Jaw aesthetics - frontal analysis

Acromegaly_Chad

Acromegaly_Chad

Offical Surgery Consultant
Joined
Apr 16, 2020
Posts
2,050
Reputation
5,180
It's time to add another chapter of brutal blackpill to the jaw surgery database. This is all about jaw angles and jaw width.

The preferred jaw angle has these characteristics: 130° in face profile view, intergonial width similar to facial width, vertical position in frontal view at the oral commissure or at least not below the lower lip, jawline slope in the face frontal view nearly parallel to (with a maximum 15° downward deviation from) a line extending from the lateral canthus to the alare, ascending ramus slope 65°–75° to the Frankfort horizontal, and curvature in the oblique view visible from earlobe to chin and not pointy.

Answers to question 4 regarding the inclination of the lower border in the face frontal Q320



But what if your jaw looks like the example on the left side and you aim for a look like on the right side ?

How jawline fillers can helpfinal


This guy had fillers, but generally, after only after a few weeks, they start to migrate, dissolve and lose contour. Additionally, they are very prone to look unnatural:

Mens jawline fillers


Just look at this after

Funny GIF



It turns out that it's necessary to take a look at the underlying scelettal situation. What makes a jaw wide, angular and aesthetic from the front are mainly:
- Width and shape of the jaw angle i.e. shape and thickness of the posterior corpus mandibulae that connects to the ramus
- Position and size of the masseter muscle and the medial pterygoid muscle

Http   wwwthousandoaksfamilydentistrycom blog 2014 12 22 the muscles of mastication


A narrow, unaesthetic jaw, with blunted, rounded jaw angles, which reeks of micrognathia and other illnesses is often the result of posterior mandibular hypoplasia that is expressed by a severe lack of posterior lateral growth of the corpus mandibulae, malplacement of the ramus or TMJ issues.
When we look at this example, we find relatively normal TMJ to dentoalveolar arch vectors which indicates that this patient has a narrow jaw due to posterior hypoplasia and not because of TMJ problems. This is the most common cause of a rounded jaw:

Screenshot 20211014 015008 Chrome


Red line: The vector
Blue circle: Lack of bony mass

So lets talk about solutions. In my opinion, implants are unfavorable for young patients, silicone because of the infection and erosion risk, medpor because of tissue ingrowth, unsatisfactory ossification, titanium because it doesn't interact with the body AT ALL and can cool down dangerously in cold wheater and HA paste well because it usually looks like shit and has other issues. It's literally bone or death.

The patient above already got a chin wing which mainly increased mid mandibular width, but also some posterior width as shown below:
DrI7uhJ


However, unfortunately, the jaw angles tend to get lost during this procedure as shown below:

Former design of the chin wing osteotomy In patients with hyperdivergent skeletal class



Reconstruction and replacement of the jaw angles and masseter muscles is therefore needed as shown in this surgical simulation:

Screenshot 20211013 174438 Instagram


This is the so called side wing. It should add anything between 8 - 14mm bigonial width, reshape and accentuate the jaw angles and reposition the masseter muscles.
However, in some cases this will not be enough, and in some cases an aggressive side wing might produce unfavorable outcomes. In that case, a BSSO can help (narrow jaws are almost always recessed so you'll need this anyways probably)

Screenshot 20211014 011842 Chrome


The red circles show the consequence of ramus widening with a BSSO, around 4 - 6mm per side. Combined with a side wing it could add almost 25mm wigonial width.

There's a guy from jawsurgeryforums who had a chin wing and side wing, plus very little fillers done. This is his before and afters:

Screenshot 20211016 010152 Samsung Internet


If it hadn't been enough, he still could have gotten the BSSO.

To sum this up:

- A narrow jaw with inward tilted jaw angles is best fixed with a chin wing, side wing, BSSO and some fillers on top.
- Young people should stay away from implants.
- And additional information: IMDO doedn't accentuate the jaw angles, it just makes the whole jaw wider which is not desired.

Therefore the promoted approach is the ONLY approach that is LEGIT, and LONG TERM SAVE.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: rusian, fl0w, Lmao and 52 others
E7B24ED1 E604 4597 9F48 970CC37752FC


@OldVirgin should I rope?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: urielRanhel, greywind, IHeightMogU and 22 others
The red circles show the consequence of ramus widening with a BSSO, around 4 - 6mm per side. Combined with a side wing it could add almost 25mm wigonial width.
Are there any complications of undergoing an osteotomy like this and then combining it with another one afterwards? When it heals up is it like as if that was your starting point
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: unwhippedcream, thecel and Squirtle
what causes wide recessed jaw with low gonial angle
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: tehVigilante, Deleted member 8869, thecel and 1 other person
@Acromegaly_Chad answer my question
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and Squirtle
Bump
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and Squirtle
"Young people should stay away from implants."
good thing I'm an oldcel then :Comfy:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: mizrahi_hater, mvp2v1, musclemaxxer and 5 others
IMDO doedn't accentuate the jaw angles, it just makes the whole jaw wider which is not desired.
actually the gonions torque outward during turning process, the anterior mandible (where the imdo advances) doesn’t widen it just projects forward like BSSO. watch dr c’s imdo 30 min explanation video
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: mvp2v1, thecel, AscendingHero and 2 others
I already know this side wing shit is done only by two jews in the whole world
probably Zarrinbal and Sailer
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Sub0, Danish_Retard, Deleted member 8869 and 4 others
It's time to add another chapter of brutal blackpill to the jaw surgery database. This is all about jaw angles and jaw width.

The preferred jaw angle has these characteristics: 130° in face profile view, intergonial width similar to facial width, vertical position in frontal view at the oral commissure or at least not below the lower lip, jawline slope in the face frontal view nearly parallel to (with a maximum 15° downward deviation from) a line extending from the lateral canthus to the alare, ascending ramus slope 65°–75° to the Frankfort horizontal, and curvature in the oblique view visible from earlobe to chin and not pointy.

View attachment 1367626


But what if your jaw looks like the example on the left side and you aim for a look like on the right side ?

View attachment 1367631

This guy had fillers, but generally, after only after a few weeks, they start to migrate, dissolve and lose contour. Additionally, they are very prone to look unnatural:

View attachment 1367632

Just look at this after

Funny GIF



It turns out that it's necessary to take a look at the underlying scelettal situation. What makes a jaw wide, angular and aesthetic from the front are mainly:
- Width and shape of the jaw angle i.e. shape and thickness of the posterior corpus mandibulae that connects to the ramus
- Position and size of the masseter muscle and the medial pterygoid muscle

View attachment 1367640

A narrow, unaesthetic jaw, with blunted, rounded jaw angles, which reeks of micrognathia and other illnesses is often the result of posterior mandibular hypoplasia that is expressed by a severe lack of posterior lateral growth of the corpus mandibulae, malplacement of the ramus or TMJ issues.
When we look at this example, we find relatively normal TMJ to dentoalveolar arch vectors which indicates that this patient has a narrow jaw due to posterior hypoplasia and not because of TMJ problems. This is the most common cause of a rounded jaw:

View attachment 1367649

Red line: The vector
Blue circle: Lack of bony mass

So lets talk about solutions. In my opinion, implants are unfavorable for young patients, silicone because of the infection and erosion risk, medpor because of tissue ingrowth, unsatisfactory ossification, titanium because it doesn't interact with the body AT ALL and can cool down dangerously in cold wheater and HA paste well because it usually looks like shit and has other issues. It's literally bone or death.

The patient above already got a chin wing which mainly increased mid mandibular width, but also some posterior width as shown below:
View attachment 1367656

However, unfortunately, the jaw angles tend to get lost during this procedure as shown below:

View attachment 1367657


Reconstruction and replacement of the jaw angles and masseter muscles is therefore needed as shown in this surgical simulation:

View attachment 1367661

This is the so called side wing. It should add anything between 8 - 14mm bigonial width, reshape and accentuate the jaw angles and reposition the masseter muscles.
However, in some cases this will not be enough, and in some cases an aggressive side wing might produce unfavorable outcomes. In that case, a BSSO can help (narrow jaws are almost always recessed so you'll need this anyways probably)

View attachment 1367663

The red circles show the consequence of ramus widening with a BSSO, around 4 - 6mm per side. Combined with a side wing it could add almost 25mm wigonial width.

There's a guy from jawsurgeryforums who had a chin wing and side wing, plus very little fillers done. This is his before and afters:

View attachment 1367665

If it hadn't been enough, he still could have gotten the BSSO.

To sum this up:

- A narrow jaw with inward tilted jaw angles is best fixed with a chin wing, side wing, BSSO and some fillers on top.
- Young people should stay away from implants.
- And additional information: IMDO doedn't accentuate the jaw angles, it just makes the whole jaw wider which is not desired.

Therefore the promoted approach is the ONLY approach that is LEGIT, and LONG TERM SAVE.
What movements did the guy from jsf get? Like how many mm with bsso and chinwing?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Squirtle and MeinChadf
Why tf do people get chin wings when custom implants exist. Chin wing is such an ugly and unstable osteotomy just look at it
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Slob, Gladiator, AscendingHero and 8 others
It's time to add another chapter of brutal blackpill to the jaw surgery database. This is all about jaw angles and jaw width.

The preferred jaw angle has these characteristics: 130° in face profile view, intergonial width similar to facial width, vertical position in frontal view at the oral commissure or at least not below the lower lip, jawline slope in the face frontal view nearly parallel to (with a maximum 15° downward deviation from) a line extending from the lateral canthus to the alare, ascending ramus slope 65°–75° to the Frankfort horizontal, and curvature in the oblique view visible from earlobe to chin and not pointy.

View attachment 1367626


But what if your jaw looks like the example on the left side and you aim for a look like on the right side ?

View attachment 1367631

This guy had fillers, but generally, after only after a few weeks, they start to migrate, dissolve and lose contour. Additionally, they are very prone to look unnatural:

View attachment 1367632

Just look at this after

Funny GIF



It turns out that it's necessary to take a look at the underlying scelettal situation. What makes a jaw wide, angular and aesthetic from the front are mainly:
- Width and shape of the jaw angle i.e. shape and thickness of the posterior corpus mandibulae that connects to the ramus
- Position and size of the masseter muscle and the medial pterygoid muscle

View attachment 1367640

A narrow, unaesthetic jaw, with blunted, rounded jaw angles, which reeks of micrognathia and other illnesses is often the result of posterior mandibular hypoplasia that is expressed by a severe lack of posterior lateral growth of the corpus mandibulae, malplacement of the ramus or TMJ issues.
When we look at this example, we find relatively normal TMJ to dentoalveolar arch vectors which indicates that this patient has a narrow jaw due to posterior hypoplasia and not because of TMJ problems. This is the most common cause of a rounded jaw:

View attachment 1367649

Red line: The vector
Blue circle: Lack of bony mass

So lets talk about solutions. In my opinion, implants are unfavorable for young patients, silicone because of the infection and erosion risk, medpor because of tissue ingrowth, unsatisfactory ossification, titanium because it doesn't interact with the body AT ALL and can cool down dangerously in cold wheater and HA paste well because it usually looks like shit and has other issues. It's literally bone or death.

The patient above already got a chin wing which mainly increased mid mandibular width, but also some posterior width as shown below:
View attachment 1367656

However, unfortunately, the jaw angles tend to get lost during this procedure as shown below:

View attachment 1367657


Reconstruction and replacement of the jaw angles and masseter muscles is therefore needed as shown in this surgical simulation:

View attachment 1367661

This is the so called side wing. It should add anything between 8 - 14mm bigonial width, reshape and accentuate the jaw angles and reposition the masseter muscles.
However, in some cases this will not be enough, and in some cases an aggressive side wing might produce unfavorable outcomes. In that case, a BSSO can help (narrow jaws are almost always recessed so you'll need this anyways probably)

View attachment 1367663

The red circles show the consequence of ramus widening with a BSSO, around 4 - 6mm per side. Combined with a side wing it could add almost 25mm wigonial width.

There's a guy from jawsurgeryforums who had a chin wing and side wing, plus very little fillers done. This is his before and afters:

View attachment 1367665

If it hadn't been enough, he still could have gotten the BSSO.

To sum this up:

- A narrow jaw with inward tilted jaw angles is best fixed with a chin wing, side wing, BSSO and some fillers on top.
- Young people should stay away from implants.
- And additional information: IMDO doedn't accentuate the jaw angles, it just makes the whole jaw wider which is not desired.

Therefore the promoted approach is the ONLY approach that is LEGIT, and LONG TERM SAVE.
so basically have a high bigonal width and angularity ?
 
Raffaini is reading this taking notes
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, Pumanator and Squirtle
what causes wide recessed jaw with low gonial angle
Class 2. deep bites are usually the result of too much force on the back teeth resulting in a rotation and very strong ramus and masseter.

class 2 usually has a strong jaw while being recessed and a shorter lower third
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: kas589, normie_joe, Iblamejordan and 10 others
Class 2. deep bites are usually the result of too much force on the back teeth resulting in a rotation and very strong ramus and masseter.

class 2 usually has a strong jaw while being recessed and a shorter lower third
if you got jaw surgery to correct your recession would it make your jaw narrow or would you still have the width?
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, Squirtle and one job away
It's time to add another chapter of brutal blackpill to the jaw surgery database. This is all about jaw angles and jaw width.

The preferred jaw angle has these characteristics: 130° in face profile view, intergonial width similar to facial width, vertical position in frontal view at the oral commissure or at least not below the lower lip, jawline slope in the face frontal view nearly parallel to (with a maximum 15° downward deviation from) a line extending from the lateral canthus to the alare, ascending ramus slope 65°–75° to the Frankfort horizontal, and curvature in the oblique view visible from earlobe to chin and not pointy.

View attachment 1367626


But what if your jaw looks like the example on the left side and you aim for a look like on the right side ?

View attachment 1367631

This guy had fillers, but generally, after only after a few weeks, they start to migrate, dissolve and lose contour. Additionally, they are very prone to look unnatural:

View attachment 1367632

Just look at this after

Funny GIF



It turns out that it's necessary to take a look at the underlying scelettal situation. What makes a jaw wide, angular and aesthetic from the front are mainly:
- Width and shape of the jaw angle i.e. shape and thickness of the posterior corpus mandibulae that connects to the ramus
- Position and size of the masseter muscle and the medial pterygoid muscle

View attachment 1367640

A narrow, unaesthetic jaw, with blunted, rounded jaw angles, which reeks of micrognathia and other illnesses is often the result of posterior mandibular hypoplasia that is expressed by a severe lack of posterior lateral growth of the corpus mandibulae, malplacement of the ramus or TMJ issues.
When we look at this example, we find relatively normal TMJ to dentoalveolar arch vectors which indicates that this patient has a narrow jaw due to posterior hypoplasia and not because of TMJ problems. This is the most common cause of a rounded jaw:

View attachment 1367649

Red line: The vector
Blue circle: Lack of bony mass

So lets talk about solutions. In my opinion, implants are unfavorable for young patients, silicone because of the infection and erosion risk, medpor because of tissue ingrowth, unsatisfactory ossification, titanium because it doesn't interact with the body AT ALL and can cool down dangerously in cold wheater and HA paste well because it usually looks like shit and has other issues. It's literally bone or death.

The patient above already got a chin wing which mainly increased mid mandibular width, but also some posterior width as shown below:
View attachment 1367656

However, unfortunately, the jaw angles tend to get lost during this procedure as shown below:

View attachment 1367657


Reconstruction and replacement of the jaw angles and masseter muscles is therefore needed as shown in this surgical simulation:

View attachment 1367661

This is the so called side wing. It should add anything between 8 - 14mm bigonial width, reshape and accentuate the jaw angles and reposition the masseter muscles.
However, in some cases this will not be enough, and in some cases an aggressive side wing might produce unfavorable outcomes. In that case, a BSSO can help (narrow jaws are almost always recessed so you'll need this anyways probably)

View attachment 1367663

The red circles show the consequence of ramus widening with a BSSO, around 4 - 6mm per side. Combined with a side wing it could add almost 25mm wigonial width.

There's a guy from jawsurgeryforums who had a chin wing and side wing, plus very little fillers done. This is his before and afters:

View attachment 1367665

If it hadn't been enough, he still could have gotten the BSSO.

To sum this up:

- A narrow jaw with inward tilted jaw angles is best fixed with a chin wing, side wing, BSSO and some fillers on top.
- Young people should stay away from implants.
- And additional information: IMDO doedn't accentuate the jaw angles, it just makes the whole jaw wider which is not desired.

Therefore the promoted approach is the ONLY approach that is LEGIT, and LONG TERM SAVE.
What’s wrong with implants
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard, thecel, Deleted member 7098 and 1 other person
if you got jaw surgery to correct your recession would it make your jaw narrow or would you still have the width?
I’m quite certain the width is not affected. If anything it gets wider.

I have a nother consultation in a few days with a blackpilled surgeon so I can ask. I have a mild class 2 so yeah.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, thecel, Be_ConfidentBro and 3 others
I’m quite certain the width is not affected. If anything it gets wider.

I have a nother consultation in a few days with a blackpilled surgeon so I can ask. I have a mild class 2 so yeah.
yeah that is lifefuel for people with class 2 and deep bites, tag me if you make a post about it
 
  • +1
Reactions: normie_joe, Squirtle, AscendingHero and 1 other person
Best of the Best?
@Gargantuan @Lorsss @Alexanderr @her @Kingkellz
 
  • +1
Reactions: Squirtle
It's time to add another chapter of brutal blackpill to the jaw surgery database. This is all about jaw angles and jaw width.

The preferred jaw angle has these characteristics: 130° in face profile view, intergonial width similar to facial width, vertical position in frontal view at the oral commissure or at least not below the lower lip, jawline slope in the face frontal view nearly parallel to (with a maximum 15° downward deviation from) a line extending from the lateral canthus to the alare, ascending ramus slope 65°–75° to the Frankfort horizontal, and curvature in the oblique view visible from earlobe to chin and not pointy.

View attachment 1367626


But what if your jaw looks like the example on the left side and you aim for a look like on the right side ?

View attachment 1367631

This guy had fillers, but generally, after only after a few weeks, they start to migrate, dissolve and lose contour. Additionally, they are very prone to look unnatural:

View attachment 1367632

Just look at this after

Funny GIF



It turns out that it's necessary to take a look at the underlying scelettal situation. What makes a jaw wide, angular and aesthetic from the front are mainly:
- Width and shape of the jaw angle i.e. shape and thickness of the posterior corpus mandibulae that connects to the ramus
- Position and size of the masseter muscle and the medial pterygoid muscle

View attachment 1367640

A narrow, unaesthetic jaw, with blunted, rounded jaw angles, which reeks of micrognathia and other illnesses is often the result of posterior mandibular hypoplasia that is expressed by a severe lack of posterior lateral growth of the corpus mandibulae, malplacement of the ramus or TMJ issues.
When we look at this example, we find relatively normal TMJ to dentoalveolar arch vectors which indicates that this patient has a narrow jaw due to posterior hypoplasia and not because of TMJ problems. This is the most common cause of a rounded jaw:

View attachment 1367649

Red line: The vector
Blue circle: Lack of bony mass

So lets talk about solutions. In my opinion, implants are unfavorable for young patients, silicone because of the infection and erosion risk, medpor because of tissue ingrowth, unsatisfactory ossification, titanium because it doesn't interact with the body AT ALL and can cool down dangerously in cold wheater and HA paste well because it usually looks like shit and has other issues. It's literally bone or death.

The patient above already got a chin wing which mainly increased mid mandibular width, but also some posterior width as shown below:
View attachment 1367656

However, unfortunately, the jaw angles tend to get lost during this procedure as shown below:

View attachment 1367657


Reconstruction and replacement of the jaw angles and masseter muscles is therefore needed as shown in this surgical simulation:

View attachment 1367661

This is the so called side wing. It should add anything between 8 - 14mm bigonial width, reshape and accentuate the jaw angles and reposition the masseter muscles.
However, in some cases this will not be enough, and in some cases an aggressive side wing might produce unfavorable outcomes. In that case, a BSSO can help (narrow jaws are almost always recessed so you'll need this anyways probably)

View attachment 1367663

The red circles show the consequence of ramus widening with a BSSO, around 4 - 6mm per side. Combined with a side wing it could add almost 25mm wigonial width.

There's a guy from jawsurgeryforums who had a chin wing and side wing, plus very little fillers done. This is his before and afters:

View attachment 1367665

If it hadn't been enough, he still could have gotten the BSSO.

To sum this up:

- A narrow jaw with inward tilted jaw angles is best fixed with a chin wing, side wing, BSSO and some fillers on top.
- Young people should stay away from implants.
- And additional information: IMDO doedn't accentuate the jaw angles, it just makes the whole jaw wider which is not desired.

Therefore the promoted approach is the ONLY approach that is LEGIT, and LONG TERM SAVE.

Can someone explain to me how the ideal male jaw angle (according to this study) is 130° if 80% of male models considered the most attractive have a jaw angle between 110°-125° ???
 
  • +1
Reactions: PubertyMaxxer, AscendingHero, Mustascend and 4 others
Class 2. deep bites are usually the result of too much force on the back teeth resulting in a rotation and very strong ramus and masseter.

class 2 usually has a strong jaw while being recessed and a shorter lower third
What should I do if I have a deep bite but high gonial angle
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member and Squirtle
Wk
It's time to add another chapter of brutal blackpill to the jaw surgery database. This is all about jaw angles and jaw width.

The preferred jaw angle has these characteristics: 130° in face profile view, intergonial width similar to facial width, vertical position in frontal view at the oral commissure or at least not below the lower lip, jawline slope in the face frontal view nearly parallel to (with a maximum 15° downward deviation from) a line extending from the lateral canthus to the alare, ascending ramus slope 65°–75° to the Frankfort horizontal, and curvature in the oblique view visible from earlobe to chin and not pointy.

View attachment 1367626


But what if your jaw looks like the example on the left side and you aim for a look like on the right side ?

View attachment 1367631

This guy had fillers, but generally, after only after a few weeks, they start to migrate, dissolve and lose contour. Additionally, they are very prone to look unnatural:

View attachment 1367632

Just look at this after

Funny GIF



It turns out that it's necessary to take a look at the underlying scelettal situation. What makes a jaw wide, angular and aesthetic from the front are mainly:
- Width and shape of the jaw angle i.e. shape and thickness of the posterior corpus mandibulae that connects to the ramus
- Position and size of the masseter muscle and the medial pterygoid muscle

View attachment 1367640

A narrow, unaesthetic jaw, with blunted, rounded jaw angles, which reeks of micrognathia and other illnesses is often the result of posterior mandibular hypoplasia that is expressed by a severe lack of posterior lateral growth of the corpus mandibulae, malplacement of the ramus or TMJ issues.
When we look at this example, we find relatively normal TMJ to dentoalveolar arch vectors which indicates that this patient has a narrow jaw due to posterior hypoplasia and not because of TMJ problems. This is the most common cause of a rounded jaw:

View attachment 1367649

Red line: The vector
Blue circle: Lack of bony mass

So lets talk about solutions. In my opinion, implants are unfavorable for young patients, silicone because of the infection and erosion risk, medpor because of tissue ingrowth, unsatisfactory ossification, titanium because it doesn't interact with the body AT ALL and can cool down dangerously in cold wheater and HA paste well because it usually looks like shit and has other issues. It's literally bone or death.

The patient above already got a chin wing which mainly increased mid mandibular width, but also some posterior width as shown below:
View attachment 1367656

However, unfortunately, the jaw angles tend to get lost during this procedure as shown below:

View attachment 1367657


Reconstruction and replacement of the jaw angles and masseter muscles is therefore needed as shown in this surgical simulation:

View attachment 1367661

This is the so called side wing. It should add anything between 8 - 14mm bigonial width, reshape and accentuate the jaw angles and reposition the masseter muscles.
However, in some cases this will not be enough, and in some cases an aggressive side wing might produce unfavorable outcomes. In that case, a BSSO can help (narrow jaws are almost always recessed so you'll need this anyways probably)

View attachment 1367663

The red circles show the consequence of ramus widening with a BSSO, around 4 - 6mm per side. Combined with a side wing it could add almost 25mm wigonial width.

There's a guy from jawsurgeryforums who had a chin wing and side wing, plus very little fillers done. This is his before and afters:

View attachment 1367665

If it hadn't been enough, he still could have gotten the BSSO.

To sum this up:

- A narrow jaw with inward tilted jaw angles is best fixed with a chin wing, side wing, BSSO and some fillers on top.
- Young people should stay away from implants.
- And additional information: IMDO doedn't accentuate the jaw angles, it just makes the whole jaw wider which is not desired.

Therefore the promoted approach is the ONLY approach that is LEGIT, and LONG TERM SAVE.
Will my bimax turn out good
 

Attachments

  • D47B8644-6EA0-4E27-AB09-83FC066ED674.jpeg
    D47B8644-6EA0-4E27-AB09-83FC066ED674.jpeg
    22.2 KB · Views: 101
  • F1C5E7E6-BE1B-4365-8AEA-0E5613D73F92.jpeg
    F1C5E7E6-BE1B-4365-8AEA-0E5613D73F92.jpeg
    33.5 KB · Views: 235
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: reptiles, Danish_Retard, mulattomaxxer and 6 others
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot
What are other procedures involved here? Clearly not just bimax

Bimax , genio, and ramus widening
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: reptiles, hairyballscel and Deleted member 5786
What are other procedures involved here? Clearly not just bimax

Bimax , genio, and ramus widening
how is ramus widening done? they just tilt it outward and hold it in place with screws? do the gaps between the cut bones such as in the chin get filled in with bone growth over time?
 
how is ramus widening done? they just tilt it outward and hold it in place with screws? do the gaps between the cut bones such as in the chin get filled in with bone growth over time?
They use bone chips to fill in the gap. So overtime it’s becomes pure bone. They torque the ramus outward
 
Wk

Will my bimax turn out good
Wow, I remember thinking the guy in ur avi was ugly af when I first joined. but now I realize what a mogger he is. Who is he?
 
Wk

Will my bimax turn out good
What's seen from the front is basically only the genioplasty. We need to see 3/4 and side profile.
 
My gonial angle is 122 degrees, i think the ideal is 100-115.
 
Bildschirmfoto 2021 11 05 um 224909

can't tell me this looks more natural than a balanced normal size implant, people just choose idiotic sizes
just cut your jaw in 20 pieces and remove a rib to get bone graft instead of a few basic screws and some silicone
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: reptiles, Danish_Retard, Tallooksmaxxer and 7 others
actually the gonions torque outward during turning process, the anterior mandible (where the imdo advances) doesn’t widen it just projects forward like BSSO. watch dr c’s imdo 30 min explanation video
Fuark so no wider chin then? 😭
 
It's time to add another chapter of brutal blackpill to the jaw surgery database. This is all about jaw angles and jaw width.

The preferred jaw angle has these characteristics: 130° in face profile view, intergonial width similar to facial width, vertical position in frontal view at the oral commissure or at least not below the lower lip, jawline slope in the face frontal view nearly parallel to (with a maximum 15° downward deviation from) a line extending from the lateral canthus to the alare, ascending ramus slope 65°–75° to the Frankfort horizontal, and curvature in the oblique view visible from earlobe to chin and not pointy.

View attachment 1367626


But what if your jaw looks like the example on the left side and you aim for a look like on the right side ?

View attachment 1367631

This guy had fillers, but generally, after only after a few weeks, they start to migrate, dissolve and lose contour. Additionally, they are very prone to look unnatural:

View attachment 1367632

Just look at this after

Funny GIF



It turns out that it's necessary to take a look at the underlying scelettal situation. What makes a jaw wide, angular and aesthetic from the front are mainly:
- Width and shape of the jaw angle i.e. shape and thickness of the posterior corpus mandibulae that connects to the ramus
- Position and size of the masseter muscle and the medial pterygoid muscle

View attachment 1367640

A narrow, unaesthetic jaw, with blunted, rounded jaw angles, which reeks of micrognathia and other illnesses is often the result of posterior mandibular hypoplasia that is expressed by a severe lack of posterior lateral growth of the corpus mandibulae, malplacement of the ramus or TMJ issues.
When we look at this example, we find relatively normal TMJ to dentoalveolar arch vectors which indicates that this patient has a narrow jaw due to posterior hypoplasia and not because of TMJ problems. This is the most common cause of a rounded jaw:

View attachment 1367649

Red line: The vector
Blue circle: Lack of bony mass

So lets talk about solutions. In my opinion, implants are unfavorable for young patients, silicone because of the infection and erosion risk, medpor because of tissue ingrowth, unsatisfactory ossification, titanium because it doesn't interact with the body AT ALL and can cool down dangerously in cold wheater and HA paste well because it usually looks like shit and has other issues. It's literally bone or death.

The patient above already got a chin wing which mainly increased mid mandibular width, but also some posterior width as shown below:
View attachment 1367656

However, unfortunately, the jaw angles tend to get lost during this procedure as shown below:

View attachment 1367657


Reconstruction and replacement of the jaw angles and masseter muscles is therefore needed as shown in this surgical simulation:

View attachment 1367661

This is the so called side wing. It should add anything between 8 - 14mm bigonial width, reshape and accentuate the jaw angles and reposition the masseter muscles.
However, in some cases this will not be enough, and in some cases an aggressive side wing might produce unfavorable outcomes. In that case, a BSSO can help (narrow jaws are almost always recessed so you'll need this anyways probably)

View attachment 1367663

The red circles show the consequence of ramus widening with a BSSO, around 4 - 6mm per side. Combined with a side wing it could add almost 25mm wigonial width.

There's a guy from jawsurgeryforums who had a chin wing and side wing, plus very little fillers done. This is his before and afters:

View attachment 1367665

If it hadn't been enough, he still could have gotten the BSSO.

To sum this up:

- A narrow jaw with inward tilted jaw angles is best fixed with a chin wing, side wing, BSSO and some fillers on top.
- Young people should stay away from implants.
- And additional information: IMDO doedn't accentuate the jaw angles, it just makes the whole jaw wider which is not desired.

Therefore the promoted approach is the ONLY approach that is LEGIT, and LONG TERM SAVE.
lifefuel for me suifuel for others this is why you mew :love::love::love::love::love::love::love:
 
View attachment 1393305
can't tell me this looks more natural than a balanced normal size implant, people just choose idiotic sizes
just cut your jaw in 20 pieces and remove a rib to get bone graft instead of a few basic screws and some silicone
I never saw a good jaw implant except for the supposed Tom Cruise implant :feelsping:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16380
I never saw a good jaw implant except for the supposed Tom Cruise implant :feelsping:
Implants are retarded.

Unless one is afraid of needles, fillers beat implants in EVERY category except longevity: fillers have better sculpting, more natural results, less dangerous, higher patient satisfaction, and so on...:unsure:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Weed and Gladiator
They look too bulky imo:feelsping:
you'd never call them out for having an implant if you saw them outside and they have an objectively good looking jaw

i've seen so many asymmetric jaw surgery results that looked most of the time not even very good. implants are superior if you don't go over-board with it
 
It's time to add another chapter of brutal blackpill to the jaw surgery database. This is all about jaw angles and jaw width.

The preferred jaw angle has these characteristics: 130° in face profile view, intergonial width similar to facial width, vertical position in frontal view at the oral commissure or at least not below the lower lip, jawline slope in the face frontal view nearly parallel to (with a maximum 15° downward deviation from) a line extending from the lateral canthus to the alare, ascending ramus slope 65°–75° to the Frankfort horizontal, and curvature in the oblique view visible from earlobe to chin and not pointy.

View attachment 1367626


But what if your jaw looks like the example on the left side and you aim for a look like on the right side ?

View attachment 1367631

This guy had fillers, but generally, after only after a few weeks, they start to migrate, dissolve and lose contour. Additionally, they are very prone to look unnatural:

View attachment 1367632

Just look at this after

Funny GIF



It turns out that it's necessary to take a look at the underlying scelettal situation. What makes a jaw wide, angular and aesthetic from the front are mainly:
- Width and shape of the jaw angle i.e. shape and thickness of the posterior corpus mandibulae that connects to the ramus
- Position and size of the masseter muscle and the medial pterygoid muscle

View attachment 1367640

A narrow, unaesthetic jaw, with blunted, rounded jaw angles, which reeks of micrognathia and other illnesses is often the result of posterior mandibular hypoplasia that is expressed by a severe lack of posterior lateral growth of the corpus mandibulae, malplacement of the ramus or TMJ issues.
When we look at this example, we find relatively normal TMJ to dentoalveolar arch vectors which indicates that this patient has a narrow jaw due to posterior hypoplasia and not because of TMJ problems. This is the most common cause of a rounded jaw:

View attachment 1367649

Red line: The vector
Blue circle: Lack of bony mass

So lets talk about solutions. In my opinion, implants are unfavorable for young patients, silicone because of the infection and erosion risk, medpor because of tissue ingrowth, unsatisfactory ossification, titanium because it doesn't interact with the body AT ALL and can cool down dangerously in cold wheater and HA paste well because it usually looks like shit and has other issues. It's literally bone or death.

The patient above already got a chin wing which mainly increased mid mandibular width, but also some posterior width as shown below:
View attachment 1367656

However, unfortunately, the jaw angles tend to get lost during this procedure as shown below:

View attachment 1367657


Reconstruction and replacement of the jaw angles and masseter muscles is therefore needed as shown in this surgical simulation:

View attachment 1367661

This is the so called side wing. It should add anything between 8 - 14mm bigonial width, reshape and accentuate the jaw angles and reposition the masseter muscles.
However, in some cases this will not be enough, and in some cases an aggressive side wing might produce unfavorable outcomes. In that case, a BSSO can help (narrow jaws are almost always recessed so you'll need this anyways probably)

View attachment 1367663

The red circles show the consequence of ramus widening with a BSSO, around 4 - 6mm per side. Combined with a side wing it could add almost 25mm wigonial width.

There's a guy from jawsurgeryforums who had a chin wing and side wing, plus very little fillers done. This is his before and afters:

View attachment 1367665

If it hadn't been enough, he still could have gotten the BSSO.

To sum this up:

- A narrow jaw with inward tilted jaw angles is best fixed with a chin wing, side wing, BSSO and some fillers on top.
- Young people should stay away from implants.
- And additional information: IMDO doedn't accentuate the jaw angles, it just makes the whole jaw wider which is not desired.

Therefore the promoted approach is the ONLY approach that is LEGIT, and LONG TERM SAVE.
IMG 20220113 234019


Ideal front jaw
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: tinderhacker, hypergamy, AscendingHero and 2 others
all examples look like shit

heres the blackpill

be born with it:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: User49, Looks234, Mrinfinityx and 2 others
you'd never call them out for having an implant if you saw them outside and they have an objectively good looking jaw

i've seen so many asymmetric jaw surgery results that looked most of the time not even very good. implants are superior if you don't go over-board with it
The fact is: they don't look ideal to me and don't look natural because you're just putting bulk and not working around the whole face, some jaw surgeries results may look bad but some look very good, that's the difference. :feelsping:
 
I had bimax + genio last year and about to get custom PEEK jaw implants. Anyone with some experience wants to see the design and give feedback? Goal is to make them look natural and harmonious, so hopefully will be a good result for future maxxers.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel and randomvanish

Similar threads

asdvek
Replies
52
Views
3K
Giant Haystacks
Giant Haystacks
lestoa
Replies
11
Views
2K
melon6329
melon6329
LooksMaxxingBoss
Replies
8
Views
1K
NebulaExplorer
NebulaExplorer
BrahminBoss
Replies
28
Views
2K
the_nextDavidLaid
the_nextDavidLaid

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top