How can people be seriously religious

[Mainlander]

Title

muh faith

 

[Yani]

They're lost in life, probably had a really bad low, or were just raised into a family where religion is law

 

[NiZr]

helps people

 

[imontheloose]

Evil God hypothesis could possibly convince me

 

[hyperbeast]

They want to feel loved, just like how we do bhai

 

[Acquiescence]

C
O
P
E

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

there is no proof or disproof of atheism or christiannity so your free to choose

most mfs in the west already have christian values any way

 

[Mainlander]

there is no proof or disproof of atheism or christiannity do your free to choose

most mfs in the west already have christian values any way

Im agnostic

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

Im agnostic

I don't care tbh it doesn't change my life what may or may not have happened 14 billion years ago,
I tried but I can't subite for some reason, I live according to my own values

I'm neither to me it's irrelevant

 

[Deleted member 310685]

there is no proof or disproof of atheism or christiannity do your free to choose

most mfs in the west already have christian values any way

The burden of proof lies with those who assert the existence of god, not with those who withhold belief in an unsubstantiated claim. In reasoned discourse, one is not obliged to prove a universal negative.

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

The burden of proof lies with those who assert the existence of god, not with those who withhold belief in an unsubstantiated claim. In reasoned discourse, one is not obliged to prove a universal negative.

no need to assert if being religious is your default

you would also be burdened by claiming all of science is the absolute truth

a the end there is equal reason to choose

 

[Deleted member 310685]

no need to assert if being religious is your default

You are conflating a personal default with a logical default. A neutral starting position requires no belief until evidence is presented. Asserting that one specific religious view is universally foundational presumes the conclusion it seeks to prove.

you would also be burdened by claiming all of science is the absolute truth

Your point is a common misconception. Science does not claim absolute truth. It offers the best available, testable models that are always open to revision with new evidence. This burden of proof is actively met through experimentation and peer review. It is the opposite of a fixed, unverifiable claim.

a the end there is equal reason to choose

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

You are conflating a personal default with a logical default. A neutral starting position requires no belief until evidence is presented. Asserting that one specific religious view is universally foundational presumes the conclusion it seeks to prove.

Your point is a common misconception. Science does not claim absolute truth. It offers the best available, testable models that are always open to revision with new evidence. This burden of proof is actively met through experimentation and peer review. It is the opposite of a fixed, unverifiable claim.

View attachment 4522060

default for that person and it's only a logical default depending on you life, if someone had great luck everytime that they prayed to god would you hate they for praying ?

each person has different lives, goals and values, you can't say everyone should be atheist some def need god even if it's a lie which you can't prove or disprove

 

[Gamerspyy786]

Because I’m simply not gonna accept this world was created from absolute nothing, I believe in God, and if God is real, we aren’t here for fun and games. Evil exists and good exist for a reason.

After researching faiths with one God and a preserved holy book that can reassure my faith I’ve came to the conclusion Islam is the truth.