Finns and Hungarians are white

FlotPSL

FlotPSL

Sphinx
Joined
May 1, 2025
Posts
2,892
Reputation
3,100
Finns and Hungarians Are European Caucasoids, Not Mongoloid Hybrids.It’s time to debunk one of the most persistent myths floating around online:“Finns and Hungarians are mixed with Asian Mongoloids.”This is false, and here’s the genetic and anthropological data to prove it. Genetic Reality: They’re European, PeriodBoth Finns and Hungarians descend from European Caucasoids, not Mongoloids.Their autosomal DNA clusters with other Europeans, Finns with Balts and Scandinavians, Hungarians with Austrians and Central Europeans.Y-DNA Haplogroup N1c (common in Finns) originated in Siberia, but that doesn’t make it Mongoloid. It arose in Caucasoid populations who had migrated eastward from Europe. Just like R1a and R1b, haplogroup N is still of Eurasian origin, carried by people with Caucasoid morphology. It doesn’t imply East Asian ancestry. Archaeological Evidence: Skull Morphology Confirms ItThe oldest anatomically modern European skull, Mladec 1 (Czech Republic, 31,000 years ago), is Caucasoid, and represents the ancestral morphology of all later Europeans.Ancient North Eurasians (ANE), such as the Mal’ta boy (MA-1) from Siberia (~24,000 years ago), had:Light skinCaucasoid skull featuresNo East Asian/Mongoloid DNAY-DNA R, ancestral to Indo-EuropeansThese ancient Siberians were European-derived peoples, not Asians. Some of them carried haplogroup N, which later spread into northeastern Europe and became common among Uralic speakers like Finns. Language ≠ RaceFinns and Hungarians speak Uralic languages, but language is not a genetic marker.They picked up Uralic speech via elite dominance and cultural transmission, just as Jews speak Germanic Yiddish, or Africans speak French or English.There was no large-scale racial replacement by Mongoloids in Finland or Hungary.Caucasoid Lineage Is ClearModern people with Caucasoid morphology from Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia, and parts of India all trace back to the same European ancestors:WHG (Western Hunter-Gatherers)ANE (Ancient North Eurasians)EEF (Early European Farmers)Unified via the Yamnaya Steppe people (R1a/R1b), forming modern Europeans. Skull structure, pigmentation genetics, and full genome sequencing all confirm that Finns and Hungarians are entirely within this Caucasoid cluster.Final Verdict:Finns and Hungarians are not “mixed” with Asian Mongoloids.They are European Caucasoids, descended from early Europeans who migrated into Siberia, developed a few unique haplogroups, and retained their original morphology and genetics.Any claim otherwise is either based on obsolete racial pseudoscience or confusion between language families and genetic ancestry.Moreover, most people don’t realize this, but what we now call the “Mongoloid” or East Asian racial type didn’t even exist until relatively recently in human history. The earliest modern humans who migrated into East Asia and Siberia were not “Asian” in the way we define it today, they were Eurasian populations with cranial features that we’d now consider Caucasoid.For example, the Mladec 1 skull found in the Czech Republic and dated to ~31,000 years ago is the oldest confirmed Caucasoid specimen. Around this same period, humans were also entering Siberia and East Asia, but those populations had not yet developed the morphological traits that define East Asians today.Mongoloid features, such as epicanthic folds, flatter facial structure, wider zygomatic arches, and thicker dermal fat , evolved later, around 15,000 to 10,000 years ago. These traits were adaptive responses to extreme cold, low UV exposure, and wind in the Siberian and northern East Asian regions during the Last Glacial Maximum.Prior to that, remains like the Tianyuan Man in China (~40,000 years ago) show no clear Mongoloid morphology. Likewise, Upper Paleolithic skeletal material across Siberia often retain Eurasian traits with cranial affinities closer to West Eurasians than to later East Asians.So when people claim that Finns or Hungarians are “mixed with Asians,” they’re misunderstanding the genetic timeline. The haplogroups like N1c that some Uralic peoples carry did indeed originate in Siberia, but before the distinctive Mongoloid phenotype had even evolved. These groups were early European-descended populations that developed in Siberia and carried new lineages westward as they returned to Europe.There is no need to postulate East Asian admixture to explain their genes. The populations were still fully Caucasoid in skull morphology and genetic structure at the time. Modern East Asians (Han, Koreans, Japanese, etc.) only became distinct in the Holocene, well after the Finnic migration westward.In short: Finns and Hungarians are European Caucasoids. The populations they descended from lived in Siberia before the Mongoloid phenotype existed. They are not hybrids or mixed breeds, they are branches off the original Caucasoid tree that developed a few new haplogroups in the north before returning to Europe.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: John6Enjoyer, gimmedatacc, Hernan and 3 others
@InanimatePragmatist
 
  • +1
Reactions: gimmedatacc and InanimatePragmatist
Thank you, albiet the fins can be quite asian like.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: KKKuroiso, MiserableMan and FlotPSL
DNR you are all snow apes :ogre:
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: diss, MiserableMan and FlotPSL
they have clear mongoloid admixture but their close enough to white for me to respect them, (this rule doesn't apply for ashekenazis because kikes are uniquely worthless) their still far superior to their retarded homo neighbour. Finland> fagden. total swede death.
 
they have clear mongoloid admixture but their close enough to white for me to respect them, (this rule doesn't apply for ashekenazis because kikes are uniquely worthless) their still far superior to their retarded homo neighbour. Finland> fagden. total swede death.
Why do u hate swedes and where are you from?
 
  • +1
Reactions: gimmedatacc
they have clear mongoloid admixture but their close enough to white for me to respect them, (this rule doesn't apply for ashekenazis because kikes are uniquely worthless) their still far superior to their retarded homo neighbour. Finland> fagden. total swede death.
Wait.......

You do realise that Ashkenazi Jews are overwhelmingly (if not exclusively) Western Eurasian, right?

Finns have LESS Western Eurasian ancestry than Ashkenazim. Now, this DOES NOT mean Finns are closer to East Eurasians than to Western Eurasians; Finns are still predominantly Northern European and are closer to Western Eurasians than to Eastern Eurasians; rather, a Finn is shifted to Eastern Eurasia compared to other Western Eurasians.
 
Wait.......

You do realise that Ashkenazi Jews are overwhelmingly (if not exclusively) Western Eurasian, right?

Finns have LESS Western Eurasian ancestry than Ashkenazim. Now, this DOES NOT mean Finns are closer to East Eurasians than to Western Eurasians; Finns are still predominantly Northern European and are closer to Western Eurasians than to Eastern Eurasians; rather, a Finn is shifted to Eastern Eurasia compared to other Western Eurasians.
Bro this was a rep farm post that i copied from some youtuber
 
  • +1
Reactions: gimmedatacc
Finns and Hungarians Are European Caucasoids, Not Mongoloid Hybrids.It’s time to debunk one of the most persistent myths floating around online:“Finns and Hungarians are mixed with Asian Mongoloids.”This is false, and here’s the genetic and anthropological data to prove it. Genetic Reality: They’re European, PeriodBoth Finns and Hungarians descend from European Caucasoids, not Mongoloids.Their autosomal DNA clusters with other Europeans, Finns with Balts and Scandinavians, Hungarians with Austrians and Central Europeans.Y-DNA Haplogroup N1c (common in Finns) originated in Siberia, but that doesn’t make it Mongoloid. It arose in Caucasoid populations who had migrated eastward from Europe. Just like R1a and R1b, haplogroup N is still of Eurasian origin, carried by people with Caucasoid morphology. It doesn’t imply East Asian ancestry. Archaeological Evidence: Skull Morphology Confirms ItThe oldest anatomically modern European skull, Mladec 1 (Czech Republic, 31,000 years ago), is Caucasoid, and represents the ancestral morphology of all later Europeans.Ancient North Eurasians (ANE), such as the Mal’ta boy (MA-1) from Siberia (~24,000 years ago), had:Light skinCaucasoid skull featuresNo East Asian/Mongoloid DNAY-DNA R, ancestral to Indo-EuropeansThese ancient Siberians were European-derived peoples, not Asians. Some of them carried haplogroup N, which later spread into northeastern Europe and became common among Uralic speakers like Finns. Language ≠ RaceFinns and Hungarians speak Uralic languages, but language is not a genetic marker.They picked up Uralic speech via elite dominance and cultural transmission, just as Jews speak Germanic Yiddish, or Africans speak French or English.There was no large-scale racial replacement by Mongoloids in Finland or Hungary.Caucasoid Lineage Is ClearModern people with Caucasoid morphology from Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia, and parts of India all trace back to the same European ancestors:WHG (Western Hunter-Gatherers)ANE (Ancient North Eurasians)EEF (Early European Farmers)Unified via the Yamnaya Steppe people (R1a/R1b), forming modern Europeans. Skull structure, pigmentation genetics, and full genome sequencing all confirm that Finns and Hungarians are entirely within this Caucasoid cluster.Final Verdict:Finns and Hungarians are not “mixed” with Asian Mongoloids.They are European Caucasoids, descended from early Europeans who migrated into Siberia, developed a few unique haplogroups, and retained their original morphology and genetics.Any claim otherwise is either based on obsolete racial pseudoscience or confusion between language families and genetic ancestry.Moreover, most people don’t realize this, but what we now call the “Mongoloid” or East Asian racial type didn’t even exist until relatively recently in human history. The earliest modern humans who migrated into East Asia and Siberia were not “Asian” in the way we define it today, they were Eurasian populations with cranial features that we’d now consider Caucasoid.For example, the Mladec 1 skull found in the Czech Republic and dated to ~31,000 years ago is the oldest confirmed Caucasoid specimen. Around this same period, humans were also entering Siberia and East Asia, but those populations had not yet developed the morphological traits that define East Asians today.Mongoloid features, such as epicanthic folds, flatter facial structure, wider zygomatic arches, and thicker dermal fat , evolved later, around 15,000 to 10,000 years ago. These traits were adaptive responses to extreme cold, low UV exposure, and wind in the Siberian and northern East Asian regions during the Last Glacial Maximum.Prior to that, remains like the Tianyuan Man in China (~40,000 years ago) show no clear Mongoloid morphology. Likewise, Upper Paleolithic skeletal material across Siberia often retain Eurasian traits with cranial affinities closer to West Eurasians than to later East Asians.So when people claim that Finns or Hungarians are “mixed with Asians,” they’re misunderstanding the genetic timeline. The haplogroups like N1c that some Uralic peoples carry did indeed originate in Siberia, but before the distinctive Mongoloid phenotype had even evolved. These groups were early European-descended populations that developed in Siberia and carried new lineages westward as they returned to Europe.There is no need to postulate East Asian admixture to explain their genes. The populations were still fully Caucasoid in skull morphology and genetic structure at the time. Modern East Asians (Han, Koreans, Japanese, etc.) only became distinct in the Holocene, well after the Finnic migration westward.In short: Finns and Hungarians are European Caucasoids. The populations they descended from lived in Siberia before the Mongoloid phenotype existed. They are not hybrids or mixed breeds, they are branches off the original Caucasoid tree that developed a few new haplogroups in the north before returning to Europe.
dnr
 
Wait.......

You do realise that Ashkenazi Jews are overwhelmingly (if not exclusively) Western Eurasian, right?

Finns have LESS Western Eurasian ancestry than Ashkenazim. Now, this DOES NOT mean Finns are closer to East Eurasians than to Western Eurasians; Finns are still predominantly Northern European and are closer to Western Eurasians than to Eastern Eurasians; rather, a Finn is shifted to Eastern Eurasia compared to other Western Eurasians
I respect gentile fakewhites (not real whites but their white dna has overwhlemed their ethnic DNA through centuries of genetic buildup) jews are a species of deformed subhuman orcs who only exist because the reptillians need them to hlep infitlrate human civilisaiton, so jews do not and never will count no matter how much white dna they steal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FlotPSL
I respect gentile fakewhites (not real whites but their white dna has overwhlemed their ethnic DNA through centuries of genetic buildup) jews are a species of deformed subhuman orcs who only exist because the reptillians need them to hlep infitlrate human civilisaiton, so jews do not and never will count no matter how much white dna they steal.
which people in europe do you consider non white?
 
  • +1
Reactions: gimmedatacc
not gonna read allat
 
Who said they weren't??
 
They mixed with arabs iirc?
yeah meds are sandniggers in denial, though I will admit their still far better than full blown arabs, I'll give them that much
 
  • +1
Reactions: FlotPSL
yeah meds are sandniggers in denial, though I will admit their still far better than full blown arabs, I'll give them that much
Yeah
whats your ethnicity btw?
im Serbian
 
Dnr🥱
 

Attachments

  • v15044gf0000d0su6ivog65lhib9soe0.mp4
    2.5 MB
Wait.......

You do realise that Ashkenazi Jews are overwhelmingly (if not exclusively) Western Eurasian, right?

Finns have LESS Western Eurasian ancestry than Ashkenazim. Now, this DOES NOT mean Finns are closer to East Eurasians than to Western Eurasians; Finns are still predominantly Northern European and are closer to Western Eurasians than to Eastern Eurasians; rather, a Finn is shifted to Eastern Eurasia compared to other Western Eurasians.
how the fuck did you even find this thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: gimmedatacc
hungarians idk, eastern finns tend to be mixed with asian blood but western i agree. i dont know enough about hungarians besides their relocation all those years ago.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FlotPSL
hungarians idk, eastern finns tend to be mixed with asian blood but western i agree. i dont know enough about hungarians besides their relocation all those years ago.
Bulgarians are not white they come from the bulgars which were asian
 
  • +1
Reactions: gimmedatacc and Hernan
Brutal
How is dating life in ireland btw?
Also is it hard to find an irish girl as a non irish man?
I'm not from Ireland, I'm just of irish descent
 
  • +1
Reactions: FlotPSL
I'm not from Ireland, I'm just of irish descent
Oh my bad g
Btw do you know why irish people tend to have green eyes instead of blue?
 
  • +1
Reactions: gimmedatacc
Oh my bad g
Btw do you know why irish people tend to have green eyes instead of blue?
its caused by a mild concentration of pheomelanin in the iris.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FlotPSL
its caused by a mild concentration of pheomelanin in the iris.
Yeah i know that but why is it so common in irish people
Also shall we rep each other?
 
  • +1
Reactions: gimmedatacc
Yeah i know that but why is it so common in irish people
Also shall we rep each other?
not sure why we evolved that way, but we did.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FlotPSL
yeah meds are sandniggers in denial, though I will admit their still far better than full blown arabs, I'll give them that much
Meds are not a monolith, though. Some are white, some mixed-looking.
 
Finns and Hungarians Are European Caucasoids, Not Mongoloid Hybrids.It’s time to debunk one of the most persistent myths floating around online:“Finns and Hungarians are mixed with Asian Mongoloids.”This is false, and here’s the genetic and anthropological data to prove it. Genetic Reality: They’re European, PeriodBoth Finns and Hungarians descend from European Caucasoids, not Mongoloids.Their autosomal DNA clusters with other Europeans, Finns with Balts and Scandinavians, Hungarians with Austrians and Central Europeans.Y-DNA Haplogroup N1c (common in Finns) originated in Siberia, but that doesn’t make it Mongoloid. It arose in Caucasoid populations who had migrated eastward from Europe. Just like R1a and R1b, haplogroup N is still of Eurasian origin, carried by people with Caucasoid morphology. It doesn’t imply East Asian ancestry. Archaeological Evidence: Skull Morphology Confirms ItThe oldest anatomically modern European skull, Mladec 1 (Czech Republic, 31,000 years ago), is Caucasoid, and represents the ancestral morphology of all later Europeans.Ancient North Eurasians (ANE), such as the Mal’ta boy (MA-1) from Siberia (~24,000 years ago), had:Light skinCaucasoid skull featuresNo East Asian/Mongoloid DNAY-DNA R, ancestral to Indo-EuropeansThese ancient Siberians were European-derived peoples, not Asians. Some of them carried haplogroup N, which later spread into northeastern Europe and became common among Uralic speakers like Finns. Language ≠ RaceFinns and Hungarians speak Uralic languages, but language is not a genetic marker.They picked up Uralic speech via elite dominance and cultural transmission, just as Jews speak Germanic Yiddish, or Africans speak French or English.There was no large-scale racial replacement by Mongoloids in Finland or Hungary.Caucasoid Lineage Is ClearModern people with Caucasoid morphology from Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia, and parts of India all trace back to the same European ancestors:WHG (Western Hunter-Gatherers)ANE (Ancient North Eurasians)EEF (Early European Farmers)Unified via the Yamnaya Steppe people (R1a/R1b), forming modern Europeans. Skull structure, pigmentation genetics, and full genome sequencing all confirm that Finns and Hungarians are entirely within this Caucasoid cluster.Final Verdict:Finns and Hungarians are not “mixed” with Asian Mongoloids.They are European Caucasoids, descended from early Europeans who migrated into Siberia, developed a few unique haplogroups, and retained their original morphology and genetics.Any claim otherwise is either based on obsolete racial pseudoscience or confusion between language families and genetic ancestry.Moreover, most people don’t realize this, but what we now call the “Mongoloid” or East Asian racial type didn’t even exist until relatively recently in human history. The earliest modern humans who migrated into East Asia and Siberia were not “Asian” in the way we define it today, they were Eurasian populations with cranial features that we’d now consider Caucasoid.For example, the Mladec 1 skull found in the Czech Republic and dated to ~31,000 years ago is the oldest confirmed Caucasoid specimen. Around this same period, humans were also entering Siberia and East Asia, but those populations had not yet developed the morphological traits that define East Asians today.Mongoloid features, such as epicanthic folds, flatter facial structure, wider zygomatic arches, and thicker dermal fat , evolved later, around 15,000 to 10,000 years ago. These traits were adaptive responses to extreme cold, low UV exposure, and wind in the Siberian and northern East Asian regions during the Last Glacial Maximum.Prior to that, remains like the Tianyuan Man in China (~40,000 years ago) show no clear Mongoloid morphology. Likewise, Upper Paleolithic skeletal material across Siberia often retain Eurasian traits with cranial affinities closer to West Eurasians than to later East Asians.So when people claim that Finns or Hungarians are “mixed with Asians,” they’re misunderstanding the genetic timeline. The haplogroups like N1c that some Uralic peoples carry did indeed originate in Siberia, but before the distinctive Mongoloid phenotype had even evolved. These groups were early European-descended populations that developed in Siberia and carried new lineages westward as they returned to Europe.There is no need to postulate East Asian admixture to explain their genes. The populations were still fully Caucasoid in skull morphology and genetic structure at the time. Modern East Asians (Han, Koreans, Japanese, etc.) only became distinct in the Holocene, well after the Finnic migration westward.In short: Finns and Hungarians are European Caucasoids. The populations they descended from lived in Siberia before the Mongoloid phenotype existed. They are not hybrids or mixed breeds, they are branches off the original Caucasoid tree that developed a few new haplogroups in the north before returning to Europe.
Dnr

But thanks

Can u now debunk the myth that south europeans 'aren't white'
 
Dnr

But thanks

Can u now debunk the myth that south europeans 'aren't white'
They aren’t white. Doesn’t mean they can’t look good but we’re not white
 
They aren’t white. Doesn’t mean they can’t look good but we’re not white
Yeah I know they're not like Aryan germanic type of white but people go as far as to say they're north African, ethnic. Pretty wild considering they're celtoiberian.

Might just be me tho, I'm not even south European:lul:
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Saint Casanova

Similar threads

thecel
Replies
22
Views
1K
smartstyle
smartstyle
D
Replies
14
Views
478
KeepCopingLads
KeepCopingLads
D
Discussion Theory
Replies
7
Views
407
John6Enjoyer
J

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top