finally, for the first time, someone ends the debate on whether bone smashing is effective or not ( ultra high iq thread)

[kahi]

Not a single molecule but I assume it's very well thought out and not AI

 

[ihatemySOST]

He's 100% brown but you can't deny he's bringing some pretty good evidence to the discussion

Im 12% brown

 

[truegoatfucker]

First off I want to recognize the effort you put in we need more of this. I think what you said scientifically checks out but extrapolating it to bone smashing is frankly wrong imo. When we look at the rat study they found changes in bone but no changes in their external appearance granted the frequency of trauma was small. However in the case of the rodeo riders there were visible changes and it is easy to attribute it purely to bone mass increasing. The truth is chronic swelling thickening of fascia and muscle adaptation from griping and bracing are likely what caused the external changes. The problem with the face is that the soft tissue is thin so you will see that swelling and fibrosis instantly which people in the community have admitted to. So the question is is the bone repairing encouraging the soft tissue changes (its not) or is it the permanent swelling and fibrosis you get from the trauma.

Anyway appreciate u

 

[ihatemySOST]

First off I want to recognize the effort you put in we need more of this. I think what you said scientifically checks out but extrapolating it to bone smashing is frankly wrong imo. When we look at the rat study they found changes in bone but no changes in their external appearance granted the frequency of trauma was small. However in the case of the rodeo riders there were visible changes and it is easy to attribute it purely to bone mass increasing. The truth is chronic swelling thickening of fascia and muscle adaptation from griping and bracing are likely what caused the external changes. The problem with the face is that the soft tissue is thin so you will see that swelling and fibrosis instantly which people in the community have admitted to. So the question is is the bone repairing encouraging the soft tissue changes (its not) or is it the permanent swelling and fibrosis you get from the trauma.

Anyway appreciate u

First off I want to recognize the effort you put in we need more of this. I think what you said scientifically checks out but extrapolating it to bone smashing is frankly wrong imo. When we look at the rat study they found changes in bone but no changes in their external appearance granted the frequency of trauma was small. However in the case of the rodeo riders there were visible changes and it is easy to attribute it purely to bone mass increasing. The truth is chronic swelling thickening of fascia and muscle adaptation from griping and bracing are likely what caused the external changes. The problem with the face is that the soft tissue is thin so you will see that swelling and fibrosis instantly which people in the community have admitted to. So the question is is the bone repairing encouraging the soft tissue changes (its not) or is it the permanent swelling and fibrosis you get from the trauma.

Anyway appreciate u

It is possible to have scars on the skin, I am not sure about that, but maybe

 

[truegoatfucker]

It is possible to have scars on the skin, I am not sure about that, but maybe

You misunderstood any "visible" growth externally is swelling and long term welling will lead to nerve damage, muscle damage so on potentially so it should be used on occasion not long term

 

[ihatemySOST]

You misunderstood any "visible" growth externally is swelling and long term welling will lead to nerve damage, muscle damage so on potentially so it should be used on occasion not long term

With the exception of pain, rodeo athletes reported no serious adverse effects