If ur high IQ answer this logic question

  • +1
Reactions: CantStopTheMog and Debetro
Scrolling and more stuff has definitely taken a toll on my brain. I need to fix this urgently, I need my sharpness back. I was so smart back in the day.
 
  • +1
Reactions: CantStopTheMog and optimisticzoomer
Scrolling and more stuff has definitely taken a toll on my brain. I need to fix this urgently, I need my sharpness back. I was so smart back in the day.
I get competency mogged by OAPs
 
  • +1
Reactions: CantStopTheMog and Debetro
more like a mental stamina/endurance test. i just wouldn't bother working out this problem
 
  • +1
Reactions: CantStopTheMog
D. Dnrd
 
  • WTF
Reactions: CantStopTheMog
thanks op for confirming im low iq
 
  • JFL
Reactions: CantStopTheMog
mental maturbation, if you want to prove you are smarter then someone then just have a debate about which of your guys worldviews are true. Also you are making it seem like being "high IQ" only means one thing and relates to how well you can solve brain teasers.
 
mental maturbation, if you want to prove you are smarter then someone then just have a debate about which of your guys worldviews are true.
winning a debate is mainly about rhetorical skill, not IQ
Intelligence includes many qualities beyond argumentation & worldviews are often subjective, making debate is a shitty way to tell who's High IQ

Also you are making it seem like being "high IQ" only means one thing and relates to how well you can solve brain teasers.
This type of problem tests both reasoning & working memory
it's a pretty good test to determine who's "High IQ"
 
winning a debate is mainly about rhetorical skill, not IQ
Intelligence includes many qualities beyond argumentation & worldviews are often subjective, making debate is a shitty way to tell who's High IQ


This type of problem tests both reasoning & working memory
it's a pretty good test to determine who's "High IQ"
If I can prove that from your worldview you cant make arguments or do logic I think that undermines any questions that have to do with "High IQ", some are more capable then others but if you don't have justified true belief there is no reason to listen to you.
 
  • +1
Reactions: CantStopTheMog
The issue with this question is that I can sit down on paper and solve it like a programming computer science if condition question and id have to exclude and exclude to deduce
 
  • +1
Reactions: CantStopTheMog
Couldn’t I just ask the truthful god, “Do you know me personally?” Since he doesn’t, he would answer either “da” or “ja,” and I could figure out which one means “no.”
Then the lying god would say the opposite (the “yes” word), and the random god would choose either answer. Maybe I’m retarded as fuck, but you said we can pick which god we speak to. So is this correct?
 
  • +1
Reactions: CantStopTheMog
Couldn’t I just ask the truthful god, “Do you know me personally?” Since he doesn’t, he would answer either “da” or “ja,” and I could figure out which one means “no.”
Then the lying god would say the opposite (the “yes” word), and the random god would choose either answer. Maybe I’m retarded as fuck, but you said we can pick which god we speak to. So is this correct?
@Gaygymmaxx You had a similar answer to me, but you were wrong? Why is this incorrect
 
  • +1
Reactions: CantStopTheMog
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: CantStopTheMog and TiktokUser
He said we could pick which god to talk to though
you can pick as in god A, B & C but you don't know who is random or truther or liar

Also don't bother with this problem
It will take hours to solve even for 180 IQ havers
OP is larping in the post when he claims he solved it in 2 minutes or whatever bs

here's the solution
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: CantStopTheMog, Gaygymmaxx and TiktokUser
.
 
  • +1
Reactions: CantStopTheMog
you can pick as in god A, B & C but you don't know who is random or truther or liar

Also don't bother with this problem
It will take hours to solve even for 180 IQ havers
OP is larping in the post when he claims he solved it in 2 minutes or whatever bs

here's the solution
I’m not larping u idiot :lul:
It’s similar to other questions just in a different format I had solved it before in different context
@Gaygymmaxx JFL at this cope
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx
I’m not larping u idiot :lul:
It’s similar to other questions just in a different format I had solved it before in different context
@Gaygymmaxx JFL at this cope
Idk i thought maybe you did larp but I didn't think @imontheloose did :feelskek:

High iq Hiearchy pill 🙏 sorry boss 💔
 
  • +1
Reactions: CantStopTheMog
Idk i thought maybe you did larp but I didn't think @imontheloose did :feelskek:

High iq Hiearchy pill 🙏 sorry boss 💔
It would be awfully hard if you were unfamiliar with the problem or its nature. I have saw a very similar problem to this when I was 16/17 in A-Level FM. OP will know what I am talking about. It's a common sort of logic chain taught.
 
  • +1
Reactions: CantStopTheMog and Gaygymmaxx
It would be awfully hard if you were unfamiliar with the problem or its nature. I have saw a very similar problem to this when I was 16/17 in A-Level FM. OP will know what I am talking about. It's a common sort of logic chain taught.
I just knew it from a maths challenge I did when I was in secondary, it was basically an IQ test, but it required the same thinking, ngl I don’t recall the question you’re talking about, but that’s probs cos I dropped further as I don’t need it and even tho homework’s easy it took so long lmao
 
It would be awfully hard if you were unfamiliar with the problem or its nature. I have saw a very similar problem to this when I was 16/17 in A-Level FM. OP will know what I am talking about. It's a common sort of logic chain taught.
I just knew it from a maths challenge I did when I was in secondary, it was basically an IQ test, but it required the same thinking, ngl I don’t recall the question you’re talking about, but that’s probs cos I dropped further as I don’t need it and even tho homework’s easy it took so long lmao
 
I don't think these types of puzzles are a definitive way to test IQ or even assume it. Most of the time it's harder to configure an answer when you're presented with some hypothetical game you must play out in your head regardless of who you are. I think an easier way to determine IQ would be to introduce an intelligent individual to any business-related field with little prior knowledge and observe how fast it takes for them to succeed or even innovate given their circumstances.

Not denying that someone with a higher IQ could figure this out quicker, obviously. I haven't attempted yet nor do I think I will. I'm not quite shrewd with these sorts of things.
 
  • +1
Reactions: CantStopTheMog
I don't think these types of puzzles are a definitive way to test IQ or even assume it. Most of the time it's harder to configure an answer when you're presented with some hypothetical game you must play out in your head regardless of who you are. I think an easier way to determine IQ would be to introduce an intelligent individual to any business-related field with little prior knowledge and observe how fast it takes for them to succeed or even innovate given their circumstances.

Not denying that someone with a higher IQ could figure this out quicker, obviously. I haven't attempted yet nor do I think I will. I'm not quite shrewd with these sorts of things.
Yeah it’s just a bit of fun to see who is at least somewhat intelligent
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bryce
Yeah it’s just a bit of fun to see who is at least somewhat intelligent
How do you solve the problem? I haven't looked through the responses so I don't know if someone has figured it out correctly yet.
 
  • +1
Reactions: CantStopTheMog
How do you solve the problem? I haven't looked through the responses so I don't know if someone has figured it out correctly yet.
I’ll sum
It up
But if I were u I’d look at mine @Gaygymmaxx or @imonthelooses answer
Cool exercise. Why not just do a repetition of “if I asked you X, would you say ‘da’?”

If X, then it will return “da” and “ja” if false no matter whether you’re asking true/false or “da” = yes/no. The wrapper of “if i asked you” basically cancels out lying vs. truthful. I can elaborate if necessary.

In easier terms, if u find the random god it is easy from there. Because u will know what either Ja or Da means, and can therefore determine the other 2. This is because ur asking an IF statement/question. So no matter if it is true or false god answer applies because the words have no meaning as of when asked.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bryce
I’ll sum
It up
But if I were u I’d look at mine @Gaygymmaxx or @imonthelooses answer
Ah, I see. I thought it would be something along the lines of random reciprocation through questions to determine the meaning of each word, but I hadn't pieced it together like that. Cool brain jogger.
 

Similar threads

CantStopTheMog
Replies
78
Views
984
ProBono
ProBono
unkownincel
Replies
15
Views
480
foidletslayer
foidletslayer
CantStopTheMog
Discussion Easier Iq question
Replies
28
Views
513
ShowerMaxxing
ShowerMaxxing
accelerationist
Discussion Idealism and God
Replies
22
Views
392
theRetard
theRetard

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top