Im so confused about what is the ideal skintone for males

whatever this is, its ideal

white with a small splash of color so its not pale

3597182 1692367435815
3607840 EDFD6EC1 2B3A 42BB 9D2D 69983FE88D2F
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksThinker and Deleted member 23558
huge copium most suicides are from white incels like you jfl. The only blacks that get bullied are the nerdy ones. Rest are high t and low inhib.

nobody cares about how your penis looks you will never use it besides on gooks you nigger
females associate your penis with a gummy worm. nobody worships your penis besides gooks and curries keep coping. You will always get mogged by bbc no matter how much you think you mog them.

View attachment 2399875
this is you rn thinking you mog
you are just another black disgusting parasite cockroach with 80 iq polluting the world. not a single woman will find even close to acceptable looking

should I even bother post what people like you suffer in eastern european and north asian countries? you are just fucking monkeys to them. you got no power in this world and if you keep destroying countries every single of you will get exterminated
 
Wow wow didn't know you could write this long. Will read soon
I was surprised as well he usually just holds back his fatass rooster neck and snaps a pic
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 23819, Deleted member 16275, Deleted member 23558 and 1 other person
Europeans have reddish undertones, while Etnikks are either ashbrown, yellowish brown or olive brown, which gives them the dirty brown colour withy hyperpigmentation on ellbows, knees, knuckles and neck. Europeans tan different
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
View attachment 2399820

he has light brown skin with red undertones giving him an orange tint. If Ramirez overdosed on lycopene and MSM he would have similar skin finish

nigga thats a whole white man,wtf are you on by continuing to make these threads classifying white people as having
"light brown skin"

please stop this cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 27987
Half white half brown gives best coloring but not best features (if dominant genes are white, usually mother)

I have permanent perfect tan and blue eyes but giant nose and manlet innit
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 27987 and Deleted member 23558
nigga thats a whole white man,wtf are you on by continuing to make these threads classifying white people as having
"light brown skin"

please stop this cope
Skin tone is the amount of melanin on the epidermis. They have accumulated enough melanin to be called light brown
 
white skin with warm undertones is the most desirable, but you only really see it in anglos.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro and Gaygymmaxx
white skin with warm undertones is the most desirable, but you only really see it in anglos.
Did you change your name for anonymity as well? :feelshah:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Debetro
this

1012
 
  • +1
Reactions: Yliaster
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx

This is ideal,at least to women and not PSL'ers.This is what they imagine when they say "I want a tall,
dark,handsome man"

I literally said this yesterday in OP's thread that Meds/Mulattos are the most desirable in this respect because
they fit the universal "Tall Dark and handsome" cliche that women always emphasize
 
This is ideal,at least to women and not PSL'ers.This is what they imagine when they say "I want a tall,
dark,handsome man"

I literally said this yesterday in OP's thread that Meds/Mulattos are the most desirable in this respect because
they fit the universal "Tall Dark and handsome" cliche that women always emphasize
ramirez is the eptiome of tall dark and handsome and hes latino so no. Meds and mulattos dont exclusively fill that archetype
 
  • +1
Reactions: ConfusedBolivian
The more pale the better
 
This is ideal,at least to women and not PSL'ers.This is what they imagine when they say "I want a tall,
dark,handsome man"

I literally said this yesterday in OP's thread that Meds/Mulattos are the most desirable in this respect because
they fit the universal "Tall Dark and handsome" cliche that women always emphasize
None women I ever heard talk about tall dark and handsome, and it doesn't mean looking like a gypsy, it means north atlantid pheno
 
Light brown is an ethnic skin tone, period.
The equivalent for whites is orange.
Coping hard again. Sunkissed bronze is white.
Ethnics become dark brown.
 
ramirez is the eptiome of tall dark and handsome and hes latino so no. Meds and mulattos dont exclusively fill that archetype
can you stop worshipping that frog? people were scaried to death when seeing him in the streets, even before he was known for killing people
 
can you stop worshipping that frog? people were scaried to death when seeing him in the streets, even before he was known for killing people
cause he was a drug addict. his bone structure mogs every PSL God.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 33079
Dnr. Niggers cant write so it's not like I would understand something

And the person in the pic is not white you dumbass
Yes it is u fag keep coping. Obviously you can't understand simple english cause your IQ can be counted on one hand
 
Coping hard again. Sunkissed bronze is white.
Ethnics become dark brown.
My skin is sun-kissed bronze without tanning. You need to tan to get our natural skin colour.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
Coping hard again. Sunkissed bronze is white.
Ethnics become dark brown.
Do you really fucking think all nonwhites have dark brown skin? Get the fuck out and touch grass.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
Yes it is u fag keep coping. Obviously you can't understand simple english cause your IQ can be counted on one hand
Dnr and don't care get off my pink dick
 
Pale white or pale brown for brahmin aunties

Meeks coloring for HIV-ridden BBC-ran through white whores

Pick your poison shit innit
 
cause he was a drug addict. his bone structure mogs every PSL God.
I don't care about psl faggotry anymore, his jaw and zygos were good but the rest was bad which is why he looked like a mutant rat toad mix with short hair.

This even mogs him
 
Light brown skin is best.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
  • +1
Reactions: CyberPsychodelic and Deleted member 23558
Dark tall and handsome is the way to go, this combo will always mog the red heads or blonde fags
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22627 and Deleted member 23558
The colour you're referring is sometimes described as gold skin.
 
Dark tall and handsome is the way to go, this combo will always mog the red heads or blonde fags
Shitskincope. When they say that they don't mean ethnic.
 
@BrahminBoss

I would argue that currently, in 2023, for men, having light skin and high-contrast coloring is ideal.

I would prove this by comparing Indians to whites. Now Indians are actually considered Caucasoid. As it turns out, apart from the skin color, we look pretty similar. Of course, there are some other differences, like the nose or the orbits. But whites and Indians look similar.
So Indians are essentially dark-skinned white people.

Now look at the perceived attractiveness of these two groups in society. Indians are generally seen as the least attractive group in the west except from maybe south east asians. Even in India, the whiter you are, the better. You can see this in Bollywood. This is the case for males and females.
Now then, you've got to ask, Why is that? Do the genes that determine melanin somehow also affect how nice of a person you are? Does whiteness equal niceness? Well, it certainly correlates (whiteness is correlated with economic prosperity; economic prosperity = more developed society = higher moral character). I don't think that's why, as even Indian men who have little relation to Indian culture are seen as unattractive in the west. Now as to why dark skin skin is unattractive on Caucasians: I don't know.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TechnoBoss
@BrahminBoss

I would argue that currently, in 2023, for men, having light skin and high-contrast coloring is ideal.

I would prove this by comparing Indians to whites. Now Indians are actually considered Caucasoid. As it turns out, apart from the skin color, we look pretty similar. Of course, there are some other differences, like the nose or the orbits. But whites and Indians look similar.
So Indians are essentially dark-skinned white people.

Now look at the perceived attractiveness of these two groups in society. Indians are generally seen as the least attractive group in the west except from maybe south east asians. Even in India, the whiter you are, the better. You can see this in Bollywood. This is the case for males and females.
Now then, you've got to ask, Why is that? Do the genes that determine melanin somehow also affect how nice of a person you are? Does whiteness equal niceness? Well, it certainly correlates (whiteness is correlated with economic prosperity; economic prosperity = more developed society = higher moral character). I don't think that's why, as even Indian men who have little relation to Indian culture are seen as unattractive in the west. Now as to why dark skin skin is unattractive on Caucasians: I don't know.
I agree with lighter skin being ideal but studies show lower contrast being more masculine. I also think the benefits of lighter skin taper off The lighter you get and pale skin is actually a failo. What amnesia posted and Meeks like colouring both seem to be somewhat ideal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6583
no, this forum is just too retarded to understand what an arborist is.
It's a badass name that's too bad

Big jacked tree hugging arborist busting down logs n shid 👺
 
Whatever skin tone you find most desirable in a foid
 
I agree with lighter skin being ideal but studies show lower contrast being more masculine. I also think the benefits of lighter skin taper off The lighter you get and pale skin is actually a failo. What amnesia posted and Meeks like colouring both seem to be somewhat ideal
Well, skin color is sexually dimorphic since it is slightly darker on males across all races. So if we're going by the sexual dimorphism theory of attractiveness, dark skin would be seen as more attractive on males. But that's not what we've seen in reality. So clearly, there's something else at play. Perhaps people hold races that are different than their own to different standards. So a Nordic male with slightly darker skin than the average Nordic male might be seen as ideal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TechnoBoss and Deleted member 23558
Well, skin color is sexually dimorphic since it is slightly darker on males across all races. So if we're going by the sexual dimorphism theory of attractiveness, dark skin would be seen as more attractive on males. But that's not what we've seen in reality. So clearly, there's something else at play. Perhaps people hold races that are different than their own to different standards. So a Nordic male with slightly darker skin than the average Nordic male might be seen as ideal.
It seems in the equatorial regions, lighter than average skin colour is preferred in males and in the arctic regions darker than average skin is preferred(in males)

file:///C:/Users/91900/Downloads/AokiAnnHumBiol2002.pdf
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6583
muh orange muh golden. this mogs all the gypsies posted in the thread

1692990010543
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23819
Meeks would AMOG if he had hair and brows
I already proved that he would look like shit with hair and brows, he would look like a the darkest goatfucker possible. see his morphs and how he looked when younger. same with ramirez

but keep coping, you never left India and never seen a white person yet you try to come up with dumb universal conclusions
 
I already proved that he would look like shit with hair and brows, he would look like a the darkest goatfucker possible. see his morphs and how he looked when younger. same with ramirez

but keep coping, you never left India and never seen a white person yet you try to come up with dumb universal conclusions
@PrinceLuenLeoncur
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Debetro
is lycopene powder working for you?
not taking it until im close to being lean, undertones only show if the dermis and epidermis doesnt contain much fat as carotenoids are lipophilic
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 67869 and Deleted member 28990
On the one hand ,being white especially WASP is high class and exudes aristocracy. But is it due to skin tone or phenotype? For example Alain Delon pale white vs with a tan where he is light brown - he looks equally aristocratic in both:

View attachment 2399773View attachment 2399775


So when white people say "white is right" or some variation they are refferring to the WASP phenotype mainly? But why then some iranid shitskins and turks who look more ethnic than even some dravidians post their whitewashed hand and act like its ideal? When the white phenotype facially is what is most important?

Surely Gandy doesnt become dravidian because he tanned to medium brown in his D and G advertisements

View attachment 2399781


So perhaps it is a problem of different undertones rather than skin tone by itself? But there are studies claiming that women find darker men especially those tanned to light brown skin the most attractive regardless of race


But perhaps if we go deeper it is a cultural problem, and some cultures find fair men attractive like gooks?



However from the face of it we can ourselves notice light brown skin being the most attractive and exudes the most masculinity and sex appeal

View attachment 2399786


We also know that lower contrast in the face means higher degree of masculinity, so is it the case that for dark haired men, light brown skin is ideal (as it lessens overall contrast) and for blonde men remaining as fair as possible is ideal (Due to the being lighter tone)? The question also is a conflict between dimorphism due to melanin vs dimorphism exhibited by lower facial contrast


So does the question ultimately hinge upon different phenotypes (and thus different undertones) having different skin tone ideals and also being culturally impacted? If so what are those ideals and how would one go about assessing it (the question then becomes if darker skin tones also set different standards for sex appeal such as women wanting darker men for ONS and fair men for LTRs)

AFAIK no such study has been done. My take is that ethnics have really shitty undertones and must remain at light brown to mask grey undertones and try to overdose on carotenoid supplements such as lycopene lutein astaxanthin etc to try and get better undertones. Ultimately I think its a question of phenotype and there are fair men with ethnic phenotypes and darker men with more caucasoid shifted phenotypes. I think having the latter as your base is better as it is easy to bleach skin colour if you tend to be on the darker side.

who said that lower contrast is related to masculinity nigga
 
On the one hand ,being white especially WASP is high class and exudes aristocracy. But is it due to skin tone or phenotype? For example Alain Delon pale white vs with a tan where he is light brown - he looks equally aristocratic in both:

View attachment 2399773View attachment 2399775


So when white people say "white is right" or some variation they are refferring to the WASP phenotype mainly? But why then some iranid shitskins and turks who look more ethnic than even some dravidians post their whitewashed hand and act like its ideal? When the white phenotype facially is what is most important?

Surely Gandy doesnt become dravidian because he tanned to medium brown in his D and G advertisements

View attachment 2399781


So perhaps it is a problem of different undertones rather than skin tone by itself? But there are studies claiming that women find darker men especially those tanned to light brown skin the most attractive regardless of race


But perhaps if we go deeper it is a cultural problem, and some cultures find fair men attractive like gooks?



However from the face of it we can ourselves notice light brown skin being the most attractive and exudes the most masculinity and sex appeal

View attachment 2399786


We also know that lower contrast in the face means higher degree of masculinity, so is it the case that for dark haired men, light brown skin is ideal (as it lessens overall contrast) and for blonde men remaining as fair as possible is ideal (Due to the being lighter tone)? The question also is a conflict between dimorphism due to melanin vs dimorphism exhibited by lower facial contrast


So does the question ultimately hinge upon different phenotypes (and thus different undertones) having different skin tone ideals and also being culturally impacted? If so what are those ideals and how would one go about assessing it (the question then becomes if darker skin tones also set different standards for sex appeal such as women wanting darker men for ONS and fair men for LTRs)

AFAIK no such study has been done. My take is that ethnics have really shitty undertones and must remain at light brown to mask grey undertones and try to overdose on carotenoid supplements such as lycopene lutein astaxanthin etc to try and get better undertones. Ultimately I think its a question of phenotype and there are fair men with ethnic phenotypes and darker men with more caucasoid shifted phenotypes. I think having the latter as your base is better as it is easy to bleach skin colour if you tend to be on the darker side.

Somali skintone is ideal
 

Similar threads

squinterhalder
Replies
13
Views
1K
looks>books
looks>books
fluoride1337
Replies
6
Views
418
rory4579
rory4579
Sloppyseconds
Replies
16
Views
630
klip11
klip11
yandex99
Replies
9
Views
1K
ZachS
ZachS

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top