroups trace back to Africa.

Spoiler: You can't, because it hasn't been proven.

the most basal lineages have been detected in West, Northwest and Central Africa, suggesting plausibility for the Y-MRCA living in the general region of North-Central Africa

Haplgroup A is far more common and diverse in African than in Europe/Asia

The highest frequencies of haplogroup A have been reported among the Khoisan of Southern Africa, Beta Israel, and Nilo-Saharans from Sudan, there are Nilo-Saharan groups such as the Dinka that literally have no non-African ancestry, so keep on coping

Accept OOA, 99% of geneticists and historians agree with it, keep on coping with the idea of Out of Europe or whatever, keep on grasping on straws like muh older fossils found outside Africa jfl, over for ur iq, ur ancestors came from Africa, it is what it is

 

[Deleted member 10104]

the most basal lineages have been detected in West, Northwest and Central Africa, suggesting plausibility for the Y-MRCA living in the general region of North-Central Africa

Haplgroup A is far more common and diverse in African than in Europe/Asia

The highest frequencies of haplogroup A have been reported among the Khoisan of Southern Africa, Beta Israel, and Nilo-Saharans from Sudan, there are Nilo-Saharan groups such as the Dinka that literally have no non-African ancestry, so keep on coping

Accept OOA, 99% of geneticists and historians agree with it, keep on coping with the idea of Out of Europe or whatever, keep on grasping on straws like muh older fossils found outside Africa jfl, over for ur iq, ur ancestors came from Africa, it is what it is

Who gives a fuck where my ancestors came from? All that matters is that my most recent ancestors mogged yours to oblivion, enslaved them, conquered the modern world, invented the language your dumb ass is speaking in, invented the internet your dumb ass is connected too, and invented the computer your dumb ass is reading this on.

 

[sensen]

Who gives a fuck where my ancestors came from? All that matters is that my most recent ancestors mogged yours to oblivion, enslaved them, conquered the modern world, invented the language your dumb ass is speaking in, invented the internet your dumb ass is connected too, and invented the computer your dumb ass is reading this on.

Even with ALL OF THAT absolute fucking mogging, this guy is STILL wrong. looooooooool

 

[hairyballscel]

this guy is STILL wrong. looooooooool

disprove what i said

 

[sensen]

the most basal lineages have been detected in West, Northwest and Central Africa, suggesting plausibility for the Y-MRCA living in the general region of North-Central Africa

Haplgroup A is far more common and diverse in African than in Europe/Asia

The highest frequencies of haplogroup A have been reported among the Khoisan of Southern Africa, Beta Israel, and Nilo-Saharans from Sudan, there are Nilo-Saharan groups such as the Dinka that literally have no non-African ancestry, so keep on coping

Accept OOA, 99% of geneticists and historians agree with it, keep on coping with the idea of Out of Europe or whatever, keep on grasping on straws like muh older fossils found outside Africa jfl, over for ur iq, ur ancestors came from Africa, it is what it is

You genuinely believe that my ancestors 100,000 years ago were Black Africans who came into Northern Europe and evolution eventually changed every single fine detail of their body, and cognition?

Bro lol... look.. You're holding onto cartoon level science. You need to realize that science is nothing more than the foundational push for Neoliberalism. That's what science stands to do.. push the regime. It's indoctrination into the modern Western system, and the modern West is so powerful that anyone, even top scientists in what would be considered 2nd or 3rd world countries are laughed out of the room on this subject.

They're not laughed out because they're wrong, they're laughed out because they're feared.

Also saying "its over for ur iq" to a White man while being Black is a comedy in itself.

 

[sensen]

disprove what i said

Bro, you keep doing this "The most basal lineages" shit like you're proving a point. It doesn't matter what's been found because there's as much if not more evidence for out of Africa being wrong than there is for the contrary. YOU KNOW THIS. I don't even have to tell you this.

 

[hairyballscel]

You genuinely believe that my ancestors 100,000 years ago were Black Africans who came into Northern Europe and evolution eventually changed every single fine detail of their body, and cognition?

You genuinely believe that my ancestors 100,000 years ago were White Europeans who came into East Africa and evolution evenutally changed every single fine detail of their body, and cogntion?

Bro lol... look.. You're holding onto cartoon level science. You need to realize that science is nothing more than the foundational push for Neoliberalism. That's what science stands to do.. push the regime. It's indoctrination into the modern Western system, and the modern West is so powerful that anyone, even top scientists in what would be considered 2nd or 3rd world countries are laughed out of the room on this subject.

muh science is leftist jewish propaganda, u haven't provided any evidence to ur claims

Bro, you keep doing this "The most basal lineages" shit like you're proving a point. It doesn't matter what's been found because there's as much if not more evidence for out of Africa being wrong than there is for the contrary. YOU KNOW THIS. I don't even have to tell you this.

are you actually retarded? the fact that the most basal lineages are found in Africa proves OOA theory, you still haven't said why african diversity is higher than european diversity yet mankind originated in europe?

please, stop talking shit and actually provide evidence for ur claims?

 

[sensen]

disprove what i said

Lets use the most popular haplogroup in Western Europe, r1b. If you trace back the lineage of r1b to find the root ancestral haplogroup that eventually spawned it, you'll go back 75,000 years to Southeast Asia to haplogroup CF. No one knows where it originated. It's descendants were found in the Indian subcontinent and up through the Middle East. If you trace it back to the ancestor of CF, you'll get CT, which is African.

So we have a 30,000 year gap that is completely written off by modern science and anthropology. And they just ASSUME that it's predated by CT in direct succession simply because they have one mutation in common.

That is a fucking cartoon. You can't build an entire hypothesis around this when there's 30,000 years completely unaccounted for. This is why out of Africa is comical.

Modern humans are varying percentages of different pre hominid species mixed with Homo Sapien. There's been little to no evidence for any of your bullshit. You just buy it because 2 digit IQ and love for daddyjoo

 

[sensen]

You genuinely believe that my ancestors 100,000 years ago were White Europeans who came into East Africa and evolution evenutally changed every single fine detail of their body, and cogntion?

No you fucking retard. You think I believe in an "OUR OF EUROPE MODEL"? When the fuck did I say that?
Read my next post. Your entire argument is on a false premise that I believe something I don't.

 

[sensen]

You genuinely believe that my ancestors 100,000 years ago were White Europeans who came into East Africa and evolution evenutally changed every single fine detail of their body, and cogntion?


muh science is leftist jewish propaganda, u haven't provided any evidence to ur claims

are you actually retarded? the fact that the most basal lineages are found in Africa proves OOA theory, you still haven't said why african diversity is higher than european diversity yet mankind originated in europe?

please, stop talking shit and actually provide evidence for ur claims?

Keep believing "African diversity is higher" when all of you look, sound and act exactly the same. Meanwhile Whites have 500 different hair and eye color combinations, and far more base skin tones. LOL AT AFRICA

 

[hairyballscel]

Keep believing "African diversity is higher" when all of you look, sound and act exactly the same. Meanwhile Whites have 500 different hair and eye color combinations, and far more base skin tones. LOL AT AFRICA

muh whites have more base skin tones

African populations are characterized by greater levels of genetic diversity, extensive population substructure, and less linkage disequilibrium (LD) among loci compared to non-African populations.
- AFRICAN GENETIC DIVERSITY: Implications for Human Demographic History, Modern Human Origins, and Complex Disease Mapping



The African diversity estimate is even higher than that between Africans and Eurasians (0.096% ± 0.012%). From available data for noncoding autosomal regions (total length = 47,038 bp) and X-linked regions (47,421 bp), we estimated the π-values for autosomal regions to be 0.105, 0.070, 0.069, and 0.097% for Africans, Asians, Europeans, and between Africans and Eurasians, and the corresponding values for X-linked regions to be 0.088, 0.042, 0.053, and 0.082%. Thus, Africans differ from one another slightly more than from Eurasians, and the genetic diversity in Eurasians is largely a subset of that in Africans, supporting the out of Africa model of human evolution.
- Larger Genetic Differences Within Africans Than Between Africans and Eurasians

Africans have the highest linguistic diversity aswell, keep on coping

 

[Deleted member 2157]

So much retardation in this thread.

The IQ differences between races are small in the same environment. All the shockingly low IQ levels for africans were gathered by testing on children in poverty, but of course incels here won't even bother checking where the studies came from.

Sierra Leone is in the 90s alongside numerous european countries, you fucking idiots never thought it was weird it was so high? JFL

 

[Deleted member 2157]

Northern europeans have larger frontal lobes than any race so you can't single out africans for this. Southern europeans also have small ones in comparison, so do most eastern europeans.