Evolution of western society

[Deleted member 17430]

From this:

To this:

 

[Bashan]

You posted chad and stacy family photos. Where are the incels? do you want me to post david laid and say muh look at the present everyone is so jacked and good looking?

 

[Deleted member 7580]

 

[Artemis]

You posted chad and stacy family photos. Where are the incels? do you want me to post david laid and say muh look at the present everyone is so jacked and good looking?

Fixing:

Now ok?

 

[Bashan]

Fixing:

Now ok?

But that's not old times

 

[Deleted member 7327]

Western society is exactly the same you’re just not good enough to take part in it, there was hella incel weirdos back then too tbh

 

[Artemis]

Western society is exactly the same you’re just not good enough to take part in it, there was hella incel weirdos back then too tbh

TBH, i don't think so.

Even 20 years ago, people were way more social on the average. Now, it is the internet, PS3+, OnlyFans, delivery of everything to the door... there is literally no room for communication. If one wants, they can literally hide behind the door and sit alone for decades... no communication necessary... It was simply impossible in the very recent past.

 

[Deleted member 7327]

TBH, i don't think so.

Even 20 years ago, people were way more social on the average. Now, it is the internet, PS3+, OnlyFans, delivery of everything to the door... there is literally no room for communication. If one wants, they can literally hide behind the door and sit alone for decades... no communication necessary... It was simply impossible in the very recent past.

people who are social now would’ve been social in the past
People who aren’t social now would’ve been doing the absolute BARE MINIMUM of socialization required to survive. Think something like the lady that neighborhood kids used to say was a witch or some old form of incel who used to go straight back and forth from his job to his house.

So in that way the only real difference is that anti socials are able to survive and stick to themselves a little bit easier, lol.

I don’t know what knee jerk reaction you’ve had that convinced you that these things make ANY meaningful difference to your or anyone else’s lives but I promise if you do the smallest amount if inspection on them you’ll find that reaction falls apart pretty quick.

Throughout human history we’ve had these different types of people, the regular people, the social butterfly/chads/famous, the freaks, etc and all throughout history their roles and lives have been exactly the same. The only difference the current time period makes is the cosmetic skin of it. We all live the same exact lives over and over and over, from noteworthy to mundane it just repeats. And that includes the hyperventilating neurotics who scream over and over that “TIMES ARE CHANGING OH NO!!!!!”

 

[risque_dew]

people who are social now would’ve been social in the past
People who aren’t social now would’ve been doing the absolute BARE MINIMUM of socialization required to survive. Think something like the lady that neighborhood kids used to say was a witch or some old form of incel who used to go straight back and forth from his job to his house.

So in that way the only real difference is that anti socials are able to survive and stick to themselves a little bit easier, lol.

I don’t know what knee jerk reaction you’ve had that convinced you that these things make ANY meaningful difference to your or anyone else’s lives but I promise if you do the smallest amount if inspection on them you’ll find that reaction falls apart pretty quick.

Throughout human history we’ve had these different types of people, the regular people, the social butterfly/chads/famous, the freaks, etc and all throughout history their roles and lives have been exactly the same. The only difference the current time period makes is the cosmetic skin of it. We all live the same exact lives over and over and over, from noteworthy to mundane it just repeats. And that includes the hyperventilating neurotics who scream over and over that “TIMES ARE CHANGING OH NO!!!!!”

I have a very hard time thinking western society is the same as it was even 70 years ago lol. I would agree that some very basic stuff is the same (like how there has always been introverts and so on...).

 

[Deleted member 7580]

Western society is exactly the same you’re just not good enough to take part in it, there was hella incel weirdos back then too tbh

Number of incels have decreased bcz women are sluttier but western society was much better 20-40 years ago

Very high chance your wife would cheat on you with a younger guy who’s barely 18 and then blame you and take all your money and make your kids hate you

 

[Deleted member 21735]

gotta love how users here will use a minority to describe the majority just to support their autistic belifes

 

[SecularIslamist]

people who are social now would’ve been social in the past
People who aren’t social now would’ve been doing the absolute BARE MINIMUM of socialization required to survive. Think something like the lady that neighborhood kids used to say was a witch or some old form of incel who used to go straight back and forth from his job to his house.

So in that way the only real difference is that anti socials are able to survive and stick to themselves a little bit easier, lol.

I don’t know what knee jerk reaction you’ve had that convinced you that these things make ANY meaningful difference to your or anyone else’s lives but I promise if you do the smallest amount if inspection on them you’ll find that reaction falls apart pretty quick.

Throughout human history we’ve had these different types of people, the regular people, the social butterfly/chads/famous, the freaks, etc and all throughout history their roles and lives have been exactly the same. The only difference the current time period makes is the cosmetic skin of it. We all live the same exact lives over and over and over, from noteworthy to mundane it just repeats. And that includes the hyperventilating neurotics who scream over and over that “TIMES ARE CHANGING OH NO!!!!!”

Jfl I actually read this and it's a gigacope.

Yes at some level there is a continuation of the past, but ever since industrialization, liberalism and feminism took hold of society every generation has developed different norms, values and practices which are more extreme than the previous - especially in this internet age where things are borderless and ideas are exchanged and take effect instantly. We have nostalgic reactionaries who romanticize a glorified past that suggests things were 'so different'. It's true we still had Chads, incels, tall, short, freaks etc but societal treatment and expectations of these people were not that bad.

You only knew or interacted with your localised social circle before the 90s. Only the TV was your window to the outside world, and even that was hardly what it is today.

 

[Iblamejordan]

Money can buy

 

[Deleted member 7327]

I have a very hard time thinking western society is the same as it was even 70 years ago lol. I would agree that some very basic stuff is the same (like how there has always been introverts and so on...).

Number of incels have decreased bcz women are sluttier but western society was much better 20-40 years ago

Very high chance your wife would cheat on you with a younger guy who’s barely 18 and then blame you and take all your money and make your kids hate you

Jfl I actually read this and it's a gigacope.

Yes at some level there is a continuation of the past, but ever since industrialization, liberalism and feminism took hold of society every generation has developed different norms, values and practices which are more extreme than the previous - especially in this internet age where things are borderless and ideas are exchanged and take effect instantly. We have nostalgic reactionaries who romanticize a glorified past that suggests things were 'so different'. It's true we still had Chads, incels, tall, short, freaks etc but societal treatment and expectations of these people were not that bad.

You only knew or interacted with your localised social circle before the 90s. Only the TV was your window to the outside world, and even that was hardly what it is today.

When OP says western society has changed he means the basic framework is different. When I say western society is exactly the same I also am referring to the basic framework.

He’s showing a family unit from the past and comparing it to some freaks from the modern day. There have ALWAYS been family units, ALWAYS been freaks, ALWAYS been incels, ALWAYS been chads etc etc. This is undeniable, when you strip life down it always just flows in this way: be a kid, grow up and do some form of resource gathering, grow up more and have a wife and kids, grow up more and die.

No shit having access to the internet means the flavor of culture is different, but the fundamentals are and will always be the same. Basically the reason I said what I said is because it’s very clear that OP is a member of the freak circle and he thinks in the past he’d be a member of the regular circle, while I’m making it clear that no, he’d be in the freak circle back then too.

 

[SecularIslamist]

When OP says western society has changed he means the basic framework is different. When I say western society is exactly the same I also am referring to the basic framework.

He’s showing a family unit from the past and comparing it to some freaks from the modern day. There have ALWAYS been family units, ALWAYS been freaks, ALWAYS been incels, ALWAYS been chads etc etc. This is undeniable, when you strip life down it always just flows in this way: be a kid, grow up and do some form of resource gathering, grow up more and have a wife and kids, grow up more and die.

No shit having access to the internet means the flavor of culture is different, but the fundamentals are and will always be the same. Basically the reason I said what I said is because it’s very clear that OP is a member of the freak circle and he thinks in the past he’d be a member of the regular circle, while I’m making it clear that no, he’d be in the freak circle back then too.

I don't disagree. But you're implying that Chad, incels and freaks are the same now as back then. These terms didn't even exist pre-2010s but there is now a whole culture dedicated to people who make up these 'class' of society. The very bar for who can be a Chad is getting higher and being an incel is slowly becoming MTN levels. We will end up like the hikkinorini in Japan. I'm late 20s so maybe I'm too late to join the 'majority'. Pretty soon

Family unit exists but is breaking down.

 

[Deleted member 16203]

From this:

To this:

we all know (((who))) ruined western society with their made-up mental illnesses and "progressive" values.

 

[Deleted member 13626]

 

[Artbreeder Is Law]

First photo still exist op they just don't mix and stay together.

 

[bordan jarrett]

the people in the before ruined it for you because they're the current generation of elderly which makes up almost the entire active voting base, and virtually all politicians are from this demographic too.

most people aren't supposed to make it, evolution would seize functioning if it did, the vast majority of men in a species are supposed to die alone without reproducing because their genes are too shit.

 

[Deleted member 25731]

Western society is exactly the same you’re just not good enough to take part in it, there was hella incel weirdos back then too tbh

nup back then it was 10x easier to get married, lower divorce rates and you had more legal, economic and social power for being a man

 

[Deleted member 7327]

I don't disagree. But you're implying that Chad, incels and freaks are the same now as back then. These terms didn't even exist pre-2010s but there is now a whole culture dedicated to people who make up these 'class' of society. The very bar for who can be a Chad is getting higher and being an incel is slowly becoming MTN levels. We will end up like the hikkinorini in Japan. I'm late 20s so maybe I'm too late to join the 'majority'. Pretty soon

Family unit exists but is breaking down.

Hypergamy does not exist. You’ve fallen for incel nonsense. Being an incel is ridiculously rare as shit, I PROMISE you EVERY guy you walk by on the street has had a girlfriend before.

To be an incel you either have to be MASSIVELY ugly, or you just have to be autistic. In no universe is an NT MTN an incel or ever going to be an incel. There’s plenty of guys here who THINK they’re in that boat (or even higher) and the reason for that is that autists often have trouble telling that they’re autists. Go make a friend who’s SLIGHTLY above average looking, you’re gonna find out how easy mode life is at that looks level, no bars are being raised incels are just narcy as shit and overrate themselves.

Terms not existing =\= those people not existing
Looks preferences are not socially constructed they’re innate, babies stare more at gl people. There were always incels, chads and normies, there always will be as well.

nup back then it was 10x easier to get married, lower divorce rates and you had more legal, economic and social power for being a man

And yet everyone you’ve ever met is inevitably married or going to get married one day. Lower divorce rates but much higher rates of massively unhappy marriages, which is equally as destructive to any family unit, it balances out. It always works out to being the same basic shit, maybe you could argue that you’re not allowed to be as much of a massive piece of shit and still REMAIN married but fuckloads of girls are in abusive relationships so not even that is really true.

 

[Sleeper]

Hypergamy does not exist. You’ve fallen for incel nonsense. Being an incel is ridiculously rare as shit, I PROMISE you EVERY guy you walk by on the street has had a girlfriend before.

To be an incel you either have to be MASSIVELY ugly, or you just have to be autistic. In no universe is an NT MTN an incel or ever going to be an incel. There’s plenty of guys here who THINK they’re in that boat (or even higher) and the reason for that is that autists often have trouble telling that they’re autists. Go make a friend who’s SLIGHTLY above average looking, you’re gonna find out how easy mode life is at that looks level, no bars are being raised incels are just narcy as shit and overrate themselves.

Terms not existing =\= those people not existing
Looks preferences are not socially constructed they’re innate, babies stare more at gl people. There were always incels, chads and normies, there always will be as well.


And yet everyone you’ve ever met is inevitably married or going to get married one day. Lower divorce rates but much higher rates of massively unhappy marriages, which is equally as destructive to any family unit, it balances out. It always works out to being the same basic shit, maybe you could argue that you’re not allowed to be as much of a massive piece of shit and still REMAIN married but fuckloads of girls are in abusive relationships so not even that is really true.

Just like the rest of your posts, this is a hideous level of cope. Hypergamy has been a fully understood term thats been around for two centuries now and not only that but every single culture in human history has practiced it to some extent in the form of families arranging marriages for their daughters with men of higher economic value since it would give her and sometimes even them a better life. The practice of hypergamy has existed forever, it's just only recently that women were the ones in charge of it.

We can see the rise of incels coalign exactly at the rise of social media and dating apps. 30% of men didnt suddenly decide to start having less sex, relationships and families in 2010 for no reason, it was a cultural shift and most people are not individualistic enough to be anything more than a reflection of the culture around them. Not only this but we've seen the exact same patterns in other countries that have been following the same blueprint like Japan or korea for instance. Are you trying to say that the 40% of men and women under 30 in Japan all being incel virgins following the exact same pattern as in the west out of pure coincidence? Don't be such an ignorant retard, we see the same pattern occuring in every single culture where feminism and dating apps become accessable en masse. The bars for attraction have also been raised enourmously, just look at what previous generations considered attractive : women thought goofball inbred lookalikes like the beatles were so hot that they would literally faint at the sight of them meanwhile modern women would literally call them incels. 60% of relationships nowadays start online and universally we are seeing women select for a smaller and smaller percentage of men based primarily on their looks. All the data from every single dating app shows exactly this pattern over and over again

And no, people do not just come up with words for no reason at all. It is quite literally the case that terms not existing = people not existing. If a term for incels did not exist its because there were so few of them in comparison to today that people barely noticed the phenomenon. Same goes for the rise of NEETs that we're seeing now, its only even a word because its a becoming an occurance noticeable enough to warrant discussion.

Everyone is not going to get married, we currently have the highest percentage of unmarried and childless women ever recorded in human history and whats more, its only showing to increase in the future. Theres a lower percentage of both families and marriages than there ever has been and its entirely a result of cultural changes. Once more we see this exact same pattern in other cultures like japan where they are now having so few families and children that they are below replacement levels. You are not basing any of what you say on any studies or objectives realities of the world. You're just spouting your own anecdotal nonsense like a reddit sperg throwing an overly emotional fit.

 

[Deleted member 7327]

Just like the rest of your posts, this is a hideous level of cope. Hypergamy has been a fully understood term thats been around for two centuries now and not only that but every single culture in human history has practiced it to some extent in the form of families arranging marriages for their daughters with men of higher economic value since it would give her and sometimes even them a better life. The practice of hypergamy has existed forever, it's just only recently that women were the ones in charge of it.

We can see the rise of incels coalign exactly at the rise of social media and dating apps. 30% of men didnt suddenly decide to start having less sex, relationships and families in 2010 for no reason, it was a cultural shift and most people are not individualistic enough to be anything more than a reflection of the culture around them. Not only this but we've seen the exact same patterns in other countries that have been following the same blueprint like Japan or korea for instance. Are you trying to say that the 40% of men and women under 30 in Japan all being incel virgins following the exact same pattern as in the west out of pure coincidence? Don't be such an ignorant retard, we see the same pattern occuring in every single culture where feminism and dating apps become accessable en masse. The bars for attraction have also been raised enourmously, just look at what previous generations considered attractive : women thought goofball inbred lookalikes like the beatles were so hot that they would literally faint at the sight of them meanwhile modern women would literally call them incels. 60% of relationships nowadays start online and universally we are seeing women select for a smaller and smaller percentage of men based primarily on their looks. All the data from every single dating app shows exactly this pattern over and over again

And no, people do not just come up with words for no reason at all. It is quite literally the case that terms not existing = people not existing. If a term for incels did not exist its because there were so few of them in comparison to today that people barely noticed the phenomenon. Same goes for the rise of NEETs that we're seeing now, its only even a word because its a becoming an occurance noticeable enough to warrant discussion.

Everyone is not going to get married, we currently have the highest percentage of unmarried and childless women ever recorded in human history and whats more, its only showing to increase in the future. Theres a lower percentage of both families and marriages than there ever has been and its entirely a result of cultural changes. Once more we see this exact same pattern in other cultures like japan where they are now having so few families and children that they are below replacement levels. You are not basing any of what you say on any studies or objectives realities of the world. You're just spouting your own anecdotal nonsense like a reddit sperg throwing an overly emotional fit.

You’re ugly. It’s very clear.
You want to believe in hypergamy because it means you can convince yourself that you’re better looking than you are while still being a virgin fuck.

Every study shows that incels like yourself are an extreme minority, you don’t want to bring them up. As for childless women and no marriages, 1. You can make an argument for people deciding to start families LATER IN LIFE than they used to in the past, most are still going to end up having kids. 2. A majority of those “unmarried” women are in very long term relationships that they just didn’t decide to make 100% official. They’re not single. There’s no ceremony required to count as a marriage, it’s functionally the same, the stats will not reflect this.

If the version of hypergamy you’re using is economic hypergamy, then that’s even LESS relevant today now that every woman works. That’s the absolute BIGGEST reason every one in this thread is claiming that shit used to be easier, because all men had to do in the past was have some regular amount of money and they could get married because women were basically leeches lmfao. Now that that’s not a factor they can select for different features. Any incel on this website talking about hypergamy is talking about LOOKS hypergamy, which is a fantasy, the absolute vast majority of couples are looksmatched.

Japan is not even remotely comparable to anywhere else in the world, it’s insanely unique. Using it in your argument is just admitting you’re a neurotic mess hyperventilating towards his computer as we speak.

Hmm, i wonder who’s more likely to be coping.. me? Or you, the ugly incel who’s so desperate to be good looking that he’s actually convinced himself that the standards required to be good looking are rising? Lmfao. You’re comprised almost entirely of coping mechanisms, just admit that to yourself.

“Terms not existing means the people didn’t exist” lmfffaaaao you think average looking people, good looking people, and ugly people/social outcasts just didn’t exist?! No wonder you’re ugly, look at what the mouthbreathing has done to your brain, I can’t even imagine your chin. All stats show incels as an extreme minority, you know why you didn’t know about them back then? Because they didn’t have entire fucking communities where you could gather all of them up ACROSS THE WORLD and make them visible. You’re an actual clown if you think this shit is new. Jesus christ this is so basic but you can’t even use the smallest amount of logic. retard.

All of you guys know for a fact that EVERYONE you know in your life are in relationships but one fuckin study shows that a good chunk of comp sci students are virgins and you guys lose your little minds jfl.

 

[looksmaxxed]

the jews did this

 

[SecularIslamist]

You’re ugly. It’s very clear.
You want to believe in hypergamy because it means you can convince yourself that you’re better looking than you are while still being a virgin fuck.

Nigga you retarded af. The simpification of society has meant the hoe economy is against the average man. Every women is a queen and thinks she deserves better than what she should get.

Every study shows that incels like yourself are an extreme minority, you don’t want to bring them up.

What study. This one done in 2018 before COVID and tiktok generation?

As for childless women and no marriages, 1. You can make an argument for people deciding to start families LATER IN LIFE than they used to in the past, most are still going to end up having kids. 2. A majority of those “unmarried” women are in very long term relationships that they just didn’t decide to make 100% official. They’re not single. There’s no ceremony required to count as a marriage, it’s functionally the same, the stats will not reflect this.

If the version of hypergamy you’re using is economic hypergamy, then that’s even LESS relevant today now that every woman works. That’s the absolute BIGGEST reason every one in this thread is claiming that shit used to be easier, because all men had to do in the past was have some regular amount of money and they could get married because women were basically leeches lmfao. Now that that’s not a factor they can select for different features. Any incel on this website talking about hypergamy is talking about LOOKS hypergamy, which is a fantasy, the absolute vast majority of couples are looksmatched.

Women want all the traditional traits of a man like being a provider but they don't want to be in the traditional role as them.

Starting families is seen as an economic burden and increased secularisation off society means they see no value in reproducing.

Japan is not even remotely comparable to anywhere else in the world, it’s insanely unique. Using it in your argument is just admitting you’re a neurotic mess hyperventilating towards his computer as we speak.

We are literally heading towards Japan. There will be an entire generation if hiklimoris who spend 99% of their lives in their homes. They will die and their decomposed bodies will be found months later.

Hmm, i wonder who’s more likely to be coping.. me? Or you, the ugly incel who’s so desperate to be good looking that he’s actually convinced himself that the standards required to be good looking are rising? Lmfao. You’re comprised almost entirely of coping mechanisms, just admit that to yourself.

You are fucking retarded. This doesn't even need an rebuttal. Even normies unaware of the blackpill will think you're insane.

“Terms not existing means the people didn’t exist” lmfffaaaao you think average looking people, good looking people, and ugly people/social outcasts just didn’t exist?! No wonder you’re ugly, look at what the mouthbreathing has done to your brain, I can’t even imagine your chin. All stats show incels as an extreme minority, you know why you didn’t know about them back then? Because they didn’t have entire fucking communities where you could gather all of them up ACROSS THE WORLD and make them visible. You’re an actual clown if you think this shit is new. Jesus christ this is so basic but you can’t even use the smallest amount of logic. retard.

The west is finished. Accept it.

 

[Deleted member 7327]

Nigga you retarded af. The simpification of society has meant the hoe economy is against the average man. Every women is a queen and thinks she deserves better than what she should get.

And yet every average man you know is in a relationship. Crazy shit. If you’re still listening to female words instead of female actions we can’t even have a meaningful discussion about this.

What study. This one done in 2018 before COVID and tiktok generation?

View attachment 2049835

Demographics of that study? Location? Explain how that’s not a minority?? Etc.

Women want all the traditional traits of a man like being a provider but they don't want to be in the traditional role as them.

Women want their looksmatch and for him not to be autistic jesus fucking christ dating is so easy go get behavioral therapy.

Starting families is seen as an economic burden and increased secularisation off society means they see no value in reproducing.

And yet most dumbfucks, especially poor ones, still are having kids. Everyone you know is still gonna have at least one kid on average.

We are literally heading towards Japan. There will be an entire generation if hiklimoris who spend 99% of their lives in their homes. They will die and their decomposed bodies will be found months later.

The fact that you’re using these weeb ass terms tells me you’re not the most unbiased source on whether we’re heading towards being like japan. Everyone you know is gonna have a family, unless you know a bunch of indian comp sci students I guess.

You are fucking retarded. This doesn't even need an rebuttal. Even normies unaware of the blackpill will think you're insane.

Yeah I’m sure normies unaware of the blackpill will totally agree with you that muhh you need to muhh be muhh gigachad to even be gl these muhhh days!! Over for tyler maher!!!
Rising in the sense of you should be lean and not look like a slob? Maybe, probably not, but maybe. Rising in the sense that your actual bone structure and shit needs to be better? No. You’re under the mistaken belief that these things are conscious societal decisions to recognize good looks, they’re innate and that means the levels will always stay the same.

The west is finished. Accept it.

Maybe if you live in the basement, this is ALL irrelevant to me personally even if the things you guys were saying were true. They’re not true, though.

 

[Sleeper]

You’re ugly. It’s very clear.
You want to believe in hypergamy because it means you can convince yourself that you’re better looking than you are while still being a virgin fuck.

Every study shows that incels like yourself are an extreme minority, you don’t want to bring them up. As for childless women and no marriages, 1. You can make an argument for people deciding to start families LATER IN LIFE than they used to in the past, most are still going to end up having kids. 2. A majority of those “unmarried” women are in very long term relationships that they just didn’t decide to make 100% official. They’re not single. There’s no ceremony required to count as a marriage, it’s functionally the same, the stats will not reflect this.

If the version of hypergamy you’re using is economic hypergamy, then that’s even LESS relevant today now that every woman works. That’s the absolute BIGGEST reason every one in this thread is claiming that shit used to be easier, because all men had to do in the past was have some regular amount of money and they could get married because women were basically leeches lmfao. Now that that’s not a factor they can select for different features. Any incel on this website talking about hypergamy is talking about LOOKS hypergamy, which is a fantasy, the absolute vast majority of couples are looksmatched.

Japan is not even remotely comparable to anywhere else in the world, it’s insanely unique. Using it in your argument is just admitting you’re a neurotic mess hyperventilating towards his computer as we speak.

Hmm, i wonder who’s more likely to be coping.. me? Or you, the ugly incel who’s so desperate to be good looking that he’s actually convinced himself that the standards required to be good looking are rising? Lmfao. You’re comprised almost entirely of coping mechanisms, just admit that to yourself.

“Terms not existing means the people didn’t exist” lmfffaaaao you think average looking people, good looking people, and ugly people/social outcasts just didn’t exist?! No wonder you’re ugly, look at what the mouthbreathing has done to your brain, I can’t even imagine your chin. All stats show incels as an extreme minority, you know why you didn’t know about them back then? Because they didn’t have entire fucking communities where you could gather all of them up ACROSS THE WORLD and make them visible. You’re an actual clown if you think this shit is new. Jesus christ this is so basic but you can’t even use the smallest amount of logic. retard.

All of you guys know for a fact that EVERYONE you know in your life are in relationships but one fuckin study shows that a good chunk of comp sci students are virgins and you guys lose your little minds jfl.

Again blatant cope. No these women are not in realtionships, they are the most single and childless demographic of women ever recorded, currently at 40% for all women under 40 and this is strictly occuring only in feminist countries. They are not married and they are not in relationships and they do not have children. No the majority of couples are not looksmatched as once again, this current demographic of women are the most obese ever recorded meanwhile the men are the most gym active ever recorded. Theres never been a wider gap in looksmatch and all you have to do is look at the past, boomers literally started the obesity epidemic and did not work out or go to the gym, it was seen as something that only athletes did. When you look at past couples you unsurprisingly see a much closer correlation in looks than today. Like I said before, the data from dating apps which is the most common way in which relationships start today all have data that represent this

Secondly Japan is not unique at all, its actually ground zero of all these situations. Incels, hikikomori, less families, less children and more divorce are all things that began in Japan with the rise of feminsim and technology. It's about 20 years ahead of the rest of the world and we've seen the exact same patterns occuring elsewhere in the exact same order as well. Japan is the blueprint of what modern society ends up becoming when adopting these cultural changes and the west is catching up to them

And yes you're coping like crazy seeing as how you're seething so much, you are not referencing a single study, statistic or fact, youre just spewing out random retardation and trying to insult me but that doesnt really work when everyone can see that youre an emotional wreck. If you want to see how ugly I am then just post your face and physique and I'll post mine, this is a site centered on looksmaxing after all so dont be shy

Yes terms do not exist until theres a wide use for them, this covers all topics. For example every language in the world first developed words for black and white, then red green yellow etc and then finally blue and most cultures didnt develop a word for blue for a long time and this is because of the order prevelance that they are found in nature with blue being rare, this is an observed and proved phenomenon. Ugly and attractive people have always existed but for the majority of human history and still in most countries today, arranged marriages were the norm and were and still are generally paired accordingly. So if incels existed in the exacts same numbers that you claim they do today then there would be words for them in all languages so why is there still not any words for them in most cultures where these changes havent taken place? Japan immediately developed words like hikikomori and herbivore men once these things grew in number and well before social media and internet communities became what they are today so how come the word incel still only exists in the west if they have existed in the exact same way, for the exact same reasons and in the exact same numbers as everywhere else and throughout all of history like you claim?

Prime case of cope and seethe, I can always smell a reddit cuck a mile away from how emotional they get over facing basic realities

 

[SecularIslamist]

And yet every average man you know is in a relationship. Crazy shit. If you’re still listening to female words instead of female actions we can’t even have a meaningful discussion about this.

No they're not. Some of my friends in late 20s are still single. Many of those who are in relationships have dated down. You think it's impossible because mathematically women can't be alone if men are alone too. This is false. Sure there are femcels, but many women get passed around chads and then wonder late in life where all the good men have gone.

Demographics of that study? Location? Explain how that’s not a minority?? Etc.

I don't demographics and can't be bothered to waste previous time on deluded fucks like you. I only quoted that study because you were referring to a fictional one yourself.

27% is not a minority. It's a quarter of the population.

Women want their looksmatch and for him not to be autistic jesus fucking christ dating is so easy go get behavioral therapy.

So why is the average man getting next to nothing on Tinder?

And yet most dumbfucks, especially poor ones, still are having kids. Everyone you know is still gonna have at least one kid on average.

The fact that you’re using these weeb ass terms tells me you’re not the most unbiased source on whether we’re heading towards being like japan.

What term? Hikkimori? That's an actual name given to these generation of people. I didn't invent it lmao.

Everyone you know is gonna have a family, unless you know a bunch of indian comp sci students I guess.

Indians are actually great reproducers jfl.

Yeah I’m sure normies unaware of the blackpill will totally agree with you that muhh you need to muhh be muhh gigachad to even be gl these muhhh days!! Over for tyler maher!!!

Nice appeal to extreme bro.

Rising in the sense of you should be lean and not look like a slob? Maybe, probably not, but maybe. Rising in the sense that your actual bone structure and shit needs to be better? No. You’re under the mistaken belief that these things are conscious societal decisions to recognize good looks, they’re innate and that means the levels will always stay the same.

What you on about? Do you always straw man people?

Maybe if you live in the basement, this is ALL irrelevant to me personally even if the things you guys were saying were true. They’re not true, though.

Even if the things were true they're not true. Holy shit you're worse than libtard feminists.

 

[Esteban1997]

Todays men are physically weak mentally and emotionally

 

[Deleted member 4362]

And yet every average man you know is in a relationship. Crazy shit. If you’re still listening to female words instead of female actions we can’t even have a meaningful discussion about this.

Demographics of that study? Location? Explain how that’s not a minority?? Etc.

Women want their looksmatch and for him not to be autistic jesus fucking christ dating is so easy go get behavioral therapy.

And yet most dumbfucks, especially poor ones, still are having kids. Everyone you know is still gonna have at least one kid on average.

The fact that you’re using these weeb ass terms tells me you’re not the most unbiased source on whether we’re heading towards being like japan. Everyone you know is gonna have a family, unless you know a bunch of indian comp sci students I guess.

Yeah I’m sure normies unaware of the blackpill will totally agree with you that muhh you need to muhh be muhh gigachad to even be gl these muhhh days!! Over for tyler maher!!!
Rising in the sense of you should be lean and not look like a slob? Maybe, probably not, but maybe. Rising in the sense that your actual bone structure and shit needs to be better? No. You’re under the mistaken belief that these things are conscious societal decisions to recognize good looks, they’re innate and that means the levels will always stay the same.

Maybe if you live in the basement, this is ALL irrelevant to me personally even if the things you guys were saying were true. They’re not true, though.

How much money do you make? If you broke just delete ur account

 

[St.TikTokcel]

From this:

To this:

 

[hirochan]

the fundamental mistake one makes is assuming foids' sexual selections are eugenic. However, "eugenic" in this mordern world means higher IQ but we know IQ has began falling. This would seem contradictory given foids are freer than ever to choose their mate...that is because we at the fundamental core are animals, and animal sexual selection is nothing more than seeking dimorphism.

In country like china where parents and society pressure their daughter to peruse men with professional degrees, naturally the IQ of that country will increase and it is increasing...does it mean that the foids are truly attracted to the nerdy engineer Tseng or would they rather be in gang bang with tatted up dimorphic square jawed Chang local mafia?

Foids are subhuman and giving them total autonomy in a safe and wealthy society leads to "dysgenics" as they will simply seek to satiate their narcissistic low iq delusional love story they paint in their head often times ending up as single mothers (single mother hood is default dynamic in chimps)

 

[ConspiracyTheory]

They keep trying to tell us this is progress