I think wearing sunscreen is only worth it for pretty boys

[Deleted member 19551]

This dude is fucking 47 years old. I know his bones help him age better, but he looks visibly aged and yet would probably still clean up 30 yo big assed Master's students on Tinder

Meanwhile pretty boys are literally devastated from 1 nanogram of fat pads melting

You can still wear it but it's so annoying to put on every morning. I'll still wear it but I won't worry about reapplying


Facelift and fat grafts in the future >>

 

[Deleted member 17159]

why is hernan dragos nose so long

 

[Deleted member 19551]

why is hernan dragos nose so long

tall skull = masc as fuck, every single masc chad has a tall skull

probably lens distortion

 

[Deleted member 16133]

 

[Wallenberg]

How come putting on sunscreen is so annoying? It's the easiest looksmax (in the long run). Just put some sunscreen on your face and neck, and that's it. Takes like 30 seconds.

 

[Deleted member 19551]

How come putting on sunscreen is so annoying? It's the easiest looksmax (in the long run). Just put some sunscreen on your face and neck, and that's it. Takes like 30 seconds.

To me it's more the concern of having to reapply it

 

[Foreverbrad]

No, that's how you look at 47 if you DO take care of your skin. There are guys in their late 20s who already look worse.

 

[Deleted member 19551]

How come putting on sunscreen is so annoying? It's the easiest looksmax (in the long run). Just put some sunscreen on your face and neck, and that's it. Takes like 30 seconds.

+ broke college student and really only expensive sunscreen is worth using since cheap sunscreens offer horrible UVA protection

 

[Deleted member 19551]

No, that's how you look at 47 if you DO take care of your skin. There are guys in their late 20s who already look worse.

You think he wears sunscreen daily and tretnoin? idk maybe but I don't think so

 

[Wallenberg]

To me it's more the concern of having to reapply it

You don't necessarily have to reapply. If you are primarily inside, it's not that bad. Just put on sunscreen 15 mins before you go out, and that's it.

And even if you would have to reapply but apply it only once, it's still better than not to use at all.

 

[Deleted member 19551]

You don't necessarily have to reapply. If you are primarily inside, it's not that bad. Just put on sunscreen 15 mins before you go out, and that's it.

And even if you would have to reapply but apply it only once, it's still better than not to use at all.

I'll probably still do that yeah, I wanna look 25 until I'm 32

 

[Wallenberg]

+ broke college student and really only expensive sunscreen is worth using since cheap sunscreens offer horrible UVA protection

Rieman P20 for kids is excellent and relatively cheap. Another one is Altruist SPF50, which is even more affordable. Do you live in Europe?

 

[onmyway]

Sunscreen is for the ill

 

[Deleted member 19157]

why is hernan dragos nose so long

tom cruise has it too. its kinda a failo but at the same time i think it might be better than long philtrum

 

[Deleted member 19551]

Rieman P20 for kids is excellent and relatively cheap. Another one is Altruist SPF50, which is even more affordable. Do you live in Europe?

I can have access to vast majority of euro sunscreens but unfortunately not reman P20 which yes has great value for price

Altruistic leaves a white cast

I'm left with LRP UVmune which is probably one of the most expensive

 

[Wallenberg]

I can have access to vast majority of euro sunscreens but unfortunately not reman P20 which yes has great value for price

Altruistic leaves a white cast

I'm left with LRP UVmune which is probably one of the most expensive

LRP UVMune is expensive; it's double the price of Riemann P20 for Kids and thrice the price of Altruist. With the new filter, it offers good protection against long UV waves. I consider trying LRP UVmune, but if I were in a bad financial position, I would use Altruist or P20.

 

[Deleted member 12002]

This dude is fucking 47 years old. I know his bones help him age better, but he looks visibly aged and yet would probably still clean up 30 yo big assed Master's students on Tinder

View attachment 1745492


Meanwhile pretty boys are literally devastated from 1 nanogram of fat pads melting

You can still wear it but it's so annoying to put on every morning. I'll still wear it but I won't worry about reapplying


Facelift and fat grafts in the future >>

I've never worn sunscreen past the age of wearing water wings and having my mother slather it on me.

 

[Deleted member 19551]

LRP UVMune is expensive; it's double the price of Riemann P20 for Kids and thrice the price of Altruist. With the new filter, it offers good protection against long UV waves. I consider trying LRP UVmune, but if I were in a bad financial position, I would use Altruist or P20.

I did some research on the new 380-400 nm protection filter and it's really not very relevant. It's longer wave but it's lower energy and does less damage to skin than the rest of the UVA spectrum. Apparently it's much more relevant for darker skinned people prone to hyper pigmentation, and rhat spectrum range is similar to short wave visible light which doesn't damage skin that much but can still cause hyperpigmentation


This new technology is great for dark skinend people because there were no cosmetically good options for them before

 

[Deleted member 4106]

He looks older than Pitt and Tom cruise at nearly 60

 

[OneTwoThree]

I use sunscreen too.

 

[Deleted member 19551]

I use sunscreen too.

Use either Rieman P20 for kids or LRP UVmune 400, they're the best if ur goal is antiaging and not just skin burn

 

[OneTwoThree]

Use either Rieman P20 for kids or LRP UVmune 400, they're the best if ur goal is antiaging and not just skin burn

lol, use LRP UVmune 400 since 2 years.

 

[Wallenberg]

lol, use LRP UVmune 400 since 2 years.

Wasn't LRP UVmune 400 released a couple of months ago?

 

[Deleted member 19551]

lol, use LRP UVmune 400 since 2 years.

Nigga it came out like 10 months ago. But I get it, you were probably using the previous version called "shaka fluid" which is also good, the updated version is better tho

 

[OneTwoThree]

Wasn't LRP UVmune 400 released a couple of months ago?

Nigga it came out like 10 months ago. But I get it, you were probably using the previous version called "shaka fluid" which is also good, the updated version is better tho

My mistake. I use that. All have simmilar packaging. Still good tho.

 

[GymCelNeckPill]

Sunscreen is cope unless you are going to spend hours in the sun

 

[Wallenberg]

I did some research on the new 380-400 nm protection filter and it's really not very relevant. It's longer wave but it's lower energy and does less damage to skin than the rest of the UVA spectrum. Apparently it's much more relevant for darker skinned people prone to hyper pigmentation, and rhat spectrum range is similar to short wave visible light which doesn't damage skin that much but can still cause hyperpigmentation


This new technology is great for dark skinend people because there were no cosmetically good options for them before

Interesting. I have seen claims that are contrary to your post; claims that 380-400 nm causes aging. Anyway, LRP UVMune 400 is a good sunscreen, so even if the new filter wouldn't be that good, if one can afford it, he can go wrong using it.

@deepweb1298 what do you think?

 

[MaxillaMaxing]

My mistake. I use that. All have simmilar packaging. Still good tho.

Are all 50 spf the same ? I have vichy 50spf is it as good as the one you have?

 

[deepweb1298]

Interesting. I have seen claims that are contrary to your post; claims that 380-400 nm causes aging. Anyway, LRP UVMune 400 is a good sunscreen, so even if the new filter wouldn't be that good, if one can afford it, he can go wrong using it.

@deepweb1298 what do you think?

i think theres been debate in the scientific community about how 380-400nm is harmless but recent studies are saying it can harm a lot. Would like to see what sources @GypsyEyes has seen.

Even if there is less damage than other UVA wavelengths its still enough to hyperpigment darker people. Doesn't really change anything imo. In paler people the damage won't show up as pigmentation but collagen damage i think.

I mean are people really that poor that they can't spend an extra $10-$15 dollars for a better spf

 

[Wallenberg]

i think theres been debate in the scientific community about how 380-400nm is harmless but recent studies are saying it can harm a lot. Would like to see what sources @GypsyEyes has seen.

Even if there is less damage than other UVA wavelengths its still enough to hyperpigment darker people. Doesn't really change anything imo. In paler people the damage won't show up as pigmentation but collagen damage i think.

I'm pale, so I'm not personally concerned about how UVMune 400 protects darker folks.

I would like to have more info about how much the new LRP filter helps regarding antiaging.

 

[Deleted member 19551]

i think theres been debate in the scientific community about how 380-400nm is harmless but recent studies are saying it can harm a lot. Would like to see what sources @GypsyEyes has seen.

Even if there is less damage than other UVA wavelengths its still enough to hyperpigment darker people. Doesn't really change anything imo. In paler people the damage won't show up as pigmentation but collagen damage i think.

All UVA rays in any part of the spectrum aren't good for your skin, but the claim that 380-410 is exceptionally bad for skin is a claim only a couple redditors made with shit citations/in vitro studies


This area is under researched to begin with. The main benefit is really for colored people that didn't have cosmetically elegant options for their hyperpigmentation

 

[deepweb1298]

I'm pale, so I'm not personally concerned about how UVMune 400 protects darker folks.

I would like to have more info about how much the new LRP filter helps regarding antiaging.

pretty hard question to answer they are still researching that.

All UVA rays in any part of the spectrum aren't good for your skin, but the claim that 380-410 is exceptionally bad for skin is a claim only a couple redditors made with shit citations/in vitro studies


This area is under researched to begin with. The main benefit is really for colored people that didn't have cosmetically elegant options for their hyperpigmentation

okay so 380-400nm exposure is bad but debatable on how bad it actually is. Worse for coloured people for pigmentation. For paler people no issue with pigmentation but some dna damage but need more studies to research it.

 

[Wallenberg]

So from what I gather, LRP UVMune 400 is good, although the real-world utility of the new filter is debatable. If you have money, you can use it. If you want to save money, you can buy P20 for Kids or some other cheaper sunscreen.

 

[Deleted member 17244]

tall skull = masc as fuck, every single masc chad has a tall skull

I have one but narrow also and I'd rather have smaller skull

 

[Deleted member 19551]

I have one but narrow also and I'd rather have smaller skull

you have a narrow jaw. Also tall skull =/= long midface

 

[Deleted member 17244]

you have a narrow jaw. Also tall skull =/= long midface

I have proper jaw according to bigonial to bizygo ratio, but have an inwarded high set gonions. Need fillers/implants there.

 

[Deleted member 19551]

I have proper jaw according to bigonial to bizygo ratio, but have an inwarded high set gonions. Need fillers/implants there.

Psl meme. Your jaw with soft tissue should be exactly as wide as zygos