(High IQ surgerymaxers needed) What surgery is needed to fix this subhuman eye area?

littlefingers

littlefingers

Iron
Joined
Dec 14, 2023
Posts
211
Reputation
204
IMG 9464
besides brutal under eye bags what surgeries are needed? I don't think a simple fat grafting would get the job done right?
 
ngl if u want smthg good orbital decompression but it's brutal
 
  • +1
Reactions: djakeneb
Moving ur maxilla forward through le fort should eliminate the eye bags
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Mainlander
orbital implants
 
  • +1
Reactions: littlefingers
1769016251959


basically this
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Mainlander and littlefingers
probably something like this your supraorbital rim is too high - fat grafting only works if you have a hood to be filled in

Post in thread 'Post the best infraorbital implant ascensions' https://looksmax.org/threads/post-the-best-infraorbital-implant-ascensions.976691/post-14776614
so I would need something like this below
yeah I was trying to cope with the fat graft. I am getting my CT scans which I plan on posting (so you guys can see my subhuman skull) near the end of February. Who are some surgeons I should be researching to get this implant?
 
  • +1
Reactions: yussimania
so I would need something like this below

yeah I was trying to cope with the fat graft. I am getting my CT scans which I plan on posting (so you guys can see my subhuman skull) near the end of February. Who are some surgeons I should be researching to get this implant?
this is one of the few times I would recommend going with @RealSurgerymax if you're serious about getting it done I would contact him

he has an Instagram too @giant.implants
 
  • +1
Reactions: RealSurgerymax, Jesus_ist_König and littlefingers
look at a diagram of where the lefort 1 cut is (he is not getting a lefort 2+). It won't change his eyes at all

Not entirely true but not sure how much of a benefit it would be for OP to have less scleral show.
 
  • +1
Reactions: yussimania

Not entirely true but not sure how much of a benefit it would be for OP to have less scleral show.
im not referring to scleral show he doesnt have it

im referring to the upper eye area

thanks for the info tho
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 319009
@bossman do you think botox could help?

I have hooded eyes with a projected browridge

If i raise my eyebrows all the way my eye area looks kinda similar to OPs with high set eyebrows and the upper lid becoming visible

Generally the eyebrows in men follow the supraorbital rim but eyebrows are also controlled by the frontalis muscle - if i droop my eyebrows even lower with my fingers it completely covers the eye (simulating botox)
 
this is one of the few times I would recommend going with @RealSurgerymax if you're serious about getting it done I would contact him

he has an Instagram too @giant.implants
thank you
 
  • +1
Reactions: yussimania
look at a diagram of where the lefort 1 cut is (he is not getting a lefort 2+). It won't change his eyes at all
I didn’t say any numbers. Le fort 3 would do the job for sure.
 
@bossman do you think botox could help?

I have hooded eyes with a projected browridge

If i raise my eyebrows all the way my eye area looks kinda similar to OPs with high set eyebrows and the upper lid becoming visible

Generally the eyebrows in men follow the supraorbital rim but eyebrows are also controlled by the frontalis muscle - if i droop my eyebrows even lower with my fingers it completely covers the eye (simulating botox)
follow up to this

@littlefingers


try this first
 
  • +1
Reactions: littlefingers
@bossman do you think botox could help?

I have hooded eyes with a projected browridge

If i raise my eyebrows all the way my eye area looks kinda similar to OPs with high set eyebrows and the upper lid becoming visible

Generally the eyebrows in men follow the supraorbital rim but eyebrows are also controlled by the frontalis muscle - if i droop my eyebrows even lower with my fingers it completely covers the eye (simulating botox)
I half arsed some measurements on GIMP. I don't think botox would provide sufficient correction here.

Ultimately as you have pointed out, the limiting factor is how low your brow ridge is. You can't keep spamming botox to lower the brow of course. And OP's brow ridge is extremely high.


I came up with a simple measurement to (very half-arsedly) measure how low the brows are. I measured the pixel distance from the centre of the eyeball to the eyebrow. I then divided it by the eyeball radius. So, the lower this value is, the lower set your brow ridge.

I calculated OP's to be roughly 2.8. Mine is 2, and when I try to move my brows down to simulate botox I can get to about 1.5. For reference, O'Pry is at around 1.2 (his right side where the brow is slightly lower).

So, while Botox would work to a certain extent, I agree with you that brow ridge implants are a serious consideration in this case. I think this sagging fat look is because of how high the brow ridge is. A traditional oculoplastic surgeon would probs suggest an upper bleph and move on. I would advise against fat grafting for the time being as it will continue to have the saggy look.
 
  • +1
Reactions: yussimania
I came up with a simple measurement to (very half-arsedly) measure how low the brows are. I measured the pixel distance from the centre of the eyeball to the eyebrow. I then divided it by the eyeball radius. So, the lower this value is, the lower set your brow ridge.
Value 1 is midpoint of pupil to lowest point of eyebrow I assume.
How do you measure value 2, what is 'eyeball radius'?
 
I half arsed some measurements on GIMP. I don't think botox would provide sufficient correction here.

Ultimately as you have pointed out, the limiting factor is how low your brow ridge is. You can't keep spamming botox to lower the brow of course. And OP's brow ridge is extremely high.


I came up with a simple measurement to (very half-arsedly) measure how low the brows are. I measured the pixel distance from the centre of the eyeball to the eyebrow. I then divided it by the eyeball radius. So, the lower this value is, the lower set your brow ridge.

I calculated OP's to be roughly 2.8. Mine is 2, and when I try to move my brows down to simulate botox I can get to about 1.5. For reference, O'Pry is at around 1.2 (his right side where the brow is slightly lower).

So, while Botox would work to a certain extent, I agree with you that brow ridge implants are a serious consideration in this case. I think this sagging fat look is because of how high the brow ridge is. A traditional oculoplastic surgeon would probs suggest an upper bleph and move on. I would advise against fat grafting for the time being as it will continue to have the saggy look.
yes, my brow ridge is super high so I think implants will be the only thing that can save me.. but now I am thinking after the implants will I need fat grafting too?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: yussimania and Nahorscend
Correct


What I ended up doing was measuring the pixel width of the eyeball and dividing it by two. It was just to standardise everything
Then my ratio is 1.1 :forcedsmile:
The distance from midpupil to either canthus is about equal to the distance from midpupil to lowest point of eyebrow
I need to Rattinanmax asap to cash in
 
Then my ratio is 1.1 :forcedsmile:
The distance from midpupil to either canthus is about equal to the distance from midpupil to lowest point of eyebrow
I need to Rattinanmax asap to cash in
Oh shit sorry I didn't explain it properly. I'm drunk lol. I should have said iris.

In OP's case

1769042633077

This

Divided by

1769042662036

This.

Measuring to the canthus is unreliable as people have varying PFL's, but measuring to the iris is ever so slightly more reliable as there is less variation. The point is to get an absolute measure of how high or low your brow bone is, standardised for photos of varying resolutions, not to get a ratio of it in relation to something else.

Sorry for the confusion
 
  • +1
Reactions: yussimania, littlefingers and Nahorscend
Oh shit sorry I didn't explain it properly. I'm drunk lol. I should have said iris.

In OP's case

View attachment 4565746
This

Divided by

View attachment 4565752
This.

Measuring to the canthus is unreliable as people have varying PFL's, but measuring to the iris is ever so slightly more reliable as there is less variation. The point is to get an absolute measure of how high or low your brow bone is, standardised for photos of varying resolutions, not to get a ratio of it in relation to something else.

Sorry for the confusion
I am mirin the explanations thank you
 
  • +1
Reactions: bossman
Oh shit sorry I didn't explain it properly. I'm drunk lol. I should have said iris.

In OP's case

View attachment 4565746
This

Divided by

View attachment 4565752
This.

Measuring to the canthus is unreliable as people have varying PFL's, but measuring to the iris is ever so slightly more reliable as there is less variation. The point is to get an absolute measure of how high or low your brow bone is, standardised for photos of varying resolutions, not to get a ratio of it in relation to something else.

Sorry for the confusion
Over then, I have 2.1-2.2 :lul::lul:
I wonder if proper supra fat grafts will bring it below 2.0 by themselves as they allegedly weigh the eyebrows down.
 
  • +1
Reactions: yussimania
Over then, I have 2.1-2.2 :lul::lul:
I wonder if proper supra fat grafts will bring it below 2.0 by themselves as they allegedly weigh the eyebrows down.
I’d recommend seeing if there’s any change in any of the Thai fat grafting before/afters.

I’ll probably do this tomorrow

Obviously the brow bone itself doesn’t change, but it’s a matter of perception which I think this measurement is good at.

The point in OP’s case is that 2.8 is so high that no “illusions” whether botox or fat grafting can bring it down to a desirable level.
 
  • +1
Reactions: yussimania and Nahorscend
I’d recommend seeing if there’s any change in any of the Thai fat grafting before/afters.

I’ll probably do this tomorrow

Obviously the brow bone itself doesn’t change, but it’s a matter of perception which I think this measurement is good at.

The point in OP’s case is that 2.8 is so high that no “illusions” whether botox or fat grafting can bring it down to a desirable level.
with orbital implants will I still need fat grafting after to get that 2.8 to a desirable level?
 
  • +1
Reactions: yussimania
with orbital implants will I still need fat grafting after to get that 2.8 to a desirable level?
yeah most likely but you would have to wait and see
 
  • +1
Reactions: bossman and littlefingers

Similar threads

S
Replies
2
Views
150
geenk worg
geenk worg
O
Replies
13
Views
254
Oesteogenesis
O
Acquiescence
Replies
2
Views
204
lurking truecel
lurking truecel
S
Replies
19
Views
376
nishka
N
HolaSoyVicky
Replies
21
Views
939
don187
don187

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top