Islam is the last remaining religion which ironically was it's mission statement

[OGJBSLAYER]

Vedic religion is not Hinduism. Modern Hinduism has nothing to do with vedic religion. Ancient Vedic people would be disgusted by Modern Hindu rituals.

That's a very dumb argument. Islam in the 7th century is very different from Islam in the 21st century. The same is true of Christianity in the 1st century to Christianity in the 21st century. You also can't treat Hinduism as one homogenous entity. It's a very diverse religion with more sects and teachings than your little retarded semitic mind can comprehend. Religions evolve overtime, but this doesn't mean they never had a beginning at some point. A child grows up to become an adult, but he is still the same person.

Plus while Rig Veda may have been originally orally composed around 1500 BC but they written manuscripts are only available from 100 BC and the like. So we can't even say clearly if what's written in the Vedas is accurate of the people of 1500 BC.

"Originally composed" .... the written manuscripts of the bible are also unavailable... does that mean it was written in the 4th century CE ? No, that's another dumb argument from you. Scholars have various methods of dating the period of the texts found in Rig Veda.

Even the oldest Quran going back to the period of Muhammad is a single parchment. Most of the Quran from that period is not avaliable to us.

( linguistic analysis, intra textual references, historiography of ideas, monuments and artifacts left behind etc )

I don't even know why l am replying to you. It's a waste of time

 

[Big White Cuck]

That's a very dumb argument. Islam in the 7th century is very different from Islam in the 21st century.

The doctrinal beliefs are the same more or less. The same can't be said of Hinduism.

Muslim in 7th century and 21s t century worship the same God. Modern Hindus worship Vishnnu and Shiva while vedic people worship Indra and Agni.

Muslims still consider Quran as a word of God and the highest authority meanwhile Vedas has been surpseded by multiple scriptures. The most important of current hindu scriptures is who is probably not older than 200 AD.

e same is true of Christianity in the 1st century to Christianity in the 21st century. You also can't treat Hinduism as one homogenous entity. It's a very diverse religion with more sects and teachings than your little retarded semitic mind can comprehend.

And I'm not even treating it as a religion. It's more of a socio-cultural identity.

Religions evolve overtime, but this doesn't mean they never had a beginning at some point. A child grows up to become an adult, but he is still the same person.

Doesn't work here because Hindus don't even consider Hinduism a religion till 15tu century

"Originally composed" .... the written manuscripts of the bible are also unavailable... does that mean it was written in the 4th century CE ? No, that's another dumb argument from you. Scholars have various methods of dating the period of the texts found in Rig Veda.

Scholars themselves belief that Modern Hinduism is not same as the Vedic religion. Some even believe that Hindu identity only came into existence after Islamic invasions.

Even the oldest Quran going back to the period of Muhammad is a single parchment. Most of the Quran from that period is not avaliable to us.

( linguistic analysis, intra textual references, historiography of ideas, monuments and artifacts left behind etc )

But you can't find a single parchment of Vedas before 200-300 BC.

I don't even know why l am replying to you. It's a waste of time

Now you are backing down because you don't have any replies.

 

[RAMU KAKA]

Seal of the Prophets - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

What a based claim at the time to declare the finality of prophecies and revelations. What a hauntingly reality it's become, that Islam is really is the last remaining religion since it's the only religion it's believers take seriously.

All other religions have been destroyed internally or externally. Islam is the last man standing. Alhamdulillah. Even the kuffar admit this. There is no denying it.

@Manchild @IndraBC

@Eternal_

Allahu akbar

 

[speedstern]

I’ve had so many Muslim friends and you guys are all good and normal people because 99.9% of you are just culturally Muslim and don’t actually know much about the religion.

I wish you cucks would just see the light. It’s so clear that Jesus Christ is God and unfathomable how anyone in their right mind can consider islam anything but a demonic cult.

I’m not Muslim or Christian but Muhammad is way more based than Christianity’s Jesus (not islams who wasn’t executed like a pussy)

 

[OGJBSLAYER]

The doctrinal beliefs are the same more or less. The same can't be said of Hinduism.

Hinduism doesn't have a single doctrinal belief. From the very start, it has been a religion with many different paths for different people with different needs.

Muslim in 7th century and 21s t century worship the same God. Modern Hindus worship Vishnnu and Shiva while vedic people worship Indra and Agni.

That's cause it was never a retarded semitic cult designed to revere its tribal God. Nevertheless, Vishnu and Shiva are just different manifestations of Brahman, the underlying ultimate reality.

Muslims still consider Quran as a word of God and the highest authority meanwhile Vedas has been surpseded by multiple scriptures. The most important of current hindu scriptures is who is probably not older than 200 AD.

In dharmic religions, we don't rely on revelation. Knowledge is obtained by meditation and spirtual experiences. The ritual and spirtual methods used to get closer to God/truth are passed from teachers to students, one generation to another, books to books etc.

And I'm not even treating it as a religion. It's more of a socio-cultural identity.

You can't define religion in the Abrahamic sense only. We can do the same and reduce your religion to a cult.

Doesn't work here because Hindus don't even consider Hinduism a religion till 15tu century

Thats just a matter of name. If other people start calling you by different names, it doesn't mean you didn't exist before that name was invented.

Scholars themselves belief that Modern Hinduism is not same as the Vedic religion. Some even believe that Hindu identity only came into existence after Islamic invasions.

The scholars :

But you can't find a single parchment of Vedas before 200-300 BC.

Now you are backing down because you don't have any replies.

I'm not backing down. I'm just saying dating parchments isn't the only way of telling the historicity of a document. You need to respond to the various other methods l listed, instead of attacking a strawman.

 

[Deleted member 13710]

The oldest manuscript containig hindu thought is not even 2000 year old.

The roots of Hinduism go back thousands of years. No serious historian would deny this. You are making hair-splitting arguments and playing with the definitions of words. Even if you consider Judaism as the early form of Islam (which doesn't really make sense), Hinduism is still older by a large margin.

Vedic religion is not Hinduism. Modern Hinduism has nothing to do with vedic religion.

Your argument cannot be taken seriously at all after saying this.