Amnesia
Legend
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2019
- Posts
- 14,088
- Reputation
- 83,801
whatever this is, its ideal
white with a small splash of color so its not pale
white with a small splash of color so its not pale
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
you are just another black disgusting parasite cockroach with 80 iq polluting the world. not a single woman will find even close to acceptable lookinghuge copium most suicides are from white incels like you jfl. The only blacks that get bullied are the nerdy ones. Rest are high t and low inhib.
nobody cares about how your penis looks you will never use it besides on gooks you nigger
females associate your penis with a gummy worm. nobody worships your penis besides gooks and curries keep coping. You will always get mogged by bbc no matter how much you think you mog them.
View attachment 2399875
this is you rn thinking you mog
I was surprised as well he usually just holds back his fatass rooster neck and snaps a picWow wow didn't know you could write this long. Will read soon
View attachment 2399820
he has light brown skin with red undertones giving him an orange tint. If Ramirez overdosed on lycopene and MSM he would have similar skin finish
Skin tone is the amount of melanin on the epidermis. They have accumulated enough melanin to be called light brownnigga thats a whole white man,wtf are you on by continuing to make these threads classifying white people as having
"light brown skin"
please stop this cope
Did you change your name for anonymity as well?white skin with warm undertones is the most desirable, but you only really see it in anglos.
no, this forum is just too retarded to understand what an arborist is.Did you change your name for anonymity as well?
ramirez is the eptiome of tall dark and handsome and hes latino so no. Meds and mulattos dont exclusively fill that archetypeThis is ideal,at least to women and not PSL'ers.This is what they imagine when they say "I want a tall,
dark,handsome man"
I literally said this yesterday in OP's thread that Meds/Mulattos are the most desirable in this respect because
they fit the universal "Tall Dark and handsome" cliche that women always emphasize
everything on the OP says differentThe more pale the better
None women I ever heard talk about tall dark and handsome, and it doesn't mean looking like a gypsy, it means north atlantid phenoThis is ideal,at least to women and not PSL'ers.This is what they imagine when they say "I want a tall,
dark,handsome man"
I literally said this yesterday in OP's thread that Meds/Mulattos are the most desirable in this respect because
they fit the universal "Tall Dark and handsome" cliche that women always emphasize
Coping hard again. Sunkissed bronze is white.Light brown is an ethnic skin tone, period.
The equivalent for whites is orange.
can you stop worshipping that frog? people were scaried to death when seeing him in the streets, even before he was known for killing peopleramirez is the eptiome of tall dark and handsome and hes latino so no. Meds and mulattos dont exclusively fill that archetype
cause he was a drug addict. his bone structure mogs every PSL God.can you stop worshipping that frog? people were scaried to death when seeing him in the streets, even before he was known for killing people
Yes it is u fag keep coping. Obviously you can't understand simple english cause your IQ can be counted on one handDnr. Niggers cant write so it's not like I would understand something
And the person in the pic is not white you dumbass
My skin is sun-kissed bronze without tanning. You need to tan to get our natural skin colour.Coping hard again. Sunkissed bronze is white.
Ethnics become dark brown.
Do you really fucking think all nonwhites have dark brown skin? Get the fuck out and touch grass.Coping hard again. Sunkissed bronze is white.
Ethnics become dark brown.
Dnr and don't care get off my pink dickYes it is u fag keep coping. Obviously you can't understand simple english cause your IQ can be counted on one hand
Ur yellowMy skin is sun-kissed bronze without tanning. You need to tan to get our natural skin colour.
I'M GOLDEN OLIVE.Ur yellow
I don't care about psl faggotry anymore, his jaw and zygos were good but the rest was bad which is why he looked like a mutant rat toad mix with short hair.cause he was a drug addict. his bone structure mogs every PSL God.
Agree to disagree.I don't care about psl faggotry anymore, his jaw and zygos were good but the rest was bad which is why he looked like a mutant rat toad mix with short hair.
This even mogs him
View attachment 2399944
Softmaxxed chadliteI don't care about psl faggotry anymore, his jaw and zygos were good but the rest was bad which is why he looked like a mutant rat toad mix with short hair.
This even mogs him
View attachment 2399944
tldr fagDnr and don't care get off my pink dick
Shitskincope. When they say that they don't mean ethnic.Dark tall and handsome is the way to go, this combo will always mog the red heads or blonde fags
I agree with lighter skin being ideal but studies show lower contrast being more masculine. I also think the benefits of lighter skin taper off The lighter you get and pale skin is actually a failo. What amnesia posted and Meeks like colouring both seem to be somewhat ideal@BrahminBoss
I would argue that currently, in 2023, for men, having light skin and high-contrast coloring is ideal.
I would prove this by comparing Indians to whites. Now Indians are actually considered Caucasoid. As it turns out, apart from the skin color, we look pretty similar. Of course, there are some other differences, like the nose or the orbits. But whites and Indians look similar.
So Indians are essentially dark-skinned white people.
Now look at the perceived attractiveness of these two groups in society. Indians are generally seen as the least attractive group in the west except from maybe south east asians. Even in India, the whiter you are, the better. You can see this in Bollywood. This is the case for males and females.
Now then, you've got to ask, Why is that? Do the genes that determine melanin somehow also affect how nice of a person you are? Does whiteness equal niceness? Well, it certainly correlates (whiteness is correlated with economic prosperity; economic prosperity = more developed society = higher moral character). I don't think that's why, as even Indian men who have little relation to Indian culture are seen as unattractive in the west. Now as to why dark skin skin is unattractive on Caucasians: I don't know.
It's a badass name that's too badno, this forum is just too retarded to understand what an arborist is.
Well, skin color is sexually dimorphic since it is slightly darker on males across all races. So if we're going by the sexual dimorphism theory of attractiveness, dark skin would be seen as more attractive on males. But that's not what we've seen in reality. So clearly, there's something else at play. Perhaps people hold races that are different than their own to different standards. So a Nordic male with slightly darker skin than the average Nordic male might be seen as ideal.I agree with lighter skin being ideal but studies show lower contrast being more masculine. I also think the benefits of lighter skin taper off The lighter you get and pale skin is actually a failo. What amnesia posted and Meeks like colouring both seem to be somewhat ideal
It seems in the equatorial regions, lighter than average skin colour is preferred in males and in the arctic regions darker than average skin is preferred(in males)Well, skin color is sexually dimorphic since it is slightly darker on males across all races. So if we're going by the sexual dimorphism theory of attractiveness, dark skin would be seen as more attractive on males. But that's not what we've seen in reality. So clearly, there's something else at play. Perhaps people hold races that are different than their own to different standards. So a Nordic male with slightly darker skin than the average Nordic male might be seen as ideal.
Meeks would AMOG if he had hair and brows
I already proved that he would look like shit with hair and brows, he would look like a the darkest goatfucker possible. see his morphs and how he looked when younger. same with ramirezMeeks would AMOG if he had hair and brows
@PrinceLuenLeoncurI already proved that he would look like shit with hair and brows, he would look like a the darkest goatfucker possible. see his morphs and how he looked when younger. same with ramirez
but keep coping, you never left India and never seen a white person yet you try to come up with dumb universal conclusions
exactly, would look better without gypsy skin and with a pink ballsack@PrinceLuenLeoncur
is lycopene powder working for you?View attachment 2399820
he has light brown skin with red undertones giving him an orange tint. If Ramirez overdosed on lycopene and MSM he would have similar skin finish
not taking it until im close to being lean, undertones only show if the dermis and epidermis doesnt contain much fat as carotenoids are lipophilicis lycopene powder working for you?
On the one hand ,being white especially WASP is high class and exudes aristocracy. But is it due to skin tone or phenotype? For example Alain Delon pale white vs with a tan where he is light brown - he looks equally aristocratic in both:
View attachment 2399773View attachment 2399775
So when white people say "white is right" or some variation they are refferring to the WASP phenotype mainly? But why then some iranid shitskins and turks who look more ethnic than even some dravidians post their whitewashed hand and act like its ideal? When the white phenotype facially is what is most important?
Surely Gandy doesnt become dravidian because he tanned to medium brown in his D and G advertisements
View attachment 2399781
So perhaps it is a problem of different undertones rather than skin tone by itself? But there are studies claiming that women find darker men especially those tanned to light brown skin the most attractive regardless of race
But perhaps if we go deeper it is a cultural problem, and some cultures find fair men attractive like gooks?
However from the face of it we can ourselves notice light brown skin being the most attractive and exudes the most masculinity and sex appeal
View attachment 2399786
We also know that lower contrast in the face means higher degree of masculinity, so is it the case that for dark haired men, light brown skin is ideal (as it lessens overall contrast) and for blonde men remaining as fair as possible is ideal (Due to the being lighter tone)? The question also is a conflict between dimorphism due to melanin vs dimorphism exhibited by lower facial contrast
So does the question ultimately hinge upon different phenotypes (and thus different undertones) having different skin tone ideals and also being culturally impacted? If so what are those ideals and how would one go about assessing it (the question then becomes if darker skin tones also set different standards for sex appeal such as women wanting darker men for ONS and fair men for LTRs)
AFAIK no such study has been done. My take is that ethnics have really shitty undertones and must remain at light brown to mask grey undertones and try to overdose on carotenoid supplements such as lycopene lutein astaxanthin etc to try and get better undertones. Ultimately I think its a question of phenotype and there are fair men with ethnic phenotypes and darker men with more caucasoid shifted phenotypes. I think having the latter as your base is better as it is easy to bleach skin colour if you tend to be on the darker side.
On the one hand ,being white especially WASP is high class and exudes aristocracy. But is it due to skin tone or phenotype? For example Alain Delon pale white vs with a tan where he is light brown - he looks equally aristocratic in both:
View attachment 2399773View attachment 2399775
So when white people say "white is right" or some variation they are refferring to the WASP phenotype mainly? But why then some iranid shitskins and turks who look more ethnic than even some dravidians post their whitewashed hand and act like its ideal? When the white phenotype facially is what is most important?
Surely Gandy doesnt become dravidian because he tanned to medium brown in his D and G advertisements
View attachment 2399781
So perhaps it is a problem of different undertones rather than skin tone by itself? But there are studies claiming that women find darker men especially those tanned to light brown skin the most attractive regardless of race
But perhaps if we go deeper it is a cultural problem, and some cultures find fair men attractive like gooks?
However from the face of it we can ourselves notice light brown skin being the most attractive and exudes the most masculinity and sex appeal
View attachment 2399786
We also know that lower contrast in the face means higher degree of masculinity, so is it the case that for dark haired men, light brown skin is ideal (as it lessens overall contrast) and for blonde men remaining as fair as possible is ideal (Due to the being lighter tone)? The question also is a conflict between dimorphism due to melanin vs dimorphism exhibited by lower facial contrast
So does the question ultimately hinge upon different phenotypes (and thus different undertones) having different skin tone ideals and also being culturally impacted? If so what are those ideals and how would one go about assessing it (the question then becomes if darker skin tones also set different standards for sex appeal such as women wanting darker men for ONS and fair men for LTRs)
AFAIK no such study has been done. My take is that ethnics have really shitty undertones and must remain at light brown to mask grey undertones and try to overdose on carotenoid supplements such as lycopene lutein astaxanthin etc to try and get better undertones. Ultimately I think its a question of phenotype and there are fair men with ethnic phenotypes and darker men with more caucasoid shifted phenotypes. I think having the latter as your base is better as it is easy to bleach skin colour if you tend to be on the darker side.