Reckless Turtle
Kraken
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2021
- Posts
- 17,143
- Reputation
- 23,783
- OP
- #51
Current average = 9.19/10
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
@;-;
@🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶
@0kami123
@12PSLsubhuman
@5'3 8psl
@5'7 zoomer
@5OuttaTen
@6’1cel
@a30
@Ach1lles
@actual9cmjawslayer
@adungonu55
@aesthetic beauty
@AlexAP
@anadeusstolemyname
@andy9432
@Anonymous Member
@antsosa
@Arditi
@Artemis
@aryanretard
@ascendedd
@AscendingHero
@ascension
@Aseancell
@AsGoodAsItGets
@Aypo129
@Azemog
@Bakin donuts 🍩
@Banasura
@banks
@bddenjoyer
@Be_ConfidentBro
@beachdude123
@Beastimmung
@BigBoy
@bill
@birdpersone
@Bitchwhipper2
@Blackgymmax
@Bloatedindeed
@Blond3cel
@bluepilled
@Brad
@BrahminBoss
@bwrauycnee
@cabbage
@caiolindo
@capybara
@ceo
@Chadeep
@Chadrapist
@ChicoChicowski
@chiisfow
@Chinacurry
@Chinlet Ascension
@chrisbauer
@chrisN
@chrollo
@Cigarette
@cillianmurphycel
@ConfusedBolivian
@Constantin Denis
@copemaxxedturanid
@copesthenics
@Coronabeer
@Crusile
@crybaby
@crymilk
@Cutecel2001
@cytoplasm
@dancs
@daniel_3303
@Danish_Retard
@Debetro
@DefinitelyNT
@DeformedCell
@DelonLover1999
@delonregen
@DicedFeta
@Dr. Greenberg
@duckducknoose
@Dystopian
@eduardkoopman
@elzde95
@emeraldglass
@Enfant terrible
@EvCu65
@Fairestknight
@fandrewpandu
@Filippo
@flippasav
@FlyingElephant
@foidaddict
@FunkyFlamingo
@Gargantuan
@GilfHunter
@goo25
@gp8
@greatape11
@Grel Hellscream
@gungnir
@gymmaxedhorse
@HeightPilledum
@HitAndRun
@holdin'on
@htnorbust
@Iblamejordan
@Icon
@IHateMyself
@IHeightMogU
@INB
@IncelBully
@Indagator
@ineonx
@inspector
@J5F0O1VJe00
@Jamaldickjavontus
@javab
@jesuschrist
@JL~
@joao
@JoeSchmoe12
@joeveniro
@john2
@JohnDoe
@jrobts.
@julian111
@justbentbro
@justinzayn
@justleavemealone
@kality
@Kama
@Kater Maxxing
@Kerbouchard
@khvirgin
@KING REIDYZ
@kuroro
@kyb
@kyrre
@LaIcriday
@leanislaw
@leopold123
@lightskinbengali
@lightskincel.
@LimaDummy
@Lone Wolf
@longjohnmong
@LooksmaxxHopeful
@LooksOrDeath
@lordgandy2000
@Loveland
@MadTwatter
@Makeyousit
@Manana
@ManzareK
@marauder
@Mastermind
@MatheusCqb
@metagross
@midlatinocel
@mizrahi_hater
@mogger69420
@MoggerChad
@MongolTurk
@moolahmole24
@mrriceguy
@mug
@NegativeNorwood
@NerdcelThundercok
@nerdycomrade
@Newday
@Nightrunner
@nordicfoidslayer23
@normie_joe
@norwegianfreak
@Oberyn
@OCDisneyChad
@ongongfr
@only10inch
@OogaBooba
@orb 2.0
@overtier1011
@PaduaSlayer
@PG4BINX
@pig_face
@Pleiadian
@PointOfNoReturn
@poopoohead
@Preston
@Pretty
@Prince88
@PubertyMaxxer
@RAITEIII
@RAMU KAKA
@RecessedChinCel
@Reckless Turtle
@Red Fox
@Reformed
@reptiles
@RetardSubhuman
@ripcordgod1
@Ritalincell
@Rixinuj
@RoadtoCurryChad
@rocoveron007
@rooman
@ROTTING
@rrrrrr8526
@ryangoslinglover377
@Sabbir0404a
@saint
@Samiscool234
@schizolool
@sebsyx
@SecularIslamist
@Sens
@serbiangandy
@Shekel
@Shieda_Kayn
@shortcel88
@Sick
@SixPack
@Skyness
@slavicpsycho
@SocietyIsSolipsistic
@solid7/10
@Sonny
@Soumyadip
@spark
@Spiͯriͯtualcel
@SteveRogers
@stpzkmpfwg
@Struggler03
@studymaxxer
@SubHumanHere
@subhumantosubhumans
@Survivor95
@sтᴀʀʙoʏ
@Tallman
@teemowhite
@temporomandibular32
@the BULL
@The Thinker
@Thegreatone
@THEMOGGER
@TheReckons
@Thorsten
@ToTheTop
@TRUE_CEL
@truthpilled
@try2beme
@TUSSELEIF
@Tylermax
@Tyronius Maximus
@uberfuckchad
@UglyItalian
@user1728482728
@vaseqmoherad
@Venommm_
@Viperm
@WannaBeA6
@wastedpotential
@WeiWei
@Whatever0
@WHITECURRY
@WhiteGoodman
@whitegymmax
@wificonnector
@Willmogulater
@Wiqfi
@WishIwasChico
@Xangsane
@yelyseiblud
@Yuno_howitez
@zainab
@zan
@Zer0/∞
@Zetoch
@Zikel_Nut
@zsombi
I'm a woman with big milkers and you're a worm-looking guy?
Already voted...@;-;
@🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶🐶
@0kami123
@12PSLsubhuman
@5'3 8psl
@5'7 zoomer
@5OuttaTen
@6’1cel
@a30
@Ach1lles
@actual9cmjawslayer
@adungonu55
@aesthetic beauty
@AlexAP
@anadeusstolemyname
@andy9432
@Anonymous Member
@antsosa
@Arditi
@Artemis
@aryanretard
@ascendedd
@AscendingHero
@ascension
@Aseancell
@AsGoodAsItGets
@Aypo129
@Azemog
@Bakin donuts 🍩
@Banasura
@banks
@bddenjoyer
@Be_ConfidentBro
@beachdude123
@Beastimmung
@BigBoy
@bill
@birdpersone
@Bitchwhipper2
@Blackgymmax
@Bloatedindeed
@Blond3cel
@bluepilled
@Brad
@BrahminBoss
@bwrauycnee
@cabbage
@caiolindo
@capybara
@ceo
@Chadeep
@Chadrapist
@ChicoChicowski
@chiisfow
@Chinacurry
@Chinlet Ascension
@chrisbauer
@chrisN
@chrollo
@Cigarette
@cillianmurphycel
@ConfusedBolivian
@Constantin Denis
@copemaxxedturanid
@copesthenics
@Coronabeer
@Crusile
@crybaby
@crymilk
@Cutecel2001
@cytoplasm
@dancs
@daniel_3303
@Danish_Retard
@Debetro
@DefinitelyNT
@DeformedCell
@DelonLover1999
@delonregen
@DicedFeta
@Dr. Greenberg
@duckducknoose
@Dystopian
@eduardkoopman
@elzde95
@emeraldglass
@Enfant terrible
@EvCu65
@Fairestknight
@fandrewpandu
@Filippo
@flippasav
@FlyingElephant
@foidaddict
@FunkyFlamingo
@Gargantuan
@GilfHunter
@goo25
@gp8
@greatape11
@Grel Hellscream
@gungnir
@gymmaxedhorse
@HeightPilledum
@HitAndRun
@holdin'on
@htnorbust
@Iblamejordan
@Icon
@IHateMyself
@IHeightMogU
@INB
@IncelBully
@Indagator
@ineonx
@inspector
@J5F0O1VJe00
@Jamaldickjavontus
@javab
@jesuschrist
@JL~
@joao
@JoeSchmoe12
@joeveniro
@john2
@JohnDoe
@jrobts.
@julian111
@justbentbro
@justinzayn
@justleavemealone
@kality
@Kama
@Kater Maxxing
@Kerbouchard
@khvirgin
@KING REIDYZ
@kuroro
@kyb
@kyrre
@LaIcriday
@leanislaw
@leopold123
@lightskinbengali
@lightskincel.
@LimaDummy
@Lone Wolf
@longjohnmong
@LooksmaxxHopeful
@LooksOrDeath
@lordgandy2000
@Loveland
@MadTwatter
@Makeyousit
@Manana
@ManzareK
@marauder
@Mastermind
@MatheusCqb
@metagross
@midlatinocel
@mizrahi_hater
@mogger69420
@MoggerChad
@MongolTurk
@moolahmole24
@mrriceguy
@mug
@NegativeNorwood
@NerdcelThundercok
@nerdycomrade
@Newday
@Nightrunner
@nordicfoidslayer23
@normie_joe
@norwegianfreak
@Oberyn
@OCDisneyChad
@ongongfr
@only10inch
@OogaBooba
@orb 2.0
@overtier1011
@PaduaSlayer
@PG4BINX
@pig_face
@Pleiadian
@PointOfNoReturn
@poopoohead
@Preston
@Pretty
@Prince88
@PubertyMaxxer
@RAITEIII
@RAMU KAKA
@RecessedChinCel
@Reckless Turtle
@Red Fox
@Reformed
@reptiles
@RetardSubhuman
@ripcordgod1
@Ritalincell
@Rixinuj
@RoadtoCurryChad
@rocoveron007
@rooman
@ROTTING
@rrrrrr8526
@ryangoslinglover377
@Sabbir0404a
@saint
@Samiscool234
@schizolool
@sebsyx
@SecularIslamist
@Sens
@serbiangandy
@Shekel
@Shieda_Kayn
@shortcel88
@Sick
@SixPack
@Skyness
@slavicpsycho
@SocietyIsSolipsistic
@solid7/10
@Sonny
@Soumyadip
@spark
@Spiͯriͯtualcel
@SteveRogers
@stpzkmpfwg
@Struggler03
@studymaxxer
@SubHumanHere
@subhumantosubhumans
@Survivor95
@sтᴀʀʙoʏ
@Tallman
@teemowhite
@temporomandibular32
@the BULL
@The Thinker
@Thegreatone
@THEMOGGER
@TheReckons
@Thorsten
@ToTheTop
@TRUE_CEL
@truthpilled
@try2beme
@TUSSELEIF
@Tylermax
@Tyronius Maximus
@uberfuckchad
@UglyItalian
@user1728482728
@vaseqmoherad
@Venommm_
@Viperm
@WannaBeA6
@wastedpotential
@WeiWei
@Whatever0
@WHITECURRY
@WhiteGoodman
@whitegymmax
@wificonnector
@Willmogulater
@Wiqfi
@WishIwasChico
@Xangsane
@yelyseiblud
@Yuno_howitez
@zainab
@zan
@Zer0/∞
@Zetoch
@Zikel_Nut
@zsombi
Place your vote.
Thanks for being proactive.Already voted...
When she have a super good looking face I dont think the body matters such much, ok not be obese or super skiny, but already with a great face the body will be decent. She have a good body, better tits and no one will talk about her not having good body.Probably. But for me personally, I can't be attracted to super skinny woman. It's similar to women who have six packs and go to the gym all the time, just not attractive at all IMO
You really need to realize that you're a bit of a delusional narcy.Maybe 2SD above average. Body is not amazing, face is pretty but has an unnatural appearance to me
You really need to have more options with the voting.
good face but too skinny. most female models tend to be skinny because the indsutry always wants them to be leanmaxxed and they c ant afford to go on a 6 month bulk because thats 6 months of them being fat which means 6 months of modeling which meaens 6 months of no money
The industry is more likely to hire lean women because they're more likely to be more attractive.good face but too skinny. most female models tend to be skinny because the indsutry always wants them to be leanmaxxed and they c ant afford to go on a 6 month bulk because thats 6 months of them being fat which means 6 months of modeling which meaens 6 months of no money
bassically what im sayingThe industry is more likely to hire lean women because they're more likely to be more attractive.
Therefore, if she "bulked," she wouldn't be as attractive.bassically what im saying
If you're going to say an insult, you need to make it relevant. "Narcy" is nonsense, because I haven't said anything positive about myself in any of these threads. Model material is not synonymous with beauty, and many of these girls (especially teh more SSA-influenced ones) are not the über elite beauties you expect them to be.You really need to realize that you're a bit of a delusional narcy.
If you're going to say an insult, you need to make it relevant. "Narcy" is nonsense, because I haven't said anything positive about myself in any of these threads.
Supermodel material to the point of being a VS angel certainly is (as dictated by the market).Model material is not synonymous with beauty
No she doesn’tShe already has a decent amount of fat distribution to her ass
Femboy loving fag detectedRoom temperature IQ coomer detected
Manlet detectedFemboy loving fag detected
Why am I so gynecomastic?
I’m 6’1. I’m not saying she looks like a man. I’m saying she has a little boy’s ass and you like that but nice try you retarded faggotManlet detected
What is the average height of men who repeatedly refer to females as "trannies?"
These particular examples come up frequently. Assume that a man is presented with these pictures, and his instinct is to respond with "tranny" or something suggesting that they depict males. Take that theoretical sample of men, average their heights, and then vote accordingly.looksmax.org
I’m 6’1.
It's giving manlet rage energyI’m saying she has a little boy’s ass and you like that but nice try you retarded faggot
I don't know if this is a confession on your part. Ratings are supposed to be either theoretical (how attractive someone can possibly be) or statistical (relative to genpop). Not everyone thinks about everything in these ego terms.View attachment 2365203
By underrating people, you bring them closer to yourself (at least based on your perception). Crab mentality is inherently narcissistic because it implies delusional importance in spite of objectivity.
Supermodels are never "dictated by the market". They are professionals hired by private companies. The fashion industry is dominated by women and gay men.Supermodel material to the point of being a VS angel certainly is (as dictated by the market).
Your statistical rating of this woman was way off.I don't know if this is a confession on your part. Ratings are supposed to be either theoretical (how attractive someone can possibly be) or statistical (relative to genpop). Not everyone thinks about everything in these ego terms.
...to sell products on the market. Women are more likely to buy products being used (worn) by highly attractive women. Men are more likely to watch advertisements designed to get them to buy things for women if the women in the advertisements are highly attractive.Supermodels are never "dictated by the market". They are professionals hired by private companies.
Only at the working level. The owners and shareholders of these massive companies are predominantly heterosexual males. The heterosexual male "owners" of these highly desirable women employ other women and homosexual men to work with them because they don't want other heterosexual men around the models (especially while the models are nude/semi-nude). Ed Razek (heterosexual male) was in charge of casting the models for VS prior to the company going woke (and allowing less attractive women to represent the brand as "models").The fashion industry is dominated by women and gay men.
AssertionYour statistical rating of this woman was way off.
This is just the efficient market hypothesis....to sell products on the market. Women are more likely to buy products being used (worn) by highly attractive women. Men are more likely to watch advertisements designed to get them to buy things for women if the women in the advertisements are highly attractive.
Assertion
Supermodel material to the point of being a VS angel certainly is (as dictated by the market).
What's your argument?This is just the efficient market hypothesis.
It's giving manlet rage energy
Models don't necessarily represent what the average person (or straight men in particular) find most attractive.What's your argument?
The average man is shorter than the average supermodel, so that argument relies on sour grapes. The prostitution/escort market, alone, reveals the true market value of women based on their physical attractiveness (newsflash: top models can charge ridiculous rates).Models don't necessarily represent what the average person (or straight men in particular) find most attractive.
Place your vote.
When she have a super good looking face I dont think the body matters such much, ok not be obese or super skiny, but already with a great face the body will be decent. She have a good body, better tits and no one will talk about her not having good body.
Face is very aesthetic but needs bigger body
Maybe 2SD above average. Body is not amazing, face is pretty but has an unnatural appearance to me
You really need to have more options with the voting.
Place your vote.No she doesn’t
No it's not. This is simple: There is a well-known preference for very tall women in modeling. Is there the same preference among men (in terms of the women men find attractive)? No. In fact, many men prefer average or short women. Thus, we have to conclude that there is something other than male preference taking place in the selection of female models, and female models do not accurately represent what is attractive to men.The average man is shorter than the average supermodel, so that argument relies on sour grapes.
Taller men have a preference for taller women. Also, you ignored my point about prostitution.No it's not. This is simple: There is a well-known preference for very tall women in modeling. Is there the same preference among men (in terms of the women men find attractive)? No. In fact, many men prefer average or short women. Thus, we have to conclude that there is something other than male preference taking place in the selection of female models, and female models do not accurately represent what is attractive to men.
Ergo, taller women don't represent men's taste in general. Because "men" and "taller men" are not synonymous.Taller men have a preference for taller women.
How many models do you think are prostitutes? It's probably too tiny to be representative of models as a whole.Also, you ignored my point about prostitution.
Taller men are more desirable to women. Taller men have a tendency to prefer taller women.Ergo, taller women don't represent men's taste in general. Because "men" and "taller men" are not synonymous.
You're creating a strawman by not controlling for other factors (notably, facial attractiveness). And again, the preference of the average man is not as relevant as the preference of above average men, as I've already explained.Do you really think someone like Ana De Armas is less attractive than someone like the model Molly Blair? For the average man, the answer is definitely no. Ana De Armas would never make it as a supermodel, though. She's just not the "model type"--tall, scrawny, angular face.
Why? It's an unjustified assumption to assume that people have a genetic propensity to prefer individuals who will provide taller offspring?Going from "[x group] prefers [y group]" to "[x group] must have a genetic propensity to prefer [y group]" is a massive unjustified assumption.
It's tiny because top models are rare to begin with (because they're exclusively attractive) and they're already acquiring money from modeling (unlike the general female population). Also, their "escort" service is oftentimes getting invited on a yacht with celebrities.How many models do you think are prostitutes? It's probably too tiny to be representative of models as a whole.
If I have to spell this out for you, I have never said that models are unattractive, just that they don't necessarily represent what men find most attractive.
The average man is shorter than the average supermodel, so that argument relies on sour grapes.
You also seem like someone who is terminally online yet has a tendency to cope. Do you also show up to the male model threads to remind users that they don't represent what most women find attractive? After all, they just need to touch grass and see that most women are not in relationships with male models.We've gotten in arguments on here, so I want to make something clear. I do not say this to be insulting or to try and win an argument. You seem like someone who is terminally online, and whose entire idea of people comes from websites like this. The vast majority of people (men especially) don't care about models. You've developed this fixation that affects your perception. While I hate the "autistic" meme, that general idea is apt here: You're obsessed with these formulas that don't actually help you understand people.
It's not even clear if this is true to begin with. Search for studies, and you'll find varied results.Taller men are more desirable to women. Taller men have a tendency to prefer taller women.
It's not a strawman. Ana De Armas is more attractive than Molly Blair. It doesn't matter if you're talking about unattractive men's opinions, attractive men's opinions, tall men's or short men's. It's safe to say the vast majority of men would agree on that. Yet, De Armas is not "model material" while Blair is. This indicates something different than pure attractiveness is relevant in becoming a model.You're creating a strawman by not controlling for other factors (notably, facial attractiveness).
Those "above average" men would prefer De Armas over Blair, so my point stands.And again, the preference of the average man is not as relevant as the preference of above average men, as I've already explained.
Because in good science, you justify all of your premises, rather than just making assumptions.Why? It's an unjustified assumption to assume that people have a genetic propensity to prefer individuals who will provide taller offspring?
This sounds like an obscure example of a phenomenon that is not recorded in any systematic way. We have no idea how much this happens, who pays them, how much they pay, etc.It's tiny because top models are rare to begin with (because they're exclusively attractive) and they're already acquiring money from modeling (unlike the general female population). Also, their "escort" service is oftentimes getting invited on a yacht with celebrities.
You've been a member for a shorter time than me but have over triple the number of posts. So who's terminally online, again?You also seem like someone who is terminally online yet has a tendency to cope.
Those differences are explained by women being pickier about having a tall partner than men."According to Pawlowski (2003), preferred partner height difference depends on an individual’s own height [24]: both shorter men and taller women prefer smaller partner height differences than taller men and shorter women do, who prefer larger partner height differences."
Discrediting a study without challenging its methodology or linking other studies is not a good idea.Finding one study that represents your opinion and basing your entire ideology off of it is not a good idea. Modern science has a very low rate of replicability (probably lower than 50%).
You're cherrypicking an example who was never a supmermodel. She only filled in a niche in high fashion and was never able to aggressively market to the general male and female population (unlike supermodels).This indicates something different than pure attractiveness is relevant in becoming a model.
Because in good science, you justify all of your premises, rather than just making assumptions.
Both of us, clearly.You've been a member for a shorter time than me but have over triple the number of posts. So who's terminally online, again?
No it doesn't. It specifies both partners in the pairings listed had that preference.Those differences are explained by women being pickier about having a tall partner than men.
You are posting shit from a subreddit.Discrediting a study without challenging its methodology or linking other studies is not a good idea.
Those high fashion jobs are the "good jobs" of the modeling industry. Only a handful of models ever are VS Angels. High fashion is what success looks like for most models. Women who reach that level are the ones who could sometimes sustain a living off that career. My example is a fine example of a successful model (but there are many others who would serve the same purpose, looking worse than De Armas).You're cherrypicking an example who was never a supmermodel. She only filled in a niche in high fashion and was never able to aggressively market to the general male and female population (unlike supermodels).
Yes, it does. Taller men are more willing to have a shorter partner than taller women.No it doesn't. It specifies both partners in the pairings listed had that preference.
That link to peer-reviewed sources. Are you asking me to link the studies and quote the sections instead?You are posting shit from a subreddit.
And you're commenting in a thread for one.Only a handful of models ever are VS Angels.
Not all of the findings in those studies are obvious to you, apparently. But based on your comment, you didn't even read the studies.Your Reddit posts do not support your bizarro belief that tall men's tastes are the accurate barometer for what is objectively attractive in women. Most of the posts are completely obvious, like pointing out that being tall and having a wide shoulder-to-waist ratio is attractive. No shit, Sherlock. Everyone knows that already.
Do you also show up to the male model threads to remind users that they don't represent what most women find attractive? After all, they just need to touch grass and see that most women are not in relationships with male models.