finn899
Peace out
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2023
- Posts
- 5,365
- Reputation
- 6,298
- OP
- #51
yes obv 5'10 with a good build looks better then 6 foot mike thrustun ugly buildThis is not height though. It’s torso length.
Mike Thurston (6ft) has a short torso
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
yes obv 5'10 with a good build looks better then 6 foot mike thrustun ugly buildThis is not height though. It’s torso length.
Mike Thurston (6ft) has a short torso
Jeff is like 5'11 maybe 6'0 bro I agree height>physique however in most cases a 5'10-11 mike tyson build mogs a 6'1 framecelView attachment 2572160View attachment 2572161 jeff looks like such a bitch irl/in realistic back camera photos hes too short.. this is a good frame ask any girlw whos body looks better they are all gonna say dude on the right.
Yes it is ?View attachment 2572164View attachment 2572166 he barely height mogs women,imagine himstanding next to robert patterson who has a regular build at 6'1
yeah i dont know why hes using an example of a guy who pushes 6 foot... i was more taking about a 5'9 gymcel vs even a normal skinny 6 foot decent buildJeff is like 5'11 maybe 6'0 bro I agree height>physique however in most cases a 5'10-11 mike tyson build mogs a 6'1 framecel
Yes it is ?
Mogs 6’4 Skywalker
Are you lost or something ?this is not about pysique at all muscles dont mean shit irl im talking about stature here
Yeah I would have to agree here fs skinny 6 foot mogs tf out of manle gymcelsyeah i dont know why hes using an example of a guy who pushes 6 foot... i was more taking about a 5'9 gymcel vs even a normal skinny 6 foot decent build
What do you mean ugly build ? Most people are skinny fat framelets ? All I see in my gym are manlets or lanklets with 6 inch wrists.yes obv 5'10 with a good build looks better then 6 foot mike thrustun ugly build
What do you mean ugly build ? Most people are skinny fat framelets ? All I see in my gym are manlets or lanklets with 6 inch wrists.
Stop being so pedantic
I’m talking about 5’10 and 11cels compared to 6’1+, why are you showing me 5’6 Manlets ?View attachment 2572173View attachment 2572174 here is a good example look at the left pic no matter how much muscle the short dude has he will still look fucking stupid bc hes short.... and hes only standing next to a 6 foot dude cant you see the problem?
I’m talking about 5’10 and 11cels compared to 6’1+, why are you showing me 5’6 Manlets ?
5’8 is quite far from the acceptable height standard for men 180cms+. I’m saying having a good frame at 5’10 can edge out someone who’s 6ft for example.View attachment 2572179View attachment 2572180 i mean its 5'8 compared to 6 foot which is still just a 4 inch difference and thats what i mean at 5'8 just by you walking around you look fucking stupid.... muscles cant compensate for that shit
by frame you mean muscles right?my point was proportions at 6 foot on average mog 5'9 gymcels bc they have short torso and legs,but yes a 5'10 gymcel can overpower a 6 foot skinny guy sometimes5’8 is quite far from the acceptable height standard for men 180cms+. I’m saying having a good frame at 5’10 can edge out someone who’s 6ft for example.
I’m taking about bidelt mostlyby frame you mean muscles right?my point was proportions at 6 foot on average mog 5'9 gymcels bc they have short torso and legs,but yes a 5'10 gymcel can overpower a 6 foot skinny guy sometimes
that is important but not as important as having long arms and torso to leg ratio and neck also matters too overall thats what makes your build,if your neck is too short or long or even too skinny it can kill your whole buildI’m taking about bidelt mostly
it’s not even about height, it’s about proportions , long legs and a small waistView attachment 2571941View attachment 2571942 if you are short which nowadays is anything under 6 foot your build will look 100 times worse then somebody who is simply 6'1 and skinny no matter how hard you gymcell,being short and jacked looks even more unproportional then simply being short. BTW if you cope under this post and blame me for this scientific fact,just know that your letting every1 know your not even 6 foot.
What do you mean it’s not Important? It’s literally how wide you are. Your horizontal height so to speak? If anything long arms and torso to leg don’t matter that much. If you have a 23 inch bidelt from bone and muscle, you’ll mog irrespective of wingspan and other ratiosthat is important but not as important as having long arms and torso to leg ratio and neck also matters too
Hell no. From my experience it seems like the taller u are, the narrower you areTypically the taller you are, the wider your frame is naturally ? I.e wider clavicles and rib cage
why am i trying to be fucking funny? i only said
Kinda true.View attachment 2571941View attachment 2571942 if you are short which nowadays is anything under 6 foot your build will look 100 times worse then somebody who is simply 6'1 and skinny no matter how hard you gymcell,being short and jacked looks even more unproportional then simply being short. BTW if you cope under this post and blame me for this scientific fact,just know that your letting every1 know your not even 6 foot.
Also true. The taller you are the higher chance you’ll have a mediocre frame.Just because your tall it doesn’t mean you have a good frame, you actually have more chance of being a lanket when your tall.
Tbh best is to be tall + wide shoulders and slim waist but that’s really rare. I rather be 5’10 with giga clavicals than 6’4 and framecel
IM 6'4 AND THIS THREAD IS PURE BASEMENT ROTTING THEORIESView attachment 2571941View attachment 2571942 if you are short which nowadays is anything under 6 foot your build will look 100 times worse then somebody who is simply 6'1 and skinny no matter how hard you gymcell,being short and jacked looks even more unproportional then simply being short. BTW if you cope under this post and blame me for this scientific fact,just know that your letting every1 know your not even 6 foot.
IM 6'4 AND THIS THREAD IS PURE BASEMENT ROTTING THEORIES
FIRST OFF FRAME IS A PART OF PHYSIQUE ITSELF LMAO
AND PHYSIQUE > HEIGHT AS ITS MUCH MORE RARE TO SEE SOMEONE JACKED THAN TO SEE SOMEONE TALL
ALSO YOU GOTTA POST SOME QUALITY POSTS RATHER THAN SUCH POSTS SO THAT YOUR POST REP IS ATLEAST POSITIVE.
What do you mean it’s not Important? It’s literally how wide you are. Your horizontal height so to speak? If anything long arms and torso to leg don’t matter that much. If you have a 23 inch bidelt from bone and muscle, you’ll mog irrespective of wingspan and other ratios
IM 6'4 AND THIS THREAD IS PURE BASEMENT ROTTING THEORIES
FIRST OFF FRAME IS A PART OF PHYSIQUE ITSELF LMAO
AND PHYSIQUE > HEIGHT AS ITS MUCH MORE RARE TO SEE SOMEONE JACKED THAN TO SEE SOMEONE TALL
ALSO YOU GOTTA POST SOME QUALITY POSTS RATHER THAN SUCH POSTS SO THAT YOUR POST REP IS ATLEAST POSITIVE.
Im guessing youre 5'10height is cope past 5'10 if you're worried sorry but you're ugly
when did i suggest to fraud? if your short you cant fraud especially not your frame its fucking over lol
Frame doesn’t work that way. Frame is in proportion to your specific body ratios. If you’re under 6’ you can still have wider shoulders in comparison to your waist, likewise many people 6’+ can have a shitty frame in comparison to their own body proportions.. as long as your shoulders are wider than your hips and your neck is thick, ideal limb length, etc. then your frame is good.. tall or short.if you are short which nowadays is anything under 6 foot your build will look 100 times worse then somebody who is simply 6'1 and skinny no matter how hard you gymcell,being short and jacked looks even more unproportional then simply being short.