HOW TO GET THE PHYSIQUE HALO WITH SBL (BECOME A SICKKVNT)

[irrumator praetor]

The delt doesn't need a perfect resistance curve to grow. It needs tension and progressive overload. Dumbbell lateral raises work. Cables work. The difference is minimal. You're writing paragraphs about stretched positions while guys with actual shoulders got theirs with dumbbells. Stop overcomplicating a side raise and just lift

It doesn't need it but studies show that it obviously benefits from it. The difference isn't minimal btw. You kind of copped out of the argument at this point. But yeah, natty and roided bodybuilders know and utilize this.

 

[shortcell29]

Ronnie did kickbacks because he was already huge and could afford to fuck around. That doesn't mean kickbacks built his triceps. Bad example. And yeah physique is mostly genetics and gear but that doesn't mean exercise selection means nothing. That's just cope for people who don't wanna squat.

Also I don't care if you prefer leg extensions. That's fine. Do what works for you. But don't sit there and pretend they're objectively better than squats for quad growth just because you like them more. That's the only point I was making. You do you bro.

ronnie and every bodybuilder ur talking abt is on grams of gear btw, doesnt matter what they do in the gym, they just train like pussies most of the time to not get injured and do a hard set once in a while

 

[irrumator praetor]

Freeweights allow more load and better tension

not always. Squats hit the quads more efficiently than free weight lateral raises hit the mid delts, if you would compare the 2 directly. While there may be benefit to doing free weight squats, there is little benefit or none for doing free weight lateral raises. The mid delt can't be compared to compound exercises for movement patterns. The mid delt is often an isolation. Therefore, free weight lateral raises are objectively inferior

 

[irrumator praetor]

They DO lol

Leg extensions bias all the heads of the quads while squats don’t target the Rec fem of the quad LOL

A squat pattern is worse for quads in any aspect other than the strech (the quads do experience SMH yes)

Although this is true, theres still benefit to having some sets of free weight compounds for the movement patterns. Primarily its about joints and tendons. This would speed up progress and make up for the other short comings of the free weight compound.

 

[shortcell29]

not always. Squats hit the quads more efficiently than free weight lateral raises hit the mid delts, if you would compare the 2 directly. While there may be benefit to doing free weight squats, there is little benefit or none for doing free weight lateral raises. The mid delt can't be compared to compound exercises for movement patterns. The mid delt is often an isolation. Therefore, free weight lateral raises are objectively inferior

everything he said can be disproven with a couple of sentences so no need to argue. Less muscles involved = more mur for the target muscles = = type 2 fibers activated = more growth cuz type 2 fibers grow larger

 

[irrumator praetor]

If leg extensions grew quads more than squats, every powerlifter and bodybuilder would just do leg extensions. Instead they all squat. You're confusing 'biases the Rectus Femoris more' with 'grows quads more'. Those are not the same thing. Load and total tension drive growth, not peak contraction on one head. Leg extensions are an accessory, not a replacement for squats. Go read anything from Schoenfeld or Israetel before you talk about quad growth again.

Although I disagreed with him in my reply above, you're still incorrect in this rebuttal

 

[combatingNorwooding]

"uneducated" Just brutally embarassed you're whole thread and you're gay boyfriend defending your cope bs points. Brutal .

Go eat your indian goyslop you ethnic shitskin

You embarrassed no one LOL

You just got exposed as a retarded. Literally debunked nothing LOL, all you did was repeating the same thing over and over again

nigga hit me with the chatgpt reply

its obvious he’s using GPT in the argument

Why are we clowning on rows gang. They are a peak movement if properly set up.

im joking but kelso shrugs mog

I have yet to see any study show quad growth is maximized from squatting vs leg extensions

every study shows otherwise even HAHA

Although this is true, theres still benefit to having some sets of free weight compounds for the movement patterns. Primarily it’s about joints and tendons. This would speed up progress and make up for the other short comings of the free weight compound.

Never said Otherwise. Compounds are actually great for a lot of people but what he said about it is just wrong

TLDR: @Juslookinnfr is a retarded who reply on GPT to argue with incels on .org

Comical if you ask me

 

[combatingNorwooding]

Appeal to authority? You mean real world evidence from people who actually built the muscle you want? That's not a fallacy, that's called results. You're hiding behind 'no study proves it' while ignoring decades of bodybuilding and powerlifting history. Show me one pro with big quads who never squats. Just one. I'll wait.

And no study proves leg extensions grow more quad mass than squats either. So your position has zero evidence too. At least squats have real world results and mechanical tension on your side. You're just coping because you don't like the answer

Studies do show it actually. Studies show squats barely work on the rec fem which is crucial for having big quads

It makes sense too if you look at the quads since the rec fem is biarticular so it doesn’t get sufficient work on squats

 

[SaiNaz]

Unless your busy to go gym all the time why do fbeod? and switch back to UL if you dont want to spend 2hrs in the gym?

more rest days for me to enjoy if i a miss a day