Its time to change the PSL rating system

[Deleted member 6403]

cause so far women have showed us that they either find u ugly or wanna rape u

so the rating system should be 0 - 1

0.25 - height
0.5 - face
0.25 - physique (frame and body)

im missing way more but this is the most obvious looks triangle

if ur missing one thing its over

 

[Hozay]

1-10 is how it should be PSL is autistic

 

[Deleted member 6403]

1-10 is how it should be

cope, women either find u ugly or very attractive

 

[Lev Peshkov]

I agree tbh let's actually talk about this big time and make it blow up

 

[Hightwolf]

u know i just realized that the retards who decided to make the psl system 0 to 8 probably refused to rate anyone a 9 or 10. Which would make sense because:

 

[Lev Peshkov]

So a 0.8 is minimum to Slay or get a foid?

 

[Hightwolf]

I agree tbh let's actually talk about this big time and make it blow up

honestly. If the high iq members here try to make a better one, they could then make a post about it and the mods could sticky it. The psl system is shit rn imo

 

[Lev Peshkov]

honestly. If the high iq members here try to make a better one, they could then make a post about it and the mods could sticky it. The psl system is shit rn imo

Unironically is
Psl doesn't talk about body and irl appeal its all about the face

We need a system which bases ur score off of irl appeal and aesthetics

 

[Deleted member 6403]

So a 0.8 is minimum to Slay or get a foid?

i'd say u could probably get a LTR at that rating but u def can't slay compared to being rated a 1

 

[Deleted member 4362]

PSL should be
Trucel >1
Incel >2
LTN >3
Normie >4
HTN >5
Chadlite > 6
Chad > 7
‘4.73’ is so retarded

 

[Lev Peshkov]

OK so the way we need to do this is gonna be complicated but easy

We get a group of foids (find how asap)

And we get different levels of faces and body's and heights and ask foids to rate out of 10 and if they would date or fuck

Then we can find the borders and find out which deserves more points as is more important

 

[Deleted member 1100]

Your rating suggestion is autistic af too LOL

it's literally 1/10 reduced to the decimal scale as if it changed anything


They rate in a BINARY manner, you're either attractive or not! There's no such "height 0.25" "face" 0.5"

Why You Should Never Ask Someone To Rate You (ESPECIALLY WOMEN!)

First of all, this won't be a detailed long post cuz honestly, I couldn't give more of a fuck about making long posts tbh, I only care about making money and looksmax at this point. But after seeing this thread, I decided to make this thread to clear somethings up: What most people on...

looksmax.org

https://looksmax.org/threads/the-concept-of-rating-is-completely-flawed.59159/

 

[Deleted member 6403]

Your rating suggestion is autistic af too LOL

it's literally 1/10 reduced to the decimal scale as if it changed anything


They rate in a BINARY manner, you're either attractive or not! There's no such "height 0.25" "face" 0.5"

Why You Should Never Ask Someone To Rate You (ESPECIALLY WOMEN!)

First of all, this won't be a detailed long post cuz honestly, I couldn't give more of a fuck about making long posts tbh, I only care about making money and looksmax at this point. But after seeing this thread, I decided to make this thread to clear somethings up: What most people on...

looksmax.org

https://looksmax.org/threads/the-concept-of-rating-is-completely-flawed.59159/

how would u add everything up and get a rating then? elab

 

[Deleted member 1100]

PSL should be
Trucel >1
Incel >2
LTN >3
Normie >4
HTN >5
Chadlite > 6
Chad > 7
‘4.73’ is so retarded

That's basically a likert scale. Which is definitely better than the pseudo-"objective" PSL scale. You still need the definitions of what makes each of them (I have some concepts, maybe I'll make a thread about it later)

 

[Lev Peshkov]

how would u add everything up and get a rating then? elab

Second this, we're gonna sort out a rating system

 

[Truecel14]

It should be 1 - 3. 1 is ugly subhuman. 2 is average. 3 is mog 90% of men.


Then you do like a 2.5 if they mog 75% of men

 

[Deleted member 10987]

0- Dios mio
1- El abomination
2- Subhuman
3- Ugly Mother fucker
4- Below Normie
5- Normie
6- Above Normie
7- Chadlite
8- Chad
9- Angel
10- Archangel

 

[Lev Peshkov]

I think we're best to stick with 1-10

As literally minoxidil brows and lashes and getting a good haircut with wavy hair can literally give u up to 3 irl points and change ur psl none

Edit: and being lean

 

[Deleted member 4362]

That's basically a likert scale. Which is definitely better than the pseudo-"objective" PSL scale. You still need the definitions of what makes each of them (I have some concepts, maybe I'll make a thread about it later)

I’ve always thought judging appeal in tiers is far more realistic than using 5 significant figures, also takes into account any other positive factors.

 

[Hightwolf]

My thoughts on things we need to add to a rating system:
-Considers height, frame, voice, physique
-Does not base of 'ideal psl traits', That way people like barrett do not get rated high
-Based instead on sex appeal traits, where someone with a long midface or a unideal forward growth would still be rated high assuming that women find them attractive.
-Keeping the psl 0 to 8 system is fine, but associate each level with a rough percentile. IE psl 7 is top 1%, psl 6 is top 10%, psl 5 is top 25%, psl 4 is top 50%.

 

[Deleted member 10987]

I think we're best to stick with 1-10

As literally minoxidil brows and lashes and getting a good haircut with wavy hair can literally give u up to 3 irl points and change ur psl none

Edit: and being lean

Being Lean is everything
You need to be below 10 % to get rated

 

[Mouthbreath]

I propose creating a powerful trained neural network, to which only few psl users will have access. It will be trained with thousands of ratings from prime jbs.

If you feed your face into it, you'll get different numbers and parameters. Because (Atleast at first) it wont be possible to get your rating with 100percent accuracy, the results of the AI oracle will have to be interpreted by the wise and experienced raters of this forum.

 

[Lev Peshkov]

My thoughts on things we need to add to a rating system:
-Considers height, frame, voice, physique
-Does not base of 'ideal psl traits', That way people like barrett do not get rated high
-Based instead on sex appeal traits, where someone with a long midface or a unideal forward growth would still be rated high assuming that women find them attractive.
-Keeping the psl 0 to 8 system is fine, but associate each level with a rough percentile. IE psl 7 is top 1%, psl 6 is top 10%, psl 5 is top 25%, psl 4 is top 50%.

Just get rid of the 1-8 ngl it doesn't make sense or is practical

Irl appeal is all that matters

You gonna listen to if a foid wants you and u look good or some basement dweller muh ideal

 

[Deleted member 4464]

I agree with that because theres no in between, girls either want to fuck you or they want to have nothing with you in general

 

[Lev Peshkov]

Being Lean is everything
You need to be below 10 % to get rated

Literally leann with good brows and lashes and good haircut

Gives u bones, jaw, zygos and good brows and lashes give you a better eye area and haircut just halos you.

Ded srs I'm on my way to doing these and will ascend

Need proof? Remember that kid on tiktok who buzzcut himself? Lost 2 irl points and appeal

Google 10% bf males. All have bones.

Google good eyebrows and eyelashes. Look at how they don't have juh hunter eyes but have good eye area

See this is how looks is

None of these really boost psl but ur irl skyrocketed

 

[Hightwolf]

Just get rid of the 1-8 ngl it doesn't make sense or is practical

Irl appeal is all that matters

You gonna listen to if a foid wants you and u look good or some basement dweller muh ideal

the scale itself doesn't really matter 1-8 or 1-10 or 0-1 it's all the same in the end.

You gonna listen to if a foid wants you and u look good or some basement dweller muh ideal

The problem here is foids absolutely refuse to rate accurately, if they are even able to. We still can form our ideas on what is more attractive but we need to base it on evidence and logic.
Also we are saying the same thing, I want a system where irl appeal is all that matters not autistic psl. We shouldn't have ppl like barret who are high psl low appeal and people with low psl high appeal.

 

[Deleted member 6305]

NO

 

[Deleted member 1100]

how would u add everything up and get a rating then? elab

You don't. You just feel it.

Looksmaxing should be about aesthetics. You know what makes a feature good, go and fix your failos to look they way they should be. The part of rating has to be SUBJECTIVE. Once you get enough of personal first person experience even if it's with what is presented to you on this forum you'll be able to see what is a 0 and what is a 1

= 0

= 1

= 1

= 1

= 0

= 1

= 1

= 0

= 1

= 1

= 1

= 0

= 0

= 1


You can easily pin point most of the things that makes the zeros a zero, you should only focus on what it needs to be done to make him a one, not making him get 1PSL point, because even though that can make him be treated better in general IRL, that won't make him experience the life of a 1, only once he becomes a 1 (IF possible for him)

 

[Lev Peshkov]

I agree with that because theres no in between, girls either want to fuck you or they want to have nothing with you in general

80th percentile is binary 1, will fuck you. Otherwise u have no appeal

 

[Bitch]

I think 0 -1 wouldn't work well with all the decimals. Just keep it 1 - 8. 4/4 for face, 2/2 for height and 2/2 for physique.

 

[Lev Peshkov]

the scale itself doesn't really matter 1-8 or 1-10 or 0-1 it's all the same in the end.


The problem here is foids absolutely refuse to rate accurately, if they are even able to. We still can form our ideas on what is more attractive but we need to base it on evidence and logic.
Also we are saying the same thing, I want a system where irl appeal is all that matters not autistic psl. We shouldn't have ppl like barret who are high psl low appeal and people with low psl high appeal.

True, I think from the 80/20 rule we know 8/10 is minimum. And it's binary 1 or 0. Top 20% 1 bottom 80% 0

This is all in line with what we know already

 

[Lev Peshkov]

Come on boys think

 

[Lev Peshkov]

Have we made a decision?

 

[JustBeCurry]

You don't. You just feel it.

Looksmaxing should be about aesthetics. You know what makes a feature good, go and fix your failos to look they way they should be. The part of rating has to be SUBJECTIVE. Once you get enough of personal first person experience even if it's with what is presented to you on this forum you'll be able to see what is a 0 and what is a 1


View attachment 902262 = 0

View attachment 902263 = 1

View attachment 902264 = 1

View attachment 902265 = 1

View attachment 902266 = 0

View attachment 902267 = 1

View attachment 902268 = 1

View attachment 902269 = 0

View attachment 902270 = 1

View attachment 902271 = 1

View attachment 902272 = 1

View attachment 902273 = 0

View attachment 902274 = 0

View attachment 902275 = 1


You can easily pin point most of the things that makes the zeros a zero, you should only focus on what it needs to be done to make him a one, not making him get 1PSL point, because even though that can make him be treated better in general IRL, that won't make him experience the life of a 1, only once he becomes a 1 (IF possible for him)

i like the 1 or 0 system tbh irl no one is going to be hyperanalyzing your features and saying this is what makes you attractive, either you are gl or not

 

[Deleted member 6403]

 

[WTFCGod]

Every single minute thing matters in every single step

 

[Lev Peshkov]

i like the 1 or 0 system tbh irl no one is going to be hyperanalyzing your features and saying this is what makes you attractive, either you are gl or not

Yes I agree that's how it's final rating should be but what for the looksmaxxers? How do we know what certain thing can gain us points?

I thibk we need a two bladed system

1) the overall system. Either gl or not gl 1 or 0

2) the looksmax system. 1-10 and figuring out what each feature and what percentage is important for attraction and being gl as a % and thus number ouut of 10. E.g body has 2 point gain and minox lean and haircut 3 points RTT 3 points gain surgery and certain things up to 4 point gain.

Something like this is how a system would work

 

[Deleted member 2100]

PSL should be
Trucel >1
Incel >2
LTN >3
Normie >4
HTN >5
Chadlite > 6
Chad > 7
‘4.73’ is so retarded

That is the psl scale, the new users dont know how it works.

4.73 would make sense because you arent a normie, nor are you a HTN, youre in between leaning towards HTN.

 

[Lev Peshkov]

View attachment 902295

Exactly but that's only half of it

That's the only accurate rating system ever created, well done.

Now we need to think of a looksmax rating system.

The boundaries for 1 seems to be 80th percentile

So what things make a man 80th percentile?

And in what order?

50% face 25% body 25% height (example)

We need to figure this out so we can create a scale for maxxers

 

[Lev Peshkov]

OK I have a solution on how we are gonna do this

Find a guy

Moroh him

There will be like 9

Skinny short good face

Skinny tall good face

Buff tall good face

Skinny short bad face

Skinny tall bad face

Buff tall bad face

Buff shorty good face

Etc

 

[Deleted member 6403]

OK I have a solution on how we are gonna do this

Find a guy

Moroh him

There will be like 9

Skinny short good face

Skinny tall good face

Buff tall good face

Skinny short bad face

Skinny tall bad face

Buff tall bad face

Buff shorty good face

Etc

ill do a couple morphs rn

 

[Deleted member 5634]

PSL is about face alone imo. All other things are sex appeal or bonuses

 

[Lev Peshkov]

ill do a couple morphs rn

Based and then make a poll for users to rate 1-0 gl or not

And figure out point increase from picture to picture

Morph soft maxxes too tbh

We will do this multiple times until we have a new system

 

[Lev Peshkov]

Irl difference points between the two pictures

 

[Deleted member 4362]

That is the psl scale, the new users dont know how it works.

4.73 would make sense because you arent a normie, nor are you a HTN, youre in between leaning towards HTN.

I think it Should still take into account other halos though not just face. 5psl face at 5’4 doesn’t have chadlite appeal irl

 

[Lev Peshkov]

Irl change?

Points change

Irl change?

Point increase with this body?

 

[Deleted member 1100]

View attachment 902295

Oh dear boy, only if you new...


That's a likert scale of 7...

This means the ones sitting at 12% are Average/Neutral...

Therefore, the ones sitting at 5% are just "SOMEWHAT attractive", they aren't 1, they are high tier normies who women would have ONS if they are in the mood.

2% are just "Attractive"




The things are more brutal than you think they are.

 

[Deleted member 10536]

i like the 1 or 0 system tbh irl no one is going to be hyperanalyzing your features and saying this is what makes you attractive, either you are gl or not

Only because irl people don't understand *what* makes something attractive, but you don't have to. Though, on the other hand, understanding attraction/aesthetics will bias your perception of beauty.

 

[Deleted member 10536]

Exactly but that's only half of it

That's the only accurate rating system ever created, well done.

Now we need to think of a looksmax rating system.

The boundaries for 1 seems to be 80th percentile

So what things make a man 80th percentile?

And in what order?

50% face 25% body 25% height (example)

We need to figure this out so we can create a scale for maxxers

Wrong. Face is everything. The rest are just multipliers. If your face is 2 and you have top 1% body and height. Your rating is still going to be an absolute trash.

 

[Lev Peshkov]

This has enough appeal irl for a foid