Light skin is a failo for blacks(the importance of nuance when looksmaxxing)

[Deleted member 27511]

See this study published in the journal of psychology (Attractiveness as a Function of Skin Tone and Facial Features: Evidence from Categorization Studies) one of the results is they found for blacks dark skin resulted in increased rafting’s of attractiveness while light skin decreased attractiveness.

For whites dark skin results in lower rates of attractiveness but interestingly enough tan skin was rated more attractive than pale white skin. For mutts brown skin was rated more attractive than light or dark skin.

TLDR: it’s important to understand the nuance so you can looksmax properly for ur phenotype, it’s why East Africans are less attractive then west Africans. They’re essentially caucasians with dark skin which as the study suggests should make them less attractive

 

[thereallegend]

ohh boy here we go

react to this
@Blackgymmax @whiteissuperior @looksmaxxer234

 

[Blackgymmax]

Retard.

 

[Deleted member 26859]

link the study or this is irrelevant

@cloUder thoughts

 

[Deleted member 26859]

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301294964.pdf

ah its legit tbf

it doesnt specify who is rating these men tho. it could be white or black women. we need to know specifics.

 

[Deleted member 27932]

See this study published in the journal of psychology (Attractiveness as a Function of Skin Tone and Facial Features: Evidence from Categorization Studies) one of the results is they found for blacks dark skin resulted in increased rafting’s of attractiveness while light skin decreased attractiveness.

For whites dark skin results in lower rates of attractiveness but interestingly enough tan skin was rated more attractive than pale white skin. For mutts brown skin was rated more attractive than light or dark skin.

TLDR: it’s important to understand the nuance so you can looksmax properly for ur phenotype, it’s why East Africans are less attractive then west Africans. They’re essentially caucasians with dark skin which as the study suggests should make them less attractive

cope lmao half the lightskins i see are good looking and even normies joke about how much lightskins slay jfl

 

[Deleted member 13787]

Retard.

The study is probably bullshit, because the facial attractiveness studies aren't using prototypically darkskin males and prototypically lightskin males. These facial attractiveness studies fail to replicate for black people, where some say lightskin/mulatto is better, while others claim darkskins are better.

This is very common in clinical psychiatry and other questionable humanities fields.

 

[khvirgin]

See this study published in the journal of psychology (Attractiveness as a Function of Skin Tone and Facial Features: Evidence from Categorization Studies) one of the results is they found for blacks dark skin resulted in increased rafting’s of attractiveness while light skin decreased attractiveness.

For whites dark skin results in lower rates of attractiveness but interestingly enough tan skin was rated more attractive than pale white skin. For mutts brown skin was rated more attractive than light or dark skin.

TLDR: it’s important to understand the nuance so you can looksmax properly for ur phenotype, it’s why East Africans are less attractive then west Africans. They’re essentially caucasians with dark skin which as the study suggests should make them less attractive

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301294964.pdf

ah its legit tbf

it doesnt specify who is rating these men tho. it could be white or black women. we need to know specifics.

east africans would be uglier even with darker skin

 

[Deleted member 27511]

link the study or this is irrelevant

@cloUder thoughts

Read the post retard, the name of the study is their JFL

 

[Deleted member 27511]

east africans would be uglier even with darker skin

Read the post retard, East Africans have caucasian features, dark skin is a failo on caucasians the study even said that. How low iq are you?

 

[Deleted member 27511]

cope lmao half the lightskins i see are good looking and even normies joke about how much lightskins slay jfl

Scientific studies > “muh personal experience”

 

[thereallegend]

East Africans have caucasian features

@Blackgymmax

 

[keepgrindingbro]

who cares about being white , black or brown , at the end of the day, you are either subhuman or chad

 

[Deleted member 27511]

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301294964.pdf

ah its legit tbf

it doesnt specify who is rating these men tho. it could be white or black women. we need to know specifics.

The study was done in Washington, only 4% of Washington is black so this reply is a cope

 

[Deleted member 27511]

The study is probably bullshit, because the facial attractiveness studies aren't using prototypically darkskin males and prototypically lightskin males. These facial attractiveness studies fail to replicate for black people, where some say lightskin/mulatto is better, while others claim darkskins are better.

This is very common in clinical psychiatry and other questionable humanities fields.

By that you mean they didn’t cherry pick the ugliest dark skin blacks they could find and the hottest light skin blacks they could find so the study would give the results you wanted

 

[Deleted member 27932]

Scientific studies > “muh personal experience”

 

[khvirgin]

Read the post retard, East Africans have caucasian features, dark skin is a failo on caucasians the study even said that. How low iq are you?

ok let's read the post you faggot


TITLE

"LIGHT SKIN IS A FAILO FOR BLACKS"


POST

"one of the results is they found for blacks dark skin resulted in increased rafting’s of attractiveness while light skin decreased attractiveness."


result: you're a clickbaiting abused dog


East africans are not caucasians, even if they're "closer", they aren't, stop this bullshit

 

[Deleted member 27511]

ok let's read the post you faggot


TITLE

"LIGHT SKIN IS A FAILO FOR BLACKS"


POST

"one of the results is they found for blacks dark skin resulted in increased rafting’s of attractiveness while light skin decreased attractiveness."


result: you're a clickbaiting abused dog


East africans are not caucasians, even if they're "closer", they aren't, stop this bullshit

The study was done in America most blacks there are of west African descent. East Africans aren’t even fully black you retard, they contain high amounts of Arab admixture over 50% in certain countries. That’s why they have a Caucasian skull. Which is why dark skin failos them I even mentioned this in my TLDR read the post you retarded dog.

 

[keepgrindingbro]

The study was done in America most blacks there are of west African descent. East Africans aren’t even fully black you retard, they contain high amounts of Arab admixture over 50% in certain countries. That’s why they have a Caucasian skull. Which is why dark skin failos them I even mentioned this in my TLDR read the post you retarded dog.

nobody cares what you think faggot , just get the fuck out of here you fucking nerd

 

[khvirgin]

The study was done in America most blacks there are of west African descent. East Africans aren’t even fully black you retard, they contain high amounts of Arab admixture over 50% in certain countries. That’s why they have a Caucasian skull.

east africans aren't fully black, but african americans are?

Which is why dark skin failos them I even mentioned this in my TLDR read the post you retarded dog.

Yes and i like I said that's irrelevant, because most of them have BAD FEATURES
good luck finding "caucasians" with those eyes and forehead bro.


I'm talking about your post
I don't care about this dogshit study with a 80 ppl sample size

 

[Deleted member 27511]

nobody cares what you think faggot , just get the fuck out of here you fucking nerd

No

east africans aren't fully black, but african americans are?


Yes and i like I said that's irrelevant, because most of them have BAD FEATURES
good luck finding "caucasians" with those eyes and forehead bro.


I'm talking about your post
I don't care about this dogshit study with a 80 ppl sample size

 

[khvirgin]

just lol at this study

the most commong IR pairing in the US? white man and asian woman

@cloUder

 

[Deleted member 13787]

just lol at this study

View attachment 2133771

the most commong IR pairing in the US? white man and asian woman

@cloUder

This result doesnt replicate. That's why its bullshit

@lordgandy2000 majority of facial attractiveness studies show white men rated as more attractive, right?

 

[Deleted member 27511]

east africans aren't fully black, but african americans are?


Yes and i like I said that's irrelevant, because most of them have BAD FEATURES
good luck finding "caucasians" with those eyes and forehead bro.


I'm talking about your post
I don't care about this dogshit study with a 80 ppl sample size

African Americans are more black than East Africans, who has a more caucasian skull the average black American or the average East African? If you think the answer is black Americans you’re retarded and have never seen an East African person.

East Africans are just a mix of blacks and caucasians so they’re features should be better according to most people on this forum. Stop coping it’s the dark skin that failos East Africans, same with Indians as well. You don’t understand the importance of harmony.

The sample size is 80, but the p values are good so the results are still significant plus it’s published in a peer reviewed journals so other scientists saw the results as significant as well stop coping.

 

[Deleted member 27511]

This result doesnt replicate. That's why its bullshit

@lordgandy2000 majority of facial attractiveness studies show white men rated as more attractive, right?

The results have been replicated by several other studies I’ll post them later stop coping, I didn’t even see the part where it said black males were rated more facially attractiveness I just skipped to peer where they analyzed how skin color effects attractiveness for certain ethnicities.

 

[khvirgin]

East Africans are just a mix of blacks and caucasians so they’re features should be better according to most people on this forum. Stop coping it’s the dark skin that failos East Africans, same with Indians as well. You don’t understand the importance of harmony.

"features should be more caucasians...so they should be better"

or maybe look at their features?

at their shitty bug eyes, huge ass forehead, poor lower third?

nooooooo it has to be the skin color, because they're "caucasians"

let's make these men darker, they would slay for sure

 

[lordgandy2000]

This result doesnt replicate. That's why its bullshit

@lordgandy2000 majority of facial attractiveness studies show white men rated as more attractive, right?

You're right, the 2 results that have the most consensus are 1) white men are rated most attractive, and 2) black women are least attractive.

Each study is a data point, so obviously not all will agree, but the point is to try to reach a consensus. I think this is the only other one that shows black men being rated more attractive than white men.

A lot of other results like asian vs white women, or single race vs mixed race don't have as much consensus like we discussed. You also have to remember that alot of these "attractiveness rating" studies have like 100-200 participants, which is very few. In this regard online dating stats are better since the sample sizes are way higher, which all clearly show white men being way more desirable than black men.

 

[Deleted member 27511]

let's make these men darker, they would slay for sure

Are you even reading what I’m saying? Dark skin WOULD make East Africans uglier I agree that’s what I’ve been saying this whole time dark skin is a failo for them

 

[loksr]

The study was done in Washington, only 4% of Washington is black so this reply is a cope

Washington is technically 4% black because of all the rural nothing areas, but every actual washington city has sizable black populations, and that almost certainly includes wherever this study was done

 

[whiteissuperior]

ohh boy here we go

react to this
@Blackgymmax @whiteissuperior @looksmaxxer234

This isn’t even worth a response

 

[whiteissuperior]

Scientific studies > “muh personal experience”

Most psychology studies are bs and fail to replicate

 

[Deleted member 24507]

See this study published in the journal of psychology (Attractiveness as a Function of Skin Tone and Facial Features: Evidence from Categorization Studies) one of the results is they found for blacks dark skin resulted in increased rafting’s of attractiveness while light skin decreased attractiveness.

For whites dark skin results in lower rates of attractiveness but interestingly enough tan skin was rated more attractive than pale white skin. For mutts brown skin was rated more attractive than light or dark skin.

TLDR: it’s important to understand the nuance so you can looksmax properly for ur phenotype, it’s why East Africans are less attractive then west Africans. They’re essentially caucasians with dark skin which as the study suggests should make them less attractive

That’s not what the study says. It says bastard (mixed) men are rated as more attractive than Edomite (so-called White) faces and Hamite (so-called African) faces.




“Experiment 1 provided evidence that facial features and skin tone have an interactive effect on perceptions of attractiveness and mixed-race faces are perceived as more attractive than single- race faces. Experiment 2 further confirmed that faces with medium levels of skin tone and facial features are perceived as more attractive than faces with extreme levels of these factors. Black phenotypes (combinations of dark skin tone and Afrocentric facial features) were rated as more attractive than White phenotypes (combinations of light skin tone and Eurocentric facial features); ambiguous faces (combinations of Afrocentric and Eurocentric physiognomy) with medium levels of skin tone were rated as the most attractive in Experiment 2.”

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301294964.pdf

 

[AspiringMogger]

east africans would be uglier even with darker skin

Lighter skinned Somalis look good whereas dark skinned Somalis look incel.

 

[Deleted member 27511]

That’s not what the study says. It says bastard (mixed) men are rated as more attractive than Edomite (so-called White) faces and Hamite (so-called African) faces.




“Experiment 1 provided evidence that facial features and skin tone have an interactive effect on perceptions of attractiveness and mixed-race faces are perceived as more attractive than single- race faces. Experiment 2 further confirmed that faces with medium levels of skin tone and facial features are perceived as more attractive than faces with extreme levels of these factors. Black phenotypes (combinations of dark skin tone and Afrocentric facial features) were rated as more attractive than White phenotypes (combinations of light skin tone and Eurocentric facial features); ambiguous faces (combinations of Afrocentric and Eurocentric physiognomy) with medium levels of skin tone were rated as the most attractive in Experiment 2.”

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301294964.pdf

Read the full study fool “ dark skin tone enhances attractiveness of Afrocentric faces, resulting in Black phenotypes, whereas medium skin tone increases attractiveness of mixed and Eurocentric faces.” Medium skin tone enhance attractiveness but ONLY for mixed race faces and white faces.

I’m not sure why you’re pointing out that mixed races faces were rated more attractive that wasn’t even the point of my post, It was about how skin color effects attractiveness in different racial groups.

 

[Deleted member 27511]

Lighter skinned Somalis look good whereas dark skinned Somalis look incel.

That’s what I’ve been saying this whole time but copers deny it

 

[Deleted member 27511]

Most psychology studies are bs and fail to replicate

reproducibility is a problem in science in general not just psychology, it’s even called the reproducibility crisis that’s why it’s important to look at peer reviewed studies published in reputable journals which that’s what this study is. Even you’re user name is a cope

 

[Deleted member 24507]

Read the full study fool “ dark skin tone enhances attractiveness of Afrocentric faces, resulting in Black phenotypes, whereas medium skin tone increases attractiveness of mixed and Eurocentric faces.” Medium skin tone enhance attractiveness but ONLY for mixed race faces and white faces.

I’m not sure why you’re pointing out that mixed races faces were rated more attractive that wasn’t even the point of my post, It was about how skin color effects attractiveness in different racial groups.

Read the study, dummy because it says they found bastard (mixed) men look better than Hamite (so-called African) men.



“Experiment 1 provided evidence that facial features and skin tone have an interactive effect on perceptions of attractiveness and mixed-race faces are perceived as more attractive than single- race faces. Experiment 2 further confirmed that faces with medium levels of skin tone and facial features are perceived as more attractive than faces with extreme levels of these factors. Black phenotypes (combinations of dark skin tone and Afrocentric facial features) were rated as more attractive than White phenotypes (combinations of light skin tone and Eurocentric facial features); ambiguous faces (combinations of Afrocentric and Eurocentric physiognomy) with medium levels of skin tone were rated as the most attractive in Experiment 2.”

 

[Deleted member 21467]

See this study published in the journal of psychology (Attractiveness as a Function of Skin Tone and Facial Features: Evidence from Categorization Studies) one of the results is they found for blacks dark skin resulted in increased rafting’s of attractiveness while light skin decreased attractiveness.

For whites dark skin results in lower rates of attractiveness but interestingly enough tan skin was rated more attractive than pale white skin. For mutts brown skin was rated more attractive than light or dark skin.

TLDR: it’s important to understand the nuance so you can looksmax properly for ur phenotype, it’s why East Africans are less attractive than west Africans. They’re essentially caucasians with dark skin which as the study suggests should make them less attractive

Being lightskin is an overrated sign of attractiveness in the blackpill community.

The dark skins are stealing all the white girls and black girls from us. I rarely see lightskin bbc moggers.

 

[Deleted member 27511]

Read the study, dummy because it says they found bastard (mixed) men look better than Hamite (so-called African) men.



“Experiment 1 provided evidence that facial features and skin tone have an interactive effect on perceptions of attractiveness and mixed-race faces are perceived as more attractive than single- race faces. Experiment 2 further confirmed that faces with medium levels of skin tone and facial features are perceived as more attractive than faces with extreme levels of these factors. Black phenotypes (combinations of dark skin tone and Afrocentric facial features) were rated as more attractive than White phenotypes (combinations of light skin tone and Eurocentric facial features); ambiguous faces (combinations of Afrocentric and Eurocentric physiognomy) with medium levels of skin tone were rated as the most attractive in Experiment 2.”

How retarded are you? I never said it didn’t say mixed race faces weren’t rated more attractive? The post was about how skin tone effects for different racial groups.

 

[Deleted member 24507]

How retarded are you? I never said it didn’t say mixed race faces weren’t rated more attractive? The post was about how skin tone effects for different racial groups.

Retarded baboon looking Hamite (so-called African) man you claimed you claimed that “dark skin” was rated more attractive but the study doesn’t say that, retard.

See this study published in the journal of psychology (Attractiveness as a Function of Skin Tone and Facial Features: Evidence from Categorization Studies) one of the results is they found for blacks dark skin resulted in increased rafting’s of attractiveness while light skin decreased attractiveness.

For whites dark skin results in lower rates of attractiveness but interestingly enough tan skin was rated more attractive than pale white skin. For mutts brown skin was rated more attractive than light or dark skin.

TLDR: it’s important to understand the nuance so you can looksmax properly for ur phenotype, it’s why East Africans are less attractive then west Africans. They’re essentially caucasians with dark skin which as the study suggests should make them less attractive

 

[Deleted member 27511]

Retarded baboon looking Hamite (so-called African) man you claimed you claimed that “dark skin” was rated more attractive but the study doesn’t say that, retard.

Bro read the title of my post how retarded are you “LIGHT SKIN IS A FAILO FOR BLACKS” which the study shows I even mentioned how tan skin is better for mutts and white people

For whites dark skin results in lower rates of attractiveness but interestingly enough tan skin was rated more attractive than pale white skin. For mutts brown skin was rated more attractive than light or dark skin.

fucking retarded baboon can’t read are u illiterate?

 

[Deleted member 24507]

Bro read the title of my post how retarded are you “LIGHT SKIN IS A FAILO FOR BLACKS” which the study shows I even mentioned how tan skin is better for mutts and white people

fucking retarded baboon can’t read are u illiterate?

That’s not what the study says, idiot, baboon looking Hamite (so-called African) man. Light skin was found more attractive than dark skin and bastards (mixed people) were found the most attractive, dummy .

That’s not what the study says. It says bastard (mixed) men are rated as more attractive than Edomite (so-called White) faces and Hamite (so-called African) faces.




“Experiment 1 provided evidence that facial features and skin tone have an interactive effect on perceptions of attractiveness and mixed-race faces are perceived as more attractive than single- race faces. Experiment 2 further confirmed that faces with medium levels of skin tone and facial features are perceived as more attractive than faces with extreme levels of these factors. Black phenotypes (combinations of dark skin tone and Afrocentric facial features) were rated as more attractive than White phenotypes (combinations of light skin tone and Eurocentric facial features); ambiguous faces (combinations of Afrocentric and Eurocentric physiognomy) with medium levels of skin tone were rated as the most attractive in Experiment 2.”

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301294964.pdf

 

[Deleted member 27511]

That’s not what the study says, idiot, baboon looking Hamite (so-called African) man. Light skin was found more attractive than dark skin and bastards (mixed people) were found the most attractive, dummy .

Are you retarded dark skin was found more attractive on black people here’s a direct quote from the study “ dark skin tone enhances attractiveness of Afrocentric faces, resulting in Black phenotypes, whereas medium skin tone increases attractiveness of mixed and Eurocentric faces.”

 

[Deleted member 27511]

That’s not what the study says, idiot, baboon looking Hamite (so-called African) man. Light skin was found more attractive than dark skin and bastards (mixed people) were found the most attractive, dummy .

Light skin was found more attractive on mixed people on blacks it was unattractive

 

[Deleted member 24507]

Are you retarded dark skin was found more attractive on black people here’s a direct quote from the study “ dark skin tone enhances attractiveness of Afrocentric faces, resulting in Black phenotypes, whereas medium skin tone increases attractiveness of mixed and Eurocentric faces.”

You really are dumb, dumb baboon . Dark skin was only found more attractive than Edomite (so-called White) faces, retarded ugly blackcel.


“Experiment 1 provided evidence that facial features and skin tone have an interactive effect on perceptions of attractiveness and mixed-race faces are perceived as more attractive than single- race faces. Experiment 2 further confirmed that faces with medium levels of skin tone and facial features are perceived as more attractive than faces with extreme levels of these factors. Black phenotypes (combinations of dark skin tone and Afrocentric facial features) were rated as more attractive than White phenotypes (combinations of light skin tone and Eurocentric facial features); ambiguous faces (combinations of Afrocentric and Eurocentric physiognomy) with medium levels of skin tone were rated as the most attractive in Experiment 2.”

Light skin was found more attractive on mixed people on blacks it was unattractive

No, you dummy that’s literally

 

[Deleted member 27511]

medium levels of skin tone and facial features are perceived as more attractive than faces with extreme levels of these factors.

You really are retarted notice how in your own quote it says “medium facial” meaning people with facial feature In between euros and Africans. My claim was that for blacks, not people with “medium facial features” are less attractive with light skin. Which the study says fucking dumbass illiterate baboon.

“ dark skin tone enhances attractiveness of Afrocentric faces, resulting in Black phenotypes, whereas medium skin tone increases attractiveness of mixed and Eurocentric faces.”

 

[Deleted member 24507]

You really are retarted notice how in your own quote it says “medium facial” meaning people with facial feature In between euros and Africans. My claim was that for blacks, not people with “medium facial features” are less attractive with light skin. Which the study says fucking dumbass illiterate baboon.

“ dark skin tone enhances attractiveness of Afrocentric faces, resulting in Black phenotypes, whereas medium skin tone increases attractiveness of mixed and Eurocentric faces.”

You really are retarded, dumb baboon because the quote says dark skin was more attractive than Edomite (so-called White) faces not light skin bastards (mixed people), retard .



Experiment 2 further confirmed that faces with medium levels of skin tone and facial features are perceived as more attractive than faces with extreme levels of these factors. Black phenotypes (combinations of dark skin tone and Afrocentric facial features) were rated as more attractive than White phenotypes (combinations of light skin tone and Eurocentric facial features)



I can’t believe you’re really dumb .

 

[Deleted member 27511]

medium levels of skin tone and facial features are perceived as more attractive than faces

Did you read you’re own quote you monkey? It says “AND MEDIUM FACIAL FEATURES” my post isn’t about people with medium facial features it’s about blacks.

 

[Deleted member 24507]

Did you read you’re own quote you monkey? It says “AND MEDIUM FACIAL FEATURES” my post isn’t about people with medium facial features it’s about blacks.

Did you read the quote, dumb baboon looking Hamite (so-called African) man that says this?


Black phenotypes (combinations of dark skin tone and Afrocentric facial features) were rated as more attractive than White phenotypes (combinations of light skin tone and Eurocentric facial features).”


Dark skin was only perceived as more attractive than Edomite (so-called White) feautures, dumb baboon . I know you can’t read but learn how to because you’re severely brain damaged and can’t even read a simple quote correctly.

 

[Deleted member 27511]

Black phenotypes (combinations of dark skin tone and Afrocentric facial features) were rated as more attractive than White phenotypes (combinations of light skin tone and Eurocentric facial features)

You do realize black phenotypes includes black face features as well right? I’m just talking about skin color, and I’m blacks not people with medium facial features as your quote says light skin is a negative