German Military vs Ottoman Military

[Deleted member 3328]

That's true man. However England could gather forces from every in the world. This wasn't the case with Germany.
In my opinion france would be invaded eventually however there would be white peace between germans and england.

If France was occupied UK wouldn't be able to do shit.

Normandy or any other landing of the troops would be impossible. Even in 1944 landing in Normandy was extremely hard.

 

[Deleted member 10913]

Ataturk look mogger but pasha look random

Atatürk was always good looking, Enver and him had rivalry between each other. In early time Enver life mogged him with being married to the sultans daughter.

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Right guy mogs

 

[TsarTsar444]

They didnt have tanks or machine guns

Germany fought on 4 different fronts and almost won. US fought on one.

Perhaps the most significant technological advance during World War I was the improvement of the machine gun, a weapon originally developed by an American, Hiram Maxim. The Germans recognized its military potential and had large numbers ready to use in 1914.

Germany literally used machine guns in 1914 and tanks in ww1 weren't as effective

1918 tanks did become important and american and french tanks wrecked german trenches cause they passed right through them, Germans had no Tanks in 1918

 

[Deleted member 3328]

1918 tanks did become important and american and french tanks wrecked german trenches cause they passed right through them, Germans had no Tanks in 1918

Look A7V up

 

[Deleted member 10913]

View attachment 1012500View attachment 1012501

Right guy mogs

The kaiser was really mistreated during childhood. The other guy i forgot his name was a war hero.

 

[TsarTsar444]

Look A7V up

That tank was barely on the field, french outmogged the germans to oblivion in tanks

 

[Deleted member 10987]

1918 tanks did become important and american and french tanks wrecked german trenches cause they passed right through them, Germans had no Tanks in 1918

>Germans had no Tanks in 1918

 

[Deleted member 10987]

That tank was barely on the field, french outmogged the germans to oblivion in tanks

Yeah but they did have some
And they captured allied tanks too

 

[Deleted member 3328]

That tank was barely on the field, french outmogged the germans to oblivion in tanks

stop coping. No country was even a close match for Germany on land in WW1. It took Russia, UK (also Canada, Australia, India, etc.), USA, France to stop them.

 

[TsarTsar444]

Yeah but they did have some
And they captured allied tanks too

They technically had tanks but they were useless and much less then french tanks

 

[TsarTsar444]

stop coping. No country was even a close match for Germany on land in WW1. It took Russia, UK (also Canada, Australia, India, etc.), USA, France to stop them.

Thats because France and Britain were focusing on better areas of culture and not military like Germany did, if French were as militarized as Germany it would be over

 

[Deleted member 10987]

They technically had tanks but they were useless and much less then french tanks

They captured renault/chamond tanks

 

[Deleted member 10913]

They technically had tanks but they were useless and much less then french tanks

Regardless they had schneider artillary, that was even deployed at the Palastine front.

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Thats because France and Britain were focusing on better areas of culture and not military like Germany did, if French were as militarized as Germany it would be over

No

 

[Deleted member 10913]

Thats because France and Britain were focusing on better areas of culture and not military like Germany did, if French were as militarized as Germany it would be over

How would they france in 1870s was more militarized even then they lost Franco-Prussian war when Germany wasn't even a empire.

 

[Deleted member 3328]

Thats because France and Britain were focusing on better areas of culture and not military like Germany did, if French were as militarized as Germany it would be over

you are honestly retarded, France never stood a chance against Germany alone. When they tried to take on Prussia in 1871 they got completely destroyed in a few weeks.

Talking about culture name one famous British composer, artist or writer (other than Shakespeare and Dickens) who worked before WW1. And now name the Germans, the list in countless.

 

[Deleted member 3328]

How would they france in 1870s was more militarized even then they lost Franco-Prussian war when Germany wasn't even a empire.

in 1870s France was extremely militarized and had a larger population and a much larger army than Prussia and still got destroyed

Franco-Prussian War - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Prussia (and all of the other German states combined)
Total deployment:

• 1,494,412[1]

France
Total deployment:

• 2,000,740

 

[TsarTsar444]

you are honestly retarded, France never stood a chance against Germany alone. When they tried to take on Prussia in 1871 they got completely destroyed in a few weeks.

Talking about culture name one famous British composer, artist or writer (other than Shakespeare and Dickens) who worked before WW1. And now name the Germans, the list in countless.

Thanks for calling me retarded even though i don't take this thread seriously at all

 

[Deleted member 10913]

in 1870s France was extremely militarized and had a larger population and a much larger army than Prussia and still got destroyed

Franco-Prussian War - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Prussia (and all of the other German states combined)
Total deployment:

• 1,494,412[1]

France
Total deployment:

• 2,000,740

This, with there whole New napoleon bullshit.

 

[Deleted member 3328]

Thanks for calling me retarded even though i don't take this thread seriously at all

You're welcome.

You keep on saying random baseless comments with zero evidence or sense.

Britain had culture, jfl good one, made me laugh. It's the most uncultured nation in Europe. They were too busy colonizing and enslaving natives all of their modern history. They haven't produced a single notable artist or a composer at the time while Germany had hundreds.

 

[Deleted member 12303]

ottoman mogs

 

[Selfahate]

the Turks were decent looking before going full Allah

 

[Deleted member 12303]

the Turks were decent looking before going full Allah

They were gooks before

 

[Deleted member 6186]

Prussia

 

[Deleted member 3328]

yea man. how much is the game?

Don't buy it. It's completely historically inaccurate. There is a ton of black soldiers which is very disrespectful to our ancestors who risked their lives on the battlefield. European battles were filled 99.9% by white people but the game studio is Swedish and made like 25% of all characters black even though the black soldiers represented like 0.01% of all soldiers on European fronts where battles take place.

 

[Deleted member 3328]

@SayHeyHey

View attachment 1012430View attachment 1012431View attachment 1012432


Battlefield 1 Ottoman Army

Ottoman army is accurate but for Germany they put 25% of the troops black and UK even more. There wasn't a single black man who fought on the European soil for Germany

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Ottoman army is accurate but for Germany they put 25% of the troops black and UK even more. There wasn't a single black man who fought on the European soil for Germany

Im talking about uniforms

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Don't buy it. It's completely historically inaccurate. There is a ton of black soldiers which is very disrespectful to our ancestors who risked their lives on the battlefield. European battles were filled 99.9% by white people but the game studio is Swedish and made like 25% of all characters black even though the black soldiers represented like 0.01% of all soldiers on European fronts where battles take place.

Its a vidéo game
And the atmosphere is great so who care

The italian, austrian, russians, bolcheviks, royal marines ottomans are 100 % Caucasian/white in the game


Only the american, german, british sniper is black
In the french army, the medic is algerian and assault is senegalese but its accurate cause a lot of them were used

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Ottoman army is accurate but for Germany they put 25% of the troops black and UK even more. There wasn't a single black man who fought on the European soil for Germany

In UK
Its only the sniper that is black
And the royal marines are 100 % white

 

[Deleted member 3328]

Its a vidéo game
And the atmosphere is great so who care

The italian, austrian, russians, bolcheviks, royal marines ottomans are 100 % Caucasian/white in the game


Only the american, german, british sniper is black
In the french army, the medic is algerian and assault is senegalese but its accurate cause a lot of them were used

no black sniper ever fought for Germany.

It's blackwashing and extremely disrespectful to people who gave their lives on the front.

 

[Deleted member 10987]

no black sniper ever fought for Germany.

It's blackwashing and extremely disrespectful to people who gave their lives on the front.

True but a very very blacks were in imperial army
Even in WW2, there was blacks in german army

 

[Deleted member 3328]

True but a very very blacks were in imperial army
Even in WW2, there was blacks in german army

are you trolling?

Blacks never fought alongside Germans in Europe. The only blacks that fought for Germany were in the African colonies and on a way smaller scale. All battles were set in Europe where no blacks ever fought for Germany.

 

[Deleted member 10987]

are you trolling?

Blacks never fought alongside Germans in Europe. The only blacks that fought for Germany were in the African colonies and on a way smaller scale. All battles were set in Europe where no blacks ever fought for Germany.

WW1

WW2

I didnt say it was 1 % or 2 %
I ont say that a atleast 50 of would have fight in both world wars

 

[Deleted member 3328]

WW1
View attachment 1014430


WW2
View attachment 1014431

I didnt say it was 1 % or 2 %
I ont say that a atleast 50 of would have fight in both world wars

50 blacks vs

11,000,000 Germans in WW1
13,600,000 Germans in WW2

still they get 25% of the recognition

 

[Deleted member 10913]

50 blacks vs

11,000,000 Germans in WW1
13,600,000 Germans in WW2

still they get 25% of the recognition

Imagine that The armies of Nazi Germany where more diverse then Imperial Germany

Waffen-SS foreign volunteers and conscripts - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Wehrmacht foreign volunteers and conscripts - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

@Maesthetic

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Imagine that The armies of Nazi Germany where more diverse then Imperial Germany
View attachment 1014610View attachment 1014620View attachment 1014624View attachment 1014632l

Waffen-SS foreign volunteers and conscripts - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Wehrmacht foreign volunteers and conscripts - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

@Maesthetic

It probably was

 

[Deleted member 3328]

Imagine that The armies of Nazi Germany where more diverse then Imperial Germany
View attachment 1014610View attachment 1014620View attachment 1014624View attachment 1014632

Waffen-SS foreign volunteers and conscripts - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Wehrmacht foreign volunteers and conscripts - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

@Maesthetic

The numbers are extremely small compared to the number of enlisted Germans. Foreigners that served were usually mostly used as Kanonenfutter, let's be honest

​