Im so confused about what is the ideal skintone for males

[autistic_tendencies]

Pale, reddish undertone signalling high T

 

[Saggitarian]

View attachment 2399820

he has light brown skin with red undertones giving him an orange tint. If Ramirez overdosed on lycopene and MSM he would have similar skin finish

bitch you smoking crack if you tihnk that's light brown lol
you should sell your crack roccs instead of smoking it you fool go rope immediately

 

[mizzy]

On the one hand ,being white especially WASP is high class and exudes aristocracy. But is it due to skin tone or phenotype? For example Alain Delon pale white vs with a tan where he is light brown - he looks equally aristocratic in both:

View attachment 2399773View attachment 2399775


So when white people say "white is right" or some variation they are refferring to the WASP phenotype mainly? But why then some iranid shitskins and turks who look more ethnic than even some dravidians post their whitewashed hand and act like its ideal? When the white phenotype facially is what is most important?

Surely Gandy doesnt become dravidian because he tanned to medium brown in his D and G advertisements

View attachment 2399781


So perhaps it is a problem of different undertones rather than skin tone by itself? But there are studies claiming that women find darker men especially those tanned to light brown skin the most attractive regardless of race

Tan is ‘In’: Study Finds Light Brown More Attractive than Pale or Dark Skin

By Katherine Kostiuk MU News Bureau Columbia, Mo. (Oct. 2, 2006) — Some African-American stars have been ridiculed for trying to lighten their skin color, but many Caucasians go to tanning salons to…

journalism.missouri.edu

But perhaps if we go deeper it is a cultural problem, and some cultures find fair men attractive like gooks?



However from the face of it we can ourselves notice light brown skin being the most attractive and exudes the most masculinity and sex appeal

View attachment 2399786


We also know that lower contrast in the face means higher degree of masculinity, so is it the case that for dark haired men, light brown skin is ideal (as it lessens overall contrast) and for blonde men remaining as fair as possible is ideal (Due to the being lighter tone)? The question also is a conflict between dimorphism due to melanin vs dimorphism exhibited by lower facial contrast

https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=psyfac

So does the question ultimately hinge upon different phenotypes (and thus different undertones) having different skin tone ideals and also being culturally impacted? If so what are those ideals and how would one go about assessing it (the question then becomes if darker skin tones also set different standards for sex appeal such as women wanting darker men for ONS and fair men for LTRs)

AFAIK no such study has been done. My take is that ethnics have really shitty undertones and must remain at light brown to mask grey undertones and try to overdose on carotenoid supplements such as lycopene lutein astaxanthin etc to try and get better undertones. Ultimately I think its a question of phenotype and there are fair men with ethnic phenotypes and darker men with more caucasoid shifted phenotypes. I think having the latter as your base is better as it is easy to bleach skin colour if you tend to be on the darker side.

doesn't matter. albino blacks will never get any love. If you have white genes, you'll have the white phenotypes, so even if you jump in a pool of vantablack you will attract woman. JBW IZ LAW

 

[Pendejo]

My avi tbh.

 

[currywhowillascends]

Europeans have reddish undertones, while Etnikks are either ashbrown, yellowish brown or olive brown, which gives them the dirty brown colour withy hyperpigmentation on ellbows, knees, knuckles and neck. Europeans tan different

So what is the solution for ethnics

 

[currywhowillascends]

Fid

@BrahminBoss

I would argue that currently, in 2023, for men, having light skin and high-contrast coloring is ideal.

I would prove this by comparing Indians to whites. Now Indians are actually considered Caucasoid. As it turns out, apart from the skin color, we look pretty similar. Of course, there are some other differences, like the nose or the orbits. But whites and Indians look similar.
So Indians are essentially dark-skinned white people.

Now look at the perceived attractiveness of these two groups in society. Indians are generally seen as the least attractive group in the west except from maybe south east asians. Even in India, the whiter you are, the better. You can see this in Bollywood. This is the case for males and females.
Now then, you've got to ask, Why is that? Do the genes that determine melanin somehow also affect how nice of a person you are? Does whiteness equal niceness? Well, it certainly correlates (whiteness is correlated with economic prosperity; economic prosperity = more developed society = higher moral character). I don't think that's why, as even Indian men who have little relation to Indian culture are seen as unattractive in the west. Now as to why dark skin skin is unattractive on Caucasians: I don't know.

Did you find any solution?

 

[Methhead]

On the one hand ,being white especially WASP is high class and exudes aristocracy. But is it due to skin tone or phenotype? For example Alain Delon pale white vs with a tan where he is light brown - he looks equally aristocratic in both:

View attachment 2399773View attachment 2399775


So when white people say "white is right" or some variation they are refferring to the WASP phenotype mainly? But why then some iranid shitskins and turks who look more ethnic than even some dravidians post their whitewashed hand and act like its ideal? When the white phenotype facially is what is most important?

Surely Gandy doesnt become dravidian because he tanned to medium brown in his D and G advertisements

View attachment 2399781


So perhaps it is a problem of different undertones rather than skin tone by itself? But there are studies claiming that women find darker men especially those tanned to light brown skin the most attractive regardless of race

Tan is ‘In’: Study Finds Light Brown More Attractive than Pale or Dark Skin

By Katherine Kostiuk MU News Bureau Columbia, Mo. (Oct. 2, 2006) — Some African-American stars have been ridiculed for trying to lighten their skin color, but many Caucasians go to tanning salons to…

journalism.missouri.edu

But perhaps if we go deeper it is a cultural problem, and some cultures find fair men attractive like gooks?



However from the face of it we can ourselves notice light brown skin being the most attractive and exudes the most masculinity and sex appeal

View attachment 2399786


We also know that lower contrast in the face means higher degree of masculinity, so is it the case that for dark haired men, light brown skin is ideal (as it lessens overall contrast) and for blonde men remaining as fair as possible is ideal (Due to the being lighter tone)? The question also is a conflict between dimorphism due to melanin vs dimorphism exhibited by lower facial contrast

https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=psyfac

So does the question ultimately hinge upon different phenotypes (and thus different undertones) having different skin tone ideals and also being culturally impacted? If so what are those ideals and how would one go about assessing it (the question then becomes if darker skin tones also set different standards for sex appeal such as women wanting darker men for ONS and fair men for LTRs)

AFAIK no such study has been done. My take is that ethnics have really shitty undertones and must remain at light brown to mask grey undertones and try to overdose on carotenoid supplements such as lycopene lutein astaxanthin etc to try and get better undertones. Ultimately I think its a question of phenotype and there are fair men with ethnic phenotypes and darker men with more caucasoid shifted phenotypes. I think having the latter as your base is better as it is easy to bleach skin colour if you tend to be on the darker side.

tan for caucasians, lightskin for blacks.

 

[Deleted member 33079]

 

[Debetro]

View attachment 2435691

vs

 

[Deleted member 33079]

vs

 

[Debetro]

View attachment 2435742

 

[Chadpreet_]

No skin tone is ideal, just be chad

 

[Deleted member 23558]

No skin tone is ideal, just be chad

Fuck imagine your avi riding when youre high on changa , although shes like MTB unfrauded

 

[saggyballsackcel]

you are the one coping, your brown skull can't hold more than 800 grams of brain that's why you can't think

you are trying to prove all skin colours are muh beautiful when irl whenever a brown or negro go to EE or NA they get bullied into suicide or deport them before that happens

you have a black dirty looking ballsack and your penis is disgusting, my ballsack is beautiful pink, and my penis is perfectly coloured, white trunk with reddish undertones and pink shaft.

females associate your genitals with hiv and diseases, females associate mine with reinassance works of art. my penis is worshipped by females of every colour and type, your is only by a mentally ill niche

Beige/white ball sack mogs pink nut sack, pink genitalia equals negative masculinity

 

[Debetro]

Beige/white ball sack mogs pink nut sack, pink genitalia equals negative masculinity

Red ballsack, pink head, uniformly pigmented white shaft.