I don’t get is stravemaxing actually good?

Romeo1111

Romeo1111

Kraken
Joined
May 9, 2021
Posts
3,000
Reputation
2,612
If you were to fast for 2-3 would you not just lose water weight and barely any bodyfat? Would you not just gain back all the weight after as well.

And if you only eat like 600-800 calories a day would you not just lose a lot of water weight muscles and minimal fat?

So much mixed opinions some saying it’s good some saying it’s bad don’t get what’s the best option to lose fat fast without needing to take fat burners and such.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SubMogger and CEO
niggas do anything but cardio.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 123620, Mighty_One, DravidianFootjob and 4 others
No you should not starve yourself
 
  • +1
Reactions: please help me, MaracasMogs and EliDKing
it's all about calories in, calories out
starving is stupid because you'll feel tired all the time and your cravings will be at an all time high so you'll end up binging and resetting your progress to zero
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tusseleif, please help me, Romeo1111 and 2 others
If you were to fast for 2-3 would you not just lose water weight and barely any bodyfat? Would you not just gain back all the weight after as well.

And if you only eat like 600-800 calories a day would you not just lose a lot of water weight muscles and minimal fat?

So much mixed opinions some saying it’s good some saying it’s bad don’t get what’s the best option to lose fat fast without needing to take fat burners and such.
No
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 138051 and EliDKing
If you were to fast for 2-3 would you not just lose water weight and barely any bodyfat? Would you not just gain back all the weight after as well.

And if you only eat like 600-800 calories a day would you not just lose a lot of water weight muscles and minimal fat?

So much mixed opinions some saying it’s good some saying it’s bad don’t get what’s the best option to lose fat fast without needing to take fat burners and such.
it's all about calories in, calories out
starving is stupid because you'll feel tired all the time and your cravings will be at an all time high so you'll end up binging and resetting your progress to zero
No you should not starve yourself
niggas do anything but cardio.
idk if ts is real.

okay, so i have had two weight loss journeys. one was from 76 to 60 kg other was from 65 to 60 kg.

so i started off 76 and lost to 60 kg reaaaaal fast with starving. this made me look uncanny and really fucking ugly even tho i am same bodyfat as i was then now.

from the 65 to 60 kg i lost it slow and still ate so i felt full. now i have same definition yet i have much more soft tissue around eye area and look much better with same angularity and shi
 
  • +1
Reactions: DravidianFootjob and Copercel
idk if ts is real.

okay, so i have had two weight loss journeys. one was from 76 to 60 kg other was from 65 to 60 kg.

so i started off 76 and lost to 60 kg reaaaaal fast with starving. this made me look uncanny and really fucking ugly even tho i am same bodyfat as i was then now.

from the 65 to 60 kg i lost it slow and still ate so i felt full. now i have same definition yet i have much more soft tissue around eye area and look much better with same angularity and shi
it’s better to not lose weight at all than to starve, especially while your in puberty. (Unless your a fucking fatty)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 138051
if u wanna lose fat and muscle to look like a twink starvemaxxing is definitely the method but if not, dont starvemaxx
 
  • JFL
Reactions: NumbThePain
If you were to fast for 2-3 would you not just lose water weight and barely any bodyfat? Would you not just gain back all the weight after as well.

And if you only eat like 600-800 calories a day would you not just lose a lot of water weight muscles and minimal fat?

So much mixed opinions some saying it’s good some saying it’s bad don’t get what’s the best option to lose fat fast without needing to take fat burners and such.
yes bro trust starvemaxxing will make u become chad!11!!11!
 
it’s better to not lose weight at all than to starve, especially while your in puberty
I mean it's not like not eating for 5 days will permanently stunt your growth and mess up your hormones.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: vendy
Just do a brief water fast for ~3 days if you really want to drop a few kegs quickly.
i.e., nothing but water.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mandiblade
Just do a brief water fast for ~3 days if you really want to drop a few kegs quickly.
I might be dumb but I was unironically thinking this. I would get to like 9% bf in 5 days. Why endure months of a chronic deficit?
 
  • +1
Reactions: aids
my friend (before starvemaxxing was even a tiktok thingie) ate nothing and only drank water for like a week (maybe 2 im unsure) and lost all his weight and never regained it

my female classmate did the same but ended up regaining the weight later
 
  • +1
Reactions: SubMogger
I might be dumb but I was unironically thinking this. I would get to like 9% bf in 5 days. Why endure months of a chronic deficit?
You can't sustain a water fast, it is a short-term remedy and not a long-term solution.
If you have a few kegs you want to lose like mentioned then yes, great idea when done infrequently, but a small deficit for months is sustainable and arguably less taxing compared to effectively starving yourself for a few days.
I'm sure you get this though, just my two cents.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mandiblade
You can't sustain a water fast, it is a short-term remedy and not a long-term solution.
WDYM? For the purpose of quickly shedding a few kgs once, why would it need to be sustainable?
 
  • +1
Reactions: aids
Maybe you have more than a few kilograms to shed, is my point.
Ah ok. Reasonable. Thanks
I'm currently a twink :ogre: so I definitely only have a few kgs
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: aids
idk if ts is real.

okay, so i have had two weight loss journeys. one was from 76 to 60 kg other was from 65 to 60 kg.

so i started off 76 and lost to 60 kg reaaaaal fast with starving. this made me look uncanny and really fucking ugly even tho i am same bodyfat as i was then now.

from the 65 to 60 kg i lost it slow and still ate so i felt full. now i have same definition yet i have much more soft tissue around eye area and look much better with same angularity and shi
How long did it take you to lose weight from 76 to 60 kg ? And was it all just bodyfat ?
 

Similar threads

I
Replies
0
Views
65
ItsOver213
I
marrone911
Replies
7
Views
469
7evenvox22
7
lowtiersubhuman
Replies
72
Views
2K
lowtiersubhuman
lowtiersubhuman
MogEater
Replies
3
Views
184
hungrythanos414
hungrythanos414

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top