Grace Elizabeth in candid

How many standard deviations above the mean (5/10) is she (full body for prime-age females)?


  • Total voters
    63
Current average = 9.19/10
 
@;-;
@🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶
@0kami123
@12PSLsubhuman
@5'3 8psl
@5'7 zoomer
@5OuttaTen
@6’1cel
@a30
@Ach1lles
@actual9cmjawslayer
@adungonu55
@aesthetic beauty
@AlexAP
@anadeusstolemyname
@andy9432
@Anonymous Member
@antsosa
@Arditi
@Artemis
@aryanretard
@ascendedd
@AscendingHero
@ascension
@Aseancell
@AsGoodAsItGets
@Aypo129
@Azemog
@Bakin donuts 🍩
@Banasura
@banks
@bddenjoyer
@Be_ConfidentBro
@beachdude123
@Beastimmung
@BigBoy
@bill
@birdpersone
@Bitchwhipper2
@Blackgymmax
@Bloatedindeed
@Blond3cel
@bluepilled
@Brad
@BrahminBoss
@bwrauycnee
@cabbage
@caiolindo
@capybara
@ceo
@Chadeep
@Chadrapist
@ChicoChicowski
@chiisfow
@Chinacurry
@Chinlet Ascension
@chrisbauer
@chrisN
@chrollo
@Cigarette
@cillianmurphycel
@ConfusedBolivian
@Constantin Denis
@copemaxxedturanid
@copesthenics
@Coronabeer
@Crusile
@crybaby
@crymilk
@Cutecel2001
@cytoplasm
@dancs
@daniel_3303
@Danish_Retard
@Debetro
@DefinitelyNT
@DeformedCell
@DelonLover1999
@delonregen
@DicedFeta
@Dr. Greenberg
@duckducknoose
@Dystopian
@eduardkoopman
@elzde95
@emeraldglass
@Enfant terrible
@EvCu65
@Fairestknight
@fandrewpandu
@Filippo
@flippasav
@FlyingElephant
@foidaddict
@FunkyFlamingo
@Gargantuan
@GilfHunter
@goo25
@gp8
@greatape11
@Grel Hellscream
@gungnir
@gymmaxedhorse
@HeightPilledum
@HitAndRun
@holdin'on
@htnorbust
@Iblamejordan
@Icon
@IHateMyself
@IHeightMogU
@INB
@IncelBully
@Indagator
@ineonx
@inspector
@J5F0O1VJe00
@Jamaldickjavontus
@javab
@jesuschrist
@JL~
@joao
@JoeSchmoe12
@joeveniro
@john2
@JohnDoe
@jrobts.
@julian111
@justbentbro
@justinzayn
@justleavemealone
@kality
@Kama
@Kater Maxxing
@Kerbouchard
@khvirgin
@KING REIDYZ
@kuroro
@kyb
@kyrre
@LaIcriday
@leanislaw
@leopold123
@lightskinbengali
@lightskincel.
@LimaDummy
@Lone Wolf
@longjohnmong
@LooksmaxxHopeful
@LooksOrDeath
@lordgandy2000
@Loveland
@MadTwatter
@Makeyousit
@Manana
@ManzareK
@marauder
@Mastermind
@MatheusCqb
@metagross
@midlatinocel
@mizrahi_hater
@mogger69420
@MoggerChad
@MongolTurk
@moolahmole24
@mrriceguy
@mug
@NegativeNorwood
@NerdcelThundercok
@nerdycomrade
@Newday
@Nightrunner
@nordicfoidslayer23
@normie_joe
@norwegianfreak
@Oberyn
@OCDisneyChad
@ongongfr
@only10inch
@OogaBooba
@orb 2.0
@overtier1011
@PaduaSlayer
@PG4BINX
@pig_face
@Pleiadian
@PointOfNoReturn
@poopoohead
@Preston
@Pretty
@Prince88
@PubertyMaxxer
@RAITEIII
@RAMU KAKA
@RecessedChinCel
@Reckless Turtle
@Red Fox
@Reformed
@reptiles
@RetardSubhuman
@ripcordgod1
@Ritalincell
@Rixinuj
@RoadtoCurryChad
@rocoveron007
@rooman
@ROTTING
@rrrrrr8526
@ryangoslinglover377
@Sabbir0404a
@saint
@Samiscool234
@schizolool
@sebsyx
@SecularIslamist
@Sens
@serbiangandy
@Shekel
@Shieda_Kayn
@shortcel88
@Sick
@SixPack
@Skyness
@slavicpsycho
@SocietyIsSolipsistic
@solid7/10
@Sonny
@Soumyadip
@spark
@Spiͯriͯtualcel
@SteveRogers
@stpzkmpfwg
@Struggler03
@studymaxxer
@SubHumanHere
@subhumantosubhumans
@Survivor95
@sтᴀʀʙoʏ
@Tallman
@teemowhite
@temporomandibular32
@the BULL
@The Thinker
@Thegreatone
@THEMOGGER
@TheReckons
@Thorsten
@ToTheTop
@TRUE_CEL
@truthpilled
@try2beme
@TUSSELEIF
@Tylermax
@Tyronius Maximus
@uberfuckchad
@UglyItalian
@user1728482728
@vaseqmoherad
@Venommm_
@Viperm
@WannaBeA6
@wastedpotential
@WeiWei
@Whatever0
@WHITECURRY
@WhiteGoodman
@whitegymmax
@wificonnector
@Willmogulater
@Wiqfi
@WishIwasChico
@Xangsane
@yelyseiblud
@Yuno_howitez
@zainab
@zan
@Zer0/∞
@Zetoch
@Zikel_Nut
@zsombi
 
  • +1
Reactions: SubHumanHere and Debetro
Below average body but beautiful face
 
  • +1
Reactions: uglysub8male
@;-;
@🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶
@0kami123
@12PSLsubhuman
@5'3 8psl
@5'7 zoomer
@5OuttaTen
@6’1cel
@a30
@Ach1lles
@actual9cmjawslayer
@adungonu55
@aesthetic beauty
@AlexAP
@anadeusstolemyname
@andy9432
@Anonymous Member
@antsosa
@Arditi
@Artemis
@aryanretard
@ascendedd
@AscendingHero
@ascension
@Aseancell
@AsGoodAsItGets
@Aypo129
@Azemog
@Bakin donuts 🍩
@Banasura
@banks
@bddenjoyer
@Be_ConfidentBro
@beachdude123
@Beastimmung
@BigBoy
@bill
@birdpersone
@Bitchwhipper2
@Blackgymmax
@Bloatedindeed
@Blond3cel
@bluepilled
@Brad
@BrahminBoss
@bwrauycnee
@cabbage
@caiolindo
@capybara
@ceo
@Chadeep
@Chadrapist
@ChicoChicowski
@chiisfow
@Chinacurry
@Chinlet Ascension
@chrisbauer
@chrisN
@chrollo
@Cigarette
@cillianmurphycel
@ConfusedBolivian
@Constantin Denis
@copemaxxedturanid
@copesthenics
@Coronabeer
@Crusile
@crybaby
@crymilk
@Cutecel2001
@cytoplasm
@dancs
@daniel_3303
@Danish_Retard
@Debetro
@DefinitelyNT
@DeformedCell
@DelonLover1999
@delonregen
@DicedFeta
@Dr. Greenberg
@duckducknoose
@Dystopian
@eduardkoopman
@elzde95
@emeraldglass
@Enfant terrible
@EvCu65
@Fairestknight
@fandrewpandu
@Filippo
@flippasav
@FlyingElephant
@foidaddict
@FunkyFlamingo
@Gargantuan
@GilfHunter
@goo25
@gp8
@greatape11
@Grel Hellscream
@gungnir
@gymmaxedhorse
@HeightPilledum
@HitAndRun
@holdin'on
@htnorbust
@Iblamejordan
@Icon
@IHateMyself
@IHeightMogU
@INB
@IncelBully
@Indagator
@ineonx
@inspector
@J5F0O1VJe00
@Jamaldickjavontus
@javab
@jesuschrist
@JL~
@joao
@JoeSchmoe12
@joeveniro
@john2
@JohnDoe
@jrobts.
@julian111
@justbentbro
@justinzayn
@justleavemealone
@kality
@Kama
@Kater Maxxing
@Kerbouchard
@khvirgin
@KING REIDYZ
@kuroro
@kyb
@kyrre
@LaIcriday
@leanislaw
@leopold123
@lightskinbengali
@lightskincel.
@LimaDummy
@Lone Wolf
@longjohnmong
@LooksmaxxHopeful
@LooksOrDeath
@lordgandy2000
@Loveland
@MadTwatter
@Makeyousit
@Manana
@ManzareK
@marauder
@Mastermind
@MatheusCqb
@metagross
@midlatinocel
@mizrahi_hater
@mogger69420
@MoggerChad
@MongolTurk
@moolahmole24
@mrriceguy
@mug
@NegativeNorwood
@NerdcelThundercok
@nerdycomrade
@Newday
@Nightrunner
@nordicfoidslayer23
@normie_joe
@norwegianfreak
@Oberyn
@OCDisneyChad
@ongongfr
@only10inch
@OogaBooba
@orb 2.0
@overtier1011
@PaduaSlayer
@PG4BINX
@pig_face
@Pleiadian
@PointOfNoReturn
@poopoohead
@Preston
@Pretty
@Prince88
@PubertyMaxxer
@RAITEIII
@RAMU KAKA
@RecessedChinCel
@Reckless Turtle
@Red Fox
@Reformed
@reptiles
@RetardSubhuman
@ripcordgod1
@Ritalincell
@Rixinuj
@RoadtoCurryChad
@rocoveron007
@rooman
@ROTTING
@rrrrrr8526
@ryangoslinglover377
@Sabbir0404a
@saint
@Samiscool234
@schizolool
@sebsyx
@SecularIslamist
@Sens
@serbiangandy
@Shekel
@Shieda_Kayn
@shortcel88
@Sick
@SixPack
@Skyness
@slavicpsycho
@SocietyIsSolipsistic
@solid7/10
@Sonny
@Soumyadip
@spark
@Spiͯriͯtualcel
@SteveRogers
@stpzkmpfwg
@Struggler03
@studymaxxer
@SubHumanHere
@subhumantosubhumans
@Survivor95
@sтᴀʀʙoʏ
@Tallman
@teemowhite
@temporomandibular32
@the BULL
@The Thinker
@Thegreatone
@THEMOGGER
@TheReckons
@Thorsten
@ToTheTop
@TRUE_CEL
@truthpilled
@try2beme
@TUSSELEIF
@Tylermax
@Tyronius Maximus
@uberfuckchad
@UglyItalian
@user1728482728
@vaseqmoherad
@Venommm_
@Viperm
@WannaBeA6
@wastedpotential
@WeiWei
@Whatever0
@WHITECURRY
@WhiteGoodman
@whitegymmax
@wificonnector
@Willmogulater
@Wiqfi
@WishIwasChico
@Xangsane
@yelyseiblud
@Yuno_howitez
@zainab
@zan
@Zer0/∞
@Zetoch
@Zikel_Nut
@zsombi
7uxomi
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Prince88, Zer0/∞, Gargantuan and 5 others
@;-;
@🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶
@0kami123
@12PSLsubhuman
@5'3 8psl
@5'7 zoomer
@5OuttaTen
@6’1cel
@a30
@Ach1lles
@actual9cmjawslayer
@adungonu55
@aesthetic beauty
@AlexAP
@anadeusstolemyname
@andy9432
@Anonymous Member
@antsosa
@Arditi
@Artemis
@aryanretard
@ascendedd
@AscendingHero
@ascension
@Aseancell
@AsGoodAsItGets
@Aypo129
@Azemog
@Bakin donuts 🍩
@Banasura
@banks
@bddenjoyer
@Be_ConfidentBro
@beachdude123
@Beastimmung
@BigBoy
@bill
@birdpersone
@Bitchwhipper2
@Blackgymmax
@Bloatedindeed
@Blond3cel
@bluepilled
@Brad
@BrahminBoss
@bwrauycnee
@cabbage
@caiolindo
@capybara
@ceo
@Chadeep
@Chadrapist
@ChicoChicowski
@chiisfow
@Chinacurry
@Chinlet Ascension
@chrisbauer
@chrisN
@chrollo
@Cigarette
@cillianmurphycel
@ConfusedBolivian
@Constantin Denis
@copemaxxedturanid
@copesthenics
@Coronabeer
@Crusile
@crybaby
@crymilk
@Cutecel2001
@cytoplasm
@dancs
@daniel_3303
@Danish_Retard
@Debetro
@DefinitelyNT
@DeformedCell
@DelonLover1999
@delonregen
@DicedFeta
@Dr. Greenberg
@duckducknoose
@Dystopian
@eduardkoopman
@elzde95
@emeraldglass
@Enfant terrible
@EvCu65
@Fairestknight
@fandrewpandu
@Filippo
@flippasav
@FlyingElephant
@foidaddict
@FunkyFlamingo
@Gargantuan
@GilfHunter
@goo25
@gp8
@greatape11
@Grel Hellscream
@gungnir
@gymmaxedhorse
@HeightPilledum
@HitAndRun
@holdin'on
@htnorbust
@Iblamejordan
@Icon
@IHateMyself
@IHeightMogU
@INB
@IncelBully
@Indagator
@ineonx
@inspector
@J5F0O1VJe00
@Jamaldickjavontus
@javab
@jesuschrist
@JL~
@joao
@JoeSchmoe12
@joeveniro
@john2
@JohnDoe
@jrobts.
@julian111
@justbentbro
@justinzayn
@justleavemealone
@kality
@Kama
@Kater Maxxing
@Kerbouchard
@khvirgin
@KING REIDYZ
@kuroro
@kyb
@kyrre
@LaIcriday
@leanislaw
@leopold123
@lightskinbengali
@lightskincel.
@LimaDummy
@Lone Wolf
@longjohnmong
@LooksmaxxHopeful
@LooksOrDeath
@lordgandy2000
@Loveland
@MadTwatter
@Makeyousit
@Manana
@ManzareK
@marauder
@Mastermind
@MatheusCqb
@metagross
@midlatinocel
@mizrahi_hater
@mogger69420
@MoggerChad
@MongolTurk
@moolahmole24
@mrriceguy
@mug
@NegativeNorwood
@NerdcelThundercok
@nerdycomrade
@Newday
@Nightrunner
@nordicfoidslayer23
@normie_joe
@norwegianfreak
@Oberyn
@OCDisneyChad
@ongongfr
@only10inch
@OogaBooba
@orb 2.0
@overtier1011
@PaduaSlayer
@PG4BINX
@pig_face
@Pleiadian
@PointOfNoReturn
@poopoohead
@Preston
@Pretty
@Prince88
@PubertyMaxxer
@RAITEIII
@RAMU KAKA
@RecessedChinCel
@Reckless Turtle
@Red Fox
@Reformed
@reptiles
@RetardSubhuman
@ripcordgod1
@Ritalincell
@Rixinuj
@RoadtoCurryChad
@rocoveron007
@rooman
@ROTTING
@rrrrrr8526
@ryangoslinglover377
@Sabbir0404a
@saint
@Samiscool234
@schizolool
@sebsyx
@SecularIslamist
@Sens
@serbiangandy
@Shekel
@Shieda_Kayn
@shortcel88
@Sick
@SixPack
@Skyness
@slavicpsycho
@SocietyIsSolipsistic
@solid7/10
@Sonny
@Soumyadip
@spark
@Spiͯriͯtualcel
@SteveRogers
@stpzkmpfwg
@Struggler03
@studymaxxer
@SubHumanHere
@subhumantosubhumans
@Survivor95
@sтᴀʀʙoʏ
@Tallman
@teemowhite
@temporomandibular32
@the BULL
@The Thinker
@Thegreatone
@THEMOGGER
@TheReckons
@Thorsten
@ToTheTop
@TRUE_CEL
@truthpilled
@try2beme
@TUSSELEIF
@Tylermax
@Tyronius Maximus
@uberfuckchad
@UglyItalian
@user1728482728
@vaseqmoherad
@Venommm_
@Viperm
@WannaBeA6
@wastedpotential
@WeiWei
@Whatever0
@WHITECURRY
@WhiteGoodman
@whitegymmax
@wificonnector
@Willmogulater
@Wiqfi
@WishIwasChico
@Xangsane
@yelyseiblud
@Yuno_howitez
@zainab
@zan
@Zer0/∞
@Zetoch
@Zikel_Nut
@zsombi
Already voted...
 
BBC only tatoo
1691347402347
 
Probably. But for me personally, I can't be attracted to super skinny woman. It's similar to women who have six packs and go to the gym all the time, just not attractive at all IMO
When she have a super good looking face I dont think the body matters such much, ok not be obese or super skiny, but already with a great face the body will be decent. She have a good body, better tits and no one will talk about her not having good body.
 
Face is very aesthetic but needs bigger body
 
  • +1
Reactions: uglysub8male
Maybe 2SD above average. Body is not amazing, face is pretty but has an unnatural appearance to me

You really need to have more options with the voting.
 
Maybe 2SD above average. Body is not amazing, face is pretty but has an unnatural appearance to me

You really need to have more options with the voting.
You really need to realize that you're a bit of a delusional narcy.
 
good face but too skinny. most female models tend to be skinny because the indsutry always wants them to be leanmaxxed and they c ant afford to go on a 6 month bulk because thats 6 months of them being fat which means 6 months of modeling which meaens 6 months of no money
 
good face but too skinny. most female models tend to be skinny because the indsutry always wants them to be leanmaxxed and they c ant afford to go on a 6 month bulk because thats 6 months of them being fat which means 6 months of modeling which meaens 6 months of no money
The industry is more likely to hire lean women because they're more likely to be more attractive.
 
You really need to realize that you're a bit of a delusional narcy.
If you're going to say an insult, you need to make it relevant. "Narcy" is nonsense, because I haven't said anything positive about myself in any of these threads. Model material is not synonymous with beauty, and many of these girls (especially teh more SSA-influenced ones) are not the über elite beauties you expect them to be.
 
If you're going to say an insult, you need to make it relevant. "Narcy" is nonsense, because I haven't said anything positive about myself in any of these threads.
Quiet part better call saul


By underrating people, you bring them closer to yourself (at least based on your perception). Crab mentality is inherently narcissistic because it implies delusional importance in spite of objectivity.

Model material is not synonymous with beauty
Supermodel material to the point of being a VS angel certainly is (as dictated by the market).
 
Manlet detected
I’m 6’1. I’m not saying she looks like a man. I’m saying she has a little boy’s ass and you like that but nice try you retarded faggot
 
View attachment 2365203

By underrating people, you bring them closer to yourself (at least based on your perception). Crab mentality is inherently narcissistic because it implies delusional importance in spite of objectivity.
I don't know if this is a confession on your part. Ratings are supposed to be either theoretical (how attractive someone can possibly be) or statistical (relative to genpop). Not everyone thinks about everything in these ego terms.

Supermodel material to the point of being a VS angel certainly is (as dictated by the market).
Supermodels are never "dictated by the market". They are professionals hired by private companies. The fashion industry is dominated by women and gay men.
 
I don't know if this is a confession on your part. Ratings are supposed to be either theoretical (how attractive someone can possibly be) or statistical (relative to genpop). Not everyone thinks about everything in these ego terms.
Your statistical rating of this woman was way off.

Supermodels are never "dictated by the market". They are professionals hired by private companies.
...to sell products on the market. Women are more likely to buy products being used (worn) by highly attractive women. Men are more likely to watch advertisements designed to get them to buy things for women if the women in the advertisements are highly attractive.

The fashion industry is dominated by women and gay men.
Only at the working level. The owners and shareholders of these massive companies are predominantly heterosexual males. The heterosexual male "owners" of these highly desirable women employ other women and homosexual men to work with them because they don't want other heterosexual men around the models (especially while the models are nude/semi-nude). Ed Razek (heterosexual male) was in charge of casting the models for VS prior to the company going woke (and allowing less attractive women to represent the brand as "models").
 
Your statistical rating of this woman was way off.
Assertion

...to sell products on the market. Women are more likely to buy products being used (worn) by highly attractive women. Men are more likely to watch advertisements designed to get them to buy things for women if the women in the advertisements are highly attractive.
This is just the efficient market hypothesis.
 
Models don't necessarily represent what the average person (or straight men in particular) find most attractive.
The average man is shorter than the average supermodel, so that argument relies on sour grapes. The prostitution/escort market, alone, reveals the true market value of women based on their physical attractiveness (newsflash: top models can charge ridiculous rates).
 
Place your vote.
When she have a super good looking face I dont think the body matters such much, ok not be obese or super skiny, but already with a great face the body will be decent. She have a good body, better tits and no one will talk about her not having good body.
Face is very aesthetic but needs bigger body
Maybe 2SD above average. Body is not amazing, face is pretty but has an unnatural appearance to me

You really need to have more options with the voting.
No she doesn’t :lul:
Place your vote.
 
The average man is shorter than the average supermodel, so that argument relies on sour grapes.
No it's not. This is simple: There is a well-known preference for very tall women in modeling. Is there the same preference among men (in terms of the women men find attractive)? No. In fact, many men prefer average or short women. Thus, we have to conclude that there is something other than male preference taking place in the selection of female models, and female models do not accurately represent what is attractive to men.
 
No it's not. This is simple: There is a well-known preference for very tall women in modeling. Is there the same preference among men (in terms of the women men find attractive)? No. In fact, many men prefer average or short women. Thus, we have to conclude that there is something other than male preference taking place in the selection of female models, and female models do not accurately represent what is attractive to men.
Taller men have a preference for taller women. Also, you ignored my point about prostitution.
 
Taller men have a preference for taller women.
Ergo, taller women don't represent men's taste in general. Because "men" and "taller men" are not synonymous.

Also, correlations are not transitive. So if A is correlated with B, and A is correlated with C, that does not necessarily mean B is correlated with C. For example, if being a tall man is correlated with preferring tall women, and being a tall man is correlated with being attractive, that doesn't mean preferring taller women is necessarily correlated with being attractive.

Do you really think someone like Ana De Armas is less attractive than someone like the model Molly Blair? For the average man, the answer is definitely no. Ana De Armas would never make it as a supermodel, though. She's just not the "model type"--tall, scrawny, angular face.


Dogshit broscience. Going from "[x group] prefers [y group]" to "[x group] must have a genetic propensity to prefer [y group]" is a massive unjustified assumption.

Also, you ignored my point about prostitution.
How many models do you think are prostitutes? It's probably too tiny to be representative of models as a whole.

If I have to spell this out for you, I have never said that models are unattractive, just that they don't necessarily represent what men find most attractive.

We've gotten in arguments on here, so I want to make something clear. I do not say this to be insulting or to try and win an argument. You seem like someone who is terminally online, and whose entire idea of people comes from websites like this. The vast majority of people (men especially) don't care about models. You've developed this fixation that affects your perception. While I hate the "autistic" meme, that general idea is apt here: You're obsessed with these formulas that don't actually help you understand people.
 
Ergo, taller women don't represent men's taste in general. Because "men" and "taller men" are not synonymous.
Taller men are more desirable to women. Taller men have a tendency to prefer taller women.

Do you really think someone like Ana De Armas is less attractive than someone like the model Molly Blair? For the average man, the answer is definitely no. Ana De Armas would never make it as a supermodel, though. She's just not the "model type"--tall, scrawny, angular face.
You're creating a strawman by not controlling for other factors (notably, facial attractiveness). And again, the preference of the average man is not as relevant as the preference of above average men, as I've already explained.

Going from "[x group] prefers [y group]" to "[x group] must have a genetic propensity to prefer [y group]" is a massive unjustified assumption.
Why? It's an unjustified assumption to assume that people have a genetic propensity to prefer individuals who will provide taller offspring?

How many models do you think are prostitutes? It's probably too tiny to be representative of models as a whole.
It's tiny because top models are rare to begin with (because they're exclusively attractive) and they're already acquiring money from modeling (unlike the general female population). Also, their "escort" service is oftentimes getting invited on a yacht with celebrities.

If I have to spell this out for you, I have never said that models are unattractive, just that they don't necessarily represent what men find most attractive.
The average man is shorter than the average supermodel, so that argument relies on sour grapes.

We've gotten in arguments on here, so I want to make something clear. I do not say this to be insulting or to try and win an argument. You seem like someone who is terminally online, and whose entire idea of people comes from websites like this. The vast majority of people (men especially) don't care about models. You've developed this fixation that affects your perception. While I hate the "autistic" meme, that general idea is apt here: You're obsessed with these formulas that don't actually help you understand people.
You also seem like someone who is terminally online yet has a tendency to cope. Do you also show up to the male model threads to remind users that they don't represent what most women find attractive? After all, they just need to touch grass and see that most women are not in relationships with male models.
 
Taller men are more desirable to women. Taller men have a tendency to prefer taller women.
It's not even clear if this is true to begin with. Search for studies, and you'll find varied results.

"According to Pawlowski (2003), preferred partner height difference depends on an individual’s own height [24]: both shorter men and taller women prefer smaller partner height differences than taller men and shorter women do, who prefer larger partner height differences."

(Referenced from-- 17. Pawlowski B, Koziel S (2002) The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements on response rates. Evol Hum Behav 23: 139–149 doi:10.1016/S1090–5138(01)00092-7. [Google Scholar] )

Finding one study that represents your opinion and basing your entire ideology off of it is not a good idea. Modern science has a very low rate of replicability (probably lower than 50%).

You're creating a strawman by not controlling for other factors (notably, facial attractiveness).
It's not a strawman. Ana De Armas is more attractive than Molly Blair. It doesn't matter if you're talking about unattractive men's opinions, attractive men's opinions, tall men's or short men's. It's safe to say the vast majority of men would agree on that. Yet, De Armas is not "model material" while Blair is. This indicates something different than pure attractiveness is relevant in becoming a model.

And again, the preference of the average man is not as relevant as the preference of above average men, as I've already explained.
Those "above average" men would prefer De Armas over Blair, so my point stands.

Why? It's an unjustified assumption to assume that people have a genetic propensity to prefer individuals who will provide taller offspring?
Because in good science, you justify all of your premises, rather than just making assumptions.

It's tiny because top models are rare to begin with (because they're exclusively attractive) and they're already acquiring money from modeling (unlike the general female population). Also, their "escort" service is oftentimes getting invited on a yacht with celebrities.
This sounds like an obscure example of a phenomenon that is not recorded in any systematic way. We have no idea how much this happens, who pays them, how much they pay, etc.

You also seem like someone who is terminally online yet has a tendency to cope.
You've been a member for a shorter time than me but have over triple the number of posts. So who's terminally online, again?
 
"According to Pawlowski (2003), preferred partner height difference depends on an individual’s own height [24]: both shorter men and taller women prefer smaller partner height differences than taller men and shorter women do, who prefer larger partner height differences."
Those differences are explained by women being pickier about having a tall partner than men.

Finding one study that represents your opinion and basing your entire ideology off of it is not a good idea. Modern science has a very low rate of replicability (probably lower than 50%).
Discrediting a study without challenging its methodology or linking other studies is not a good idea.

This indicates something different than pure attractiveness is relevant in becoming a model.
You're cherrypicking an example who was never a supmermodel. She only filled in a niche in high fashion and was never able to aggressively market to the general male and female population (unlike supermodels).

Because in good science, you justify all of your premises, rather than just making assumptions.






You've been a member for a shorter time than me but have over triple the number of posts. So who's terminally online, again?
Both of us, clearly.
 
Those differences are explained by women being pickier about having a tall partner than men.
No it doesn't. It specifies both partners in the pairings listed had that preference.

Discrediting a study without challenging its methodology or linking other studies is not a good idea.
You are posting shit from a subreddit.

You're cherrypicking an example who was never a supmermodel. She only filled in a niche in high fashion and was never able to aggressively market to the general male and female population (unlike supermodels).
Those high fashion jobs are the "good jobs" of the modeling industry. Only a handful of models ever are VS Angels. High fashion is what success looks like for most models. Women who reach that level are the ones who could sometimes sustain a living off that career. My example is a fine example of a successful model (but there are many others who would serve the same purpose, looking worse than De Armas).

Your Reddit posts do not support your bizarro belief that tall men's tastes are the accurate barometer for what is objectively attractive in women. Most of the posts are completely obvious, like pointing out that being tall and having a wide shoulder-to-waist ratio is attractive. No shit, Sherlock. Everyone knows that already.
 
No it doesn't. It specifies both partners in the pairings listed had that preference.
Yes, it does. Taller men are more willing to have a shorter partner than taller women.

You are posting shit from a subreddit.
That link to peer-reviewed sources. Are you asking me to link the studies and quote the sections instead?

Only a handful of models ever are VS Angels.
And you're commenting in a thread for one.

Your Reddit posts do not support your bizarro belief that tall men's tastes are the accurate barometer for what is objectively attractive in women. Most of the posts are completely obvious, like pointing out that being tall and having a wide shoulder-to-waist ratio is attractive. No shit, Sherlock. Everyone knows that already.
Not all of the findings in those studies are obvious to you, apparently. But based on your comment, you didn't even read the studies.

You dodged this point, by the way:
Do you also show up to the male model threads to remind users that they don't represent what most women find attractive? After all, they just need to touch grass and see that most women are not in relationships with male models.
 
0 sex appeal, cause of low body fat and no tits failo.
 

Similar threads

PMF1
Replies
5
Views
109
SecularIslamist
SecularIslamist
6'5 HTN
Replies
6
Views
343
niggatron
niggatron
BWC_virgin
Replies
27
Views
515
klip11
klip11
Xangsane
Replies
26
Views
373
socialcel
socialcel
coisbhai
Replies
11
Views
189
coisbhai
coisbhai

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top