Gears of War Character Shows that ES Ratios > 0.5 and Midface Ratios > 1.2 Can Look Good

thecel

thecel

morph king
Joined
May 16, 2020
Posts
23,899
Reputation
50,369
FB9D1A58 8B44 4C63 8C9E 36D32251FC3E


His ES ratio doesn’t look too wide despite being numerically high. Muh “0.47 is ideal and higher than 0.49 looks dolphin tier”.

His midface ratio looks like 1.2 or something. .org autists say that women prefer longish midfaces like 0.95–1.0 and that midface ratios higher than 1.05 look childish and feminine. Cope. This guy look childish and feminine?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: cromagnon, Darkeningstar, iblamehumphrey and 7 others
@Sprinkles

I heard you like the looks of Gears of War characters
 
IMG 0269
 
  • JFL
  • Woah
  • Hmm...
Reactions: piec, cromagnon, lemonnz and 6 others
look like this or death

1727010728328
1727010739050
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
@Sprinkles

I heard you like the looks of Gears of War characters

your male morphs remind me of them

very exaggerated and comically masculine
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
View attachment 3189385

His ES ratio doesn’t look too wide despite being numerically high. Muh “0.47 is ideal and higher than 0.49 looks dolphin tier”.

His midface ratio looks like 1.2 or something. .org autists say that women prefer longish midfaces like 0.95–1.0 and that midface ratios higher than 1.05 look childish and feminine. Cope. This guy look childish and feminine?
that's real one goal look
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
1727011866439
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: cromagnon, ss07, Bars and 1 other person
View attachment 3189385

His ES ratio doesn’t look too wide despite being numerically high. Muh “0.47 is ideal and higher than 0.49 looks dolphin tier”.

His midface ratio looks like 1.2 or something. .org autists say that women prefer longish midfaces like 0.95–1.0 and that midface ratios higher than 1.05 look childish and feminine. Cope. This guy look childish and feminine?
I thought mid face ratio of 1 was perfectly normal

Well the higher your ES ratio, the more horizontal scleral show you need.

My bizygomatic width is 14 cm and ipd is 6.7-6.9 so 0.48-0.49:feelshehe:
 
  • Love it
Reactions: thecel
View attachment 3189385

His ES ratio doesn’t look too wide despite being numerically high. Muh “0.47 is ideal and higher than 0.49 looks dolphin tier”.

His midface ratio looks like 1.2 or something. .org autists say that women prefer longish midfaces like 0.95–1.0 and that midface ratios higher than 1.05 look childish and feminine. Cope. This guy look childish and feminine?
Would look better with a longish mid face tho
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: thecel
View attachment 3189385

His ES ratio doesn’t look too wide despite being numerically high. Muh “0.47 is ideal and higher than 0.49 looks dolphin tier”.

His midface ratio looks like 1.2 or something. .org autists say that women prefer longish midfaces like 0.95–1.0 and that midface ratios higher than 1.05 look childish and feminine. Cope. This guy look childish and feminine?
This has to be a troll, this guy looks absolutely ogre, -10/10 female appeal
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
It looks good but still would look better with 0.46-0.5 esr and 1.0-1.15 midface

I believe you have a stronger fetish for exaggerated features than other women do
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
facts those neanderthal ratios are pretty rare but look peak mogger in person

like this santa claus guy built like a human-sized dwarf from minas moria

 
  • JFL
Reactions: iblamehumphrey
View attachment 3189385
His midface ratio looks like 1.2 or something. .org autists say that women prefer longish midfaces like 0.95–1.0 and that midface ratios higher than 1.05 look childish and feminine. Cope. This guy look childish and feminine?
just because he looks good doesn't mean he wouldn't look better with an ES ratio of 0.46 and a mid face ratio of 1:1.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel
I have midface ratio 1.05 and es ratio 0.46
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
The wider your skull is the more pfl/ipd/esr you need
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
I have midface ratio 1.05 and es ratio 0.46
then why do you ride for low ipd and esr with your threads so much? I would expect you to have 0.42ish esr with the threads you make
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
keep coping low ipd mogs wide
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: piec and Narroworbits
keep coping low ipd mogs wide
1727226515200

fuckable
vs
i cant even find a foid with 0.39 esr (equivalent to 0.52)
but you can probably imagine the absolute vomit inducing subhumanity
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
View attachment 3196703
fuckable
vs
i cant even find a foid with 0.39 esr (equivalent to 0.52)
but you can probably imagine the absolute vomit inducing subhumanity
thats a different conversation, low ipd is already over for females but there are some examples like emilia clarke
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
He indeed looks like a undeveloped human

Men with compact midfaces will always looks better with longer midfaces

Screenshot 20240924 213139


This edition is far better

1:1 midface ratio is an absolute mogger trait, and now if you have a 0.46 ESR and a high total fwhr like 1.37 you have a really good base to start with

Men have to reach a good fwhr by having a wide enough face and good eyebrow setness not by compact midface, that only work for women
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel

Similar threads

chief detectiveman
Replies
12
Views
5K
slavicpsycho
slavicpsycho
emeraldglass
Replies
8
Views
21K
Phillybeard1996
P
Jason Voorhees
2
Replies
70
Views
6K
Crimson
Crimson

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top