you are just another black disgusting parasite cockroach with 80 iq polluting the world. not a single woman will find even close to acceptable looking
I was surprised as well he usually just holds back his fatass rooster neck and snaps a pic
Skin tone is the amount of melanin on the epidermis. They have accumulated enough melanin to be called light brown
no, this forum is just too retarded to understand what an arborist is.Did you change your name for anonymity as well?
ramirez is the eptiome of tall dark and handsome and hes latino so no. Meds and mulattos dont exclusively fill that archetype
everything on the OP says different
None women I ever heard talk about tall dark and handsome, and it doesn't mean looking like a gypsy, it means north atlantid pheno
Coping hard again. Sunkissed bronze is white.
can you stop worshipping that frog? people were scaried to death when seeing him in the streets, even before he was known for killing people
cause he was a drug addict. his bone structure mogs every PSL God.
Yes it is u fag keep coping. Obviously you can't understand simple english cause your IQ can be counted on one hand
My skin is sun-kissed bronze without tanning. You need to tan to get our natural skin colour.
Do you really fucking think all nonwhites have dark brown skin? Get the fuck out and touch grass.
Dnr and don't care get off my pink dick
Ur yellow
I'M GOLDEN OLIVE.
I don't care about psl faggotry anymore, his jaw and zygos were good but the rest was bad which is why he looked like a mutant rat toad mix with short hair.
Agree to disagree.
Softmaxxed chadlite
tldr fag
Shitskincope. When they say that they don't mean ethnic.
I agree with lighter skin being ideal but studies show lower contrast being more masculine. I also think the benefits of lighter skin taper off The lighter you get and pale skin is actually a failo. What amnesia posted and Meeks like colouring both seem to be somewhat ideal
Well, skin color is sexually dimorphic since it is slightly darker on males across all races. So if we're going by the sexual dimorphism theory of attractiveness, dark skin would be seen as more attractive on males. But that's not what we've seen in reality. So clearly, there's something else at play. Perhaps people hold races that are different than their own to different standards. So a Nordic male with slightly darker skin than the average Nordic male might be seen as ideal.
It seems in the equatorial regions, lighter than average skin colour is preferred in males and in the arctic regions darker than average skin is preferred(in males)
Meeks would AMOG if he had hair and brows
I already proved that he would look like shit with hair and brows, he would look like a the darkest goatfucker possible. see his morphs and how he looked when younger. same with ramirez
@PrinceLuenLeoncur
exactly, would look better without gypsy skin and with a pink ballsack
is lycopene powder working for you?
not taking it until im close to being lean, undertones only show if the dermis and epidermis doesnt contain much fat as carotenoids are lipophilic
On the one hand ,being white especially WASP is high class and exudes aristocracy. But is it due to skin tone or phenotype? For example Alain Delon pale white vs with a tan where he is light brown - he looks equally aristocratic in both:
View attachment 2399773View attachment 2399775
So when white people say "white is right" or some variation they are refferring to the WASP phenotype mainly? But why then some iranid shitskins and turks who look more ethnic than even some dravidians post their whitewashed hand and act like its ideal? When the white phenotype facially is what is most important?
Surely Gandy doesnt become dravidian because he tanned to medium brown in his D and G advertisements
View attachment 2399781
So perhaps it is a problem of different undertones rather than skin tone by itself? But there are studies claiming that women find darker men especially those tanned to light brown skin the most attractive regardless of race
But perhaps if we go deeper it is a cultural problem, and some cultures find fair men attractive like gooks?
However from the face of it we can ourselves notice light brown skin being the most attractive and exudes the most masculinity and sex appeal
View attachment 2399786
We also know that lower contrast in the face means higher degree of masculinity, so is it the case that for dark haired men, light brown skin is ideal (as it lessens overall contrast) and for blonde men remaining as fair as possible is ideal (Due to the being lighter tone)? The question also is a conflict between dimorphism due to melanin vs dimorphism exhibited by lower facial contrast
So does the question ultimately hinge upon different phenotypes (and thus different undertones) having different skin tone ideals and also being culturally impacted? If so what are those ideals and how would one go about assessing it (the question then becomes if darker skin tones also set different standards for sex appeal such as women wanting darker men for ONS and fair men for LTRs)
AFAIK no such study has been done. My take is that ethnics have really shitty undertones and must remain at light brown to mask grey undertones and try to overdose on carotenoid supplements such as lycopene lutein astaxanthin etc to try and get better undertones. Ultimately I think its a question of phenotype and there are fair men with ethnic phenotypes and darker men with more caucasoid shifted phenotypes. I think having the latter as your base is better as it is easy to bleach skin colour if you tend to be on the darker side.
On the one hand ,being white especially WASP is high class and exudes aristocracy. But is it due to skin tone or phenotype? For example Alain Delon pale white vs with a tan where he is light brown - he looks equally aristocratic in both:
View attachment 2399773View attachment 2399775
So when white people say "white is right" or some variation they are refferring to the WASP phenotype mainly? But why then some iranid shitskins and turks who look more ethnic than even some dravidians post their whitewashed hand and act like its ideal? When the white phenotype facially is what is most important?
Surely Gandy doesnt become dravidian because he tanned to medium brown in his D and G advertisements
View attachment 2399781
So perhaps it is a problem of different undertones rather than skin tone by itself? But there are studies claiming that women find darker men especially those tanned to light brown skin the most attractive regardless of race
But perhaps if we go deeper it is a cultural problem, and some cultures find fair men attractive like gooks?
However from the face of it we can ourselves notice light brown skin being the most attractive and exudes the most masculinity and sex appeal
View attachment 2399786
We also know that lower contrast in the face means higher degree of masculinity, so is it the case that for dark haired men, light brown skin is ideal (as it lessens overall contrast) and for blonde men remaining as fair as possible is ideal (Due to the being lighter tone)? The question also is a conflict between dimorphism due to melanin vs dimorphism exhibited by lower facial contrast
So does the question ultimately hinge upon different phenotypes (and thus different undertones) having different skin tone ideals and also being culturally impacted? If so what are those ideals and how would one go about assessing it (the question then becomes if darker skin tones also set different standards for sex appeal such as women wanting darker men for ONS and fair men for LTRs)
AFAIK no such study has been done. My take is that ethnics have really shitty undertones and must remain at light brown to mask grey undertones and try to overdose on carotenoid supplements such as lycopene lutein astaxanthin etc to try and get better undertones. Ultimately I think its a question of phenotype and there are fair men with ethnic phenotypes and darker men with more caucasoid shifted phenotypes. I think having the latter as your base is better as it is easy to bleach skin colour if you tend to be on the darker side.
